Skip to main content
Original Research Article Open Access SINTA 2 Accredited

Regional Government Service Innovation Model in Disaster Mitigation

DOI
10.21787/jbp.13.2021.383-394
Published & Pages
30 December 2021 · pp. 383-394
Manuscript History
Received2 Sep 2021 Accepted10 Dec 2021 Published30 Dec 2021

2,789 Views 1,312 Downloads

Abstract

Indonesia has a geographical, geological, hydrological, and demographic situation prone to disasters with a relatively high frequency, thus requiring systematic, integrated, and coordinated disaster management. The disasters that occurred until 2020 were dominated by hydro-meteorological natural disasters such as floods, landslides, hurricanes, droughts to forests, and land fires (BNPB, 2021). The purpose of this study is to identify innovation models for regional government services in disaster mitigation. This study uses a qualitative descriptive method with data collection techniques, namely literature studies, FGDs, and interviews with related disaster mitigation innovations at the research location. The field findings illustrate that the SDIS innovation implemented by Sleman Regency is among the best innovations in handling volcanic eruptions. This innovation has been initiated since 2016 and continues to be refined. In the city of Semarang, specifically for flood disasters, the Early Warning System tool was installed at several points as the best innovation in flood management. However, difficulties were installing it at certain points due to geographical contours that were impossible. Meanwhile, for Sumedang Regency, their innovation through the SITABAH application still needs further development to become the best innovation in landslide mitigation due to limitations in infrastructure and human resources. In addition, the application is still one-way. Of the three disaster mitigation innovation models, the SDIS innovation is an innovation that has been successfully implemented by the Regional Disaster Management Agency of Sleman Regency. Especially on the "My distance and Merapi" feature, which can be accessed online, this innovation model can be replicated in other areas.

Read the Full Text

The full text of this article is available as PDF. Version of record published in Vol. 13 No. 3 (2021).

Open PDF

References

25 references
  1. Behlert, B., Diekjobst, R., Felgentreff, C., Manandhar, T., Mucke, P., Pries, L., Radtke, K., & Weller, D. (2020). WorldRiskReport 2020—Focus: Forced Displacement and Migration. Bündnis Entwicklung Hilft. https://reliefweb.int/report/world/worldriskreport-2020-focus-forced-displacement-and-migration
  2. BNPB. (2014). Dana Penanggulangan Bencana BNPB. BNPB. https://bnpb.go.id/berita/dana-penanggulangan-bencana-bnpb
  3. Budiarti, W., Gravitiani, E., & Mujiyo. (2017). Upaya Mitigasi Banjir di Sub DAS Samin Melalui Pengembangan Masyarakat Tangguh Bencana. Jurnal Teknologi Lingkungan, 18(2), 241–250. https://doi.org/10.29122/jtl.v18i2.962
  4. Chan, C.-S., Nozu, K., & Zhou, Q. (2020). Tourism Stakeholder Perspective for Disaster-Management Process and Resilience: The Case of the 2018 Hokkaido Eastern Iburi Earthquake in Japan. Sustainability, 12(19), 7882. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12197882
  5. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  6. Hariyanti, M. (2015, May 28). Analisis Data Kualitatif Miles dan Hubermen. Kompasiana. https://www.kompasiana.com/meykurniawan/556c450057937332048b456c/analisis-data-kualitatif-miles-dan-hubermen
  7. Hutauruk, T. R. (2010). Tinjauan Daya Inovasi Pemerintah Daerah dalam Pelaksanaan Desentralisasi di Kabupaten/Kota Provinsi Kalimantan Timur. Jurnal Borneo Administrator, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.24258/jba.v6i3.66
  8. Khafifah, N. (2018, January 31). Indonesia Kekurangan Alat Pendeteksi Gempa. KumparanNews. https://kumparan.com/kumparannews/indonesia-kekurangan-alat-pendeteksi-gempa/full
  9. Mansur, A. N., Taufik, A., & Nurmaeta, St. (2020). Eksistensi Nilai Lokal dalam Inovasi Pemerintah Daerah Studi Kasus: Program Brigade Siaga Bencana (BSB) di Kabupaten Bantaeng. Gorontalo Journal of Government and Political Studies, 3(1), 11–23. https://doi.org/10.32662/gjgops.v3i1.740
  10. Nasyiruddin, Muhammadiah, & Badjido, M. Y. (2015). Strategi Pemerintah Daerah dalam Penanggulangan Bencana Banjir di Kabupaten Bantaeng. Otoritas: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 5(2), 157–173. https://doi.org/10.26618/ojip.v5i2.121
  11. Noor, I. (2013). Desain Inovasi Pemerintahan Daerah. Universitas Brawijaya Press.
  12. Oswaronto, E., Saleh, M., & Harjito. (2020). PDPGR (Program Daerah Pemberdayaan Gotong Royong) sebagai Inovasi dalam Penanganan Percepatan Rehabilitasi dan Rekonstruksi Pasca Gempa Bumi di Kabupaten Sumbawa Barat. Jurnal Tambora, 4(3), 13–20. https://doi.org/10.36761/jt.v4i3.787
  13. Priambodo, S. A. (2009). Panduan Praktis Menghadapi Bencana: Badai, Banjir, Gempa Bumi, Letusan Gunung Api, Kerusuhan Massal, Teror Bom, Kebakaran, Polusi Lingkungan. Penerbit Kanisius.
  14. Pusparisa, Y. (2021, January 19). 2010-2020: Dekade Penuh Bencana Bagi Indonesia. Databoks. https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2021/01/19/2010-2020-dekade-penuh-bencana-bagi-indonesia
  15. Rikin, A. S. (2020, December 14). Dalam Setahun, Bencana Alam Telan 360 Korban Jiwa, 6 Juta Mengungsi. Beritasatu. https://www.beritasatu.com/nasional/709313/dalam-setahun-bencana-alam-telan-360-korban-jiwa-6-juta-mengungsi
  16. Riyalda, B. F., Turyana, I., & Santoso, E. W. (2018). Sistem Informasi Bencana Tanah Longsor (Si-Benar) Berbasis Web untuk Wilayah Desa Cililin, Kecamatan Cililin, Kabupaten Bandung Barat. Jurnal Alami: Jurnal Teknologi Reduksi Risiko Bencana, 2(2), 131–138. https://doi.org/10.29122/alami.v2i2.3102
  17. Rogers, E. M., & Roger, G. (1983). Diffusion of Innovations (3rd ed.). Free Press.
  18. Sadat, A. (2019). Intergovernmental dalam Penanganan Bencana Alam di Pemerintahan Daerah. Kybernan: Jurnal Studi Kepemerintahan, 2(1), 66–81. https://doi.org/10.35326/kybernan.v4i1.312
  19. Soesanto, H. (2017). Development of Innovation Project as the Result of Leadership Training Through the Innovation Actor Collaboration Model in the Region. Jurnal Bina Praja, 9(2), 335–343. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.09.2017.335-343
  20. Song, W., Lee, D., Choi, C.-I., & Choi, J. (2019). Development of a Customer Friendly GIS-based Disaster Management System in South Korea. Journal of Distribution Science, 17(11), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.15722/JDS.17.11.201911.27
  21. Sudibyakto, H. A. (2011). Manajemen Bencana di Indonesia ke Mana? Gadjah Mada University Press.
  22. Wandari, S. (2020, September 22). Pagu Anggaran BNPB 2021 Capai Rp813,12 Miliar. Media Indonesia. https://mediaindonesia.com/humaniora/346819/pagu-anggaran-bnpb-2021-capai-rp81312-miliar
  23. Widjaya, K. P. W. (2008). Pengaruh Manajemen Bencana Terpadu dan Pemenuhan Kebutuhan Dasar Masyarakat Korban Bencana terhadap Keberfungsian Sosial Keluarga Korban Studi Kasus Masyarakat Korban Bencana Luapan Lumpur Lapindo Sidoarjo di Lokasi Pengungsian Pasar Baru, Porong. Universitas Indonesia.
  24. Wilkin, J., Biggs, E., & Tatem, A. (2019). Measurement of Social Networks for Innovation within Community Disaster Resilience. Sustainability, 11(7), 1943. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11071943
  25. Zufrizal. (2021, May 1). BNPB : 1.205 Bencana Alam Terjadi Selama 1 Januari-30 April 2021. Kabar24. https://kabar24.bisnis.com/read/20210501/15/1389038/bnpb-1205-bencana-alam-terjadi-selama-1-januari-30-april-2021

Copyright & Open Access License

Copyright (c) 2021 Author(s). This article is licensed under CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0.