Beralih ke bagian utama
Artikel Riset Asli Akses Terbuka Terakreditasi SINTA 2

Penguatan Tata Kelola Perkotaan melalui Standardisasi Alamat

Pendekatan Sistem Informasi Transisi di Indonesia

Penulis

  • I Made Andi Darma Kesuma 1* Penulis korespondensi
  • Heri Sutanta 1
  • Wahyu Handoyo 2
  • Pamungkas 2
  • Arief Amrullah 2
DOI
10.21787/jbp.18.2026.3275
Tanggal Terbit & Halaman
3 Agustus 2026 · Hlm. 245-260
Riwayat Naskah
Diterima3 Mei 2026 Disetujui3 Jul 2026 Terbit3 Agu 2026
Lisensi
CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0
Baca PDF 2,4 MB Kutip

450 Dilihat 449 Diunduh

Abstrak

Sistem pengalamatan berbasis naratif yang tidak terstruktur di banyak negara berkembang memfragmentasi pengelolaan data spasial dan menghambat tata kelola perkotaan yang efektif. Meskipun Indonesia telah secara resmi menetapkan standar nasional untuk pengalamatan perkotaan dan pedesaan (SNI 9037:2021), implementasinya masih terbatas, sehingga menghasilkan catatan alamat yang tidak konsisten, tidak tergeocoding, dan tidak interoperabel. Oleh karena itu, penguatan standardisasi alamat sangat penting untuk meningkatkan penyampaian layanan publik, integrasi data spasial, dan interoperabilitas data nasional. Studi ini mengusulkan sistem informasi alamat berbasis web yang dirancang sebagai mekanisme transisi untuk mendukung implementasi bertahap pengalamatan standar tanpa langsung menghilangkan praktik pengalamatan yang tertanam secara lokal. Dengan menggunakan Kecamatan Mantrijeron di Kota Yogyakarta sebagai studi kasus, kami mengembangkan basis data geospasial skema ganda dan mekanisme pencarian hibrida yang menghubungkan alamat berbasis komunitas yang ada dengan format standar. Hasilnya menunjukkan bahwa sistem tersebut memetakan kueri alamat lokal deskriptif ke catatan bangunan yang terstandarisasi dan terreferensi secara spasial. Model sistem ganda transisi memungkinkan pemerintah daerah untuk mempromosikan standardisasi alamat sambil mempertahankan kegunaan operasional selama periode transisi. Evaluasi kegunaan menunjukkan penerimaan pengguna yang kuat di antara pengguna awal, meskipun kesiapan untuk implementasi yang lebih luas masih perlu ditetapkan. Kami menyimpulkan bahwa standardisasi alamat yang efektif dalam konteks negara berkembang dapat memperoleh manfaat dari strategi digital yang adaptif dan inklusif. Alih-alih memaksakan reformasi mendadak dari atas ke bawah, sistem informasi transisi dapat memfasilitasi kepatuhan bertahap terhadap standar nasional sambil memperkuat tata kelola perkotaan dan mendukung kerangka kerja Satu Data Indonesia.

Kata Kunci:

Baca Naskah Lengkap

Isi lengkap artikel ini tersedia dalam format PDF. Versi resmi yang diterbitkan pada Vol 18 No 2 (2026).

Buka PDF

Daftar Pustaka

42 rujukan
  1. Abdul Rahman, M., Aamir Basheer, M., Khalid, Z., Tahir, M., & Uppal, M. (2022). Last Mile Logistics: Impact of Unstructured Addresses on Delivery Times. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XLVIII-4/W5-2022, 3–8. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-W5-2022-3-2022
  2. Aldhi, I. F., Suhariadi, F., Rahmawati, E., Supriharyanti, E., Hardaningtyas, D., Sugiarti, R., & Abbas, A. (2025). Bridging Digital Gaps in Smart City Governance: The Mediating Role of Managerial Digital Readiness and the Moderating Role of Digital Leadership. Smart Cities, 8(4), 117. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities8040117
  3. Aprinia, P. R. M., & Sutanta, H. (2024). Survei dan Pembuatan Sistem Informasi Geografis Alamat Berkode Lokasi (Geocoded Address) untuk Wilayah Kalurahan Mantrijeron, Kota Yogyakarta. Journal of Geospatial Information Science and Engineering, 7(2), 208–217. https://doi.org/10.22146/jgise.102071
  4. Balaji, S., & Murugaiyan, M. S. (2012). Waterfall Vs V-Model Vs Agile: A Comparative Study on SDLC. International Journal of Information Technology and Business Management, 2(1), 26–30.
  5. Budiantoro, R. A., Aji, M. R. W., Prayogi, J., & Susanti, A. (2023). SI Desa (Sistem Informasi Desa): Initiation of an Integrated Village Economic Information System and Data Management by the Provincial Government of East Java. Jurnal Bina Praja, 15(2), 233–247. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.15.2023.233-247
  6. Bui, H.-N., & Tran, V.-T. (2019). A Novel Conditional Random Fields Aided Fuzzy Matching in Vietnamese Address Standardization. Proceedings of the Tenth International Symposium on Information and Communication Technology - SoICT 2019, 23–28. https://doi.org/10.1145/3368926.3369687
  7. Choi, J., & Lee, J. (2018). Redefining Korean Road Name Address System to Implement the Street-Based Address System. Journal of the Korean Society of Surveying, Geodesy, Photogrammetry and Cartography, 36(5), 381–394. https://doi.org/10.7848/ksgpc.2018.36.5.381
  8. Christen, P., Churches, T., & Willmore, A. (2004). A Probabilistic Geocoding System Based on a National Address File. Proceedings 3rd Australasian Data Mining Conference, 280. http://hdl.handle.net/1885/77414
  9. Cortes, T. R., Silveira, I. H. da, & Junger, W. L. (2021). Improving Geocoding Matching Rates of Structured Addresses in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 37(7). https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311x00039321
  10. Dewa, D. D., Buchori, I., Rudiarto, I., & Sejati, A. W. (2025). Spatiotemporal Variations of Urban Expansion and its Relation with Geomorphological Complexity: a Case Study of the Yogyakarta Urban Region, Indonesia. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy, 18(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-024-09629-z
  11. Distor, C. B., & Khaltar, O. (2022). What Motivates Local Governments to Be Efficient? Evidence from Philippine Cities. Sustainability, 14(15), 9426. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159426
  12. Dumedah, G. (2021). Address Points of Landmarks and Paratransit Services as a Credible Reference Database for Geocoding. Transactions in GIS, 25(2), 1027–1048. https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.12716
  13. Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., & Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive Governance of Social-Ecological Systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30(1), 441–473. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511
  14. Guermazi, Y., Sellami, S., & Boucelma, O. (2022). A RoBERTa Based Approach for Address Validation. In S. Chiusano, T. Cerquitelli, R. Wrembel, K. Nørvåg, B. Catania, G. Vargas-Solar, & E. Zumpano (Eds.), New Trends in Database and Information Systems (pp. 157–166). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15743-1_15
  15. Gutiérrez-Mora, D., & Oto-Peralías, D. (2022). Gendered Cities: Studying Urban Gender Bias Through Street Names. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 49(6), 1792–1809. https://doi.org/10.1177/23998083211068844
  16. Hughes, T. P., Pinch, T. J., & Bijker, W. E. (Eds.). (1987). The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. MIT Press.
  17. Jahani Chehrehbargh, F., Rajabifard, A., Atazadeh, B., & Steudler, D. (2024). Current Challenges and Strategic Directions for Land Administration System Modernisation in Indonesia. Journal of Spatial Science, 69(4), 1097–1129. https://doi.org/10.1080/14498596.2024.2360531
  18. Jasanoff, S. (Ed.). (2004). States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and the Social Order. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203413845
  19. Javidaneh, A., Karimipour, F., & Alinaghi, N. (2020). How Much Do We Learn from Addresses? On the Syntax, Semantics and Pragmatics of Addressing Systems. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 9(5), 317. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9050317
  20. Jiang, H. (2021). Smart Urban Governance in the ‘Smart’ Era: Why Is It Urgently Needed? Cities, 111, 103004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.103004
  21. Kesuma, I. M. A. D., & Sutanta, H. (2025). Pembuatan Sistem Informasi Alamat Existing dan Sesuai Standar di Kemantren Mantrijeron Kota Yogyakarta [Development of an Existing and Standard-Compliant Address Information System in Mantrijeron Subdistrict, Yogyakarta City] [Master’s Thesis, Universitas Gadjah Mada]. https://etd.repository.ugm.ac.id/penelitian/detail/269768
  22. Kipkemoi, I., & Ngare, I. O. (2025). Transforming Kenya’s Addressing Landscape: Use Case Models Approach to a Responsive National Addressing System. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2025.1411904
  23. Klaus, C. A., Henry, K. A., & Il’yasova, D. (2023). Capturing Emergency Dispatch Address Points As Geocoding Candidates to Quantify Delimited Confidence in Residential Geolocation. International Journal of Health Geographics, 22(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12942-023-00347-2
  24. Malaainine, M. E. I., & Lechgar, H. (2021). Urban Addressing Practices and Geocoding Algorithm Validity in Developing Countries. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2021.0120269
  25. Mislawaty, S. E., Harahap, R., & Anisyah, S. (2022). Digitalizing Governance in South Sumatera: An Introduction “E-Sumsel” System Reforming Public Service Management. Jurnal Bina Praja, 14(3), 399–411. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.14.2022.399-411
  26. Monir, N., Rasam, A. R. A., Ghazali, R., Suhandri, H. F., & Cahyono, A. (2021). Address Geocoding Services in Geospatial-based Epidemiological Analysis: A Comparative Reliability for Domestic Disease Mapping. International Journal of Geoinformatics, 17(5), 156–166. https://doi.org/10.52939/ijg.v17i5.2029
  27. Mustika Rani, B., & Malau, G. C. (2025). Analysis of Smart Urban Governance From the Perspective of Dynamic Governance in the City of Surabaya. Jurnal Administrasi Negara, 31(2), 146–163. https://doi.org/10.33509/jan.v31i2.3782
  28. Pargaonkar, S. (2023). A Comprehensive Research Analysis of Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) Agile & Waterfall Model Advantages, Disadvantages, and Application Suitability in Software Quality Engineering. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 13(8), 120–124. https://doi.org/10.29322/IJSRP.13.08.2023.p14015
  29. Pierre, J. (1999). Models of Urban Governance. Urban Affairs Review, 34(3), 372–396. https://doi.org/10.1177/10780879922183988
  30. Quesenbery, W. (2004, January 31). Balancing the 5Es of Usability. Cutter Consortium. https://www.cutter.com/article/balancing-5es-usability-409241
  31. Rachmat, D. F., Mulyadi, D., Abdullah, S., Putrianti, S. D., & Nurliawati, R. (2024). Analysis of the Governance of One Data Indonesia (SDI) at the Communication and Information Office of Sukabumi City. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Administrative Science (ICAS 2022), 42–60. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-104-3_6
  32. Ragunath, P. K., Velmourougan, S., Davachelvan, P., Kayalvizhi, S., & Ravimohan, R. (2010). Evolving a New Model (SDLC Model-2010) for Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC). International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 10(1), 119.
  33. Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996). The New Governance: Governing without Government. Political Studies, 44(4), 652–667. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb01747.x
  34. Rose-Redwood, R., Rose-Redwood, C., Alderman, D. H., & Hackett, K. (2024). The Making of the Campus Namescape: A Comparison of University Naming Policies in Canada and the United States. The Professional Geographer, 76(3), 277–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2024.2308622
  35. Sadewo, P. A., & Sutanta, H. (2021). Pembuatan Alamat yang Memiliki Kode Lokasi (Geocoded Address) untuk Desa Karangsari, Kabupaten Kulon Progo [Development of Geocoded Addresses for Karangsari Village, Kulon Progo Regency] [Undergraduate Thesis, Universitas Gadjah Mada]. https://etd.repository.ugm.ac.id/penelitian/detail/201483
  36. Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach (7th ed.). Wiley.
  37. Song, K., Chen, Y., Duan, Y., & Zheng, Y. (2023). Urban Governance: A Review of Intellectual Structure and Topic Evolution. Urban Governance, 3(3), 169–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ugj.2023.06.001
  38. Sutanta, H., Chintya, N. P. P., Atunggal, D., Diyono, Mustofa, M. F., & Siswosudarma, S. (2022). Tipologi Alamat di Perkotaan dan Perdesaan Indonesia dalam Proses Standardisasi Pengalamatan. Majalah Geografi Indonesia, 36(1), 32–40. https://doi.org/10.22146/mgi.68348
  39. Sutanta, H., Chintya, N. P. P., Laksono, D., & Atunggal, D. (2023). Developing Address Model and Geocoding Framework for Urban Area in Indonesia. In T. Aditya K. M., B. K. Cahyono, & R. Fitria (Eds.), Proceeding of South East Asia Workshop on Geodetic Data Sciences, Geoinformatics and Land Administration (Geo-Land-Sea) 2023. Gadjah Mada University Press.
  40. Sutanta, H., Chintya, N. P. P., Suprajaka, Widada, A., Diyono, Mustofa, F., Atunggal, D., Widowati, D. A., Nugraheni, M. E., & Kusumawardhani, R. (2020). Standardisasi Alamat di Indonesia: Kondisi, Urgensi, dan Tantangannya. Seminar Nasional Geomatika 2020: Informasi Geospasial untuk Inovasi Percepatan Pembangunan Berkelanjutan, 840. https://doi.org/10.24895/SNG.2020.0-0.1198
  41. Sutanta, H., Chintya, N. P. P., & Syarafina, Z. (2016). Issues and Challenges in Developing Geocoded Address in Indonesia. Advances of Science and Technology for Society: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Science and Technology 2015 (ICST-2015), 070010. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4958505
  42. Tong, Q., & Qiu, F. (2020). Population Growth and Land Development: Investigating the Bi-directional Interactions. Ecological Economics, 169, 106505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106505

Hak Cipta & Lisensi Akses Terbuka

Hak Cipta (c) 2026 Penulis. Artikel ini dilisensikan di bawah CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0.