Beralih ke bagian utama
Artikel Riset Asli Akses Terbuka Terakreditasi SINTA 2

Mengintegrasikan Budaya Lokal dalam Kota Cerdas

Kolaborasi Tata Kelola Berbasis ‘Sombere’ di Kota Makassar, Indonesia

DOI
10.21787/jbp.16.2024.541-556
Tanggal Terbit & Halaman
31 Desember 2024 · Hlm. 541-556
Riwayat Naskah
Diterima13 Nov 2024 Terbit31 Des 2024

1.154 Dilihat 1.070 Diunduh

Abstrak

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji integrasi budaya lokal dalam kota pintar. Kebaruan penelitian ini memperkenalkan konsep Kota Pintar Terintegrasi Budaya, yang menekankan pentingnya mengintegrasikan kerangka teknologi Kota Pintar dengan nilai-nilai budaya lokal sehingga pengembangan kota pintar menjadi lebih inklusif, berkelanjutan, dan berakar pada kearifan lokal. Penelitian ini menggunakan deskriptif kualitatif. Sumber data utama dalam penelitian ini diperoleh dari informan. Informan awal dipilih secara sengaja: orang-orang yang memahami masalah dalam tata kelola kolaboratif dan kota pintar. Penelitian ini menemukan bahwa komunikasi yang efektif melalui dialog tatap muka dalam perencanaan pembangunan memberikan ruang bagi masyarakat untuk menyampaikan aspirasi, yang menjadi bagian dari kebijakan pemerintah. Selain itu, membangun kepercayaan antara pemerintah dan masyarakat terbukti penting dalam mengelola inisiatif Kota Pintar, terutama dalam mengembangkan infrastruktur teknologi seperti sistem pengawasan CCTV dan program revitalisasi gang wisata. Komitmen pemerintah daerah, sektor swasta, dan partisipasi aktif masyarakat dalam setiap tahapan implementasi Kota Pintar berbasis Sombere di Makassar mencerminkan kolaborasi yang solid berdasarkan nilai-nilai budaya lokal. Keterbatasan penelitian ini menekankan pada aspek kolaborasi dan integrasi budaya dalam Smart City namun belum membahas secara mendalam aspek teknis dan ekonomi yang turut mempengaruhi keberlanjutan Smart City.

Baca Naskah Lengkap

Isi lengkap artikel ini tersedia dalam format PDF. Versi resmi yang diterbitkan pada Vol 16 No 3 (2024).

Buka PDF

Daftar Pustaka

38 rujukan
  1. Abramson, A. J. (2013). Book Review: Collaborative Governance: Private Roles for Public Goals in Turbulent Times. The American Review of Public Administration, 43(4), 493–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074013484792
  2. Allam, Z., & Newman, P. (2018). Redefining the Smart City: Culture, Metabolism and Governance. Smart Cities, 1(1), 4–25. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities1010002
  3. Amir, M. A. (2022). Implementasi Smart City dalam Kinerja Quick Response Pelayanan Kesehatan Berdasarkan Persepsi Masyarakat di Kota Makassar [Thesis, Universitas Hasanuddin]. https://repository.unhas.ac.id/id/eprint/18634/
  4. Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2007). Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032
  5. Arnstein, S. R. (2019). A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 85(1), 24–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2018.1559388
  6. Bachmann, R., & Zaheer, A. (Eds.). (2013). Handbook of Advances in Trust Research. Edward Elgar Publishing.
  7. Balfaqih, M., & Alharbi, S. A. (2022). Associated Information and Communication Technologies Challenges of Smart City Development. Sustainability, 14(23), 16240. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142316240
  8. Bawany, N. Z., Karachi, S., Jawwad, P., & Shamsi, A. (2015). Smart City Architecture: Vision and Challenges. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 6(11). https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2015.061132
  9. Bovaird, T. (2007). Beyond Engagement and Participation: User and Community Coproduction of Public Services. Public Administration Review, 67(5), 846–860. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00773.x
  10. Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
  11. Cornwall, A., & Gaventa, J. (2001). From Users and Choosers to Makers and Shapers: Repositioning Participation in Social Policy. Institute of Development Studies.
  12. Cypress, B. S. (2017). Rigor or Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research: Perspectives, Strategies, Reconceptualization, and Recommendations. Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing, 36(4), 253–263. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCC.0000000000000253
  13. Donahue, J. D., & Zeckhauser, R. J. (2011). Collaboration for Productivity. In Collaborative Governance: Private Roles for Public Goals in Turbulent Times (pp. 63–103). Princeton University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt7spt3.7
  14. Emerson, K., & Nabatchi, T. (2015). Collaborative Governance and Collaborative Governance Regimes. In Collaborative Governance Regimes (pp. 14–36). Georgetown University Press.
  15. Fung, A. (2006). Varieties of Participation in Complex Governance. Public Administration Review, 66(SUPPL. 1), 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00667.x
  16. Fung, A., & Wright, E. O. (2001). Deepening Democracy: Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance. Politics & Society, 29(1), 5–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329201029001002
  17. Giffinger, R., Fertner, C., Kramar, H., Kalasek, R., Pichler-Milanovi?, N., & Meijers, E. (2007). Smart Cities – Ranking of European Medium-Sized Cities.
  18. Gracias, J. S., Parnell, G. S., Specking, E., Pohl, E. A., & Buchanan, R. (2023). Smart Cities—A Structured Literature Review. Smart Cities, 6(4), 1719–1743. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities6040080
  19. Graham, S., & Marvin, S. (2002). Splintering Urbanism?: Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities and the Urban Condition. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203452202
  20. Huxham, C., & Vangen, S. (2013). Managing to Collaborate: The Theory and Practice of Collaborative Advantage. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203010167
  21. Kallio, H., Pietilä, A. M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic Methodological Review: Developing a Framework for a Qualitative Semi-structured Interview Guide. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(12), 2954–2965. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13031
  22. Komninos, N. (2011). Intelligent Cities: Variable Geometries of Spatial Intelligence. Intelligent Buildings International, 3(3), 172–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508975.2011.579339
  23. Lende, P., & Ambadkar, S. (2024). Factors Affecting the Consideration of Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) for Smart City Projects in Indore City. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 11(5), 138–147. https://doi.org/10.14445/23488352/IJCE-V11I5P114
  24. Meijer, A., & Bolívar, M. P. R. (2015). Governing the Smart City: A Review of the Literature on Smart Urban Governance. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(2), 392–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852314564308
  25. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. SAGE.
  26. Naderifar, M., Goli, H., & Ghaljaie, F. (2017). Snowball Sampling: A Purposeful Method of Sampling in Qualitative Research. Strides in Development of Medical Education, 14(3), 67670. https://doi.org/10.5812/sdme.67670
  27. Nam, T., & Pardo, T. A. (2011). Smart City As Urban Innovation: Focusing on Management, Policy, and Context. ICEGOV ’11: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, 185–194. https://doi.org/10.1145/2072069.2072100
  28. Negara, E. S. (2021). Smart Goverment. PPP-UBD Press.
  29. Ostrom, E. (2010). Polycentric Systems for Coping With Collective Action and Global Environmental Change. Global Environmental Change, 20(4), 550–557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.004
  30. Pianezzi, D., Mori, Y., & Uddin, S. (2023). Public–Private Partnership in a Smart City: A Curious Case in Japan. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 89(3), 632–647. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523211051839
  31. Purdy, J. M. (2012). A Framework for Assessing Power in Collaborative Governance Processes. Public Administration Review, 72(3), 409–417. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02525.x
  32. Rachmawati, R., Sari, A. D., Sukawan, H. A. R., Widhyastana, I. M. A., & Ghiffari, R. A. (2021). The Use of ICT-Based Applications to Support the Implementation of Smart Cities During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Indonesia. Infrastructures, 6(9), 119. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures6090119
  33. Siyoto, S., & Sodik, M. A. (2015). Dasar Metodologi Penelitian. Literasi Media Publishing.
  34. Triyanto, D., Warsono, H., & Herawati, A. R. (2022). A Study Collaborative Governance in Bengkulu City, Indonesia. Journal of Madani Society, 1(1), 59–63. https://doi.org/10.56225/jmsc.v1i1.128
  35. Utami, A. T., Adianto, & Mayarni. (2022). Collaborative Governance Process in Supporting Smart Living in Pekanbaru City. Publica: Jurnal Pemikiran Administrasi Negara, 14(2), 215–233. https://doi.org/10.15575/jpan.v14i2.21371
  36. Wahyudi, A. A., Widowati, Y. R., & Nugroho, A. A. (2022). Strategi Implementasi Smart City Kota Bandung. Good Governance, 18(1), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.32834/gg.v18i1.460
  37. Wahyuni, S., Alwi, & Indar, N. I. N. (2021). Strategi Implementasi Smart Governance di Kota Makassar (Studi Kasus pada Program Rindu Capil Dinas Kependudukan dan Catatan Sipil). Kolaborasi: Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.26618/kjap.v7i3.6175
  38. Wismabrata, M. H. (2022, January 18). Sejumlah Daerah Ini Sudah Terapkan Konsep “Smart City”, Mana Saja? Kompas.Com. https://regional.kompas.com/read/2022/01/18/151110978/sejumlah-daerah-ini-sudah-terapkan-konsep-smart-city-mana-saja?page=all

Hak Cipta & Lisensi Akses Terbuka

Hak Cipta (c) 2024 Penulis. Artikel ini dilisensikan di bawah CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0.