Beralih ke bagian utama
Artikel Riset Asli Akses Terbuka Terakreditasi SINTA 2

Dampak Revitalisasi Pasar Tradisional terhadap Persepsi dan Kujungan Konsumen

DOI
10.21787/jbp.10.2018.183-193
Tanggal Terbit & Halaman
13 November 2018 · Hlm. 183-193
Riwayat Naskah
Diterima26 Jun 2018 Disetujui24 Sep 2018 Terbit13 Nov 2018

2.388 Dilihat 1.573 Diunduh

Abstrak

The Consumers’ Perception and Frequency of Visit Before and After Wet Market Revitalization

The Ministry of Trade revealed that there are 41 wet markets in 12 provinces in Indonesia suffering from damage, 50 percent of which are due to incomplete and inadequate market facilities. From a survey of 3,956 markets, 95 percent of them have a physical building over 25 years. In Banyumas regency there are two wet markets that have experienced the revitalization program, namely those in Cilongok and Sokaraja. However, this research focused on Cilongok market. This research aims to compare consumer assessment toward the level of cleanliness, safety, orderliness, and lighting, level of favorability and frequency of consumer visit to Cilongokwetmarket. This study used a comparative descriptive method to compare consumers’ assessment. The before-after approach is used to assess the effectiveness of the treatment, characterized by an average difference before and after treatment. This research surveyed 100 respondents selected by accidental sampling. Data were collected by questionnaire-based exit interview. Data of the assessment pre-revitalization are obtained by recall method. Data were then analyzed using paired sample t-test. The results show that consumer assessment toward the level of cleanliness, safety, orderliness, and lighting of the Cilongokwet market after revitalization is higher than that before revitalization. Moreover, their level of favorability and frequency of visiting the market are higher, too. The results imply that revitalization of wet markets has been perceived positively by consumers, which has affected their frequency of shopping, thereby improving the competitiveness of the wet market against the modern market.

Baca Naskah Lengkap

Isi lengkap artikel ini tersedia dalam format PDF. Versi resmi yang diterbitkan pada Vol 10 No 2 (2018).

Buka PDF

Daftar Pustaka

30 rujukan
  1. Agung, I. D. M. (2011). Revitalisasi Pasar Tradisional: Masyarakat Harus Disadarkan Bahwa Berbelanja di Pasar Tradisional Bukan Berarti Kuno dan Antimodernisme. Sewaka Dharma Edisi I, pp. 14–17.
  2. Aria, P. (2014, March 13). Pemerintah Revitalisasi 461 Pasar Tradisional - Bisnis Tempo.co. Retrieved from https://bisnis.tempo.co/read/561977/pemerintah-revitalisasi-461-pasar-tradisional
  3. Arikunto, S. (2013). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
  4. detikFinance. (2011, July 5). 95% Pasar di Indonesia Sudah Berumur Seperempat Abad. Retrieved from https://finance.detik.com/berita-ekonomi-bisnis/1674695/95-pasar-di-indonesia-sudah-berumur-seperempat-abad?
  5. Dewi, U., & Winarni, F. (2013). Pengembangan Pasar Tradisional Menghadapi Gempuran Pasar Modern di Kota Yogyakarta. In Proceeding Simposium Nasional Asian III. Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Semarang.
  6. Fatmawati, F., & Lantu, D. C. (2017). Evaluation of Revitalization Program (Case: Cihapit Traditional Market). Journal of Business and Management, 6(1), 101–113. Retrieved from http://journal.sbm.itb.ac.id/index.php/jbm/article/view/2144
  7. Gindi, A. A., Abdullah, A. M., Ismail, M. M., & Nawi, N. M. (2016). Shopping drivers of generational cohorts: A comparison between night market and wet market formats for fresh fruit and vegetable purchase in Malaysia. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ), 24(2), 165–170. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2016.05.002
  8. Gonzalez, S., & Waley, P. (2013). Traditional Retail Markets: The New Gentrification Frontier? Antipode, 45(4), 965–983. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2012.01040.x
  9. Gorton, M., Sauer, J., & Supatpongkul, P. (2009). Investigating Thai Shopping Behaviour: Wet-Markets, Supermarkets and Food Quality. In The 83rd Annual Conference of the Agricultural Economics Society (pp. 1–29). Dublin.
  10. Halik, A. (2014). Peran Pemerintah Kota Serang dalam Kebijakan Pengembangan Pasar Tradisional. Jurnal Bina Praja, 06(02), 84–100. http://doi.org/10.21787/JBP.06.2014.84-100
  11. Handayati, P. (2018). Developing Regional Market Based on Local Commodity: (Case Study on Regional Market in Pasuruan Regency). KnE Social Sciences, 3(3), 491. http://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i3.1906
  12. Haryotejo, B. (2014). Dampak Ekspansi Hypermarket terhadap Pasar Tradisional di Daerah. Jurnal Bina Praja, 06(03), 241–248. http://doi.org/10.21787/JBP.06.2014.241-248
  13. Huang, C., Tsai, K.-H., & Chen, Y.-C. (2015). How do wet markets still survive in Taiwan? British Food Journal, 117(1), 234–256. http://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-05-2013-0136
  14. Ika, A. (2016, May 4). Mendag: Target Revitalisasi Pasar 2015 Tercapai - Kompas.com. Retrieved from https://ekonomi.kompas.com/read/2016/05/04/190100526/Mendag.Target.Revitalisasi.Pasar.2015.Tercapai
  15. Johnson, D. B., & Mowry, T. A. (2012). Mathematics: A Practical Odyssey (7th ed.). Cengage Learning.
  16. Lagerkvist, C. J., Shikuku, K., Okello, J., Karanja, N., & Ackello-Ogutu, C. (2015). A conceptual approach for measuring farmers’ attitudes to integrated soil fertility management in Kenya. NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 74–75(75), 17–26. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2015.06.001
  17. Mele, C., Ng, M., & Chim, M. B. (2015). Urban markets as a ‘corrective’ to advanced urbanism: The social space of wet markets in contemporary Singapore. Urban Studies, 52(1), 103–120. http://doi.org/10.1177/0042098014524613
  18. Najib, M. F., & Sosianika, A. (2017). Retail Service Quality in Indonesia: Traditional Market Vs. Modern Market. Academy of Marketing Studies Journal, 21(2). Retrieved from https://www.abacademies.org/articles/retail-service-quality-in-indonesia-traditional-market-vs-modern-market-6763.html
  19. Paramita, A. A. I. M. P., & Ayuningsasi, A. A. K. (2013). Efektivitas dan Dampak Program Revitalisasi Pasar Tradisional di Pasar Agung Peninjoan. E-Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan, 2(5), 233–243. Retrieved from https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/eep/issue/view/800
  20. Pramana, H. W. (2012). Aplikasi Inventory Berbasis Access 2003. Jakarta: Elex Media Komputindo.
  21. Puska Dagri BP2KP. (2015). Laporan Akhir Analisis Arah Pengembangan Pasar Rakyat. Jakarta.
  22. Riduwan, & Sunarto, H. (2014). Pengantar Statistika Pendidikan, Sosial, Ekonomi, Komunikasi, dan Bisnis. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  23. Schipmann, C., & Qaim, M. (2011). Modern Food Retailers and Traditional Markets in Developing Countries: Comparing Quality, Prices, and Competition Strategies in Thailand. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 33(3), 345–362. http://doi.org/10.1093/aepp/ppr018
  24. Si, Z., Scott, S., & McCordic, C. (2018). Wet markets, supermarkets and alternative food sources: consumers’ food access in Nanjing, China. Canadian Journal of Development Studies / Revue Canadienne d’études Du Développement, 0(0), 1–19. http://doi.org/10.1080/02255189.2018.1442322
  25. Sipahutar, H. (2016). Factors Affecting Traditional Markets Competitiveness. Jurnal Bina Praja, 08(01), 27–38. http://doi.org/10.21787/JBP.08.2016.27-38
  26. Sugiyono. (2009). Metode Penelitian Bisnis (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D). Bandung: Alfabeta.
  27. Sumarsono, S. (2006). Ekonomi Mikro: Teori dan Soal Latihan. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
  28. Widyanto, M. A. (2013). Statistika Terapan: Konsep & Aplikasi SPSS/LISEL dalam Penelitian Pendidikan, Psikologi & Ilmu Sosial Lainnya. Jakarta: Elex Media Komputindo.
  29. Yang, S.-H., & Monteiro, D. S. (2016). What’s in a Price? The Impact of Starting Point Bias in WTP for Information in Taiwanese Wet Markets. In The Agricultural & Applied Economics Association’s 2016 AAEA Annual Meeting. Boston, MA: The Agricultural & Applied Economics Association.
  30. Zhang, Q. F., & Pan, Z. (2013). The Transformation of Urban Vegetable Retail in China: Wet Markets, Supermarkets and Informal Markets in Shanghai. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 43(3), 497–518. http://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2013.782224