Skip to main content
Original Research Article Open Access SINTA 2 Accredited

The Effect of Rural Development on Poverty Gap, Poverty Severity and Local Economic Growth in Indonesia

DOI
10.21787/jbp.13.2021.369-381
Published & Pages
30 December 2021 · pp. 369-381
Manuscript History
Received7 Aug 2021 Accepted9 Nov 2021 Published30 Dec 2021

5,803 Views 3,459 Downloads

Abstract

The effect of rural development in reducing the poverty gap and economic growth has not been much analyzed in recent studies. This study examines the effects of rural development (as calculated by using the Village Development Index, VDI) on poverty and economic growth. Precisely, poverty is measured by the depth of poverty (as measured by Poverty Gap Index, P1) and poverty severity (as measured by Poverty Severity Index, P2) using the aggregate data at the district level in Indonesia. Understandably, many factors influence the effort to reduce the poverty gap in rural areas, and it can be started by improving rural economic development. The result of this study indicates that regions with the VDI categorized as “independent” and “developed” villages have the potential to reduce the depth of poverty and poverty severity in its areas and to increase economic growth. In contrast, underdeveloped and very underdeveloped regions in their VDI category experienced a more significant gap in the depth and severity of the poverty. This result implies that the Indonesian government must accelerate and improve the development of rural areas, especially in less developed regions. Thus, a better rural development status will attract more opportunities to grow rural economic activities and improve the community welfare.

Read the Full Text

The full text of this article is available as PDF. Version of record published in Vol. 13 No. 3 (2021).

Open PDF

References

42 references
  1. Adhayanto, O., Arianto, B., Winatawira, W., Suryadi, S., & Nurhasanah, N. (2019). The Evaluation of the Utilization of the 2018 Village Funds in Bintan District and Lingga District. Jurnal Bina Praja, 11(2), 125–136. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.11.2019.125-136
  2. Akita, T., & Miyata, S. (2018). Spatial Inequalities in Indonesia, 1996–2010: A Hierarchical Decomposition Analysis. Social Indicators Research, 138(3), 829–852. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1694-1
  3. Amri, K. (2019). Bumdes Acceleration Towards Mandiri Village. Iapa Proceedings Conference, 268. https://doi.org/10.30589/proceedings.2019.236
  4. Antlöv, H., Wetterberg, A., & Dharmawan, L. (2016). Village Governance, Community Life, and the 2014 Village Law in Indonesia. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 52(2), 161–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2015.1129047
  5. Arham, M. A., & Hatu, R. (2020). Does Village Fund Transfer Address the Issue of Inequality and Poverty? A Lesson from Indonesia. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(10), 433–442. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no10.433
  6. Arham, M. A., & Payu, B. R. (2019). Village Fund Transfer and Rural Poverty in Indonesia. Economics Development Analysis Journal, 8(4), 324–334. https://doi.org/10.15294/edaj.v8i4.31698
  7. Arifin, B., Wicaksono, E., Tenrini, R. H., Wardhana, I. W., Setiawan, H., Damayanty, S. A., Solikin, A., Suhendra, M., Saputra, A. H., Ariutama, G. A., Djunedi, P., Rahman, A. B., & Handoko, R. (2020). Village fund, village-owned-enterprises, and employment: Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Rural Studies, 79, 382–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.08.052
  8. Arsyad, M., Nuddin, A., Fahmid, I. M., Salman, D., Pulubuhu, D. A. T., Unde, A. A., Djufry, F., & Darwis. (2020). Agricultural development: poverty, conflict and strategic programs in country border. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 575(1), 012091. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/575/1/012091
  9. Boonperm, J., Haughton, J., & Khandker, S. R. (2013). Does the Village Fund matter in Thailand? Evaluating the impact on incomes and spending. Journal of Asian Economics, 25, 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2013.01.001
  10. BPS. (2020a). Data dan Informasi Kemiskinan Kabupaten/Kota Tahun 2019.
  11. BPS. (2020b). Kemiskinan dan Ketimpangan.
  12. BPS. (2020c). Profil Kemiskinan di Indonesia Maret 2020.
  13. Bununu, Y. A. (2020). Poverty Reduction: Concept, Approaches, and Case Studies. In W. L. Filho, A. M. Azul, L. Brandli, A. L. Salvia, & T. Wall (Eds.), Decent Work and Economic Growth (pp. 1–12). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71058-7_31-1
  14. Chambers, R. (1987). Pembangunan Desa: Mulai dari Belakang (P. Sudradjat (trans.)). LP3ES.
  15. Eko, S., Khasanah, T. I., Widuri, D., Handayani, S., Qomariyah, P., Aksa, S., Hastowiyono, Suharyanto, & Kurniawan, B. (2014). Desa Membangun Indonesia. Forum Pengembangan Pembaharuan Desa (FPPD).
  16. Honig, E., & Zhao, X. (2019). Across the Great Divide. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108595728
  17. Kansuntisukmongkol, K. (2017). Philosophy of sufficiency economy for community-based adaptation to climate change: Lessons learned from Thai case studies. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 38(1), 56–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2016.03.002
  18. Kemendes PDTT. (2019). Status IDM Indeks Desa Membangun Provinsi, Kabupaten, Kecamatan Tahun 2019.
  19. Kislat, C., & Menkhoff, L. (2013). The Village Fund Loan Programme: Who Gets It, Keeps It and Loses It? In Vulnerability to Poverty (pp. 283–304). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230306622_11
  20. Mahiuddin, M., Chowdhury, M. M., & Ahmad, A. (2015). The Impact of Rural Development Program on Poverty Alleviation: A Case of Bangladesh. International Research Journal Publisher: Global Journals Inc, 15(4).
  21. Mai, T., & Mahadevan, R. (2016). A research note on the poverty dynamics and cost of poverty inequality: Case study of Indonesia. Economic Analysis and Policy, 49, 100–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2015.12.003
  22. Mukmin, B. A., & Prayetno. (2019). Analysis of Funds Management Through The Village Owned Business Entity at Gudang Garam Village, Bintang Bayu District, Serdang Bedagai Regency. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Social Sciences and Interdisciplinary Studies (ICSSIS 2018). https://doi.org/10.2991/icssis-18.2019.6
  23. Nawawi, M., Ali, A., Irawan, B., Ahmad, B., Mukramin, S., Riswandy Marsuki, N., Basrun, M. C., Umanailo, & Kaya, I. R. G. (2020). The Village Kalesang Program as a Poverty Alleviation Community. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 9(3), 3103–3107.
  24. Nugroho, C., Pertiwi, V., & Meitasari, D. (2020). Improving the Competitive Advantage of BUMDes Based on The Optimal Utilization of Local Assets Communities. HABITAT, 31(3), 161–168. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.habitat.2020.031.3.19
  25. Paellorisky, M., & Solikin, A. (2019). Village Fund Reform: A Proposal for More Equitable Allocation Formula. Jurnal Bina Praja, 11(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.11.2019.1-13
  26. Pusat Kajian Anggaran-Badan Keahlian DPR RI. (2020). Efektivitas Dana Desa.
  27. Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Hardy, D. (2015). Addressing poverty and inequality in the rural economy from a global perspective. Applied Geography, 61, 11–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.02.005
  28. Rustiadi, E., & Nasution, A. (2017). Can Social Capital Investment Reduce Poverty in Rural Indonesia? International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 7(2), 109–117. https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijefi/article/view/3904
  29. Sara, I. M., Jayawarsa, A. A. K., & Saputra, K. A. K. (2021). Rural Assets Administration and Establishment of Village-Owned Enterprises for the Enhancement of Rural Economy. Jurnal Bina Praja, 13(1), 81–91. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.13.2021.81-91
  30. Saragi, N. B., Muluk, M. R. K., & Sentanu, I. G. E. P. S. (2021). Indonesia’s Village Fund Program: Does It Contribute to Poverty Reduction? Jurnal Bina Praja, 13(1), 65–80. https://doi.org/10.21787/jpb.13.2021.65-80
  31. Setiawan, Alfurkon. (2019, June 24). Membangun Indonesia dari Pinggiran Desa. Sekretariat Kabinet Republik Indonesia. https://setkab.go.id/membangun-indonesia-dari-pinggiran-desa/
  32. Setiawan, Andi. (2019). Analisis Perbedaan Tingkat Kemiskinan dan Ketimpangan Perdesaan Sebelum dan Sesudah Digulirkannya Dana Desa. Akuntabel: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Keuangan, 16(1), 31–35. https://doi.org/10.29264/jakt.v16i1.5394
  33. Shehu, H. (2018). Rural Development, Inclusive Growth and Poverty Alleviation: Nigerian and Indian Perspectives. European Journal of Social Sciences Studies, 3(3), 263–285. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1491712
  34. Singh, P. K., & Chudasama, H. (2020). Evaluating poverty alleviation strategies in a developing country. PLOS ONE, 15(1), e0227176. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227176
  35. Sudipa, N., & Nurjani, P. S. (2021). Strategy for Accelerating Poverty Reduction in Klungkung Regency, Bali. Jurnal Bina Praja, 13(1), 41–51. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.13.2021.41-51
  36. Suryahadi, A., Suryadarma, D., & Sumarto, S. (2009). The effects of location and sectoral components of economic growth on poverty: Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Development Economics, 89(1), 109–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2008.08.003
  37. Tarlani, & Sirajuddin, T. (2020). Rural development strategies in Indonesia: Managing villages to achieve sustainable development. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 447(1), 012066. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/447/1/012066
  38. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2021). World Social Report 2021: Reconsidering Rural Development. United Nations. https://www.un.org/development/desa/dspd/world-social-report/2021-2.html
  39. van Leeuwen, B., & Földvári, P. (2016). The Development of Inequality and Poverty in Indonesia, 1932–2008. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 52(3), 379–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2016.1184226
  40. Watts, J. D., Tacconi, L., Irawan, S., & Wijaya, A. H. (2019). Village transfers for the environment: Lessons from community-based development programs and the village fund. Forest Policy and Economics, 108(June 2018), 101863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.01.008
  41. World Bank. (2015). Rural poverty headcount ratio at national poverty lines (% of rural population).
  42. Wu, H., Ding, S., & Wan, G. (2015). Income inequality and rural poverty in China. China Agricultural Economic Review, 7(1), 65–85. https://doi.org/10.1108/CAER-01-2014-0005

Author Biographies

  • Felix Wisnu Handoyo · Research Center for Economic, the National Research and Innovation Agency

    Research Center for Economic, the National Research and Innovation Agency, Widya Graha Building 4&5 Floor, Gatot Subroto Kav. 10, Jakarta 12190, Indonesia, +62-21-5207120

  • Achsanah Hidayatina · Research Center for Economic, the National Research and Innovation Agency

    Researcher at Research Center for Economic, the National Research and Innovation Agency, Widya Graha Building 4&5 Floor, Gatot Subroto Kav. 10, Jakarta 12190, Indonesia, +62-21-5207120

  • Purwanto · Research Center for Economic, the National Research and Innovation Agency

    Researcher at Research Center for Economic, the National Research and Innovation Agency, Widya Graha Building 4&5 Floor, Gatot Subroto Kav. 10, Jakarta 12190, Indonesia, +62-21-5207120

Copyright & Open Access License

Copyright (c) 2021 Author(s). This article is licensed under CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0.