Beralih ke bagian utama
Artikel Riset Asli Akses Terbuka Terakreditasi SINTA 2

Sistem Peradilan Adat Nagari di Sumatera Barat

Penulis

  • Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Imam Bonjol Padang
  • *Penulis korespondensi
DOI
10.21787/jbp.11.2019.53-62
Tanggal Terbit & Halaman
31 Mei 2019 · Hlm. 53-62
Riwayat Naskah
Diterima3 Mar 2019 Disetujui9 Apr 2019 Terbit31 Mei 2019
Baca PDF 484 KB Kutip

1.240 Dilihat 1.142 Diunduh

Abstrak

Nagari Customary Justice System in West Sumatra

The state recognizes and respects indigenous and tribal people and their traditional rights insofar as they are alive and in accordance with the development of society and the principles of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia, as contained in Article 18 B paragraph 2 of the 1945 Constitution. However, the fulfillment of cultural identity and the rights of indigenous people have not been maximized. This study aims to find the conceptual model of the Customary Justice system in an effort to protect the existence of the rights of indigenous people to build the strength of civil society in West Sumatra. This research uses research and development methods. Data retrieval is done by survey, observation, interview, and Focus Group Discussion (FGD) methods. This study found that; 1) Minangkabau people have their own local wisdom in resolving customary disputes, even for a broader range of life issues, long before Indonesia was found, 2) Nagari Customary Justice system is a translation of Customary Limbago which is the life philosophy of Minangkabau people, 3) Nagari Customary Judicial institutional structure is a representation of the existence of the tribe in the Nagari, so that its cultural legitimacy becomes strong. And, 4) the Nagari Customary Justice system is an effort to build the sovereignty of civil society, namely an autonomous, independent, egalitarian, and democratic society. It is hoped that the results of this study will be a guideline in establishing the Nagari Customary Justice institution in West Sumatra.

Kata Kunci:

Baca Naskah Lengkap

Isi lengkap artikel ini tersedia dalam format PDF. Versi resmi yang diterbitkan pada Vol 11 No 1 (2019).

Buka PDF

Daftar Pustaka

43 rujukan
  1. Aermadepa. (2016). Perlindungan Hak Konstitusional Masyarakat Hukum Adat Minangkabau dalam Pelaksanaan Gadai Tanah Pertanian. Jurnal Konstitusi, 13(3), 597–612. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1336
  2. Afandi, A. K. (2012). Konsep Kekuasaan Michel Faucault. Teosofi: Jurnal Tasawuf Dan Pemikiran Islam, 2(1), 131–149. https://doi.org/10.15642/teosofi.2012.2.1.131-149
  3. Afrizal. (2003). Sistem Pemerintahan Nagari dalam Tinjauan Filosofis Budaya Minangkabau (UIN Sunan Kalijaga). Retrieved from http://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/9440/
  4. Akmal. (2008). Perlindungan Hak Masyarakat Hukum Adat di Sumatera Barat. Jurnal Demokrasi, 7(1), 1–16. Retrieved from http://ejournal.unp.ac.id/index.php/jd/article/view/1142
  5. Aliansi Masyarakat Adat Nusantara, & Partnership for Governance Reform in Indonesia. (2003). Sistem Peradilan Adat dan Lokal di Indonesia: Peluang dan Tantangan. Jakarta: Aliansi Masyarakat Adat Nusantara.
  6. Amalia, N., Mukhlis, & Yusrizal. (2018). Model Penyelesaian Sengketa dan Peradilan Adat di Aceh. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 25(1), 159–179. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol25.iss1.art8
  7. Azwar, W. (2018). The Resistance of Local Wisdom Towards Radicalism: The Study of the Tarekat Community of West Sumatra, Indonesia. PERTANIKA Journal Social Sciences & Humanities, 26(1), 75–102. Retrieved from http://www.pertanika.upm.edu.my/Pertanika PAPERS/JSSH Vol. 26 (1) Mar. 2018/05 JSSH-1622-2016-3rdProof.pdf
  8. Azwar, W., Yunus, Y., Muliono, M., & Permatasari, Y. (2018). Nagari Minangkabau: The Study of Indigenous Institutions in West Sumatra, Indonesia. Jurnal Bina Praja, 10(2), 231–239. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.10.2018.231-239
  9. Corpuz, J. (2012). Pluralisme hukum: Pengalaman Filipina. In M. Colchester & S. Chao (Eds.), Beragam Jalur Menuju Keadilan: Pluralisme Hukum dan Hak-hak Masyarakat Adat di Asia Tenggara (1st ed.). Retrieved from https://www.forestpeoples.org/id/topics/rights-land-natural-resources/publication/2012/beragam-jalur-menuju-keadilan-pluralisme-hukum
  10. Doolittle, A. (2012). Hak-hak masyarakat asli atas tanah adat di Sabah, Malaysia 1881-2010. In M. Colchester & S. Chao (Eds.), Beragam Jalur Menuju Keadilan: Pluralisme Hukum dan Hak-hak Masyarakat Adat di Asia Tenggara (1st ed.). Retrieved from https://www.forestpeoples.org/id/topics/rights-land-natural-resources/publication/2012/beragam-jalur-menuju-keadilan-pluralisme-hukum
  11. Faundez, J. (2003). Non-State Justice Systems in Latin America. Case Studies: Peru and Colombia. Paper Prepared for the DFID Workshop on “Working with Non-State Justice Systems.”
  12. Fauzan, E. (2004). Pemanfaatan Tanah Ulayat Nagari dalam Sistem Kembali ke Pemerintahan Nagari (Studi Kecamatan Matur Kabupaten Again Provinsi Sumatera Barat) (Universitas Diponegoro). Retrieved from http://eprints.undip.ac.id/11008/
  13. Fazillah, N. (2017). Konsep Civil Society Nurcholish Madjid dan Relevansinya dengan Kondisi Masyarakat Indonesia Kontemporer. AL-LUBB: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam, 2(1), 206–225. Retrieved from http://jurnal.uinsu.ac.id/index.php/lubb/article/view/753
  14. Fitlayeni, R. (2015). Konflik Tanah Ulayat Antara Kaum Caniago di Nagari Kasang dengan Badan Pertanahan Nasional Padang Pariman. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Mamangan, 4(2), 151–157. https://doi.org/10.22202/MAMANGAN.1310
  15. Foucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972-1977 (C. Gordon, Ed.). New York: Pantheon Books.
  16. Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (1989). Educational Research: An Introduction (5th ed.). New York: Longman.
  17. Harsono, B. (1999). Hukum Agraria Indonesia: Sejarah Pembentukan Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria, Isi, dan Pelaksanaannya. Jakarta: Djambatan.
  18. Jb, M. C., & Darmawan, L. (2016). Wacana Civil Society (Masyarakat Madani) di Indonesia. Jurnal Sosiologi Reflektif, 10(2), 35–64. https://doi.org/10.14421/jsr.v10i2.1157
  19. Maliki, Z. (2016). Sosiologi Politik: Makna Kekuasaan dan Transformasi Politik. Yogyakarta: UGM Press.
  20. Mawardi, I. (2015). Dimensi-Dimensi Masyarakat Madani: Membangun Kultur Etika Sosial. Cakrawala: Jurnal Studi Islam, 10(2), 156–174. Retrieved from http://journal.ummgl.ac.id/index.php/cakrawala/article/view/81
  21. Mutolib, A., Yonariza, Mahdi, & Ismono, H. (2015). Konflik Agraria dan Pelepasan Tanah Ulayat (Studi Kasus pada Masyarakat Suku Melayu di Kesatuan Pemangkuan Hutan Dharmasraya, Sumatera Barat). Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Dan Ekonomi Kehutanan, 12(3), 213–225. Retrieved from http://ejournal.forda-mof.org/latihan/index.php/JPSE/article/view/967
  22. Parmudi, M. (2015). Kebangkitan Civil Society di Indonesia. At-Taqaddum, 7(2), 295–310. https://doi.org/10.21580/at.v7i2.1208
  23. Penal Reform International. (2000). Access to justice in sub - Saharan Africa: the role of traditional and informal justice systems. London: Penal Reform International.
  24. Prasetya, R., Firdaus, & Hasanah, U. (2018). Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah Ulayat Kaum oleh Masyarakat Adat di Nagari Supayang Kecamatan Salimpaung Kabupaten Tanah Datar (Sengketa Tanah Kaum Datuk Tianso dan Kaum Datuk Cumano). Jurnal Online Mahasiswa (JOM) Bidang Ilmu Hukum, 5(1), 1–15. Retrieved from https://jom.unri.ac.id/index.php/JOMFHUKUM/article/view/19563
  25. Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Sistem Hukum Nasional Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia RI. (2013). Peluang Peradilan Adat dalam Meneyelesaikan Sengketa Antar Masyarakat Hukum Adat dengan Pihak Luar. Jakarta.
  26. Puspitasari, S. H. (2001). Kontektualisasi Pemikiran Machiavelli tentang Kekuasaan-Tujuan Negara. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 8(18), 30–45. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol8.iss18.art3
  27. Ritzer, G., & Goodman, D. J. (2005). Teori Sosiologi Modern. Jakarta: Prenada Media.
  28. Ritzer, G., & Smart, B. (2012). Handbook Teori Sosial. Jakarta: Nusa Media.
  29. Rochaeti, N., & Sutanti, R. D. (2018). Kontribusi Peradilan Adat dan Keadilan Restoratif dalam Pembaruan Hukum Pidana di Indonesia. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 47(3), 198–214. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.47.3.2018.198-214
  30. Roy, D. (2012). Penegasan hak-hak atas tanah adat di Chittagong Hill Tracts, Bangladesh: Berbagai tantangan bagi pluralisme hukum dan pluralisme yuridis. In M. Colchester & S. Chao (Eds.), Beragam Jalur Menuju Keadilan: Pluralisme Hukum dan Hak-hak Masyarakat Adat di Asia Tenggara (1st ed.). Retrieved from https://www.forestpeoples.org/id/topics/rights-land-natural-resources/publication/2012/beragam-jalur-menuju-keadilan-pluralisme-hukum
  31. Sudantra, I. K. (2016). Pengakuan Peradilan Adat dalam Politik Hukum Kekuasaan Kehakiman. Denpasar: Swasta Nulus.
  32. Sugiswati, B. (2012). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Eksistensi Masyarakat Adat di Indonesia. Perspektif, 17(1), 31–43. Retrieved from http://jurnal-perspektif.org/index.php/perspektif/article/view/92
  33. Sulaiman. (2017). Rekonseptualisasi Hukum Indonesia. Pandecta: Research Law Journal, 12(2), 98–110. https://doi.org/10.15294/PANDECTA.V12I2.9324
  34. Suroto. (2015). Konsep Masyarakat Madani di Indonesia dalam Masa Postmodern (Sebuah Analitis Kritis). Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan, 5(9), 664–671. Retrieved from https://www.neliti.com/id/publications/121296/konsep-masyarakat-madani-dii-indonesia-dalam-masa-postmodern-sebuah-analitis-kri
  35. Tegnan, H. (2015). Legal pluralism and land administration in West Sumatra: the implementation of the regulations of both local and nagari governments on communal land tenure. The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 47(2), 312–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2015.1072386
  36. Trakansuphakon, P. (2012). Menjamin kepastian hak melalui pluralisme hukum: Pengelolaan lahan komunal di kalangan Masyarakat Adat Karen di Thailand. In M. Colchester & S. Chao (Eds.), Beragam Jalur Menuju Keadilan: Pluralisme Hukum dan Hak-hak Masyarakat Adat di Asia Tenggara (1st ed.). Retrieved from https://www.forestpeoples.org/id/topics/rights-land-natural-resources/publication/2012/beragam-jalur-menuju-keadilan-pluralisme-hukum
  37. Ubbe, A. (2013). Peradilan Adat dan Keadilan Restoratif. Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 2(2), 161–175. Retrieved from http://rechtsvinding.bphn.go.id/ejournal/index.php/jrv/article/view/70
  38. UN-Habitat. (2015). Harmonization of the Legal Systems Resolving Land Disputes in Somaliland and Puntland. Retrieved from https://unhabitat.org/books/harmonization-of-the-legal-systems-resolving-land-disputes-in-somaliland-and-puntland/
  39. United Nations for Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner. (2016). Human Rights and Traditional Justice Systems in Africa. https://doi.org/10.18356/e4202da6-en
  40. Utama, T. S. J., & Aristya, S. D. F. (2015). Kajian tentang Relevansi Peradilan Adat Terhadap Sistem Peradilan Perdata Indonesia. Mimbar Hukum, 27(1), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.15910
  41. Wajdi Ibrahim, F. (2012). Pembentukan Masyarakat Madani di Indonesia Melalui Civic Education. Jurnal Ilmiah Didaktika, 13(1), 130–149. https://doi.org/10.22373/jid.v13i1.469
  42. Warman, K., & Syofiarti. (2012). Pola Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah Ulayat di Sumatera Barat (Sengketa Antara Masyarakat vs Pemerintah). Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 41(3), 407–415. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.41.3.2012.407-415
  43. Wignjosoebroto, S. (2002). Hukum: Paradigma, Metode, dan Dinamika Masalahnya. Jakarta: Elsam.

Artikel paling banyak dibaca berdasarkan penulis yang sama