Beralih ke bagian utama
Artikel Riset Asli Akses Terbuka Terakreditasi SINTA 2

The Local Government and Creative Industry

Experience from Batik Tulis Lasem Industries

Penulis

  • Ali Roziqin 1* Penulis korespondensi
  • Nunuk Dwi Retnandari 2
  • Amaliana N. Fajrina 3
  • Iradhad T. Sihidi 3
  • Muhammad Kamil 3
  • 1 Department of Government Studies, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang
  • 2 Master of Public Administration, Faculty of Social & Political Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada
  • 3 Department of Government Studies, Faculty of Social & Political Sciences, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang
  • *Penulis korespondensi
DOI
10.21787/jbp.13.2021.419-429
Tanggal Terbit & Halaman
30 Desember 2021 · Hlm. 419-429
Riwayat Naskah
Diterima27 Mar 2021 Disetujui16 Nov 2021 Terbit30 Des 2021
Lisensi
CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0
Baca PDF 212 KB Kutip

1.561 Dilihat 980 Diunduh

Abstrak

The Local Government and Creative Industry: Experience from Batik Tulis Lasem Industries

Recently, Batik Tulis Lasem had several problems with a product, starting from input until the market process. Also, there is the problem of capital and technological capabilities from Batik Tulis Lasem industry, poverty, and social inequality of the craftsman. This article aims to examine the role of local government in improving creative industries, especially Batik Tulis Lasem. Further, this article was conducted by qualitative descriptive approach, particularly using the case study. In addition, the researchers collected data from semi-structured interviews with official local government and Batik Tulis Lasem entrepreneurs in the period covered 2018-2019. The results showed that local government has an important role in improving creative industries, firstly as a regulator, secondly as a facilitator, and thirdly to ensure the existence of Batik Tulis Lasem through empowerment. The problems in Batik Tulis Lasem are the regeneration of entrepreneurs, including batik craftsman, the lack of empowerment by local government, and the lack of information technology knowledge among the majority of Batik entrepreneurs. As an implication, the government should increase empowerment for the Batik Tulis Lasem industry through the regeneration program of batik craftsman and increase capacity for digital marketing.

Kata Kunci:

Baca Naskah Lengkap

Isi lengkap artikel ini tersedia dalam format PDF. Versi resmi yang diterbitkan pada Vol 13 No 3 (2021).

Buka PDF

Daftar Pustaka

45 rujukan
  1. Asim, S., Li, C., Makhdoom, H. U. R., & Zafar, Z. (2019). Entrepreneurial technology opportunism and its impact on business sustainability with the moderation of government regulations. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 7(3), 161–185. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2019.070309
  2. Badan Ekonomi Kreatif. (2018). Infografis Ringkasan Data Statistik Ekonomi Kreatif. https://www.bekraf.go.id/berita/page/9/83-infografis-ringkasan-data-statistik-ekonomi-kreatif-indonesia
  3. Bae, S. H., & Yoo, K. (2015). Economic modeling of innovation in the creative industries and its implications. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 96, 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.02.010
  4. Bennett, J.;Woods, R.;Bower, N.;Bruce, S.;O’Connor, G. (2015). Creative Councils for Creative Communities;Australian Centre of Excellence for Local Government. Broadway.
  5. Chen, C. (2013). Facilitators of national innovation policy in a SME-dominated country: A case study of Taiwan. Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice, 15(4), 405–415.
  6. Cheng, Y., Liu, Y., Fan, W., Yan, Z., & Ye, X. (2019). Triple helix on globalization: A case study of the China International Nanotech Innovation Cluster. Information Development, 35(2), 272–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666917743050
  7. Choi, S., Yang, J. S. W., & Park, H. W. (2015). Quantifying the Triple Helix relationship in scientific research: Statistical analyses on the dividing pattern between developed and developing countries. Quality and Quantity. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-014-0052-5
  8. Daniel, R. (2016). Policy development and engagement: perspectives and insights from key stakeholders involved in the creative industries in north Queensland, Australia. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 22(2), 256–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2014.985667
  9. Datta, P. K. (2013). Making Local Self-Government in Rural India Work: Old Tradition and New Challenges. Indian Journal of Public Administration, 59(1), 93–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0019556120130108
  10. Diercks, G., Larsen, H., & Steward, F. (2019). Transformative innovation policy: Addressing variety in an emerging policy paradigm. Research Policy, 48(4), 880–894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.028
  11. Drab-Kurowska, A. (2018). State intervention in the context of creative industries. Management, 22(1), 74–84. https://doi.org/10.2478/manment-2018-0006
  12. Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Studies of science Etudes sur la science Innovation in innovation : the Triple Helix of university - industry - government relations. Social Science Information, 42(3), 293–337. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026276308287
  13. Etzkowitz, H. (2008). The triple helix: University-industry-government innovation in action. In The Triple Helix: University-Industry-Government Innovation in Action. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203929605
  14. Etzkowitz, H. (2012). Triple helix clusters: Boundary permeability at university-industry-government interfaces as a regional innovation strategy. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30(5), 766–779. https://doi.org/10.1068/c1182
  15. Fahmi, F. Z., McCann, P., & Koster, S. (2017). Creative economy policy in developing countries: The case of Indonesia. Urban Studies, 54(6), 1367–1384. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098015620529
  16. Farzin, F. (2017). Localising the impact of techno-entrepreneurship in Eastern Iran: Birjand’s Science and Technology Park as a local innovation community. Local Economy. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269094217734327
  17. Genat, B. (2009). Building emergent situated knowledges in participatory action research. Action Research, 7(1), 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750308099600
  18. Gibson, C., & Kong, L. (2005). Cultural economy: A critical review. In Progress in Human Geography. https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132505ph567oa
  19. Graebner, M. E., & Eisenhardt, K. (2007). Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges Kathleen. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32.
  20. Hakim, L., Solihat, A., Setiawati, S. D., & Roisah, R. (2018). Implementasi Triple Helix pada Inkubasi Bisnis Outwall. Abdimas BSI, 1(3), 379–389.
  21. Haryono, T., & Azis, F. (2017). Potensi Batik Lasem Sebagai Upaya Pengembangan Ekonomi Kreatif Untuk Meningkatkan Keunggulan Kompetitif Berkelanjutan di Kecamatan Lasem Kabupaten Rembang. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Kontemporer, 3(2), 44.
  22. Indriartiningtias, R., Subagyo, & Hartono, B. (2019). Creativity of small firms in creative industry: Initial evidence from Indonesia. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 11, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1847979019849135
  23. Jayne, M. (2005). Creative industries: The regional dimension? Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 23(4), 537–556. https://doi.org/10.1068/c0453
  24. Jiang, Y., Qian, Q., Zhang, X., & Chen, Y. (2019). The formation of government-oriented creative community and its driving mechanisms: A case study of the 39° space art creative community in Foshan, China. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(3), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030625
  25. Kasali, R. (2017). Era Disruption. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
  26. Lee, Y. H., & Kim, Y. J. (2016). Analyzing interaction in R&D networks using the Triple Helix method: Evidence from industrial R&D programs in Korean government. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 110, 93–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.10.017
  27. Leydesdorff, L. (2012). The Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix, ..., and an N-Tuple of Helices: Explanatory Models for Analyzing the Knowledge-Based Economy? Journal of the Knowledge Economy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-011-0049-4
  28. Lin, W. I., & Chiu, S. Y. (2019). The mobilisation of creative city building as a new mode of governmentality in Dihua Street neighbourhood, Taipei City. Geoforum, 106(May 2018), 320–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.05.002
  29. Listyorini, H. (2012). Komponen Dan Dampak Social Entrepreneurship Upaya Revitalisasi Budaya Dan Industri Kabupaten Rembang. Jurnal Ilmiah Dinamika Kepariwisataan.
  30. Low, M. B., & Macmillan, I. C. (1988). Entrepreneurship: Past Research and Future Challenges. Journal of Management, 14(2), 139–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638801400202
  31. Luken, R., & Van Rompaey, F. (2008). Drivers for and barriers to environmentally sound technology adoption by manufacturing plants in nine developing countries. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.10.006
  32. Maulany, N. N., & Masruroh, N. N. (2017). Kebangkitan Industri Batik Lasem di Awal Abad XXI. Putrawidya, 18(1), 1–12.
  33. Nassaji, H. (2015). Qualitative and descriptive research: Data type versus data analysis. Language Teaching Research, 19(2), 129–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168815572747
  34. Naughton, B. (2007). The Chinese Economy: Transitions and Growth. RePec & MIT Press.
  35. Peck, J. (2005). Struggling with the creative class. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2005.00620.x
  36. Pratt, A. C. (2008). Creative cities: The cultural industries and the creative class. Geografiska Annaler, Series B: Human Geography. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0467.2008.00281.x
  37. Ratminto. (2015). Skenario Optimis Pengembangan Batik Jogja. In Manajemen Publik Kontemporer. Gava Media.
  38. Rembang, P. (2020). Dorong Kemajuan Batik Tulis Lasem Dengan Pembuatan Kluster. Dorong Kemajuan Batik Tulis Lasem Dengan Pembuatan Kluster
  39. Shafi, M., Sarker, M. N. I., & Junrong, L. (2019). Social Network of Small Creative Firms and Its Effects on Innovation in Developing Countries. SAGE Open, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019898248
  40. Sidauruk, R. (2013). Peningkatan Peran Pemerintah Daerah dalam Rangka Pengembangan Ekonomi Kreatif di Provinsi Jawa Barat. Jurnal Bina Praja, 05(03), 141–158. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.05.2013.141-158
  41. Smith, R., & Warfield, K. (2007). The creative city: A matter of values. In Creative Cities, Cultural Clusters and Local Economic Development.
  42. Tahwin, M., Dewi, D. A. L., & Mahmudi, A. A. (2015). Supply Chain Usaha Kecil Menengah (Studi Kasus Industri Batik Tulis Lasem Kabupaten Rembang). The 2nd University Research Coloquium 2015 ISSN, 4, 71–79.
  43. Wong, P. K. (2001). Leveraging multinational corporations, fostering technopreneurship: The changing role of S&T policy in Singapore. International Journal of Technology Management. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijtm.2001.002977
  44. Zheng, J. (2011). “Creative Industry Clusters” and the “Entrepreneurial City” of Shanghai. Urban Studies, 48(16), 3561–3582. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098011399593
  45. Zhou, J., Li, J., Jiao, H., Qiu, H., & Liu, Z. (2018). The more funding the better? The moderating role of knowledge stock on the effects of different government-funded research projects on firm innovation in Chinese cultural and creative industries. Technovation, November, 102059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2018.11.002

Hak Cipta & Lisensi Akses Terbuka

Hak Cipta (c) 2021 Penulis. Artikel ini dilisensikan di bawah CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0.