Beralih ke bagian utama
Artikel Riset Asli Akses Terbuka Terakreditasi SINTA 2

Melampaui Penyederhanaan Struktural

Transformasi Budaya Birokrasi dan Resistensi terhadap Perubahan Organisasi—Bukti dari Kabupaten Tangerang, Indonesia

Penulis

  • Ani Martini * Penulis korespondensi
  • Muhammad Fadhil Marwan
DOI
10.21787/jbp.18.2026.3391
Tanggal Terbit & Halaman
31 Agustus 2026 · Hlm. 353-371
Riwayat Naskah
Diterima28 Jun 2026 Disetujui10 Agu 2026 Terbit31 Agu 2026
Lisensi
CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0
Baca PDF 1,4 MB Kutip

298 Dilihat 129 Diunduh

Abstrak

Penyederhanaan birokrasi di Indonesia diperkenalkan untuk mengurangi lapisan hierarki serta mendorong administrasi publik yang lebih lincah, profesional, dan berorientasi pada kinerja; namun, reformasi struktural tidak secara otomatis mengubah budaya birokrasi dan praktik kerja yang telah mengakar kuat. Studi ini mengkaji karakteristik budaya birokrasi pasca-penyederhanaan birokrasi dan menjelaskan faktor-faktor yang mendasari resistensi terhadap perubahan di lingkungan Pemerintah Kabupaten Tangerang. Desain fenomenologi kualitatif diterapkan melalui wawancara mendalam semi-terstruktur, observasi terbatas, dan analisis dokumen yang melibatkan pejabat yang terdampak langsung oleh penyetaraan jabatan serta pihak yang bertanggung jawab atas pelaksanaannya. Data dianalisis menggunakan analisis tematik yang didukung oleh perangkat lunak NVivo 14 melalui tahapan sistematis berupa pengodean, kategorisasi, pengembangan tema, dan interpretasi. Temuan studi mengungkapkan lima dimensi yang saling berkaitan: budaya hierarkis dan sentralisasi pengambilan keputusan, budaya akuntabilitas administratif-digital, budaya transisi struktural-fungsional, budaya kerja fungsional, dan resistensi terhadap perubahan. Resistensi muncul sebagai tema dominan, yang tercermin dalam ambiguitas peran, ketidakpastian karier, kesenjangan kompetensi, resistensi pasif, dan adaptasi defensif. Meskipun praktik kerja berbasis tim, multitasking, koordinasi berbasis data, responsivitas layanan, dan profesionalisasi mulai berkembang, praktik-praktik tersebut masih terkendala oleh otoritas hierarkis, ketergantungan pada arahan formal, dan identitas kerja yang berorientasi struktural. Studi ini mengonseptualisasikan birokrasi pasca-penyederhanaan sebagai budaya transisi hibrida, di mana praktik fungsional yang baru muncul hidup berdampingan dengan norma struktural yang masih bertahan, sementara resistensi menandakan adanya ketegangan yang belum terselesaikan terkait otoritas, identitas pekerjaan, kompetensi, kepastian karier, dan dukungan organisasi. Oleh karena itu, penyederhanaan birokrasi yang efektif memerlukan manajemen perubahan yang berkelanjutan, pengaturan peran dan karier yang jelas, pengembangan kompetensi, kepemimpinan tim yang berdaya, serta pelembagaan sistem kerja berbasis tim.

Kata Kunci:

Baca Naskah Lengkap

Isi lengkap artikel ini tersedia dalam format PDF. Versi resmi yang diterbitkan pada Vol 18 No 2 (2026).

Buka PDF

Daftar Pustaka

49 rujukan
  1. Agostino, D., Saliterer, I., & Steccolini, I. (2022). Digitalization, Accounting and Accountability: A Literature Review and Reflections on Future Research in Public Services. Financial Accountability & Management, 38(2), 152–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12301
  2. Alamaa, L., Hall, P., & Löfgren, K. (2026). Managers, Professionals, or Public Servants? Organizational Professionals in the Public Sector as Hybrid Professionals. Public Administration, 104(1), 90–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.70000
  3. Anggraini, K., Muchsin, S., & Kurniati, R. R. (2025). Transformasi Birokrasi Daerah melalui Pemberdayaan ASN: Analisis Praktik Reinventing Government di BKPSDM Kota Malang [Regional Bureaucratic Transformation Through Civil Servant Empowerment: Analysis of Reinventing Government Practices at BKPSDM Malang City]. Transparansi: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Administrasi, 8(2), 405–417. https://doi.org/10.31334/transparansi.v8i2.5437
  4. Baharudin, B. (2023). Policy for Equalizing Functional Positions in the Ministry of Home Affairs: Effectiveness to Quality of Performance. Jurnal Bina Praja, 15(2), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.15.2023.389-402
  5. Barbera, C., Ferry, L., Hyndman, N., Liguori, M., McCandless, S., & Midgley, H. C. (2025). Governance and Accountability in Reshaping Public Services: Open Challenges and Wicked Problems of the 21st Century. Public Administration, 103(3), 677–692. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.70012
  6. Boda, Z., & Hajnal, G. (2025). The Illiberal Transformation of Government Bureaucracies: Patterns and Dynamics. Public Policy and Administration, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/09520767251365998
  7. Brandtner, C., Powell, W. W., & Horvath, A. (2024). From Iron Cage to Glass House: Repurposing of Bureaucratic Management and the Turn to Openness. Organization Studies, 45(2), 193–221. https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406231200727
  8. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  9. Brinkmann, S., & Kvale, S. (2014). InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing. Sage Publications.
  10. Brower, R. S., & Abolafia, M. Y. (1995). The Structural Embeddedness of Resistance among Public Managers. Group & Organization Management, 20(2), 149–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601195202005
  11. Campion, A. (2018). ‘Joined-Up’ Local Governments? Restructuring and Reorganising Internal Management. Local Government Studies, 44(3), 436–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2018.1475171
  12. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2017). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Sage Publications.
  13. Ding, F., Wen, B., & Shon, J. (2023). Frontline Bureaucratic Attitude toward Administrative Integration: Does Organizational Configuration Matter? Administration & Society, 55(7), 1255–1289. https://doi.org/10.1177/00953997231165995
  14. Farrel, M., & Fikri, M. (2025). Budaya Kerja Adaptif sebagai Strategi Organisasi dalam Menghadapi Perubahan Digital yang Pesat [Adaptive Work Culture as an Organizational Strategy in Facing Rapid Digital Change]. Journal of Economic and Business Advancement, 1(2), 272–281. https://doi.org/10.65310/sw2bye95
  15. Fatchurrohman, M., Supriadi, I., Alfiyatussholichah, A., & Wardhani, P. S. (2025). Digital Transformation and Innovation in the Digitalization Era to Improve Organizational Culture. RIGGS: Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business, 4(2), 7327–7332. https://doi.org/10.31004/riggs.v4i2.1840
  16. Ford, J. D., Ford, L. W., & D’Amelio, A. (2008). Resistance to Change: The Rest of the Story. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 362–377. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2008.31193235
  17. Fred, M., & Mukhtar-Landgren, D. (2024). Productive Resistance in Public Sector Innovation – Introducing Social Impact Bonds in Swedish Local Government. Public Management Review, 26(3), 793–810. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2022.2123027
  18. Haug, N., Dan, S., & Mergel, I. (2024). Digitally-Induced Change in the Public Sector: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda. Public Management Review, 26(7), 1963–1987. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2023.2234917
  19. Insani, I., Warsono, H., Kismartini, & Astuti, R. S. (2021). Analysis of the Transfer of Administrative Positions to Functional Positions at the Ministry of Administrative and Bureaucratic Reform. Proceedings of the 3rd Annual International Conference on Public and Business Administration (AICoBPA 2020), 191, 333–337. https://doi.org/10.2991/AEBMR.K.210928.063
  20. Kaufmann, W., Borry, E. L., & DeHart‐Davis, L. (2019). More than Pathological Formalization: Understanding Organizational Structure and Red Tape. Public Administration Review, 79(2), 236–245. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12958
  21. Klemsdal, L., Andreassen, T. A., & Breit, E. (2022). Resisting or Facilitating Change? How Street-Level Managers’ Situational Work Contributes to the Implementation of Public Reforms. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 32(4), 736–749. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muac004
  22. Kuipers, B. S., Higgs, M., Kickert, W., Tummers, L., Grandia, J., & Van Der Voet, J. (2014). The Management of Change in Public Organizations: A Literature Review. Public Administration, 92(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12040
  23. Leixnering, S., Schikowitz, A., Hammerschmid, G., & Meyer, R. E. (2018). Multiple Shades of Grey: Opening the Black Box of Public Sector Executives’ Hybrid Role Identities. Comparative Social Research, 33, 157–176. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0195-631020180000033012
  24. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Sage Publications.
  25. Luciano, M. M., Watson, M. K., Kabra, A., & Winchester, C. C. (2026). Why and How Organizational Structures Change: An Integrative Review and Framework. Academy of Management Annals, 20(1), 400–450. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2024.0089
  26. Maulana, A., Indriati, F., & Hidayah, K. (2022). Analysis of Bureaucratic Reform Through Delayering of Government Institutions in Indonesia. Jurnal Borneo Administrator, 18(2), 155–170. https://doi.org/10.24258/jba.v18i2.1003
  27. Mojic, D., Jovancevic, J., & Jovancevic, S. (2018). Culture and Public Administration Reforms in Postsocialist Transformation: The Case of Serbia. Sociologija, 60(3), 653–669. https://doi.org/10.2298/SOC1803653M
  28. Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological Research Methods. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412995658
  29. Muhidin, B., & Suswanta, S. (2023). Birocracy Politization Typology in Structural Official Replacement (Case Study in Regional Government of North Maluku Province). International Journal of Social Service and Research, 3(2), 452–459. https://doi.org/10.46799/ijssr.v3i2.279
  30. Nebie, E., & Tbitbi, E. (2022). La résistance au changement organisationnel dans la gouvernance des organisations publiques: meilleures pratiques pour réussir les transformations [Resistance to Organizational Change in the Governance of Public Organizations: Best Practices for Successful Transformations]. Revue de Management et Cultures, (7), 397–412. https://doi.org/10.48430/IMIST.PRSM/REMAC-N7.34248
  31. Oreg, S. (2006). Personality, Context, and Resistance to Organizational Change. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 15(1), 73–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320500451247
  32. Oreg, S., Vakola, M., & Armenakis, A. (2011). Change Recipients’ Reactions to Organizational Change. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 47(4), 461–524. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886310396550
  33. Pangarso, A., Winarno, A., Aulia, P., & Ritonga, D. A. (2022). Exploring the Predictor and the Consequence of Digital Organisational Culture: A Quantitative Investigation Using Sufficient and Necessity Approach. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 43(3), 370–385. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-11-2021-0516
  34. Park, S. (2019). Dusk for the Pyramid-Shaped Bureaucracy: Examining the Shape of the U.S. Federal Bureaucracy in the Twenty First Century. Quality & Quantity, 53(3), 1565–1585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-018-0827-1
  35. Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice. SAGE Publications, Inc.
  36. Pérez-Durán, I. (2024). Twenty-Five Years of Accountability Research in Public Administration: Authorship, Themes, Methods, and Future Trends. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 90(3), 546–562. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523231211751
  37. Pircher Verdorfer, A., & van Ginkel, G. (2024). Adapting to Organizational Change in a Public Sector High-Reliability Context: The Role of Negative Affect and Normative Commitment to Change. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 34(3), 465–479. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muae009
  38. Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2017). Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis – Into the Age of Austerity. Oxford University Press.
  39. Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational Culture and Leadership. John Wiley & Sons.
  40. Schweiger, S., Stouten, H., & Bleijenbergh, I. L. (2018). A System Dynamics Model of Resistance to Organizational Change: The Role of Participatory Strategies. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 35(6), 658–674. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2509
  41. Setiady, M. F., Mufti, Moh. I., & Nawawi, Muh. (2025). Perilaku Aparatur Sipil Negara Pasca Penyetaraan Jabatan Struktural ke dalam Jabatan Fungsional [Civil Servant Behavior After the Equalization of Structural Positions Into Functional Positions]. Jurnal Syntax Imperatif, 6(3), 734–745. https://doi.org/10.54543/syntaximperatif.v6i3.778
  42. Stanley, D. J., Meyer, J. P., & Topolnytsky, L. (2005). Employee Cynicism and Resistance to Organizational Change. Journal of Business and Psychology, 19(4), 429–459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-005-4518-2
  43. Turner, M., Prasojo, E., & Sumarwono, R. (2022). The Challenge of Reforming Big Bureaucracy in Indonesia. Policy Studies, 43(2), 333–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2019.1708301
  44. Verlinden, S., Wynen, J., Kleizen, B., & Verhoest, K. (2023). Blurred Lines: Exploring the Impact of Change Complexity on Role Clarity in the Public Sector. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 43(3), 479–503. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X221093573
  45. Waddell, D., & Sohal, A. S. (1998). Resistance: A Constructive Tool for Change Management. Management Decision, 36(8), 543–548. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251749810232628
  46. Wang, Q., Wu, Z., Liu, J., Zhang, Y., & Liu, L. (2025). Middle Managers’ Role Overload, Workplace Anxiety, and Resistance to Change: The Moderating Effect of Emotion Regulation Strategies. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 61(4), 685–714. https://doi.org/10.1177/00218863241246284
  47. Weber, M. (1978). Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology (C. Wittich & G. Roth, Eds.; Vol. 2). University of California Press.
  48. Weerheijm, B., Galdames, M., & Giest, S. (2026). Bureaucratic Accountability: Enabler or Barrier for Algorithm Use? Policy Design and Practice, 9(1), 16–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2025.2578064
  49. Zamzani, R., Hayat, & Kurniati, R. R. (2025). Bureaucratic Transformation in Realizing Responsive and Accountable Public Services. Jurnal Inovasi Ilmu Sosial dan Politik, 7(2), 219–228. https://doi.org/10.33474/jisop.v7i2.24479

Hak Cipta & Lisensi Akses Terbuka

Hak Cipta (c) 2026 Penulis. Artikel ini dilisensikan di bawah CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0.