Beralih ke bagian utama
Artikel Riset Asli Akses Terbuka Terakreditasi SINTA 2

The Effect of Village Income and Gross Regional Domestic Product on Poverty in Indonesia

Penulis

  • Yore Isti Tosan Aji
DOI
10.21787/jbp.14.2022.315-328
Tanggal Terbit & Halaman
28 September 2022 · Hlm. 315-328
Riwayat Naskah
Diterima24 Mar 2022 Disetujui5 Jul 2022 Terbit28 Sep 2022
Lisensi
CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0
Baca PDF 564 KB Kutip

1.697 Dilihat 1.166 Diunduh

Abstrak

The Effect of Village Income and Gross Regional Domestic Product on Poverty in Indonesia

The problem of poverty still exists today, and economic disparities are still found in districts/cities in Indonesia. The government has taken various ways to alleviate the problem of poverty, one of which is by distributing village funds to all corners of the country. Based on the data availability in Buku Saku Dana Desa and Buku Pintar Dana Desa published by the Ministry of Finance, Village income from 2015 to 2017 tends to increase. Meanwhile, the number of poor individuals throughout Indonesia between 2016 and 2017 has decreased. This paper attempts to examine whether or not Village Income, such as Village Funds, Revenue Sharing Taxes and Levies, Village Fund Allocations, and Village Original Income, as well as the GRDP (Gross Regional Domestic Product), affect the incidence of District/City poverty in Indonesia. This study uses secondary data from Statistics Indonesia for two years, consisting of 407 districts/cities in Indonesia each year. The regression analysis with static panel data using a double log model is the data analysis technique used in this article. The results show that Village Income and GRDP have an effect on poverty in districts/cities in Indonesia, with values of -0.0004 for Village Funds, 0.003 for Revenue Sharing Taxes and Levies, -0.026 for Village Fund Allocation, 0.002 for Village Original Income, and -0.197 for Gross Regional Domestic Product. We advise the government to increase village fund transfers, village fund allocation, and GRDP to lower poverty levels.

Kata Kunci:

Baca Naskah Lengkap

Isi lengkap artikel ini tersedia dalam format PDF. Versi resmi yang diterbitkan pada Vol 14 No 2 (2022).

Buka PDF

Daftar Pustaka

27 rujukan
  1. Agusta, I. (2014). Transformasi Desa di Indonesia 2003-2025.
  2. Arifin, B., Wicaksono, E., Tenrini, R. H., Wardhana, I. W., Setiawan, H., Damayanty, S. A., Solikin, A., Suhendra, M., Saputra, A. H., Ariutama, G. A., Djunedi, P., Rahman, A. B., & Handoko, R. (2020). Village Fund, Village-Owned-Enterprises, and Employment: Evidence From Indonesia. Journal of Rural Studies, 79, 382–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.08.052
  3. Azwardi, & Sukanto. (2014). Efektifitas Alokasi Dana Desa (ADD) dan Kemiskinan di Provinsi Sumatera Selatan. Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan, 12(1), 29–41. https://doi.org/10.29259/jep.v12i1.4865
  4. Bappenas, & Kompak. (2017). Dana Desa dan Penanggulangan Kemiskinan. https://kompak.or.id/en/article/village-fund-and-poverty-alleviation
  5. BPS - Statistics Indonesia. (2018). Statistik Keuangan Pemerintah Desa 2017. BPS - Statistics Indonesia. https://www.bps.go.id/publication/2018/06/28/7daee6a7e594b9ab167c5ec7/statistik-keuangan-pemerintah-desa-2017.html
  6. BPS - Statistics Indonesia. (2019a). Produk Domestik Regional Bruto Kabupaten/Kota di Indonesia 2014-2018. BPS - Statistics Indonesia. https://www.bps.go.id/publication/2019/10/04/9812a1c4ea25298004839596/produk-domestik-regional-bruto-kabupaten-kota-di-indonesia-2014-2018.html
  7. BPS - Statistics Indonesia. (2019b). Statistik Keuangan Pemerintah Desa 2018. BPS - Statistics Indonesia. https://www.bps.go.id/publication/2019/06/28/c268874253f99e7ad62e61f0/statistik-keuangan-pemerintah-desa-2018.html
  8. BPS - Statistics Indonesia. (2020a). Jumlah Penduduk Miskin Menurut Kabupaten/Kota, 2015 - 2019. BPS - Statistics Indonesia. https://www.bps.go.id/dynamictable/2017/08/03/1260/jumlah-penduduk-miskin-menurut-kabupaten-kota-2015---2019.html
  9. BPS - Statistics Indonesia. (2020b). Jumlah Penduduk Miskin Menurut Provinsi, 2007-2020. BPS - Statistics Indonesia. https://www.bps.go.id/dynamictable/2016/01/18/1119/jumlah-penduduk-miskin-menurut-provinsi-2007-2019.html
  10. BPS - Statistics Indonesia. (2020c). Persentase Penduduk Miskin Menurut Kabupaten/Kota, 2015 - 2019. BPS - Statistics Indonesia. https://www.bps.go.id/dynamictable/2017/08/03/1261/persentase-penduduk-miskin-menurut-kabupaten-kota-2015---2019.html
  11. Direktorat Daerah Tertinggal Transmigrasi dan Perdesaan. (2016). Kegiatan Kajian Penyusunan Instrumen Evaluasi Pembangunan Perdesaan (Lingkup Desa) Tahun 2016.
  12. Gujarati, D. N., & Porter, D. C. (2009). Basic Econometrics. McGraw-Hill Irwin.
  13. Haughton, J., & Khandker, S. R. (2012). Pedoman tentang Kemiskinan dan Ketimpangan. Salemba Empat.
  14. Hestiliani, T. (2019). Decentralisatie Wet van Nederland Indies 1903. Istoria: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Sejarah, 15(2), 206–215. https://doi.org/10.21831/istoria.v15i2.27389
  15. Jayani, D. H. (2019, September 27). Berapa Realisasi Dana Desa hingga Agustus 2019? Databoks. https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2019/09/27/berapa-realisasi-dana-desa-hingga-agustus-2019
  16. Kadafi, M., & Sudrahman, H. (2018). Implikasi Dana Desa yang Diterima Desa Tertinggal per Kabupaten/Kota terhadap Kemiskinan dan Angka Melek Huruf: Bukti Empiris di Indonesia. Prosiding SNITT Poltekra. https://jurnal.poltekba.ac.id/index.php/prosiding/article/view/583
  17. Lewis, B. D. (2015). Decentralising to Villages in Indonesia: Money (and Other) Mistakes. Public Administration and Development, 35(5), 347–359. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1741
  18. Murliasari, R. (2021). Implementation of Village Fund Management Policy Affirmation in Village Development. Jurnal Bina Praja, 13(3), 555–567. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.13.2021.555-567
  19. Riyanto, & Junaedi. (2017). Implikasi Penggunaan Dana Desa terhadap Ketahanan Sosial, Ekonomi, dan Ekologi Desa Tertinggal di Kabupaten Karanganyar. Jurnal Sains Tech Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat, 4(2).
  20. Saragi, N. B., Muluk, M. R. K., & Sentanu, I. G. E. P. S. (2021). Indonesia’s Village Fund Program: Does It Contribute to Poverty Reduction? Jurnal Bina Praja, 13(1), 65–80. https://doi.org/10.21787/jpb.13.2021.65-80
  21. Sari, I. M., & Abdullah, M. F. (2017). Analisis Ekonomi Kebijakan Dana Desa terhadap Kemiskinan Desa di Kabupaten Tulungagung. Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan, 15(1), 34–49. https://doi.org/10.22219/jep.v15i1.4645
  22. Suliswanto, M. S. W. (2010). Pengaruh Produk Domestik Bruto (PDB) dan Indeks Pembangunan Manusia (IPM) terhadap Angka Kemiskinan di Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan, 8(2), 357–366. https://doi.org/10.22219/jep.v8i2.3610
  23. Susilowati, N. I., Susilowati, D., & Hadi, S. (2017). Pengaruh Alokasi Dana Desa, Dana Desa, Belanja Modal, dan Produk Domestik Regional Bruto terhadap Kemiskinan Kabupaten/Kota di Jawa Timur. Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi, 1(4), 514–526. https://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/jie/article/view/6288
  24. Tim Kajian Pusat Kebijakan APBN. (2017). Manfaat Dana Desa dalam Percepatan Pembangunan dan Pengentasan Kemiskinan Desa. https://fiskal.kemenkeu.go.id/kajian/2018/07/02/132003146906279-kajian-manfaat-dana-desa-dalam-percepatan-pembangunan-dan-pengentasan-kemiskinan-desa
  25. Todaro, M. P. (1989). Economic Development in the Third World (4th ed.). Longman.
  26. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2019). The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2019. United Nations. https://doi.org/10.18356/55eb9109-en
  27. Wiguna, V. I., & Sakti, R. K. (2013). Analisis Pengaruh PDRB, Pendidikan, dan Pengangguran terhadap Kemiskinan di Provinsi Jawa Tengah Tahun 2005–2010. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa FEB Universitas Brawijaya, 1(2). https://jimfeb.ub.ac.id/index.php/jimfeb/article/view/647

Hak Cipta & Lisensi Akses Terbuka

Hak Cipta (c) 2022 Author(s). Artikel ini dilisensikan di bawah CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0.