Beralih ke bagian utama
Artikel Riset Asli Akses Terbuka Terakreditasi SINTA 2

Transformative Policies and Infrastructure Strengthening Towards the Police Era 4.0

DOI
10.21787/jbp.13.2021.231-243
Tanggal Terbit & Halaman
31 Agustus 2021 · Hlm. 231-243
Riwayat Naskah
Diterima10 Mei 2021 Disetujui14 Jul 2021 Terbit31 Agu 2021

1.855 Dilihat 1.362 Diunduh

Abstrak

Transformative Policies and Infrastructure Strengthening Towards the Police Era 4.0

Police transformation policy to carry out community security functions is very adaptive in addressing the changing times. The research aims to map the transformation and strengthening of police infrastructure in response to the era of digitalization. The research uses a qualitative type of research with a literature study approach and policy analysis programmed by the Police. The results showed that the transformation policy consisting of organizational transformation, operation transformation, public service transformation, and supervise transformation is needed by the Police, especially in the current digital transition. Moreover, it can be carried out correctly if the Police have internally and externally owned by POLRI. The research concludes that transformative efforts and strengthening of police infrastructure strongly support the duties and functions of the National Police in securing the community.

Baca Naskah Lengkap

Isi lengkap artikel ini tersedia dalam format PDF. Versi resmi yang diterbitkan pada Vol 13 No 2 (2021).

Buka PDF

Daftar Pustaka

22 rujukan
  1. Amin, R. M., Febrina, R., & Wicaksono, B. (2021). Handling COVID-19 from a Collaborative Governance Perspective in Pekanbaru City. Jurnal Bina Praja, 13(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.13.2021.1-13
  2. Bryman, A. (2017). Quantitative and qualitative research: further reflections on their integration. In J. Brannen (Ed.), Mixing Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Research (pp. 57–78). Taylor & Francis Group.
  3. Djumantiara, R. E., & Susilawati, N. (2018). Policy Analysis on the Maximum Limit of Occupational Expenses in the Article 21 Income Tax Calculation. 2nd International Conference on Administrative Science, Policy, and Governance Studies 2018 (ICAS-PGS 2018), 257–267.
  4. Furqoni, I., Rosyadi, S., & Isna, A. (2019). Collaborative Governance in Corporate Social Responsibility Forum in Banyumas Regency. Jurnal Bina Praja, 11(2), 209–217. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.11.2019.209-217
  5. Gash, T., & Hobbs, R. (2018). Policing 4.0: Deciding the Future of Policing in the UK.
  6. Gobillot, E. (2009). Leadershift: Reinventing Leadership for the Age of Mass Collaboration. Kogan Page.
  7. Heri, E. I. (2019). Tantangan Pengembangan SDM Polri di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Jurnal Ilmu Kepolisian, 13(2), 90–105. http://www.jurnalptik.id/index.php/JIK/article/view/159
  8. Kerlinger, F. N. (1996). Methods in Social Research. McGraw Hill.
  9. Kranz, M. (2016). Building the Internet of Things: Implement New Business Models, Disrupt Competitors, Transform Your Industry. Wiley.
  10. Lopez-Varela, A. (Ed.). (2012). Theoretical and Methodological Approaches to Social Sciences and Knowledge Management. InTech. https://doi.org/10.5772/2273
  11. Machruf, I. N., Hermawan, D., & Meutia, I. F. (2020). Penanggulangan Pra Bencana Alam Tsunami di Kabupaten Lampung Selatan dalam Perspektif Collaborative Governance. Administrativa: Jurnal Birokrasi, Kebijakan Dan Pelayanan Publik, 2(1), 129–146. https://doi.org/10.23960/administrativa.v2i1.25
  12. Manning, P. K. (1981). The Technology of Policing: Crime Mapping, Information Technology, and the Rationality of Crime Control. NYU Press.
  13. Mukhtas, H. (2018). Formulasi Kebijakan Restrukturisasi Organisasi Markas Besar Polri Pasca Reformasi 1998. Jurnal Politik Pemerintahan Dharma Praja, 11(2), 107–119. https://doi.org/10.33701/jppdp.v11i2.399
  14. Mulyana, S., Tumpu, M., Rachman, R., Pasoepati, I. G. P. A. G., Saeni, A., Alpius, Rangan, P., Salle, L., Sahar, N., Darsim, S., Asdar, M., Tanje, H., Atmika, I. M. B., & Gusty, S. (2019). Pengembangan Inovasi dan Teknologi di Era Industri 4.0: Konsep & Penerapan (I. Marjuki, M. Chaerul, & N. Desi (Eds.)). Tohar Media.
  15. Neuman, W. L., & Wiegand, B. (2000). Criminal Justice Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Allyn and Bacon.
  16. Schwab, K. (2017). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Penguin Books Limited.
  17. Supriyanto, E. E. (2016). Kebijakan Inovasi Teknologi Informasi (IT) Melalui Program Elektronik Goverment dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Pelayanan Publik di Indonesia. JIP (Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan): Kajian Ilmu Pemerintahan Dan Politik Daerah, 1(1), 141–161. https://doi.org/10.24905/jip.1.1.2016.141-161
  18. Supriyanto, E. E. (2021). Strategi Penerapan Kebijakan Sovereign Wealth Funds (SWFs) di Indonesia: Studi Literatur dan Studi Komparatif Oman. Jurnal Inovasi Ilmu Sosial Dan Politik (JISoP), 3(1), 10–21. https://doi.org/10.33474/JISOP.V3I1.6959
  19. Supriyanto, E. E., Bakti, I. S., & Furqon, M. (2021). The Role of Big Data in the Implementation of Distance Learning. Paedagoria: Jurnal Kajian, Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Kependidikan, 12(1), 61–68. https://doi.org/10.31764/PAEDAGORIA.V12I1.3902
  20. Tim Peneliti ITK. (2015). Laporan Eksekutif Indeks Tata Kelola Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia.
  21. Trochim, W. M. K. (2019). Research Methods.
  22. Wardhana, B. S. (2020). Kompleksitas Tugas Kepolisian pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Ilmu Kepolisian, 14(2), 80–88. https://jurnalptik.id/index.php/JIK/article/view/252

Hak Cipta & Lisensi Akses Terbuka

Hak Cipta (c) 2021 Penulis. Artikel ini dilisensikan di bawah CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0.