Beralih ke bagian utama
Artikel Riset Asli Akses Terbuka Terakreditasi SINTA 2

Fiscal Decentralization Dilemma in Indonesia

Between Corruption Accountability and Probability at Local Levels

DOI
10.21787/jbp.12.2020.101-110
Tanggal Terbit & Halaman
28 Mei 2020 · Hlm. 103-112
Riwayat Naskah
Diterima13 Apr 2020 Disetujui23 Mei 2020 Terbit28 Mei 2020

4.464 Dilihat 2.768 Diunduh

Abstrak

Fiscal Decentralization Dilemma in Indonesia: Between Corruption Accountability and Probability at Local Levels

Decentralization in Indonesia is an unfinished reform and to date, its implementation has not been maximized especially fiscal decentralization. This study aims to investigate the dilemma of fiscal decentralization in Indonesia, between accountability and the probability of corruption at the local level. Data collection in this research is in the form of documentation study to collect secondary data. Secondary data, this study will rely on documentary analysis of official documents from government, NGOs and news items from the media. For data analysis, the study will run analysis processes such as coding, combining emerging codes into themes, verifying themes through theory and follow-up interviews, and drawing conclusions. Whereas the validity mechanism applies member checks, triangulation, multiple sources of data, and looking for counterexamples. This research empirically found that the implementation of fiscal decentralization in Indonesia not only had a positive impact on the financial accountability of local governments but also had a positive impact on the occurrence of corruption in local governments. This means, fiscal decentralization is like two sides of a coin, on the one hand, it is able to increase the financial accountability of local governments, but on the other hand the greater the balance of funds provided by the central government to the regions, the higher the probability of corruption in local governments. Therefore, the supervision of the implementation of fiscal decentralization in order to create good financial governance and minimize corruption in the local government body in Indonesia.

Baca Naskah Lengkap

Isi lengkap artikel ini tersedia dalam format PDF. Versi resmi yang diterbitkan pada Vol 12 No 1 (2020).

Buka PDF

Daftar Pustaka

61 rujukan
  1. Abdullah, H. (2015). Realokasi Kebijakan Fiskal: Implikasi Peningkatan Human Capital dan Pembangunan Infrastruktur terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi dan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat. Jurnal Bina Praja: Journal of Home Affairs Governance, 6(2), 117–128. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.06.2014.117-128
  2. Addink, H. (2019). Good Governance. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198841159.001.0001
  3. Akbar, M. R. H. (2013). Analisis Determinan Ekonomi Korupsi di Era Desentralisasi pada 12 Ibukota Provinsi Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa FEB, 1(2). https://jimfeb.ub.ac.id/index.php/jimfeb/article/view/612
  4. Anan, E. (2012). Desentralisasi Fiskal dan Tingkat Korupsi di Indonesia. EBBANK, 3(2), 371–382. http://ebbank.stiebbank.ac.id/index.php/EBBANK/article/view/50
  5. Arifin, T., Trinugroho, I., Prabowo, M. A., Sutaryo, S., & Muhtar, M. (2015). Local governance and corruption: Evidence from Indonesia. Corporate Ownership and Control, 12(4), 194–199. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv12i4c1p3
  6. Baskaran, T. (2011). Fiscal decentralization, ideology, and the size of the public sector. European Journal of Political Economy, 27(3), 485–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2011.03.003
  7. Boeije, H. R. (2009). Analysis in Qualitative Research. SAGE.
  8. Carnegie, G. D., & West, B. P. (2005). Making accounting accountable in the public sector. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 16(7), 905–928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2004.01.002
  9. Chêne, M. (2007). Corruption and Decentralisation in Afghanistan. In U4 Expert Answer. U4 Anti-CorruptionResource Centre. https://www.u4.no/publications/corruption-and-decentralisation-in-afghanistan
  10. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
  11. Crook, R. C., & Sverrisson, A. S. (2001). Decentralisation and Poverty-Alleviation in Developing Countries: A Comparative Analysis or, is West Bengal Unique? In IDS Working Paper Series (130). https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/20.500.12413/3904
  12. Djalil, R. (2014). Akuntabilitas Keuangan Daerah: Implementasi Pasca Reformasi. RMBooks.
  13. Elsye, R. (2014). Implementasi Kebijakan Desentralisasi Fiskal di Provinsi Sumatera Selatan. Sosiohumaniora, 16(2), 171–183. https://doi.org/10.24198/sosiohumaniora.v16i2.5730
  14. Fisman, R., & Gatti, R. (2002). Decentralization and corruption: evidence across countries. Journal of Public Economics, 83(3), 325–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(00)00158-4
  15. Fontanella, A., & Rossieta, H. (2014). Pengaruh Desentralisasi Fiskal dan Kinerja Terhadap Akuntabilitas Pelaporan Keuangan Pemerintah di Indonesia. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi 17.
  16. Giannoni, M., & Hitiris, T. (2002). The regional impact of health care expenditure: the case of Italy. Applied Economics, 34(14), 1829–1836. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840210126809
  17. Gideon, J. (2001). The decentralization of primary health care delivery in Chile. Public Administration and Development, 21(3), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.175
  18. Halim, A. (2001). Manajemen Keuangan Daerah: Bunga Rampai. UPP AMP YKPN.
  19. Hartanto, R., & Probohudono, A. N. (2013). Desentralisasi Fiskal, Karakteristik Pemerintah Daerah dan Tingkat Korupsi Pemerintah Daerah pada Tahun 2008 dan 2010. Proceeding Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XVI Manado.
  20. Haryanto, J. (2017). Comparative Analysis of Financial Performance in Fiscal Decentralization Era Among Natural and Non-Natural Resources Region. Jurnal Bina Praja. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.09.2017.171-184
  21. Haug, M. (2007). Kemiskinan dan desentralisasi di Kutai Barat: dampak otonomi daerah terhadap kesejahteraan Dayak Benuaq. In CIFOR. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR). https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/002359
  22. Henderson, J. V., & Kuncoro, A. (2011). Corruption and local democratization in Indonesia: The role of Islamic parties. Journal of Development Economics, 94(2), 164–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2010.01.007
  23. Hill, H. (2012). Corruption and development: The Indonesian experience. In S. Khoman (Ed.), A Scholar for All: Essays in Honour of Medhi Krongkaew (pp. 150–164). Thammasat University Press.
  24. Holtzappel, C. J. G., & Ramstedt, M. (Eds.). (2009). Decentralization and Regional Autonomy in Indonesia: Implementation and Challenges. ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/decentralization-and-regional-autonomy-in-indonesia/389B9E1C406C3C9DABF80A02AD4348C7
  25. Huda, N. A., & Sasana, H. (2013). Analisis Dampak Desentralisasi Fiskal Terhadap Outcomes Pelayanan Publik Bidang Pendidikan (Studi Kasus: Provinsi DKI Jakarta). Diponegoro Journal of Economics, 2(1), 1–13. https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/jme/article/view/1965
  26. Isufaj, M. (2014). Decentralization and the Increased Autonomy in Local Governments. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 109, 459–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.490
  27. Jayani, D. H. (2019, July 13). Sejak 2004 hingga 2019, Terdapat 124 Kepala Daerah Terjerat Korupsi (H. Widowati (Ed.)). Databoks.Katadata.Co.Id. https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2019/07/13/sejak-2004-hingga-2019-terdapat-124-kepala-daerah-terjerat-korupsi
  28. Jonas, G. J., & Blanchet, J. (2000). Assessing Quality of Financial Reporting. Accounting Horizons, 14(3), 353–363. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2000.14.3.353
  29. Juwono, V., & Mayasari, I. (2019, March 14). Pola Korupsi Pemerintah Daerah dan Pimpinan Transformasional. Kpk.Go.Id. https://www.kpk.go.id/id/berita/publik-bicara/782-pola-korupsi-pemerintah-daerah-dan-pimpinan-transformasional
  30. Kapucu, N. (2009). New Public Management and Governance Perspectives in Understanding Public Management. Public Administration Review, 69(6), 1187–1190. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.02078.x
  31. Kuncoro, A. (2006). Decentralization and Corruption in Indonesia: Manufacturing Firms Survival under Decentralization. In The International Centre for the Study of East Asian Development (2006-25).
  32. Kyriacou, A. P., & Roca-Sagalés, O. (2011). Fiscal decentralization and government quality in the OECD. Economics Letters, 111(3), 191–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2011.02.019
  33. Liu, C. (2007). What Type of Fiscal Decentralization System has Better Performance? University of Maryland.
  34. Maria, E., Halim, A., Suwardi, E., & Miharjo, S. (2019). Desentralisasi fiskal dan probabilitas terjadinya korupsi: Sebuah bukti empiris dari Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 22(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.24914/jeb.v22i1.2036
  35. Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education: Revised and Expanded from Case Study Research in Education (2nd ed.). Wiley.
  36. Mills, A. (1994). Decentralization and accountability in the health sector from an international perspective: What are the choices? Public Administration and Development, 14(3), 281–292. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.4230140305
  37. Mimba, N. P. S., Helden, G., & Tillema, S. (2007). Public Sector Performance Measurement in Developing Countries: A Literature Review and Research Agenda. Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change, 3(3), 192–208.
  38. Mudhofar, K., & Tahar, A. (2016). Pengaruh Desentralisasi Fiskal dan Kinerja Terhadap Akuntabilitas Pelaporan Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah di Indonesia: Efek Moderasi dari Kinerja. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Investasi, 17(2), 176–185. https://doi.org/10.18196/jai.2016.0053.176-185
  39. Muqoyyidin, A. W. (2013). Pemekaran Wilayah dan Otonomi Daerah Pasca Reformasi di Indonesia: Konsep, Fakta Empiris dan Rekomendasi ke Depan. Jurnal Konstitusi, 10(2), 287–309. https://jurnalkonstitusi.mkri.id/index.php/jk/article/view/105
  40. Mursitama, T. N. (2007). Creating relational rents: The effect of business groups on affiliated firms’ performance in Indonesia. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23(4), 537–557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-006-9014-3
  41. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. SAGE Publications.
  42. Purbasari, H., & Bawono, A. D. B. (2017). Pengaruh Desentralisasi Fiskal, Sistem Pengendalian Internal dan Kinerja Pemerintah Daerah Terhadap Akuntabilitas Laporan Keuangan. Riset Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 2(2), 102–108. https://doi.org/10.23917/reaksi.v2i2.4884
  43. Puspasari, N., & Suwardi, E. (2016). The Effect of Individual Morality and Internal Control on The Propensity to Commit Fraud: Evidence from Local Governments. Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business, 31(2), 208–219. https://doi.org/10.22146/jieb.15291
  44. Rinaldi, T., Purnomo, M., & Damayanti, D. (2007). Memerangi Korupsi di Indonesia yang Terdesentralisasi: Studi Kasus Penanganan Korupsi Pemerintahan Daerah. In Justice for the Poor Project (No. 43641; 1). http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/593731468040748249/Memerangi-korupsi-di-Indonesia-yang-terdesentralisasi-studi-kasus-penanganan-korupsi-pemerintahan-daerah
  45. Rini, R. A. P. (2019, June 18). Sepanjang 2014-2019, Tercatat 105 Kasus Korupsi Libatkan Pejabat Tinggi Daerah, Ini Daerahnya (J. Simanjuntak (Ed.)). Tribunnews.Com. https://www.tribunnews.com/nasional/2019/06/18/sepanjang-2014-2019-tercatat-105-kasus-korupsi-libatkan-pejabat-tinggi-daerah-ini-daerahnya
  46. Ryan, C., Stanley, T., & Nelson, M. (2002). Accountability Disclosures by Queensland Local Government Councils: 1997–1999. Financial Accountability & Management, 18(3), 261–289. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0408.00153
  47. Saputra, B. (2012). Dampak Desentralisasi Fiskal Terhadap Korupsi di Indonesia. Jurnal Borneo Administrator, 8(3), 293–309. https://doi.org/10.24258/jba.v8i3.92
  48. Saragih, J. P. (2003). Desentralisasi Fiskal dan Keuangan Daerah dalam Otonomi. Ghalia Indonesia.
  49. Sari, M., & Arza, F. I. (2019). Pengaruh Karakteristik Pemerintah Daerah Terhadap Kondisi Financial Distress Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten dan Kota Se-Indonesia Periode 2015-2017. Wahana Riset Akuntansi, 7(1), 1425–1436. http://ejournal.unp.ac.id/index.php/wra/article/view/104566
  50. Sasana, H. (2009). Peran Desentralisasi Fiskal Terhadap Kinerja Ekonomi di Kabupaten/Kota Provinsi Jawa Tengah. Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan: Kajian Masalah Ekonomi Dan Pembangunan, 10(1), 103–124. https://doi.org/10.23917/jep.v10i1.811
  51. Simanjuntak, K. (2015). Implementasi Kebijakan Desentralisasi Pemerintahan di Indonesia. Jurnal Bina Praja, 7(2), 111–130. https://doi.org/10.21787/JBP.07.2015.111-130
  52. Steccolini, I. (2003). Local Government Annual Report: An Accountability Medium? SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.376204
  53. Syahruddin, H. (n.d.). Desentralisasi Fiskal: Perlu Penyempurnaan Kebijakan dan Implementasi yang Konsisten. https://docplayer.info/46383870-Desentralisasi-fiskal-perlu-penyempurnaan-kebijakan-dan-implementasi-yang-konsisten.html#show_full_text
  54. Syarif, A. (2017). Desentralisasi Fiskal dan Korupsi: Fakta dalam Era Otonomi Daerah (Studi pada 15 Kabupaten/Kota di Indonesia) [Universitas Gadjah Mada]. http://etd.repository.ugm.ac.id/home/detail_pencarian/110315
  55. Taylor, S. J., Bogdan, R., & DeVault, M. (2015). Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods: A Guidebook and Resource (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
  56. Tirtosudarmo, R. (2008). Paradigma dalam Kebijakan Desentralisasi di Indonesia: Sebuah Kritik Terhadap Dominasi Public Administration School. Jurnal Masyarakat & Budaya, 10(1), 27–52. http://jmb.lipi.go.id/index.php/jmb/article/view/170
  57. Utami, I. S. (2018). Desentralisasi, Korupsi, dan Tambal Sulam Pemerintahan Daerah di Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan, 5(1), 35–46. https://doi.org/10.32493/jpkn.v5i1.y2018.p35-46
  58. Valsecchi, M. (2013). Local Elections and Corruption during Democratization: Evidence from Indonesia. https://lir.gu.se/digitalAssets/1457/1457696_130130_mv_corruption.pdf
  59. Wu, X. (2005). Corporate Governance and Corruption: A Cross-Country Analysis. Governance, 18(2), 151–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2005.00271.x
  60. Yin, R. K. (2014). Case Study Research. SAGE Publications, inc.
  61. Yudha, D. M. A. K., Wirakusuma, M. G., & Rasmini, N. K. (2016). Pengaruh Desentralisasi Fiskal pada Pertumbuhan Ekonomi dengan Moderasi Akuntabilitas Pelaporan Keuangan. E-Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Universitas Udayana, 5(8), 2461–2490. https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/EEB/article/view/19930