Beralih ke bagian utama
Artikel Riset Asli Akses Terbuka Terakreditasi SINTA 2

Abstentions Phenomenon (Golput) Direct Local Election

DOI
10.21787/jbp.12.2020.203-212
Tanggal Terbit & Halaman
16 Desember 2020 · Hlm. 203-212
Riwayat Naskah
Diterima31 Jul 2020 Disetujui18 Nov 2020 Terbit16 Des 2020

1.538 Dilihat 1.819 Diunduh

Abstrak

Abstentions Phenomenon (Golput) Direct Local Election

The phenomenon of the "Golput" occurs in each election fluctuation, sometimes up and down, sometimes influenced by various factors. This research uses the literature study method by summarizing some documentation related to Indonesia's phenomenon of abstentions. Factors that cause voters not to give their voting rights are political, ideological, and identity factors. But abstentions can also be influenced by an improperly organized election system. From the results of this study, someone behaves abstentions from the technical aspects due to voters' technical constraints. It prevents them from exercising their right to vote, for example, having other activities at the same time on election day so they cannot come to the voting place. Golput is a person's attachment to voting in the general election process based on psychological factors, sociological factors, and rational voter factors. On the political aspect, abstentions have reasons such as distrust of the party, and candidates do not believe in a better chance. Meanwhile, if viewed from one aspect, identity can see based on religion, education level, age, gender, etc. In terms of faith, a person decides to abstain because party is expected not to be elected as a candidate. For example, Christian tends not to choose a party that carries Islam, such as the Prosperous Justice Party (PKS), the United Development Party (PPP), and others. In contrast, most nationalist candidates or political parties are considered less representative to accommodate their aspirations. Then abstentions will be the final choice taken.

Baca Naskah Lengkap

Isi lengkap artikel ini tersedia dalam format PDF. Versi resmi yang diterbitkan pada Vol 12 No 2 (2020).

Buka PDF

Daftar Pustaka

13 rujukan
  1. Amalia, N., & Mulyadi, A. (2019). Strategi Komisi Pemilihan Umum dalam Mengurangi Angka Golput pada Pemilihan Presiden dan Wakil Presiden. JOPPAS: Journal of Public Policy and Administration Silampari, 1(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.31539/joppa.v1i1.801
  2. Apriani, T., Hamudy, Moh. I. A., Rifki, M. S., & Hadi, A. S. (2018). E-voting in the Village Head Election in Batanghari and Kabupaten Bogor Regencies. Jurnal Bina Praja, 10(2), 317–326. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.10.2018.317-326
  3. Bakti, N. M. (2015). Perlindungan Golput dalam Perspektif HAM. Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal), 4(1), 82–89. https://doi.org/10.24843/JMHU.2015.v04.i01.p06
  4. Djuyandi, Y. (2017). Political Communication Strategy of the Regional Head in Managing Government in North Gorontalo Regency. Jurnal Bina Praja, 9(1), 53–61. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.09.2017.53-61
  5. Djuyandi, Y., & Herdiansah, A. G. (2018). Political Participation of Youth in the West Java Regional Election (Pilkada) in 2018. Jurnal Bina Praja, 10(2), 195–207. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.10.2018.195-207
  6. Ferza, R., & Aulia, N. F. (2020). 2018 Simultaneous Regional Head Elections: Political Dowry and Policy Implication. Jurnal Bina Praja, 12(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.12.2020.11-20
  7. Hariono, D. (2018). Hadis dalam Pusaran Pemilu (Mengkaji Pemahaman Hadis MUI dalam Fatwa Haram Golput Pemilu). UNIVERSUM, 12(1), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.30762/universum.v12i1.1058
  8. Masitoh, D., Utomo, S., & Widayati, W. (2013). Fenomena Golput pada Pilkada Pati 2011. Journal of Politic and Government Studies, 2(3), 111–125. https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/jpgs/article/view/2942
  9. Muhtadi, B. (2019). Vote Buying in Indonesia: The Mechanics of Electoral Bribery. Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6779-3
  10. Nababan, W. M. C. (2017). Rasionalisasi Golongan Putih (Golput).
  11. Putra, H. (2017). Determinants of Vote Buying in Local Head Election in Indonesia. Jurnal Bina Praja, 9(2), 205–218. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.09.2017.205-218
  12. Subanda, N. (2009). Analisis Kritis Terhadap Fenomena Golput di Indonesia. Konstitusi, 1(1), 60–72. https://ejournal.unpatti.ac.id/ppr_paperinfo_lnk.php?id=44
  13. Supriyanto, E. E. (2016). Kebijakan Inovasi Teknologi Informasi (IT) Melalui Program Elektronik Goverment dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Pelayanan Publik di Indonesia. JIP (Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan): Kajian Ilmu Pemerintahan Dan Politik Daerah, 1(1), 141–161. https://doi.org/10.24905/jip.1.1.2016.141-161

Hak Cipta & Lisensi Akses Terbuka

Hak Cipta (c) 2020 Penulis. Artikel ini dilisensikan di bawah CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0.