Beralih ke bagian utama
Artikel Riset Asli Akses Terbuka Terakreditasi SINTA 2

Digitalisasi dan Inovasi Proses Layanan

Upaya Peningkatan Kualitas Layanan Pendidikan Tinggi di Pulau Kalimantan

DOI
10.21787/jbp.16.2024.69-81
Tanggal Terbit & Halaman
30 April 2024 · Hlm. 69-81
Riwayat Naskah
Diterima18 Feb 2024 Disetujui29 Apr 2024 Terbit30 Apr 2024

1.399 Dilihat 1.018 Diunduh

Abstrak

Pelayanan publik yang mengimplementasikan asasnya merupakan amanat Undang-Undang. Digitalisasi dan inovasi proses layanan menjadi suatu keharusan pada era digital saat ini. Masih banyaknya laporan masyarakat atas layanan digital secara umum dan masih banyaknya perguruan tinggi swasta di Kalimantan memiliki akreditasi kategori C/Baik/Tidak Terakreditasi menandakan proses digitalisasi dan inovasi layanan pada layanan pendidikan tinggi di Kalimantan mempunyai tantangan yang tidak mudah. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengungkap bagaimana upaya Lembaga Layanan Pendidikan Tinggi (LLDIKTI) Wilayah XI dalam meningkatkan kualitas layanan pendidikan tinggi di Pulau Kalimantan serta untuk mengetahui faktor keberhasilan dan faktor penghambat pada upaya ini. Metode pada penelitian ini adalah kualitatif dengan interview atau wawancara dan observasi sebagai data primer, sedangkan data sekunder menggunakan dokumentasi, dan studi literatur. Teknis analisis data menggunakan triangulasi dengan tahap pengumpulan data, reduksi, penyajian, dan verifikasi. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa 1) Terdapat 5 inovasi digitalisasi layanan yang diperuntukkan untuk stakeholder atau pengguna layanan yang terus dikembangkan untuk mengakomodir seluruh jenis layanan pada sesuai dengan standar pelayanan, 2) Inovasi proses layanan yang dilakukan dengan mengubah alur proses pada standar pelayanan dari 12,4 hari menjadi 7,5 hari, 3) Faktor pendukung yang menjadi utama yakni digital leadership dan sumber daya manusia, 4) Faktor penghambat yang menjadi utama yakni komitmen dan literasi digital. Hal ini menunjukkan bahwa diperlukan suatu upaya yang harus didukung semua aspek pada sebuah organisasi untuk menjalankan digitalisasi dan inovasi layanan yang berkelanjutan.

Baca Naskah Lengkap

Isi lengkap artikel ini tersedia dalam format PDF. Versi resmi yang diterbitkan pada Vol 16 No 1 (2024).

Buka PDF

Daftar Pustaka

45 rujukan
  1. Agarwal, R., Selen, W., Roos, G., & Green, R. (Eds.). (2015). The Handbook of Service Innovation. Springer London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6590-3
  2. Alenezi, M. (2021). Deep Dive into Digital Transformation in Higher Education Institutions. Education Sciences, 11(12), 770. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11120770
  3. Altukhova, N., Vasileva, E., & Mirzoyan, M. (2018). Competence-Based Approach to Managing Staff in Public Administration on the Basis of Ontologies. Business Informatics, 2018(1), 17–27. https://doi.org/10.17323/1998-0663.2018.1.17.27
  4. Anggraini, Y., & Rahayuningsih, Y. (2021). The Quality of Public Services on One Roof System (SAMSAT) of Banten Province. Jurnal Bina Praja, 13(3), 485–500. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.13.2021.485-500
  5. Araujo, L. M. de, Priadana, S., Paramarta, V., & Sunarsi, D. (2021). Digital Leadership in Business Organizations. International Journal of Educational Administration, Management, and Leadership, 5–16. https://doi.org/10.51629/ijeamal.v2i1.18
  6. Avni, E., & Rotem, A. (2019). Digital Competence. In Journalism and Ethics (pp. 288–317). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-8359-2.ch018
  7. Chandra, T., Chandra, S., & Hafni, L. (2020). Service Quality, Consumer Satisfaction, dan Consumer Loyalty: Tinjauan Teoritis. CV IRDH.
  8. Cortellazzo, L., Bruni, E., & Zampieri, R. (2019). The Role of Leadership in a Digitalized World: A Review. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01938
  9. Edelmann, N., Mergel, I., & Lampoltshammer, T. (2023). Competences That Foster Digital Transformation of Public Administrations: An Austrian Case Study. Administrative Sciences, 13(2), 44. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13020044
  10. Fauzan, D. N., Triono, R. A., & Dalimunthe, Z. (2022). How Does Public Service Motivation Explain Knowledge Sharing Behavior among Indonesian Civil Servants? Jurnal Bina Praja, 14(1), 71–82. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.14.2022.71-82
  11. Febriyanti, D., Widianingsih, I., Sumaryana, A., & Buchari, Rd. A. (2023). Information Communication Technology (ICT) on Palembang city government, Indonesia: Performance measurement for great digital governance. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2269710
  12. Feng, C., Robin, M., Fan, L., & Huang, X. (2020). Commitment to Change. Personnel Review, 49(5), 1069–1090. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-05-2018-0163
  13. Fitriati, R., & Marsanty, D. A. (2023). Transformational Leadership in Times of Crisis: Study of Handling COVID-19 in Bumi Raja-Raja. Jurnal Bina Praja, 15(2), 289–308. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.15.2023.289-308
  14. Gapsalamov, A., Akhmetshin, E., Bochkareva, T., Vasilev, V., & Anisimova, T. (2020). Comparative Analysis of Education Quality and the Level of Competitiveness of Leader Countries Under Digitalization Conditions. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 11(2), 133–150. https://jsser.org/index.php/jsser/article/view/1737
  15. Gasova, K., & Stofkova, K. (2017). E-Government as a Quality Improvement Tool for Citizens’ Services. Procedia Engineering, 192, 225–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.06.039
  16. Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2012). Enacting Electronic Government Success (Vol. 31). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2015-6
  17. Gil-Garcia, J. R., Dawes, S. S., & Pardo, T. A. (2018). Digital Government and Public Management Research: Finding the Crossroads. Public Management Review, 20(5), 633–646. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1327181
  18. Grefen, P. (2021). Digital Literacy and Electronic Business. Encyclopedia, 1(3), 934–941. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia1030071
  19. Gupta, V., Chopra, S., & Kakani, R. K. (2018). Leadership Competencies for Effective Public Administration: A Study of Indian Administrative Service Officers. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 11(1), 98–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/17516234.2017.1353942
  20. Harsoyo, H., & Suparno, S. (2021). Public Satisfaction With Public Services (Study at the Department of Population and Civil Registration of Semarang City). Jurnal Sosial Humaniora, 14(1), 123–137. https://doi.org/10.12962/j24433527.v14i1.8447
  21. Hensellek, S. (2022). Digital Leadership. Journal of Media Management and Entrepreneurship, 2(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.4018/JMME.2020010104
  22. Hesse, A. (2018). Digitalization and Leadership - How Experienced Leaders Interpret Daily Realities in a Digital World. Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1854–1863. https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2018.234
  23. Hofmann, S., & Ogonek, N. (2018). Different but Still the Same? How Public and Private Sector Organisations Deal With New Digital Competences. Electronic Journal of E-Government, 16(2), pp127 135-pp127 135. https://academic-publishing.org/index.php/ejeg/article/view/657
  24. Hutagalung, S. S., & Hermawan, D. (2018). Evaluation of Local Government Innovation Program in Lampung Province. Jurnal Bina Praja, 10(2), 241–250. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.10.2018.241-250
  25. Iveroth, E., & Hallencreutz, J. (2020). Leadership and Digital Change. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429296420
  26. Julien, H. (2018). Digital Literacy in Theory and Practice. In Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology, Fourth Edition (pp. 2243–2252). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-2255-3.ch195
  27. Klein, M. (2020). Leadership Characteristics in the Era of Digital Transformation. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 8(1), 883–902. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v8i1.1441
  28. Lallmahomed, M. Z. I., Lallmahomed, N., & Lallmahomed, G. M. (2017). Factors Influencing the Adoption of e-Government Services in Mauritius. Telematics and Informatics, 34(4), 57–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.01.003
  29. Mahmoud, M. A., Hinson, R. E., & Anim, P. A. (2018). Service Innovation and Customer Satisfaction: The Role of Customer Value Creation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 21(3), 402–422. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-09-2017-0117
  30. Mergel, I. (2021). Digital Transformation of the German State (pp. 331–355). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53697-8_19
  31. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. SAGE.
  32. Mislawaty, S. E., Harahap, R., & Anisyah, S. (2022). Digitalizing Governance in South Sumatera: An Introduction “E-Sumsel” System Reforming Public Service Management. Jurnal Bina Praja, 14(3), 399–411. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.14.2022.399-411
  33. Nazarova, E., & Nazarov, A. (2021). Digital Literacy and the Development of Digital Education. KnE Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v5i2.8348
  34. Rahayuningsih, Y., Anggraini, Y., & Listyaningsih, L. (2018). Implementation Quality Level of Health Public Service Policy in Banten Province Local Hospital (RSUD). Jurnal Bina Praja, 10(1), 121–134. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.10.2018.121-134
  35. Rizki, T., & Kurniawan, S. (2023). Public Service Performance: An Influence of Female Leadership and Good Governance. Jurnal Bina Praja, 15(3), 443–452. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.15.2023.443-452
  36. Sahyaja, Ch., & Rao, K. S. S. (2018). New Leadership in the Digital Era – A Conceptual Study on Emotional Dimensions in Relation With Intellectual Dimensions. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 9(1), 738–747.
  37. Sari, N. M. (2021). Information Service Activities on the Public Satisfaction Levels in the Public Service Mall of Palopo City. Jurnal Bina Praja, 13(2), 219–229. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.13.2021.219-229
  38. Satriawan, B. H., & Syamsuri, S. (2023). Measuring Political Will and Political Constellation in Moving Indonesia’s Capital City Policy. Jurnal Bina Praja, 15(2), 339–356. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.15.2023.339-356
  39. Seggewiss, B. J., Straatmann, T., Hattrup, K., & Mueller, K. (2019). Testing Interactive Effects of Commitment and Perceived Change Advocacy on Change Readiness: Investigating the Social Dynamics of Organizational Change. Journal of Change Management, 19(2), 122–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2018.1477816
  40. Sholihah, Q. (2019). Pengantar Metodologi Penelitian. Universitas Brawijaya Press.
  41. Sokolov, D. (2022). Digitalization of Culture. Review of the book “Eine kurze Geschichte der Digitalisierung” by M. Burckhardt. Science Management: Theory and Practice, 4(1), 257–261. https://doi.org/10.19181/smtp.2022.4.1.14
  42. Straatmann, T., Nolte, J. K., & Seggewiss, B. J. (2018). Psychological Processes Linking Organizational Commitment and Change-Supportive Intentions. Personnel Review, 47(2), 403–424. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-09-2016-0230
  43. Tanniru, M. R. (2018). Digital Leadership. In Management of Information Systems. InTech. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.76045
  44. Wahyudianto, H. (2015). Pengukuran Tingkat Kepuasan Masyarakat terhadap Pelaksanaan Kebijakan Pelayanan Pemerintah. Jurnal Bina Praja, 07(04), 331–345. https://doi.org/10.21787/JBP.07.2015.331-345
  45. Wandaogo, A. (2022). Does Digitalization Improve Government Effectiveness? Evidence From Developing and Developed Countries. Applied Economics, 54(33), 3840–3860. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2021.2016590

Hak Cipta & Lisensi Akses Terbuka

Hak Cipta (c) 2024 Penulis. Artikel ini dilisensikan di bawah CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0.