Beralih ke bagian utama
Artikel Riset Asli Akses Terbuka Terakreditasi SINTA 2

Efek Spillover Kinerja Pembangunan terhadap Kualitas Lingkungan di Sumatera, Indonesia

Peran Demokrasi dan Dampak Negatif Aktivitas Ekonomi

Penulis

  • Raina Linda Sari
  • Arif Rahman * Penulis korespondensi
  • Inggrita Gusti Sari Nasution
  • Irsad Lubis
DOI
10.21787/jbp.16.2024.321-334
Tanggal Terbit & Halaman
30 Agustus 2024 · Hlm. 321-334
Riwayat Naskah
Diterima15 Agu 2024 Terbit30 Agu 2024
Lisensi
CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0
Baca PDF 478 KB Kutip

1.046 Dilihat 624 Diunduh

Abstrak

Isu lingkungan semakin meningkat seiring dengan aktivitas manusia yang merusak ekosistem dan memicu perubahan iklim. Meningkatnya tekanan ini menyebabkan pemusatan perhatian pada pembangunan yang tidak hanya berorientasi ekonomi dan sosial tetapi juga lingkungan. Sejalan dengan semangat WCED tahun 1987, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji dampak langsung dan spillover kinerja pembangunan terhadap kualitas lingkungan di Pulau Sumatera. Observasi dari tahun 2015 sampai dengan 2022. Data yang digunakan adalah data panel yang bersumber dari instansi pemerintah Indonesia. Metode penelitian menggunakan model autoregresi spasial dengan pembobotan satu tetangga terdekat. Sebelumnya telah dilakukan uji ketergantungan cross-section untuk memastikan adanya efek spasial dalam model. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa peningkatan proporsi pekerja berpendidikan tinggi akan meningkatkan kualitas lingkungan di provinsi observasi dan meningkatkan lingkungan di provinsi tetangga terdekat. Demokrasi juga memiliki efek langsung dan spillover positif yang kuat. Peningkatan beban ketergantungan pekerja akan meningkatkan kualitas lingkungan di provinsi observasi, dengan efek spillover yang lemah. Sebaliknya, peningkatan PDRB riil per kapita menurunkan kualitas lingkungan dan mempengaruhi kualitas lingkungan di wilayah tetangga. Empat faktor penentu memiliki pengaruh total yang kuat. Sementara itu, kepadatan penduduk dan pengeluaran daerah tidak memiliki pengaruh yang signifikan. Implikasi dari penelitian ini adalah perlunya intervensi dari pihak berwenang untuk mengubah perspektif terhadap aktivitas ekonomi dan pengeluaran daerah secara keseluruhan sehingga nilai tambah ekonomi tidak mengorbankan lingkungan.

Kata Kunci:

Baca Naskah Lengkap

Isi lengkap artikel ini tersedia dalam format PDF. Versi resmi yang diterbitkan pada Vol 16 No 2 (2024).

Buka PDF

Daftar Pustaka

53 rujukan
  1. Adlin. (2021). Waste Management System in Pekanbaru City: City Government Capability, Issues, and Policy Alternatives. Jurnal Bina Praja, 13(3), 395–406. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.13.2021.395-406
  2. Anam, M. S., Batubara, M. Z., Atem, & Rahmatu, H. P. (2024). Social Inclusion and Empowerment: Developing Local Potential in Bahu Palawa Village of Pulang Pisau Regency of Central Kalimantan Province. Jurnal Bina Praja, 16(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.16.2024.55-68
  3. Anselin, L. (2005). Spatial Regression Analysis in R: A Workbook. Center for Spatially Integrated Social Science.
  4. Anselin, L., & Rey, S. J. (Eds.). (2010). Perspectives on Spatial Data Analysis. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01976-0
  5. Badunenko, O., Galeotti, M., & Hunt, L. C. (2023). Better to Grow or Better to Improve? Measuring Environmental Efficiency in OECD Countries With a Stochastic Environmental Kuznets Frontier (SEKF). Energy Economics, 121, 106644. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENECO.2023.106644
  6. Cleave, E., & Arku, G. (2020). Immigrant Attraction Through Place Branding? Evidence of City-Level Effectiveness From Canada’s London. Cities, 97, 102502. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CITIES.2019.102502
  7. de Jong, M., Chen, Y., Joss, S., Lu, H., Zhao, M., Yang, Q., & Zhang, C. (2018). Explaining City Branding Practices in China’s Three Mega-city Regions: The Role of Ecological Modernization. Journal of Cleaner Production, 179, 527–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2018.01.098
  8. Dordmond, G., de Oliveira, H. C., Silva, I. R., & Swart, J. (2021). The Complexity of Green Job Creation: An Analysis of Green Job Development in Brazil. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(1), 723–746. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10668-020-00605-4
  9. Du, Q., Wu, N., Zhang, F., Lei, Y., & Saeed, A. (2022). Impact of Financial Inclusion and Human Capital on Environmental Quality: Evidence From Emerging Economies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(22), 33033–33045. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11356-021-17945-X
  10. Farzin, Y. H., & Bond, C. A. (2006). Democracy and Environmental Quality. Journal of Development Economics, 81(1), 213–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JDEVECO.2005.04.003
  11. Fatoni, A. (2020). Fiscal Decentralization Dilemma in Indonesia: Between Corruption Accountability and Probability at Local Levels. Jurnal Bina Praja, 12(1), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.12.2020.101-110
  12. Firdaus, M., Irawan, T., Ahmad, F. S., Siregar, H., Siswara, D., & Jakariya, R. (2024). Aplikasi Model Ekonometrika dengan RStudio (Model Time-Series, Panel, Spatial). IPB Press.
  13. Galeotti, M. (2007). Economic Growth and the Quality of the Environment: Taking Stock. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 9(4), 427–454. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10668-006-9030-Y
  14. Galinato, G. I., & Galinato, S. P. (2016). The Effects of Government Spending on Deforestation Due to Agricultural Land Expansion and CO2 Related Emissions. Ecological Economics, 122, 43–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOLECON.2015.10.025
  15. Giroth, L. G. J., Warouw, F. F., Rotty, V. N. J., & Oroh, O. (2021). The Perception of Election Administrators in Achieving Environmentally Friendly Election in North Sulawesi Province. Jurnal Bina Praja, 13(2), 307–317. https://doi.org/10.21787/JBP.13.2021.307-317
  16. Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1991). Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement (3914). https://doi.org/10.3386/W3914
  17. Gujarati, D. N., & Porter, D. C. (2009). Basic Econometrics. McGraw-Hill Irwin.
  18. Herdiansyah, H., Ningrum, Z. B., Fitri, I. S., & Mulyawan, M. (2018). Adaptation Strategy of the Bajo Fishermen towards Climate Change. Jurnal Bina Praja, 10(2), 275–285. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.10.2018.275-285
  19. Ibrahim, A. H. H., Baharuddin, T., & Wance, M. (2023). Developing a Forest City in a New Capital City: A Thematic Analysis of the Indonesian Government’s Plans. Jurnal Bina Praja, 15(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.15.2023.1-13
  20. Ingallina, P. (2019). Ecocity, Knowledge City, Smart City. In Ecocity, Knowledge city, Smart city. Presses universitaires du Septentrion. https://doi.org/10.4000/BOOKS.SEPTENTRION.35851
  21. Islam, A. M., & López, R. E. (2015). Government Spending and Air Pollution in the US. International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, 8(2), 139–189. https://doi.org/10.1561/101.00000068
  22. Juwono, V., & Damara, B. C. (2020). Performance Analysis of Depok City Health Office in Supporting Child-Friendly City. Jurnal Bina Praja, 12(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.12.2020.1-10
  23. Kim, D., & Go, S. (2020). Human Capital and Environmental Sustainability. Sustainability, 12(11), 4736. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12114736
  24. Kim, D.-Y., & Ho, C. in. (2022). Development and Application of the Fengshui Ecocity Indicators. Journal of the Korea Real Estate Management Review, 25(25), 149–178. https://doi.org/10.37642/JKREMR.2022.25.7
  25. King, A., & Shackleton, C. M. (2020). Maintenance of Public and Private Urban Green Infrastructure Provides Significant Employment in Eastern Cape Towns, South Africa. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 54, 126740. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.UFUG.2020.126740
  26. Ma, W., de Jong, M., de Bruijne, M., & Schraven, D. (2020). Economic City Branding and Stakeholder Involvement in China: Attempt of a Medium-Sized City to Trigger Industrial Transformation. Cities, 105, 102754. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CITIES.2020.102754
  27. Mackay, C. M. L., & Schmitt, M. T. (2019). Do People Who Feel Connected to Nature Do More to Protect It? A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 65, 101323. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JENVP.2019.101323
  28. Magriaty, R., Murtilaksono, K., & Anwar, S. (2020). The Impact of Government Policy Regarding Waste Management in Tapin Districts South Kalimantan Province. Jurnal Bina Praja, 12(1), 89–99. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.12.2020.89-99
  29. Manoby, W. M., Siscawati, M., & Dewi, K. H. (2023). Papua Special Autonomy in Engagement With Gender, Generations and Deforestation: Insight From Feminist Political Ecology. Jurnal Bina Praja, 15(2), 431–442. https://doi.org/10.21787/JBP.15.2023.431-442
  30. Mayer, F. S., & Frantz, C. M. P. (2004). The Connectedness to Nature Scale: A Measure of Individuals’ Feeling in Community With Nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(4), 503–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JENVP.2004.10.001
  31. Mihardja, E., Bintoro, B., Saleh, R., & Yusmanizar. (2019). City Branding Strategy and Local Government Readiness. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Sustainable Innovation 2019 – Humanity, Education and Social Sciences (IcoSIHESS 2019), 206–212. https://doi.org/10.2991/ICOSIHESS-19.2019.34
  32. Ministry of Environment and Forestry of the Republic of Indonesia. (2020). Indeks Kualitas Lingkungan Hidup.
  33. Munawaroh, S., & Fajri, M. N. (2023). Regional Branding as an Effort to Promote a Sustainable Environment. Jurnal Bina Praja, 15(1), 73–83. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.15.2023.73-83
  34. Nurdin, M., & Baharuddin, T. (2023). Capacity Building Challenges and Strategies in the Development of New Capital City of Indonesia. Jurnal Bina Praja, 15(2), 221–232. https://doi.org/10.21787/JBP.15.2023.221-232
  35. Perkins, H. E. (2010). Measuring Love and Care for Nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(4), 455–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JENVP.2010.05.004
  36. Renaldi, I., & Frinaldi, A. (2022). Implementation of Batang Arau Watershed Management with Good Environmental Governance Perspective. Jurnal Bina Praja, 14(2), 225–237. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.14.2022.225-237
  37. Rizzati, M. C. Pietro, Florenzio, N., Guastella, G., & Pareglio, S. (2023). Kuznets and the Cities: Urban Level EKC Evidence From Europe. Ecological Indicators, 148, 110143. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOLIND.2023.110143
  38. Schienke, E. W. (2012). “Ecocity China”: An Ethos Under Development. In S. H. Christensen, C. Mitcham, B. Li, & Y. An (Eds.), Engineering, Development and Philosophy: American, Chinese and European Perspectives (Vol. 11, pp. 69–85). Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5282-5_5
  39. Setianingtias, R., Baiquni, M., & Kurniawan, A. (2019). Pemodelan Indikator Tujuan Pembangunan Berkelanjutan di Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Pembangunan, 27(2), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.14203/JEP.27.2.2019.61-74
  40. Shafik, N., & Bandyopadhyay, S. (1992). Economic Growth and Environmental Quality: Time Series and Cross-Country Evidence (904; Policy Research Working Paper Series). The World Bank. https://ideas.repec.org/p/wbk/wbrwps/904.html
  41. Simandjorang, B. M. T. V., Gunawan, F. X. C., Mesa, A. N. L. M., Apriani, T., Pranasari, M. A., Putra, I. R. A. S., & Fitri, S. E. (2022). Environmental Conservation Based on Community Empowerment: Case Study in Toba Caldera UNESCO Global Geopark. Jurnal Bina Praja, 14(3), 517–527. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.14.2022.517-527
  42. Soesanta, P. E., Putra, I. R. A. S., & Hutagalung, O. H. (2023). The Development of a Sustainable Tourism Area for Borobudur Temple as a City Branding Theme for Magelang Regency. Jurnal Bina Praja, 15(1), 111–122. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.15.2023.111-122
  43. Sonn, J. W., & Park, J. (2023). Smart City, Eco City, World City, Creative City, Et Cetera Et Cetera: A Marxian Interpretation of Urban Discourses’ Short Lifecycles. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 47(2), 393–407. https://doi.org/10.1093/CJE/BEAC069
  44. Statistics Indonesia. (2023). Statistical Yearbook of Indonesia 2023. Statistics Indonesia.
  45. Sulistiowati, R., Yulianto, Y., Meiliyana, M., Atika, D. B., & Saputra, D. A. (2023). The Combination of City Branding and Ecocity: A Critical Review of Opportunities and Challenges in Indonesia. Jurnal Bina Praja, 15(1), 43–57. https://doi.org/10.21787/JBP.15.2023.43-57
  46. Taušová, M., Mihaliková, E., ?ulková, K., Stehlíková, B., Tauš, P., Kudelas, D., Štrba, ?., & Domaracká, L. (2020). Analysis of Municipal Waste Development and Management in Self-Governing Regions of Slovakia. Sustainability, 12(14), 5818. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145818
  47. Tooze, A. (2023, November 23). The Climate Emergency Really Is a New Type of Crisis – Consider the ‘Triple Inequality’ at the Heart of It. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/commentisfree/2023/nov/23/climate-emergency-crisis-conference-cop-28
  48. Vorobyov, V. V., & Shilo, O. S. (2021). Eco-Friendly City and Ecological City: Similarities and Differences. Ukrainian Journal of Construction and Architecture, 3(3), 62–72. https://doi.org/10.30838/J.BPSACEA.2312.010721.62.768
  49. Wirawan, S. M. S. (2018). Evaluation of Budget Spending Sustainability of DKI Jakarta Province’s Budget. Jurnal Bina Praja, 10(1), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.10.2018.27-38
  50. Wu, Y., Zong, T., Shuai, C., Liao, S., Jiao, L., & Shen, L. (2022). Does Resource Environment Carrying Capacity Have a Coercive Effect on Urbanization Quality? Evidence From the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 365, 132612. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2022.132612
  51. Xie, P., He, W., An, M., Fan, M., & Dong, X. (2023). Synergy of Ecological Environment Quality and Economic Development at Industrial Park Level. Ecological Indicators, 155, 111027. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOLIND.2023.111027
  52. Yan, C., Li, H., & Li, Z. (2022). Environmental Pollution and Economic Growth: Evidence of SO2 Emissions and GDP in China. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 930780. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPUBH.2022.930780
  53. Zhu, M. (2023). The Role of Human Capital and Environmental Protection on the Sustainable Development Goals: New Evidences From Chinese Economy. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 36(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2113334

Hak Cipta & Lisensi Akses Terbuka

Hak Cipta (c) 2024 Penulis. Artikel ini dilisensikan di bawah CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0.