Skip to main content
Original Research Article Open Access SINTA 2 Accredited

Implementation of Village Fund Management Policy Affirmation in Village Development

DOI
10.21787/jbp.13.2021.555-567
Published & Pages
30 December 2021 · pp. 555-567
Manuscript History
Received24 Sep 2021 Published30 Dec 2021

1,925 Views 1,081 Downloads

Abstract

The pendulum direction of development which initially only leans in the city is now directed to rural areas. Affirmation of government policies to villages is evidenced by the distribution of Village Funds since 2015. This study aims to find out how the implementation of village fund management in village development is through the role of village governments with an approach to rights of origin and local authority on a village scale. This study uses an explanatory approach by combining a case study design with a comparative study, which focuses on conducting an in-depth study on the role of village government in village development in Sirnagalih Village, Cipongkor District, West Bandung Regency. Data sources include the Village Head, Village Apparatus, Regional Personnel, and Training Agency, Village Community Institutions and Village Traditional Institutions, Community Leaders, Head of Subdistrict and Echelon Officials in the subdistrict, Head of Regency Village Community Empowerment Service and Echelon Officials at the Village Community Empowerment Service, as well as elements of the Community. The data analysis method used was qualitative analysis. The analysis results show that village development has a very strategic role in spurring regional development. It happens because it contains elements of equitable distribution of development and its results and directly touches the interests of the majority of the people who live in rural areas. It was found that village development programs and activities responsive to Community need to have resulted in high community participation. Therefore, the optimization of development implementation is influenced by community participation activities in implementing and preserving development results. For this reason, the main solution that needs to be given to the problem of managing Village Funds in Village development is the application of policy affirmations in the management of Village Funds.

Read the Full Text

The full text of this article is available as PDF. Version of record published in Vol. 13 No. 3 (2021).

Open PDF

References

23 references
  1. Agusta, I. (2014). Transformasi Desa di Indonesia 2003-2025.
  2. Bappenas dan BPS. (2015). Indeks Pembangunan Desa 2014: Tantangan Pemenuhan Standar Pelayanan Minimum Desa.
  3. Berry, B. J. L. (1973). Nineteenth-Century Industrial Urbanisation. In The Human Consequences of Urbanisation (pp. 1–26). Macmillan Education UK. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-86193-4_1
  4. BPS. (2016, January 4). Persentase Penduduk Miskin September 2015 mencapai 11,13%. Berita Resmi Statistik, XIX(05/01).
  5. Cohen, J. M., & Uphoff, N. T. (1977). Rural Development Participation: Concepts and Measures for Project Design, Implementation and Evaluation. Cornell University.
  6. Ditjen Bina Pemdes. (2018). Modul Pelatihan Aplikasi Sistem Keuangan Desa (SISKEUDES). Ditjen Bina Pemdes.
  7. Dye, T. R. (1995). Understanding Public Policy. Prentice Hall.
  8. Eko, S., Khasanah, T. I., Widuri, D., Handayani, S., Qomariyah, P., Aksa, S., Hastowiyono, Suharyanto, & Kurniawan, B. (2014). Desa Membangun Indonesia. Forum Pengembangan Pembaharuan Desa (FPPD).
  9. Irawan, N. (2017). Tata Kelola Pemerintahan Desa Era UU Desa. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.
  10. Kartika, R. (2012). Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Mengelola Alokasi Dana Desa (ADD) di Desa Tegeswetan dan Desa Jangkrikan Kecamatan Kepil Kabupaten Wonosobo. Jurnal Bina Praja, 04(03), 179–188. https://doi.org/10.21787/JBP.04.2012.179-188
  11. Kementerian Desa PDTT. (2020). Prioritas Penggunaan Dana Desa 2019-2020. Kementerian Desa PDTT.
  12. Mashoed. (2004). Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Miskin: Membuka Kawasan Terisolasi. Papyrus.
  13. Nadeak, H., Dalla, A., Nuryadin, D., & Hadi, A. (2015). Batas Wilayah Desa Pasca Berlakunya Undang-undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 tentang Desa. Jurnal Bina Praja, 07(03), 239–250. https://doi.org/10.21787/JBP.07.2015.239-250
  14. Osborne, D. (1993). Reinventing Government. Public Productivity & Management Review, 16(4), 349–356. https://doi.org/10.2307/3381012
  15. Sabatier, P., & Mazmanian, D. (1979). The Conditions of Effective Implementation: A Guide to Accomplishing Policy Objectives. Policy Analysis, 5(4), 481–504. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42783358
  16. Saragi, N. B., Muluk, M. R. K., & Sentanu, I. G. E. P. S. (2021). Indonesia’s Village Fund Program: Does It Contribute to Poverty Reduction? Jurnal Bina Praja, 13(1), 65–80. https://doi.org/10.21787/jpb.13.2021.65-80
  17. Schuck, P. H. (2002). Affirmative Action: Past, Present, and Future. Yale Law & Policy Review, 20(1), 1–96. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41308517
  18. Sigelman, L. (1997). The Public and Disadvantage-based Affirmative Action: An Early Assessment. Social Science Quarterly, 78(4), 1011–1022. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42863746
  19. Suharto, D. (2012). Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Desa dalam Perspektif Desentralisasi Administratif dan Desentralisasi Politik. Jurnal Bina Praja, 04(03), 153–160. https://doi.org/10.21787/JBP.04.2012.153-160
  20. Suharyanto, S., & Sofianto, A. (2012). Model Pembangunan Desa Terpadu Inovatif di Jawa Tengah. Jurnal Bina Praja, 04(04), 251–260. https://doi.org/10.21787/JBP.04.2012.251-260
  21. Supriatna, T. (1997). Birokrasi, Pemberdayaan, dan Pengentasan Kemiskinan. Humaniora Utama Press.
  22. Tjokrowinoto, M. (1999). Konsep Pembangunan Nasional. Liberty.
  23. Todaro, M. P. (1994). Economic Development. Longman.

Copyright & Open Access License

Copyright (c) 2021 Author(s). This article is licensed under CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0.