Beralih ke bagian utama
Artikel Riset Asli Akses Terbuka Terakreditasi SINTA 2

Filantropi Sosial Budaya

Tradisi Lokal, Solidaritas Mekanik-Organisasi, dan Dinamika

Penulis

  • Iqbal Arpannudin * Penulis korespondensi
  • Yayuk Hidayah
  • Nabila Ihza Nur Muttaqi
  • Nita Maghfiratul Jannah
DOI
10.21787/jbp.17.2025.157-167
Tanggal Terbit & Halaman
30 April 2025 · Hlm. 157-167
Riwayat Naskah
Diterima11 Feb 2025 Terbit30 Apr 2025
Lisensi
CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0
Baca PDF 535 KB Kutip

545 Dilihat 532 Diunduh

Abstrak

Filantropi di Indonesia berakar kuat pada tradisi lokal dan semangat kerja sama komunal, menjadikannya aspek fundamental kehidupan sosial. Konsep kewarganegaraan di Indonesia melampaui definisi hukum dan politik, mencakup nilai-nilai sosial budaya yang diungkapkan melalui beragam praktik filantropi. Studi ini mengeksplorasi bagaimana tradisi lokal dan dinamika antara solidaritas mekanis dan organik membentuk kerangka sosial budaya filantropi dan memengaruhi pembangunan sipil. Para peneliti mensurvei 387 responden di tujuh wilayah utama: Yogyakarta, Bandung, Jakarta, Makassar, Medan, Denpasar, dan Samarinda. Pengumpulan data difokuskan pada kesadaran komunal, praktik tradisional, dan peran solidaritas dalam upaya amal. Analisis regresi berganda mengungkapkan bahwa tradisi lokal berkontribusi 35% terhadap penguatan nilai-nilai filantropi. Solidaritas mekanis, yang berakar pada keyakinan bersama, menyumbang 25%, sementara solidaritas organik, yang didorong oleh peran fungsional, menyumbang 20%. Interaksi antara tradisi dan modernitas menambah 20%. Temuan-temuan ini menyoroti bahwa tradisi budaya dan perpaduan solidaritas mekanis dan organik merupakan fondasi vital bagi pembangunan kesadaran sosial. Penelitian ini menggarisbawahi pentingnya kolaborasi yang lebih kuat antara lembaga pemerintah dan masyarakat untuk mengintegrasikan unsur-unsur budaya ini ke dalam gerakan filantropi Indonesia yang modern dan berorientasi kewarganegaraan.

Kata Kunci:

Baca Naskah Lengkap

Isi lengkap artikel ini tersedia dalam format PDF. Versi resmi yang diterbitkan pada Vol 17 No 1 (2025).

Buka PDF

Daftar Pustaka

38 rujukan
  1. Alawiyah, T. (2013). Religious non-governmental organizations and philanthropy in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies, 3(2), 203–221. https://doi.org/10.18326/ijims.v3i2.203-221
  2. Analiansyah, A., Furqani, H., Mulia, R., Yulindawati, Y., Afriani, S., & Juliansyah, R. (2024). Techno-sociopreneurship in practice by strengthening mosque-based islamic philanthropy management: A case in Thailand. In Technopreneurship in Small Businesses for Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-3530-7.ch011
  3. Andrikopoulos, A. (2020). Delineating social finance. International Review of Financial Analysis, 70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2020.101519
  4. Anoraga, B. (2024). A decade of charitable crowdfunding and its impacts on the social justice trajectory of Islamic philanthropy in Indonesia. Advances in Southeast Asian Studies, 17(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.14764/10.ASEAS-0094
  5. Ardianto, Y., Riskarini, D., Baharuddin, G., & Handayani, S. P. (2024). The impact of compensation and job satisfaction on employee performance: A case study of PT Bank XYZ (Persero) Tbk. Jurnal Bina Praja, 16(2), 377–388. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.16.2024.377-388
  6. Arpannudin, I. (2022). Disertasi: Penguatan gerakan filantropi untuk mengembangkan dimensi sosio-kultural kewarganegaraan. Universiats Pendidikan Indonesia.
  7. Arpannudin, I., Suryadi, K., Malihah, E., & Anggraeni, L. (2023). The contribution of philanthropic movement for civic education: Lessons learned from generosity amid pandemic. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 42(3), 826–839. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v42i3.43970
  8. Batu, M., Oz, M., Yazar, S., Tos, O., & Kurban, V. (2024). Media coverage of nowruz rituals and reflections: similarities and differences across the turkic world. Turk Kulturu ve Haci Bektas Veli - Arastirma Dergisi, 111, 263–284. https://doi.org/10.60163/tkhcbva.1470705
  9. Chen, Z., & Yang, J. (2022). Different social representations of the same belief in urban tourism cities in Southeast Asia and China. International Journal of Tourism Cities, 8(1), 70–87. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJTC-04-2021-0069
  10. Creswell, J. W. (2019). Research design approaches to qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods (4 th). Student Library.
  11. Dijst, M., & Schenkel, W. (2018). Urban governance and infrastructure: Coping with diversity, complexity and uncertainty. In Governing Cities on the Move: Functional and Management Perspectives on Transformations of European Urban Infrastructures (pp. 289–301). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315191782
  12. Edagawa, A. (2011). Actual state of preservation of tangible folk cultural properties and their role in promoting regional identity amid a changing social structure. Studies in Regional Science, 41(4), 1089–1101. https://doi.org/10.2457/srs.41.1089
  13. Enright, W. G., & Miyamoto, R. T. (2008). Building a cathedral for your soul: Generosity as a virtue and a practice. Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 138(5), 552–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otohns.2008.02.013
  14. Fauzia, A. (2017). Islamic philanthropy in Indonesia: Modernization, islamization, and social justice. Austrian Journal of South East Asian Studies, 10(2), 223–236. https://doi.org/10.14764/10.ASEAS-2017.2-6
  15. Halimah, L., Hidayah, Y., Heryani, H., Trihastuti, M., & Arpannudin, I. (2023). The meaning of maintaining a life philosophy of simplicity for life pleasure: A study in Kampung Naga, Tasikmalaya. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 33(8), 1149–1159. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2022.2128489
  16. Inatsu, Y., & Bari, M. L. (2014). Food safety challenges associated with traditional fermented foods. In Microorganisms and Fermentation of Traditional Foods (pp. 341–369). https://doi.org/10.1201/b17307
  17. Jones, R. (2009). Heritage and Culture. In International Encyclopedia of Human Geography: Volume 1-12 (Vols. 1–12, pp. V5-98). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008044910-4.00362-X
  18. Landon, L. B., Douglas, G. L., Downs, M. E., Greene, M. R., Whitmire, A. M., Zwart, S. R., & Roma, P. G. (2019). The behavioral biology of teams: Multidisciplinary contributions to social dynamics in isolated, confined, and extreme environments. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02571
  19. Latief, H. (2016). Philanthropy and “muslim citizenship” in post-Suharto Indonesia. Southeast Asian Studies, 5(2), 269–286. https://doi.org/10.20495/seas.5.2_269
  20. Luceri, L., Vancheri, A., Braun, T., & Giordano, S. (2018). On the social influence in human behavior: Physical, homophily, and social communities. Studies in Computational Intelligence, 689, 856–868. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72150-7_69
  21. Mano, R. S. (2016). Boundary-spanning philanthropy: A micro-macro perspective on philanthropy, nonprofit organizations and online prosocial behavior. In Philanthropy: Past, Present and Future Perspectives (pp. 45–67). https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85019961322&partnerID=40&md5=6c8eaed540f9311ed1e1cc1de485d677
  22. Nickel, P. M., & Eikenberry, A. M. (2009). A critique of the discourse of marketized philanthropy. American Behavioral Scientist, 52(7), 974–989. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764208327670
  23. Okamoto, N. (2009). Local culture and regional images: The case of clay toys in Okayama Prefecture. Japanese Journal of Human Geography, 61(3), 63–79. https://doi.org/10.4200/jjhg.61.3_249
  24. Piliyanti, I., Latief, H., & Anwar, S. (2022). Technologizing Islamic philanthropy during the Covid-19 Pandemic in Indonesia. Journal of Muslim Philanthropy and Civil Society, 6(2), 120–141.
  25. Rochani, A., Yuliastuti, N., & Sudarwanto, B. (2021). Philanthropy in settlement infrastructure development. Iop Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science, 832(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/832/1/012010
  26. Rogers-Whitehead, C., Milstead, A. O., & Farris-Hill, L. (2022). Advocating digital citizenship: Resources for the library and classroom. In Advocating Digital Citizenship: Resources for the Library and Classroom. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85186753832&partnerID=40&md5=9ed4ab2e897e0df5aa3ebaa83f76a5fd
  27. Santalia, I., Thamrin, M. I., & Barsihannor, B. (2024). The syncretic swing of faith in maddoa: islamic and buginese theological assimilation in pinrang’s harvest festival of indonesia. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 16(3), 24–44. https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.2024.4445
  28. Shalihin, N., Firdaus, F., Yulia, Y., & Wardi, U. (2020). Ramadan and strengthening of the social capital of indonesian muslim communities. Hts Teologiese Studies Theological Studies, 76(3), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.4102/HTS.V76I3.6241
  29. Sheng, Q., Wan, D., & Yu, B. (2021). Effect of space configurational attributes on social interactions in urban parks. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(14). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147805
  30. Stocker, R., & Larkin, H. (2008). Association in multi-agent simulations of dynamic random social networks. 3rd International ICST Conference on Bio-Inspired Models of Network, Information and Computing Systems, BIONETICS 2008. https://doi.org/10.4108/icst.bionetics2008.4742
  31. Sukmana, H. T., Nanang, H., Agustin, F. E. M., Aristoi, Z. F., & Azizah, K. (2024). The success factors of e-philanthropy are determined based on perceived trust, perceived usefulness, subjective norms, enjoyment and religiosity: a case study on a charity site. Journal of Applied Data Sciences, 5(3), 1087–1095. https://doi.org/10.47738/jads.v5i3.310
  32. Supardan, D. (2019). Pengantar Ilmu Sosial. Bumi Aksara.
  33. Triantoro, D. A., Wahyuni, T., & Purna, F. P. (2021). Digital philanthropy: the practice of giving among middle to upper-class muslim in Indonesia and soft capitalism. Qudus International Journal of Islamic Studies, 9(2), 315–350. https://doi.org/10.21043/qijis.v9i2.7814
  34. Üstünova, K. (2016). On the interpretation of the language of traditions: Helesa. Milli Folklor, 2016(111), 180–192.
  35. Van Den Berg, M. (2009). Between the past and the future: Reflections on how to deal with tradition(s). Volkskunde, 110(3–4), 231-252+391.
  36. Vannoy, S. A., & Palvia, P. (2010). The social influence model of technology adoption. Communications of the ACM, 53(6), 149–153. https://doi.org/10.1145/1743546.1743585
  37. Wurarah, R. N., & Mulyanto, M. (2024). Effective government strategies to deal with climate change impacts in the West Papua region: budget optimization for mitigation and adaptation. Jurnal Bina Praja, 16(2), 235–249. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.16.2024.235-249
  38. Zunz, O. (2014). Philanthropy in America: A history. In Philanthropy in America: A History.

Hak Cipta & Lisensi Akses Terbuka

Hak Cipta (c) 2025 Penulis. Artikel ini dilisensikan di bawah CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0.