Beralih ke bagian utama
Artikel Riset Asli Akses Terbuka Terakreditasi SINTA 2

Tata Kelola Multitingkat untuk Inovasi Metropolitan di Indonesia

Menghubungkan Koordinasi Kelembagaan dan Transformasi Digital

Penulis

  • Rachman Kosasih * Penulis korespondensi
  • Mohammad Rizky Luthfiah Aziz
  • Tomy Veryanto Bawulang
DOI
10.21787/jbp.18.2026.3233
Tanggal Terbit & Halaman
31 Agustus 2026 · Hlm. 437-449
Riwayat Naskah
Diterima9 Apr 2026 Terbit31 Agu 2026
Lisensi
CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0
Baca PDF 1,1 MB Kutip

0 Dilihat 0 Diunduh

Abstrak

Inovasi metropolitan semakin bergantung pada koordinasi lintas batas administratif, tetapi kawasan metropolitan di Indonesia masih dikelola melalui institusi yang kewenangan, sumber daya, dan kapasitas digitalnya tersebar di berbagai tingkat pemerintahan. Studi ini mengkaji bagaimana tata kelola multitingkat membentuk inovasi metropolitan melalui koordinasi kelembagaan serta bagaimana transformasi digital dapat memperkuat hubungan tersebut. Kajian pustaka kualitatif terstruktur dilakukan dengan menggunakan artikel ilmiah yang ditelaah sejawat, karya akademik, dan laporan kebijakan mengenai tata kelola multitingkat, tata kelola metropolitan, inovasi sektor publik, transfer pengetahuan, dan transformasi digital. Sumber diidentifikasi melalui kata kunci yang telah ditetapkan, disaring berdasarkan relevansi dan kredibilitas, dikodekan secara tematik, dibandingkan antarsumber, lalu disintesiskan berdasarkan dimensi tata kelola, koordinasi, pengetahuan, digital, dan inovasi. Sintesis mengindikasikan bahwa inovasi metropolitan tidak terutama dibatasi oleh ketersediaan teknologi, melainkan oleh fragmentasi kewenangan, ketidakkonsistenan kebijakan, ketimpangan kapasitas kelembagaan, keterbatasan transfer pengetahuan, dan lemahnya interoperabilitas. Koordinasi kelembagaan muncul sebagai mekanisme penghubung utama: tata kelola multitingkat menetapkan distribusi kewenangan; koordinasi menyelaraskan peran, kebijakan, sumber daya, dan pengetahuan; sedangkan transformasi digital menyediakan infrastruktur untuk berbagi informasi dan mengintegrasikan layanan. Studi ini mengembangkan kerangka terpadu yang menempatkan replikasi inovasi sebagai proses pembelajaran adaptif yang melibatkan transfer pengetahuan, keselarasan kelembagaan, kapasitas tata kelola, implementasi, evaluasi, dan umpan balik. Kerangka tersebut mengimplikasikan bahwa kebijakan metropolitan di Indonesia perlu memprioritaskan koordinasi fungsional, infrastruktur data bersama, penguatan kapasitas adaptif, dan mekanisme untuk memperluas inovasi lintas yurisdiksi.

Kata Kunci:

Baca Naskah Lengkap

Isi lengkap artikel ini tersedia dalam format PDF. Versi resmi yang diterbitkan pada Vol 18 No 2 (2026).

Buka PDF

Daftar Pustaka

35 rujukan
  1. Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032
  2. Artioli, F., & Le Galès, P. (2025). Metropolitan Governance As Organised Anarchy: The Case of the Paris Region. Cities, 158, 105607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.105607
  3. Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
  4. BPS-Statistics Indonesia. (2026, May 29). Indonesia Metropolitan Statistical Areas 2024. BPS-Statistics Indonesia. https://www.bps.go.id/en/publication/2026/05/29/61f2317887bfbf98ce596e5c/indonesia-metropolitan-statistical-areas-2024.html
  5. Cinar, E., Simms, C., & Trott, P. (2023). Collaborative Public Sector Innovation: An Analysis of Italy, Japan, and Turkey. Governance, 36(2), 379–400. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12673
  6. de Vries, H., Bekkers, V., & Tummers, L. (2016). Innovation in the Public Sector: A Systematic Review and Future Research Agenda. Public Administration, 94(1), 146–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12209
  7. Farhan, A. (2023). Inovasi Pelayanan Publik pada Pemerintah Daerah di Indonesia [Public Service Innovations in Indonesia Local Government]. Matra Pembaruan, 7(2), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.21787/mp.7.2.2023.111-123
  8. Firman, T. (2014). Inter-Local-Government Partnership for Urban Management in Decentralizing Indonesia: From Below or Above? Kartamantul (Greater Yogyakarta) and Jabodetabek (Greater Jakarta) Compared. Space and Polity, 18(3), 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562576.2014.959252
  9. Galvin, P. (2019). Local Government, Multilevel Governance, and Cluster-Based Innovation Policy: Economic Cluster Strategies in Canada’s City Regions. Canadian Public Administration, 62(1), 122–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/capa.12314
  10. Hilmawan, R., Aprianti, Y., Yudaruddin, R., Anggraini Bintoro, R. F., Suharsono, Fitrianto, Y., & Wahyuningsih, N. (2023). Public Sector Innovation in Local Government and Its Impact on Development Outcomes: Empirical Evidence in Indonesia. Heliyon, 9(12), e22833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22833
  11. Isik, L. (2025). Innovation Interrupted: The Gap Between Value Creation and Evaluation in the Public Sector. Government Information Quarterly, 42(3), 102035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2025.102035
  12. Kallio, H., Pietilä, A. M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic Methodological Review: Developing a Framework for a Qualitative Semi-structured Interview Guide. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(12), 2954–2965. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13031
  13. Koschatzky, K., & Kroll, H. (2007). Which Side of the Coin? The Regional Governance of Science and Innovation. Regional Studies, 41(8), 1115–1127. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400701530857
  14. Kurniyanta, A., Nuzula, N. F., Fahrudi, A. N. L. I., & Astuti, E. S. (2026). Developing a Model of Innovation Capability and Digital Transformation in Indonesia’s Public Sector: The Role of Leadership and It Governance. Cogent Business & Management, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2026.2637243
  15. Mahpudin. (2022). Inovasi Pelayanan Publik: Pengalaman dari Kota Cilegon, Indonesia [Public Service Innovation: An Explanation From Cilegon City, Indonesia]. Matra Pembaruan, 6(2), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.21787/mp.6.2.2022.107-117
  16. Matkin, D. S. T., & Frederickson, H. G. (2009). Metropolitan Governance: Institutional Roles and Interjurisdictional Cooperation. Journal of Urban Affairs, 31(1), 45–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9906.2008.00428.x
  17. Meijer, A., & Bolívar, M. P. R. (2015). Governing the Smart City: A Review of the Literature on Smart Urban Governance. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(2), 392–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852314564308
  18. Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2019). Defining Digital Transformation: Results From Expert Interviews. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002
  19. Miao, J. T., & Vasconcelos, D. de O. (2026). Who Govern Innovation Districts? A Grounded Investigation Through the Lens of Jurisdictions. Urban Affairs Review, 62(5), 1476–1507. https://doi.org/10.1177/10780874251413124
  20. Mora, L., Gerli, P., Ardito, L., & Messeni Petruzzelli, A. (2023). Smart City Governance From an Innovation Management Perspective: Theoretical Framing, Review of Current Practices, and Future Research Agenda. Technovation, 123, 102717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102717
  21. Moser-Plautz, B., & Schmidthuber, L. (2023). Digital Government Transformation as an Organizational Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic. Government Information Quarterly, 40(3), 101815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2023.101815
  22. Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195092691.001.0001
  23. OECD. (2019). Enhancing Innovation Capacity in City Government. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/f10c96e5-en
  24. O’Sullivan, E., Rassel, G., Berner, M., & Taliaferro, J. (2016). Research Methods for Public Administrators. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315563534
  25. Pittaway, J. J., & Montazemi, A. R. (2020). Know-How to Lead Digital Transformation: The Case of Local Governments. Government Information Quarterly, 37(4), 101474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101474
  26. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.). Simon and Schuster.
  27. Savory, C. (2009). Building Knowledge Translation Capability Into Public-Sector Innovation Processes. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 21(2), 149–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320802625223
  28. Scupola, A., & Mergel, I. (2022). Co-production in Digital Transformation of Public Administration and Public Value Creation: The Case of Denmark. Government Information Quarterly, 39(1), 101650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101650
  29. Sotarauta, M., & Kautonen, M. (2007). Co-evolution of the Finnish National and Local Innovation and Science Arenas: Towards a Dynamic Understanding of Multi-level Governance. Regional Studies, 41(8), 1085–1098. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400701292284
  30. Thabit, S., Degkwitz, T., Fadmastuti, M., & Mora, L. (2026). Decentralisation in Public Sector Data Platforms: A Pathway to Enhancing Public Value? Government Information Quarterly, 43(3), 102149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2026.102149
  31. Torfing, J., Sørensen, E., & Røiseland, A. (2019). Transforming the Public Sector Into an Arena for Co-Creation: Barriers, Drivers, Benefits, and Ways Forward. Administration & Society, 51(5), 795–825. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399716680057
  32. Waheduzzaman, W. (2026). Understanding Post-COVID Public Sector Innovation: A Systematic Review of Concepts, Antecedents, Outcomes, Constraints, and Theoretical Perspectives. Administrative Sciences, 16(2), 88. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci16020088
  33. Wang, Y., Sun, X., Xiong, W., & Onishi, M. (2026). Beyond Technology: Exploring Public Value Creation Mechanisms and Outcomes in Platform-to-Government Data Sharing. Government Information Quarterly, 43(2), 102129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2026.102129
  34. Wardhana, A. F. G., & Huda, N. (2022). Relasi Kewenangan Pemerintah Pusat dan Pemerintah Daerah dalam Penataan Kawasan Metropolitan Jabodetabek-Punjur. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 29(3), 494–515. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol29.iss3.art2
  35. Wijaya, A. F., Lestari, M., Sari, M. K., & Ferdiandinata, R. (2026). Public Sector Innovation in Smart Cities: A Framework of Ambidextrous AI Governance. Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Teknologi Komputer, 11(3), 765–774. https://doi.org/10.33480/jitk.v11i3.7672

Hak Cipta & Lisensi Akses Terbuka

Hak Cipta (c) 2026 Penulis. Artikel ini dilisensikan di bawah CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0.