Beralih ke bagian utama
Artikel Riset Asli Akses Terbuka Terakreditasi SINTA 2

Akses Air Minum Layak

Apakah Transfer Spesifik dan Tata Kelola itu Penting?

Penulis

  • Yossi Martino * Penulis korespondensi
  • Riatu Mariatul Qibthiyyah
  • Jurusan Ekonomi, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia
  • *Penulis korespondensi
DOI
10.21787/jbp.16.2024.279-290
Tanggal Terbit & Halaman
30 Agustus 2024 · Hlm. 279-290
Riwayat Naskah
Diterima26 Jun 2024 Terbit30 Agu 2024
Lisensi
CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0
Baca PDF 234 KB Kutip

1.650 Dilihat 1.424 Diunduh

Abstrak

Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Nasional Tahun 2020-2024 menargetkan akses air minum layak bagi 100% penduduk. Namun, menurut Badan Pusat Statistik, rata-rata penduduk yang memiliki akses air minum layak masih berada di angka 92% pada tahun 2022. Pencapaian target tersebut sulit dilakukan tanpa memperhatikan kebijakan dan tata kelola transfer fiskal. Penelitian ini mengkaji keterkaitan antara transfer fiskal dan tata kelola pemerintahan yang baik terhadap akses air minum layak di setiap kabupaten/kota di Indonesia dengan menggunakan data Survei Sosial Ekonomi, Badan Pusat Statistik, Kementerian Keuangan, dan Kementerian Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi tahun 2019-2022. Hasil regresi data panel dengan menggunakan model efek tetap menunjukkan bahwa hibah modal tujuan khusus untuk air minum dan tata kelola pemerintahan yang baik secara signifikan berdampak positif terhadap akses air minum layak. Hasil ini menunjukkan bahwa hibah modal tujuan khusus masih memegang peranan penting dalam penyediaan akses air minum layak. Sementara itu, tata kelola pemerintahan yang baik juga menjadi faktor kunci dalam memperoleh capaian optimal dalam penyediaan air minum layak. Di wilayah barat Indonesia, tata kelola pemerintahan yang baik dan tata kelola pemerintahan yang buruk memiliki dampak yang lebih kuat terhadap akses terhadap air minum yang aman sedangkan hibah modal tujuan khusus di wilayah timur memiliki dampak yang lebih besar.

Kata Kunci:

Baca Naskah Lengkap

Isi lengkap artikel ini tersedia dalam format PDF. Versi resmi yang diterbitkan pada Vol 16 No 2 (2024).

Buka PDF

Daftar Pustaka

35 rujukan
  1. Abubakar, I. R. (2018). Exploring the Determinants of Open Defecation in Nigeria Using Demographic and Health Survey Data. Science of The Total Environment, 637–638, 1455–1465. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2018.05.104
  2. Afonso, A., Schuknecht, L., & Tanzi, V. (2010). Public Sector Efficiency: Evidence for New EU Member States and Emerging Markets. Applied Economics, 42(17), 2147–2164. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840701765460
  3. Armah, F. A., Ekumah, B., Yawson, D. O., Odoi, J. O., Afitiri, A. R., & Nyieku, F. E. (2018). Access to Improved Water and Sanitation in Sub-Saharan Africa in a Quarter Century. Heliyon, 4(11), e00931. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HELIYON.2018.E00931
  4. Aryani, Y. A., Gantyowati, E., Nurrahmawati, A., Arifin, T., & Sutaryo, S. (2023). Determinants of Local Government Public Service Quality: Evidence From the Developing Economy. Journal of Governance and Regulation, 12(1 (Special Issue)), 229. https://doi.org/10.22495/JGRV12I1SIART2
  5. Binh, N. T., & Giai, N. Q. (2022). Transparency in Local Government in Vietnam. Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubice, 30(2). https://doi.org/10.46585/SP30021564
  6. De Carvalho, S. C. P., Carden, K. J., & Armitage, N. P. (2009). Application of a Sustainability Index for Integrated Urban Water Management in Southern African Cities: Case Study Comparison – Maputo and Hermanus. Water SA, 35(2), 144–151. https://doi.org/10.4314/WSA.V35I2.76727
  7. Ezeh, O. K., Agho, K. E., Dibley, M. J., Hall, J., & Page, A. N. (2014). The Impact of Water and Sanitation on Childhood Mortality in Nigeria: Evidence from Demographic and Health Surveys, 2003–2013. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 11(9), 9256–9272. https://doi.org/10.3390/IJERPH110909256
  8. Gisselquist, R. M. (2012). Good Governance as a Concept, and Why This Matters for Development Policy (30). https://www.wider.unu.edu/publication/good-governance-concept-and-why-matters-development-policy
  9. Greene, W. H. (2012). Econometric Analysis (7th ed.). Prentice Hall.
  10. Ihwandi, L. R., & Khoirunurrofik, K. (2023). Regional Financial Performance and Inclusive Economic Development: Empirical Evidence From Provinces in Indonesia. Jurnal Bina Praja, 15(2), 417–429. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.15.2023.417-429
  11. Juanda, B., & Handra, H. (2017). Reformasi Mekanisme Dana Alokasi Khusus (DAK) untuk Mendorong Pertumbuhan dan Pemerataan Pembangunan di Indonesia (2; Seri Kertas Kerja KOMPAK).
  12. Kumah, S., & Brazys, S. (2016). Democracy or Accountability? Governance and Social Spending in Africa. The Journal of Development Studies, 52(2), 286–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2015.1087513
  13. Lewis, B. D. (2014). Indonesian Intergovernmental Performance Grants: An Empirical Assessment of Impact. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 50(3), 415–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2014.980378
  14. Lewis, B. D. (2017). Local Government Spending and Service Delivery in Indonesia: The Perverse Effects of Substantial Fiscal Resources. Regional Studies, 51(11), 1695–1707. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1216957
  15. Mehta, M., Fugelsnes, T., & Virjee, K. (2005). Financing the Millennium Development Goals for Water and Sanitation: What Will it Take? International Journal of Water Resources Development, 21(2), 239–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/07900620500108445
  16. Oates, W. E. (1972). Fiscal Federalism. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
  17. Pinilla-Rodríguez, D. E., & Torres-Sánchez, Y. A. (2019). Gasto público social, el acceso al agua potable y el saneamiento de las poblaciones rurales en América Latina. Problemas de Desarrollo, 50(196), 55–81. https://doi.org/10.22201/IIEC.20078951E.2019.196.63499
  18. Prabowo, H. (2019). Influence of Implementation of Development and Supervision Policy to the Effectiveness of Regional Autonomy in Indonesia. Jurnal Bina Praja, 11(1), 63–73. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.11.2019.63-73
  19. Pradana, A. C. T., & Mun’im, A. (2022). The Effect of Local Revenue and Balancing Funds on the Economy of Bali Province in 2012-2019. Jurnal Bina Praja, 14(3), 439–451. https://doi.org/10.21787/JBP.14.2022.439-451
  20. Purba, S. F., Permatasari, C., Mudrawan, I., & Simandjorang, B. M. T. V. (2023). The Impact of Fiscal Balance Funds Toward Human Development in Riau Province. Jurnal Bina Praja, 15(2), 275–288. https://doi.org/10.21787/JBP.15.2023.275-288
  21. Rajkumar, A. S., & Swaroop, V. (2008). Public Spending and Outcomes: Does Governance Matter? Journal of Development Economics, 86(1), 96–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JDEVECO.2007.08.003
  22. Rizki, T., & Kurniawan, S. (2023). Public Service Performance: An Influence of Female Leadership and Good Governance. Jurnal Bina Praja, 15(3), 443–452. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.15.2023.443-452
  23. Sandjaja, F. R., Nafisa, F., & Manurung, I. N. (2020). The Impact of Fiscal Decentralization on Welfare in Selected Provinces in Indonesia. Jurnal Bina Praja, 12(1), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.12.2020.21-31
  24. Saputra, N. A. A., & Setiawan, D. (2021). Fiscal Decentralization, Accountability and Corruption Indication: Evidence from Indonesia. Jurnal Bina Praja, 13(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.13.2021.29-40
  25. Sastra Wijaya, K. A. (2024). Innovative Governance in Public Services Management Through the Jakarta Kini Application in DKI Jakarta Province. Jurnal Bina Praja, 16(1), 157–169. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.16.2024.157-169
  26. Simanjuntak, K. (2015). Implementasi Kebijakan Desentralisasi Pemerintahan di Indonesia. Jurnal Bina Praja, 07(02), 111–130. https://doi.org/10.21787/JBP.07.2015.111-130
  27. Sow, M., & Razafimahefa, I. (2015). Fiscal Decentralization and the Efficiency of Public Service Delivery (IMF Working Papers). International Monetary Fund (IMF). https://doi.org/10.5089/9781484351116.001
  28. Sudarsono, R. A., & Nurkholis. (2020). Pendanaan dalam Pencapaian Akses Universal Air Minum di Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Pembangunan Indonesia, 20(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.21002/jepi.2020.01
  29. Triesmarandita, A. Y., Suman, A., & Ekawaty, M. (2022). Determinants of Drinking Water Supply in Indonesia. Journal of International Conference Proceedings, 5(2), 84–95. https://doi.org/10.32535/JICP.V5I2.1673
  30. UNICEF, & World Health Organization. (2015). Progress on Sanitation and Drinking Water – 2015 Update and MDG Assessment. UNICEF and World Health Organization.
  31. van Ginneken, M., Netterstrom, U., & Bennett, A. (2011). More, Better, or Different Spending? Trends in Public Expenditure on Water and Sanitation in Sub-Saharan Africa. World Bank. https://hdl.handle.net/10986/17224
  32. Widodo, B. T. (2019). Evaluasi Dinamis Dampak Fiskal Otonomi Khusus terhadap Efisiensi Layanan Publik Dan Pertumbuhan Ekonomi di Provinsi Papua, Papua Barat dan Aceh Tahun 2011-2017. KEK (Kajian Ekonomi Dan Keuangan), 3(1), 31–53. https://doi.org/10.31685/KEK.V3I1.463
  33. Widowati, L., Setyowati, K., & Suharto, D. G. (2023). Dynamic Governance As Perspective in Indonesian Bureaucracy Reform: Qualitative Analysis of Indonesian Bureaucracy Reform Based on Dynamic Governance. Jurnal Bina Praja, 15(2), 403–415. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.15.2023.403-415
  34. World Bank. (2003). World Development Report 2004: Making Services Work for Poor People. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/0-8213-5468-X
  35. World Health Organization, & UNICEF. (2013). Progress on Sanitation and Drinking-Water – 2013 Update. World Health Organization and UNICEF.

Hak Cipta & Lisensi Akses Terbuka

Hak Cipta (c) 2024 Penulis. Artikel ini dilisensikan di bawah CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0.