Innovation of Village Head Election Regulation Policy in Reducing Patronation of Village Asset Utilization in Tuban District
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21787/mp.6.2.2022.133-145Keywords:
innovation, Village Treasury Lands, Village Head ElectionAbstract
Forceful resistance to changes in regulations and patronage practices for the use of village assets, especially crooked land. This was shown, among other things, by the rejection from the Indonesian Village Government Alliance (APDESI) on Government Regulation Number 43 of 2014, especially those governing crooked land, which urged President Jokowi to immediately sign the revision. The purpose of this study is to analyze and explain how innovations in village head election regulations (Pilkades) reduce patronage of village asset utilization, especially bengkok land. This research method uses a qualitative method with a case study methodology to examine Village Head Election Policy Innovations in Reducing Patronage of Village Asset Utilization in Tuban Regency. The selected informants were carried out using purposive sampling techniques and snowballing where the initial informant data was obtained from one key informant which was then identified, mapped to determine other informants who met the criteria as additional informants in this study. The findings of this study are that the innovation in formulating regional head regulations regarding Pilkades in reducing patronage of village asset utilization through regulations governing Pilkades in Tuban Regency in 2019, has created a new history of village governance. Prospective Village Head candidates are willing to give up their share of entitlements from the crooked land when elected later with varying percentages of the amount handed over. There is no objection to this regulatory innovation in its formulation and implementation, even though there are several deficiencies in the formulation of this regulation, including the weak sanctions and control from the district government in its function as a role of guidance and supervision of village administration so that it requires improvement in the future.
References
Anderson, J. E. (2003). Public policymaking : an introduction. Houghton Mifflin.
Andhika, L. . (2017). Bahaya Patronase Dan Klientelisme Dalam Pemilihan Kepala Desa Serentak. Kajian, 22(3), 205-219.
Aspinall, E. (2013). A NATION IN FRAGMENTS: Patronage and Neoliberalism in Contemporary Indonesia. Critical Asian Studies, 45(1), 27-54. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2013.758820
Aspinall, E., & Rohman, N. (2017). Village head elections in Java: Money politics and brokerage in the remaking of Indonesia’s rural elite. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 48(1), 31-52. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022463416000461
Athoilah, A. (2022, July 27). Cakades Wajib Santuni Warga Miskin. Radar Tuban Jawa Pos.
Bank Dunia. (2018). Rasio jumlah penduduk miskin pada garis kemiskinan nasional (% dari populasi) - Indonesia. data.worldbank.org. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SI.POV.NAHC?end=2018&locations=ID
BPS Tuban. (2018). Statistik Kesejahteraan Rakyat Kabupaten Tuban 2018.
Borman, W., Penner, L., Allen, T., Motowidlo, S. (2006). Personality Predictors of Citizenship Performance. International Journal of Selection and Assesment.
Budiono. (2022). Inovasi Pakta Integritas pada Pilkades.
Chomsky, N. (1997). Democracy lite. Index on Censorship, 26(3), 56-58. https://doi.org/10.1177/030642209702600311.
Creswell, John W. 2017. Pendekatan Metode Kualitatif, Kuantittatif dan Campuran. Yogya: Pustaka Pelajar
Direktorat Jenderal Pengendalian Perubahan Iklim. (2013). Reforestasi di Taman-Nasional Bromo Tengger Semeru. http://ditjenppi.menlhk.go.id/kcpi/index.php/aksi/mitigasi/implementasi/317-reforestasi-di-taman-nasional-bromo-tengger-semeru
Dye, R. T. (2013). Why You Need This New Edition Six good reasons why you should buy this.
Fauzi, G. (2015). Tuntut Hak Tanah Bengkok Ratusan Kepala Desa Demo Jokowi. CNN Indonesia. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20150527115945-20-55979/tuntut-hak-tanah-bengkok-ratusan-kepala-desa-demo-jokowi
Fauzi, I. (2016). Empat Kades di Tuban Terlibat Dugaan Korupsi Tiga Dipenjara Satu Masih Diperiksa. https://surabaya.tribunnews.com/2016/08/22/empat-kades-di-tuban-terlibat-dugaan-korupsi-tiga-dipenjara-satu-masih-diperiksa
Foxell, S., & Cooper, I. (2015). Closing the policy gaps. Building Research and Information, 43(4), 399-406. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2015.1041298
Giliberto Capano, Michael Howlett, M. R. and A. V. (2019). Making Policies Work: First- and Second-Order Mechanisms in Policy Design. In NASPA Journal.
Groenendyk, E. W. (2013). Competing Motives In The Partisan Mind: How Loyalty and Responsiveness Shape Party Identification and Democracy. Oxford University Press.
Habibi, M. (2021). The Pandemic and the Decline of Indonesian Democracy: The Snare of Patronage and Clientelism of Local Democracy. Asian Political Science Review, 5(9), 9-21. https://doi.org/10.14456/apsr.2021.4
Hall, A. (1974). Concepts and Terms. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 1(4), 506–509. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066157408437908
Hendrawan, E. (2021). Terapkan E Voting Pilkades Kemendagri Akui Inovasi Bantaeng. https://makassar.sindonews.com/read/582304/713/terapkan-e-voting-pilkades-kemendagri-akui-inovasi-bantaeng-1635401420
Hidayat, E. (2018). Praktik Politik Oligarki dan Mobilisasi Sumber Daya Kekuasaan Di Pilkades Desa Sitimerto Pada Tahun 2016. Jurnal Sosial Politik, 4(2), 124. https://doi.org/10.22219/sospol.v4i2.6795
Howlett, M. and M. (2017). HANDBOOK OF POLICY FORMULATION.
Undang-undang (UU) No. 19 Tahun 1965 Tentang Desapraja Sebagai Bentuk Peralihan Untuk Mempercepat Terwujudnya Daerah Tingkat III Di Seluruh Wilayah Republik Indonesia, Pub. L. No. No. 19 (1965).
Undang-undang (UU) No. 5 Tahun 1979 Tentang Pemerintahan Desa, (1979).
Jemmy Tristantono. (2022). Inovasi Pakta Integritas pada Pilkades.
Kartohadikoesoemo, S. (1984). Desa. PN Balai Pustaka.
Kermit. (2022). Inovasi Pakta Integritas pada Pilkades.
Klimczuk, A. (2017). Welfare State. The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social Theory, 35423, Paper No. 40041, posted 17.
Majid, H., & Memon, R. (2019). Patronage and Public Goods Provisioning in an Unequal Land. Social Indicators Research, 145(3), 805-830. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1707-0
Mann, C. B., Gronke, P., & Adona, N. (2020). Framing Automatic Voter Registration: Partisanship and Public Understanding of Automatic Voter Registration: Part of Special Symposium on Election Sciences. American Politics Research, 48(6), 693-699. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X20922525
Miller, M. K. (2015). Elections, Information, and Policy Responsiveness in Autocratic Regimes. In Comparative Political Studies (Vol. 48, Issue 6). https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414014555443
Miles, M.B, Huberman, A.M, & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis, A Methods Sourcebook, Edition 3. USA: Sage Publications. Terjemahan Tjetjep Rohindi Rohidi, UI-Press.
Neuman, W. (2014). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches Seventh Edition. Assex: Pearson Education Limited.
Nickyrawi, F. (2022). Kantor Desa Dirusak Dibakar Saat Pilkades Camat Tambora Lapor Polisi. https://www.detik.com/bali/nusra/d-6169034/kantor-desa-dirusak-dibakar-saat-pilkades-camat-tambora-lapor-polisi
Osborne, S. P., & Brown, L. (2011). Innovation, Public Policy and Public Services Delivery in The UK. The Word that would be King? Public Administration, 89(4), 1335–1350. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01932.x
Pramono, A. (2022). Tolak Kades Terpilih Sejumlah Warga di Sinjai Segel Kantor Desa. https://www.detik.com/sulsel/berita/d-6095261/tolak-kades-terpilih-sejumlah-warga-di-sinjai-segel-kantor-desa
Naskah Akademik Rancangan Undang-Undang, (2007).
Rich, R. F. (1981). (1981). The Power of Social Science Information and Public Policymaking: The Case of the Continuous National Survey. Jossey-Bass.
Shaleh, K., Sinaga, O., & Roespinoedji, D. (2021). Village Budget and Patron-Client Social Relations: Implications for Fraud: A Geographical Review. Review of International Geographical Education Online, 11(1), 720–725. https://doi.org/10.33403/rigeo.800611
Sugiyarto. (2018). Ribuan Kades di Jombang Demo Bupati Ini Penyebabnya. https://www.tribunnews.com/regional/2018/03/22/ribuan-kades-di-jombang-demo-bupati-ini-penyebabnya
Suhut. (2022). Inovasi Pakta Integritas pada Pilkades.
Suryono, A. (2014). Kebijakan Publik untuk Kesejahteraan Rakyat. TRANSPARANSI Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Administrasi, VI(September), 98–102.
Undang-Undang tentang Desa, Pub. L. No. 6 (2014).
Widoyoko, J. D. (2018). Politik, Patronase dan Pengadaan: Studi Kasus Korupsi Proyek Wisma Atlet. Integritas, 4(2), 23. https://jurnal.kpk.go.id/index.php/integritas/article/view/200
Yin, R. K. (2013). Validity and generalization in future case study evaluations. Evaluation, 19(3), 321-332.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Creative Commons-Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike License 4.0 International applies to all works published by Matra Pembaruan: Jurnal Inovasi Kebijakan. Authors will retain copyright of the work.
