Beralih ke bagian utama
Artikel Riset Asli Akses Terbuka Terakreditasi SINTA 2

Pemilihan Kepala Daerah: Politik Uang dan Demokrasi Cukong

Money Politics and Cukong Democracy

Penulis

  • Halilul Khairi
  • Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri (IPDN)
DOI
10.21787/jbp.12.2020.249-260
Tanggal Terbit & Halaman
16 Desember 2020 · Hlm. 249-260
Riwayat Naskah
Diterima28 Sep 2020 Disetujui26 Nov 2020 Terbit16 Des 2020
Lisensi
CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0
Baca PDF 167 KB Kutip

1.668 Dilihat 1.199 Diunduh

Abstrak

Local Elections (Pilkada): Money Politics and Cukong Democracy

Local elections (Pilkada) still face problems, both technical and substantive. Efforts to improve have been made several times by revising the law regulating local elections (Pilkada). In the simultaneous local elections in 2020, money politics arose again. The issue of cukong democracy practices depicted capital owners' power to finance local leaders candidates to contest local elections (Pilkada). This study explores and structures the problems underlying money politics in local elections (Pilkada), which formulate alternative solutions based on logical reasoning. The exploration and formulation of issues and the preparation of alternative solutions are carried out using strong arguments to ensure the conclusions' plausibility. The practice of money politics can occur in two main areas, namely in ​​the nomination process in the form of political dowries paid by candidates to political parties. In the campaign area, the condition of buying and selling votes carried out by candidates with voters. The practice of political dowry occurs due to the limited alternatives that a person can use to run for regional head elections. The nomination mechanism is much more difficult and costly through individual channels, so paying political dowries to political parties is the easiest and more specific option. The practice of money politics occurs because of voters' mental attitudes who are not rational, and the system of sanctions still supports the way of buying and selling votes. Alternative solutions to money politics in these two areas are compiled by doing a simulative analysis that can eliminate the practice's root causes. Decreasing the threshold for candidate submission by political parties, adopting the maximum point for political party support, reducing the number of voter support requirements for individual candidates, eliminating political dowries in local leader nominations, and simultaneously reducing costs for individual candidates. Adopting criminal sanctions for givers in the practice of buying and selling votes is an alternative solution in preventing the way of buying and selling votes in local elections (Pilkada).

Kata Kunci:

Baca Naskah Lengkap

Isi lengkap artikel ini tersedia dalam format PDF. Versi resmi yang diterbitkan pada Vol 12 No 2 (2020).

Buka PDF

Daftar Pustaka

30 rujukan
  1. Abdel-Monem, T., Herian, M. N., Hoppe, R., PytlikZillig, L. M., & Tomkins, A. J. (2016). Policymakers’ Perceptions of the Benefits of Citizen-Budgeting Activities. Public Performance & Management Review, 39(4), 835–863. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2015.1137774
  2. Aditjondro, G. J. (2006). Korupsi Kepresidenan: Reproduksi Oligarki Berkaki Tiga: Istana, Tangsi, dan Partai Penguasa. LKiS.
  3. Arif, A., & Maksum, I. R. (2017). Functional decentralization Construct in Decentralization Policy in Indonesia (A study of Irrigation, Education, and Free trade sectors). JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan Dan Administrasi Publik), 21(1), 55–75. https://doi.org/10.22146/jkap.25383
  4. Asshiddiqie, J. (2012). Hukum Tata Negara dan Pilar-pilar Demokrasi. Sinar Grafika.
  5. Chiang, Y.-S., & Hsu, Y.-F. (2017). Direct Election of Group Decision-Makers Can Facilitate Cooperation in the Public Goods Game. Group Decision and Negotiation, 26(1), 197–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-016-9478-6
  6. Dahl, R. A. (1982). Dilemmas of Pluralist Democracy: Autonomy Vs. Control. Yale University Press.
  7. Dawson, S. (2020). Electoral fraud and the paradox of political competition. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2020.1740716
  8. Delamaide, D. (2009). The Energy Shadow Government. Cogeneration & Distributed Generation Journal, 24(2), 6–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/15453660909509004
  9. Djafar, TB. M. (2008). Demokratisasi, DPRD, dan Penguatan Politik Lokal. Jurnal POELITIK, 1(1), 1–12. https://studylibid.com/doc/494199/demokratisasi--dprd--dan-penguatan-politik-lokal1
  10. Do, T. T., Vu, T. T., & Nguyen, H. T. M. (2016). A Comparative Study on the Self-help Approach in Rural Development between Vietnam’s New Rural Development and Korea’s Saemaul Undong. East Asian Economic Review, 20(1), 91–125. https://doi.org/10.11644/KIEP.JEAI.2016.20.1.306
  11. Eger, R. J., III. (2006). Casting Light on Shadow Government: A Typological Approach. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(1), 125–137. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui040
  12. Fang, H., Li, Z., Xu, N., & Yan, H. (2018). In the Shadows of the Government: Relationship Building During Political Turnovers (No. w25300; p. w25300). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w25300
  13. Ferza, R., & Aulia, N. F. (2020). 2018 Simultaneous Regional Head Elections: Political Dowry and Policy Implication. Jurnal Bina Praja, 12(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.12.2020.11-20
  14. Gie, T. L. (2000). Pengantar Filsafat Ilmu (5th ed.). Liberty Yogyakarta.
  15. Hakim, M. Z., & Jurdi, F. (2018). Immature Politicians and Oligarchy As a Threat to Democracy. Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 11(4), 342–354. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v11no4.979
  16. Heryadi, D. (2016). Menumbuhkan Karakter Akademik dalam Perkuliahan Berbasis Logika. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 1(3), 317–330. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v1i3.453
  17. Hidayat, A. R. (2018). Filsafat Berpikir Teknik-teknik Berpikir Logis Kontra Kesesatan Berpikir. Duta Media Publishing.
  18. Hoessein, B. (1993). Berbagai Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Besarnya Otonomi Dati II: Suatu Kajian Desentralisasi dan Otonomi Daerah dari Segi Ilmu Administrasi Negara [Dissertation, Universitas Indonesia]. http://lib.ui.ac.id/detail?id=20449558&lokasi=lokal
  19. Holden, M. (1975). Hitler. Wayland. Humes, S. (1959). The Structure of Local Governments Throughout the World: A Comparative Introduction. Springer.
  20. Hussain, S. (n.d.). The Role of Elections in Strengthening Democracy Principles and Values. Agora.
  21. Meinke, S. R. (2008). Institutional Change and the Electoral Connection in the Senate: Revisiting the Effects of Direct Election. Political Research Quarterly, 61(3), 445–457. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912907309156
  22. Mohr, L. B. (1994). Authority in Organizations: On the Reconciliation of Democracy and Expertise. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 4(1), 49–66. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a037193
  23. Putra, H. (2017). Determinants of Vote Buying in Local Head Election in Indonesia. Jurnal Bina Praja, 9(2), 205–218. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.09.2017.205-218
  24. Rachman, D. A. (2018, August 5). Modus Korupsi 32 Kepala Daerah yang Sudah Ditangkap KPK. KOMPAS.com. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2018/08/05/10101301/modus-korupsi-32-kepala-daerah-yang-sudah-ditangkap-kpk
  25. Samuels, D. (2000). Concurrent Elections, Discordant Results: Presidentialism, Federalism, and Governance in Brazil. Comparative Politics, 33(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.2307/422421
  26. Solihah, R. (2018). Peluang dan Tantangan Pemilu Serentak 2019 dalam Perspektif Politik. JIIP: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pemerintahan, 3(1), 73–88. https://doi.org/10.14710/jiip.v3i1.3234
  27. Suryanto, & Hidayat, T. M. (2016). Regional Autonomy and Local Democracy: Independent Candidates Cases. Jurnal Bina Praja, 8(2), 199–208. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.08.2016.199-208
  28. Turati, G., Boetti, L., & Piacenza, M. (2012). Decentralization and Local Governments’ Performance: How Does Fiscal Autonomy Affect Spending Efficiency? FinanzArchiv, 68(3), 269. https://doi.org/10.1628/001522112X653840
  29. Winters, J. A. (2013). Oligarchy and Democracy in Indonesia. Indonesia, 96(1), 11–33. https://doi.org/10.1353/ind.2013.0017
  30. Yuwono, T. (2001). Manajemen Otonomi Daerah: Membangun Daerah Berdasar Paradigma Baru. Pusat Kajian Otonomi Daerah dan Kebijakan Publik.

Hak Cipta & Lisensi Akses Terbuka

Hak Cipta (c) 2020 Penulis. Artikel ini dilisensikan di bawah CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0.

Artikel paling banyak dibaca berdasarkan penulis yang sama