Beralih ke bagian utama
Artikel Riset Asli Akses Terbuka Terakreditasi SINTA 2

Implementasi Kebijakan Pengembangan Kawasan Cagar Budaya Kayutangan di Kota Malang

DOI
10.21787/jbp.17.2025.2569
Tanggal Terbit & Halaman
29 Agustus 2025
Riwayat Naskah
Diterima19 Mei 2025 Disetujui8 Jul 2025 Terbit29 Agu 2025

1.288 Dilihat 1.278 Diunduh

Abstrak

Kawasan Kayutangan di Kota Malang memiliki nilai sejarah, sosial budaya, dan ekonomi, serta diakui sebagai kawasan cagar budaya dengan daya tarik yang unik. Namun, modernisasi yang berlebihan di kawasan ini, yang utamanya didorong oleh sektor swasta, telah mulai mengikis keberadaan bangunan cagar budaya dan nilai-nilai lokal, sehingga menimbulkan tantangan signifikan bagi pelestarian cagar budaya. Sebagai respons, Pemerintah Kota Malang telah menerapkan kebijakan yang berfokus pada pelestarian dan pembangunan, termasuk pengurangan kawasan kumuh, revitalisasi infrastruktur, dan pertumbuhan pariwisata lokal. Meskipun upaya-upaya ini telah dilakukan, masih terdapat kesenjangan dalam pengelolaan keberlanjutan nilai-nilai cagar budaya dalam menghadapi tekanan modernisasi. Studi ini mengeksplorasi implementasi kebijakan pengembangan Kawasan Cagar Budaya Kayutangan melalui kerangka kerja implementasi kebijakan Grindle (2017), dengan fokus pada isi dan luaran kebijakan. Pendekatan deskriptif kualitatif digunakan, meliputi wawancara semi-terstruktur, observasi, dan dokumentasi. Data dianalisis menggunakan pengkodean kualitatif, yang melibatkan pengumpulan, kategorisasi, dan penarikan kesimpulan. Studi ini menemukan bahwa meskipun kebijakan tersebut telah menghasilkan dampak positif seperti pengurangan kawasan kumuh, perbaikan infrastruktur, peningkatan UMKM, peningkatan kunjungan wisatawan, dan pelestarian sejarah, tantangan terhadap keberlanjutan tetap muncul. Hal ini mencakup modernisasi yang tidak selaras dengan tema warisan dan kurangnya regulasi yang jelas tentang desain visual, yang melemahkan citra warisan kawasan tersebut. Ketiadaan otoritas pengelolaan khusus dan lemahnya koordinasi antar instansi pemerintah daerah juga menghambat intervensi yang efektif. Studi ini merekomendasikan penguatan regulasi dengan membentuk otoritas pengelolaan kawasan warisan khusus dan memperluas dampak kebijakan untuk memastikan keberlanjutan pembangunan jangka panjang dan distribusi manfaat yang lebih merata.

Baca Naskah Lengkap

Isi lengkap artikel ini tersedia dalam format PDF. Versi resmi yang diterbitkan pada Vol 17 No 2 (2025).

Buka PDF

Daftar Pustaka

43 rujukan
  1. Antariksa, Santosa, H., Ernawati, J., & Yasmin, A. P. (2024). The Impact of Community Activity Enlivening in Shaping Historical Areas Case Study: Kayutangan Heritage, Malang, Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1324(1), 012057. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1324/1/012057
  2. Boz, Y., & Cay, T. (2024). How Smart and Sustainable Are the Cities in Turkiye? – National Policies and the Enthusiasm Level of the Local Governments. Heliyon, 10(4), e26002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26002
  3. Buwono, S. L. L., Faliti, A. F., & Hilmi, A. N. (2023). Culture-led Regeneration Policy as Urban Transformation Opportunity in Indonesia: Lessons from Glasgow. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Arts and Humanities 2023 (IJCAH 2023), 1726–1735. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-152-4_174
  4. Cabrera-Jara, N., & Greene-Zuñiga, M. (2024). Forgetting Intangible Values and Community: The Case of Heritage Conservation Policies in Cuenca, Ecuador. Journal of Urban Management, 13(2), 279–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2023.12.004
  5. Campbell, C. (2008). Foucault, Psychology and the Analytics of Power. Hook, D.(Ed.). (2007). Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan; Pp. 301, ISBN 978-0-230-00819-9. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 18(6), 645–646. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.994
  6. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. SAGE.
  7. Del Barrio-Tellado, M. J., Gómez-Vega, M., & Herrero-Prieto, L. C. (2023). Performance of Cultural Heritage Institutions: A Regional Perspective. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 87, 101593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2023.101593
  8. Destin, Z., & Narottama, N. (2020). Strategi Diversifikasi Produk Wisata untuk Menarik Minat Kunjungan Wisatawan di Desa Celuk, Kabupaten Gianyar. Jurnal Destinasi Pariwisata, 8(1), 66–73. https://doi.org/10.24843/JDEPAR.2020.v08.i01.p09
  9. Erdiyanto, F., Riyanto, R., & Susanti, T. (2024). Unsur dan Faktor Perubahan Fasad Bangunan di Kawasan Pecinan Jalan Petudungan Kota Semarang. Arsir: Jurnal Arsitektur, 8(2), 169–181. https://doi.org/10.32502/arsir.v8i2.121
  10. García-Hernández, M., de la Calle-Vaquero, M., & Chamorro-Martínez, V. (2023). Can Overtourism at Heritage Attractions Really Be Sustainably Managed? Lights and Shadows of the Experience at the Site of the Alhambra and Generalife (Spain). Heritage, 6(10), 6494–6509. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage6100339
  11. Grindle, M. S. (2017). Politics and Policy Implementation in the Third World (M. S. Grindle, Ed.). Princeton University Press.
  12. Hamjen, H., Oktavianor, T., & Arbain, T. (2023). Implementation of Smart Branding Policy in the River City of Banjarmasin. Jurnal Bina Praja, 15(1), 163–179. https://doi.org/10.21787/JBP.15.2023.163-179
  13. Hanafiah, M. H., Jamaluddin, M. R., & Kunjuraman, V. (2021). Qualitative Assessment of Stakeholders and Visitors Perceptions Towards Coastal Tourism Development at Teluk Kemang, Port Dickson, Malaysia. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 35, 100389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2021.100389
  14. Hermawan, D., & Hutagalung, S. S. (2024). Sustainable Tourism Development: A Model of Adaptive Destination Management in Lampung Province, Indonesia. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 19(9), 3699–3705. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.190938
  15. Kim, H., Kim, H., & Woosnam, K. M. (2023). Considering Urban Regeneration Policy Support: Perceived Collaborative Governance in Cultural Heritage-Led Regeneration Projects of Korea. Habitat International, 140, 102921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2023.102921
  16. Kluskens, N., Alkemade, F., & Höffken, J. (2024). Beyond a Checklist for Acceptance: Understanding the Dynamic Process of Community Acceptance. Sustainability Science, 19(3), 831–846. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-024-01468-8
  17. Koerner, B., Sushartami, W., & Spencer, D. M. (2024). An Assessment of Tourism Policies and Planning in Indonesia. Tourism Recreation Research, 49(6), 1500–1511. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508281.2023.2214030
  18. Krisnanda, I. G. R. A., Parlindungan, J., & Kurniawan, E. B. (2023). Peran Stakeholder dalam Pengelolaan Kampung Heritage Kayutangan. Planning for Urban Region and Environment, 12(2), 149–156. https://purejournal.ub.ac.id/index.php/pure/article/view/527
  19. Li, Y., Feng, X., Gao, Y., & Zhao, Z. (2024). Perceived Tourism Implicit Conflict Among Community Residents and Its Spatial Variation. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1291. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03782-z
  20. Liu, Y., Jin, X., & Dupre, K. (2022). Engaging Stakeholders in Contested Urban Heritage Planning and Management. Cities, 122, 103521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103521
  21. Lotfi, Y. A., & Aly, T. F. (2025). Evaluating the Long-Term Impact of Adaptive Reuse on Heritage Spaces: A Case Study of Aslam Square in Cairo, Egypt. Built Heritage, 9(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43238-025-00186-z
  22. Maninggar, N., Kusharsanto, Z. S., Suhandojo, & Maulidya, D. (2023). Model Pengukuran Implementasi Konsep Sistem Inovasi Daerah di Indonesia. Jurnal Pembangunan Wilayah dan Kota, 19(1), 87–104. https://doi.org/10.14710/pwk.v19i1.44002
  23. Mekonnen, H., Bires, Z., & Berhanu, K. (2022). Practices and Challenges of Cultural Heritage Conservation in Historical and Religious Heritage Sites: Evidence From North Shoa Zone, Amhara Region, Ethiopia. Heritage Science, 10(1), 172. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-022-00802-6
  24. Milano, C., Novelli, M., & Cheer, J. M. (2019). Overtourism and Tourismphobia: A Journey Through Four Decades of Tourism Development, Planning and Local Concerns. Tourism Planning & Development, 16(4), 353–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568316.2019.1599604
  25. Mulyadi, L., Fathony, B., & Prikasari, E. (2019). Potensi Kampung Heritage Kayutangan sebagai Destinasi Wisata di Kota Malang (D. Yuhana & L. Rosida, Eds.). Deazha.
  26. Nursanty, E., Rusmiatmoko, D., & Husni, M. F. D. (2023). From Heritage to Identity: The Role of City Authenticity in Shaping Local Community Identity and Cultural Preservation. Journal of Architecture and Human Experience, 1(2), 131–150. https://doi.org/10.59810/archimane.v1i2.17
  27. Pahl-Wostl, C., Sendzimir, J., Jeffrey, P., Aerts, J., Berkamp, G., & Cross, K. (2007). Managing Change Toward Adaptive Water Management Through Social Learning. Ecology and Society, 12(2), art30. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-02147-120230
  28. Pham Hong, L., Ngo, H. T., & Pham, L. T. (2021). Community-Based Tourism: Opportunities and Challenges a Case Study in Thanh Ha Pottery Village, Hoi an City, Vietnam. Cogent Social Sciences, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2021.1926100
  29. Primasari, S. A., Muchsin, S., & Sekarsari, R. W. (2023). Dampak Pembangunan Wisata Kayutangan Heritage terhadap Kawasan Kumuh di Daerah Kayutangan Kota Malang (Studi Kasus Zona II Wisata Kayutangan Heritage Kota Malang). Respon Publik, 17(11), 62–70. https://jim.unisma.ac.id/index.php/rpp/article/view/22959
  30. Purwanto, R. E., Lidiawati, & Purwanti, H. (2023). Strategi Pemberdayaan Pemandu Wisata Lokal dalam Menunjang Keberlanjutan Ekonomi dan Sosial Budaya Masyarakat (Studi pada Desa Adat Ngadas Poncokusumo Kab. Malang). Jurnal Sosiologi Nusantara, 9(1), 61–78. https://doi.org/10.33369/jsn.9.1.61-78
  31. Putra, I. M. A. W. W., & Huda, M. N. (2022). Implementation of Good Village Governance in Tourism Industry Development. Nakhoda: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 21(2), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.35967/njip.v21i2.365
  32. Rahman, F., Made Kutanegara, P., Bachruddin, Z., & Susilastuti, D. H. (2024). Barriers to Local Community Involvement in Community-Based Tourism Development: Evidence from Area Model of Conservation and Education (AMCE) Oro-Oro Ombo Village Batu City Indonesia. Journal of Tourism Sustainability, 4(3), 133–149. https://doi.org/10.35313/jtospolban.v4i3.130
  33. Rahmat, Rozikin, M., & Suryadi. (2023). “Collaborative Governance” Pembangunan Kampung Wisata Heritage Kayutangan Kota Malang. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 6(5), 318–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0121(73)90012-8
  34. Rodrigues, R., Heitor, J. C., Pimentel, H., & Lopes, T. (2025). Relationship Between Preservation of Built Cultural Heritage and Economic Development in Lisbon and Porto: Cultural Legacy and Urban Revitalization as Serial Mediation Mechanisms. Societies, 15(5), 124. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15050124
  35. Sameer Basrawi, M. (2024). Study the Impact of Tourism on the Environment and Local Culture. Arab Journal for Scientific Publishing, 7(68), 1–50. https://doi.org/10.36571/ajsp681
  36. Sasongko, I., Gai, A. M., & Azzizi, V. T. (2024). Sustainable Development Concept of Heritage Kampung Tourism Using Novel Prioritization Approach. Sustainability, 16(7), 2934. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16072934
  37. Seila, F., Selim, G., & Newisar, M. (2025). A Systematic Review of Factors Contributing to Ineffective Cultural Heritage Management. Sustainability, 17(1), 366. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17010366
  38. Soini, K., & Aakkula, J. (2007). Framing the Biodiversity of Agricultural Landscape: The Essence of Local Conceptions and Constructions. Land Use Policy, 24(2), 311–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2006.03.001
  39. Syahrul, Ritonga, A. K., Zulfan, M., & Hasriyani, E. (2024). The Impact of Destination Management Organization (DMO) on Sustainable Tourism Development in Samosir Regency. Society, 12(2), 348–364. https://doi.org/10.33019/society.v12i2.604
  40. Tang, C., Qiu, T., & Li, Y. (2025). Heritage Perspectives on Cultural Memory and Spatial Identity in Yuan River Basin, Hunan, China. Npj Heritage Science, 13(1), 261. https://doi.org/10.1038/s40494-025-01841-5
  41. Ulinnuha, M. F., Anom, I. P., & Ariana, N. (2024). The Government’s Role in DMO-Based Urban Tourism in Kayutangan Area of Malang City. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 9(7), 103–110. https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24JUL244
  42. Yulianto, I., Z. Estocada, D., Dela Cruz, M., & . R. (2024). Integrated Community-Based Tourism for Balanced Regional Development: A Case Study of Kayutangan Area and Kampong Heritage in Malang City. KnE Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i29.17265
  43. Zhao, L., Li, Y., Zhang, N., & Zhang, Z. (2023). Public Policies and Conservation Plans of Historic Urban Landscapes Under the Sustainable Heritage Tourism Milieu: Discussions on the Equilibrium Model on Kulangsu Island, UNESCO World Heritage Site. Built Heritage, 7(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43238-023-00086-0

Biografi Penulis

  • Agus Suryono · Universitas Brawijaya

    Profesor Administrasi Publik Universitas Brawijaya

  • Ike Wanusmawatie · Universitas Brawijaya

    Dosen di Fakultas Ilmu Administrasi, Universitas Brawijaya. Minat penelitian meliputi pemerintahan daerah, kebijakan publik, dan administrasi publik.

Hak Cipta & Lisensi Akses Terbuka

Hak Cipta (c) 2025 Penulis. Artikel ini dilisensikan di bawah CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0.