Beralih ke bagian utama
Artikel Riset Asli Akses Terbuka Terakreditasi SINTA 2

Dari Kepatuhan Menuju Kapabilitas Tata Kelola

Evaluasi Efektivitas Kebijakan Manajemen Risiko di Pemerintah Provinsi Kalimantan Timur

DOI
10.21787/jbp.17.2025-2858
Tanggal Terbit & Halaman
29 Agustus 2025

436 Dilihat 429 Diunduh

Abstrak

Manajemen risiko di pemerintahan daerah semakin diposisikan sebagai instrumen strategis untuk memperkuat tata kelola, integritas, dan kualitas pengambilan keputusan publik. Namun, berbagai studi menunjukkan bahwa peningkatan regulasi dan kematangan sistem manajemen risiko tidak selalu diterjemahkan menjadi peningkatan substantif dalam tata kelola dan pengendalian risiko perilaku. Studi ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis efektivitas kebijakan manajemen risiko di Pemerintah Provinsi Kalimantan Timur dengan memeriksa kesesuaian desain kebijakan, variasi implementasi di berbagai lembaga daerah, dan dampaknya terhadap tata kelola dan integritas pemerintah. Studi ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif, deskriptif, dan evaluatif melalui studi kasus empat lembaga daerah strategis. Data dikumpulkan melalui wawancara mendalam, observasi partisipan terbatas, dan analisis dokumen. Data dianalisis menggunakan model interaktif. Hasil studi ini menunjukkan bahwa kebijakan manajemen risiko di Pemerintah Provinsi Kalimantan Timur selaras secara normatif dengan standar internasional dan telah berhasil meningkatkan kematangan sistem pengendalian internal. Namun, efektivitas kebijakan tersebut masih bervariasi di berbagai lembaga daerah dan belum sepenuhnya memperkuat integritas, sebagaimana tercermin dalam paradoks antara peningkatan kematangan sistem dan penurunan efektivitas pengendalian korupsi. Temuan ini menegaskan bahwa manajemen risiko belum sepenuhnya diinternalisasi sebagai budaya dan instrumen pengambilan keputusan strategis. Kesimpulannya, penguatan manajemen risiko memerlukan pergeseran dari pendekatan kepatuhan administratif ke pendekatan pembelajaran kebijakan yang reflektif dan terintegrasi. Disarankan juga agar kebijakan lebih diarahkan pada penguatan kepemimpinan risiko, peran Inspektorat sebagai fasilitator risiko, pengintegrasian risiko ke dalam perencanaan dan penganggaran, serta pengembangan budaya sadar risiko, khususnya di seluruh instansi regional dalam Pemerintah Provinsi Kalimantan Timur.

Baca Naskah Lengkap

Isi lengkap artikel ini tersedia dalam format PDF. Versi resmi yang diterbitkan pada Vol 17 No 2 (2025).

Buka PDF

Daftar Pustaka

31 rujukan
  1. Adusupalli, B. (2024). The Role of Internal Audit in Enhancing Corporate Governance: A Comparative Analysis of Risk Management and Compliance Strategies. MSW Management: Multidisciplinary, Scientific Word and Management Journal, 34(2), 818–831. https://doi.org/10.7492/n6e19h86
  2. Anderson, J. E. (2015). Public Policymaking. Cengage.
  3. Ardianingsih, A., & Payamta, P. (2022). Analysis of the Effectiveness of Risk Based Internal Audit Implementation: A Case Study. Quality - Access to Success, 23(190). https://doi.org/10.47750/QAS/23.190.09
  4. Aziz, N. A. A., Manab, N. A., & Othman, S. N. (2015). Exploring the Perspectives of Corporate Governance and Theories on Sustainability Risk Management (SRM). Asian Economic and Financial Review, 5(10), 1148–1158. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.aefr/2015.5.10/102.10.1148.1158
  5. Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
  6. Christensen, T., Roness, P., Arne Røvik, K., & Lægreid, P. (2007). Organization Theory and the Public Sector. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780415449014
  7. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2017). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Sage Publications.
  8. Demidenko, E., & McNutt, P. (2010). The Ethics of Enterprise Risk Management as a Key Component of Corporate Governance. International Journal of Social Economics, 37(10), 802–815. https://doi.org/10.1108/03068291011070462
  9. Devaney, L. (2016). Good Governance? Perceptions of Accountability, Transparency and Effectiveness in Irish Food Risk Governance. Food Policy, 62(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.04.003
  10. Erlina, Putri, D. R., & Muda, I. (2019). The Model of Successful Risk Management Implementation in Local Government. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 10(02), 310–319.
  11. Frost, N. (2021). The Myth of Measurement: Inspection, Audit, Targets and the Public Sector. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529760750
  12. Gattie, S. U. (2025). Risk Management and Good Governance Support Organizational Value. Frontiers of Health Services Management, 41(3), 14–18. https://doi.org/10.1097/HAP.0000000000000212
  13. Gericke, R. C. (2018). Corporate Governance and Risk Management in Financial Institutions. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67311-0
  14. Halachmi, A. (2005). Governance and Risk Management: Challenges and Public Productivity. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 18(4), 300–317. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513550510599238
  15. Hill, M., & Hupe, P. (2014). Implementing Public Policy: An Introduction to the Study of Operational Governance. Sage Publications.
  16. Hubbard, D. W. (2020). The Failure of Risk Management: Why It’s Broken and How to Fix It. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119521914
  17. Irianto, G., & Amirya, M. (2024). Kendala dan Strategi Implementasi Manajemen Risiko di Pemerintah Daerah Indonesia. Ekuitas: Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi, 12(2), 302–312. https://doi.org/10.23887/ekuitas.v12i2.84241
  18. Lincoln, Y. S., Guba, E. G., & Pilotta, J. J. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 9(4), 438–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8
  19. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Sage Publications.
  20. Mulyono, R. D. A. P. (2020). How Important Risk Management Culture in Local Governments? Journal of Governance and Public Policy, 7(1), 35–40. https://doi.org/10.18196/jgpp71121
  21. Nguyen, Q. K., & Dang, V. C. (2022). The Impact of Risk Governance Structure on Bank Risk Management Effectiveness: Evidence From ASEAN Countries. Heliyon, 8(10), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11192
  22. OECD. (2025). Managing Emerging Critical Risks. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/1f9858ea-en
  23. Oulasvirta, L., & Anttiroiko, A.-V. (2017). Adoption of Comprehensive Risk Management in Local Government. Local Government Studies, 43(3), 451–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2017.1294071
  24. Papadaki, M., Gale, A. W., Rimmer, J. R., Kirkham, R. J., Taylor, A., & Brown, M. (2014). Essential Factors that Increase the Effectiveness of Project/Programme Risk Management. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 119, 921–930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.103
  25. Power, M. (2009). The Risk Management of Nothing. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(6–7), 849–855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2009.06.001
  26. Praise, I., & Rapina, R. (2022). The Role of Internal Audit, Leadership Effectiveness, and Organizational Culture in Risk Management Effectiveness. European Journal of Management Issues, 30(2), 83–91. https://doi.org/10.15421/192208
  27. Rahmawati, N., Irsyah, & Ningrum, T. A. (2025). Optimalisasi Sistem Pengendalian Inters Pemerintah (SPIP) Melalui Pendekatan Manajemen Risiko. Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen dan Pendidikan, 02(03), 1018–1023. https://jurnal.kopusindo.com/index.php/jimp/article/view/1417
  28. SCCE, & HCCA. (2020). Compliance Risk Management: Applying the COSO ERM Framework.
  29. Vijayakumar, A. N., & Nagaraja, N. (2012). Internal Control Systems: Effectiveness of Internal Audit in Risk Management at Public Sector Enterprises. BVIMR Management Edge, 5(1), 1–8.
  30. Widiyastuti, M., & Winarna, J. (2024). Risk Management, Corruption Control, and Public Monitoring: Do They Improve Government Performance Accountability? International Journal of Economics, Business and Management Research, 08(10), 132–147. https://doi.org/10.51505/IJEBMR.2024.81010
  31. Zammit, C., Grima, S., & Kizilkaya, Y. M. (2021). A Maturity Evaluation of Governance, Risk Management and Compliance (GRC) within the Maltese Public Sector. In Contemporary Issues in Public Sector Accounting and Auditing (pp. 219–255). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1569-375920200000105016

Hak Cipta & Lisensi Akses Terbuka

Hak Cipta (c) 2025 Penulis. Artikel ini dilisensikan di bawah CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0.