Beralih ke bagian utama
Artikel Riset Asli Akses Terbuka Terakreditasi SINTA 2

Hubungan Dana Desa dengan Pembangunan Ekonomi Desa: Studi tingkat Desa di Indonesia

Studi Tingkat Desa di Indonesia

Penulis

  • Mohamad Yusuf 1
  • Khoirunurrofik 2* Penulis korespondensi
  • 1 Facultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Indonesia
  • 2 Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Indonesia
  • *Penulis korespondensi
DOI
10.21787/jbp.14.2022.493-504
Tanggal Terbit & Halaman
26 Desember 2022 · Hlm. 493-504
Riwayat Naskah
Diterima29 Jul 2022 Disetujui9 Nov 2022 Terbit26 Des 2022
Lisensi
CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0
Baca PDF 266 KB Kutip

2.693 Dilihat 1.812 Diunduh

Abstrak

Program Dana Desa merupakan wujud desentralisasi fiskal di Indonesia yang ditujukan untuk mendukung pemerataan pembangunan dan peningkatan kesejahteraan masyarakat. Pemerintah desa berwenang merencanakan penggunaan Dana Desa dan membelanjakannya dengan memperhatikan peraturan dari pemerintah pusat. Penggunaan Dana Desa perlu dievaluasi untuk mengetahui apakah dana tersebut telah dibelanjakan dengan baik dan mendukung pembangunan ekonomi desa. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi kegiatan program Dana Desa yang dapat mempengaruhi pembangunan ekonomi desa dan menentukan prioritas daerah dalam pemanfaatan Dana Desa untuk pembangunan desa di bidang ekonomi. Analisis dilakukan dengan pendekatan kualitatif dengan memetakan dan menandai pengeluaran Dana Desa. Pemetaan dan penandaan bertujuan untuk memastikan bahwa belanja Dana Desa sesuai dengan amanat dan untuk mengetahui komposisi porsi belanja ekonomi di masing-masing daerah. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: (1) penggunaan Dana Desa telah sesuai dengan pedoman prioritas penggunaan Dana Desa yang berlaku; (2) pangsa belanja ekonomi di Indonesia bagian timur lebih rendah dibandingkan kawasan lain, namun dengan tren yang terus meningkat, sedangkan porsi belanja ekonomi di pulau Jawa dan Bali menunjukkan angka yang lebih tinggi. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian, penelitian ini menyarankan agar desa di daerah tertinggal mengutamakan belanja Dana Desa untuk perbaikan infrastruktur dan keterbukaan wilayah untuk meningkatkan kemajuan atau kemandirian desa.

Kata Kunci:

Baca Naskah Lengkap

Isi lengkap artikel ini tersedia dalam format PDF. Versi resmi yang diterbitkan pada Vol 14 No 3 (2022).

Buka PDF

Daftar Pustaka

37 rujukan
  1. Arcand, J.-L., & Bassole, L. (2007). Does Community Driven Development Work? Evidence From Senegal. 1–42. https://hdl.handle.net/10855/15011
  2. Arifin, B., Wicaksono, E., Tenrini, R. H., Wardhana, I. W., Setiawan, H., Damayanty, S. A., Solikin, A., Suhendra, M., Saputra, A. H., Ariutama, G. A., Djunedi, P., Rahman, A. B., & Handoko, R. (2020). Village Fund, Village-Owned-Enterprises, and Employment: Evidence From Indonesia. Journal of Rural Studies, 79, 382–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.08.052
  3. Arina, A. I. S., Masinambow, V. A. J., & Walewangko, E. N. (2021). Pengaruh Dana Desa dan Alokasi Dana Desa terhadap Indeks Desa Membangun di Kabupaten Minahasa Tenggara. Jurnal Pembangunan Ekonomi dan Keuangan Daerah, 22(3), 22–41. https://doi.org/10.35794/jpekd.35490.22.3.2021
  4. Arsandi, S. (2022). Collaborative Governance in the Optimization of Tax Revenue: Case Study in Yogyakarta. Jurnal Bina Praja, 14(1), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.14.2022.17-29
  5. Aziz, N. L. L. (2016). Otonomi Desa dan Efektivitas Dana Desa. Jurnal Penelitian Politik, 13(2), 193–211. https://doi.org/10.14203/jpp.v13i2.575
  6. Baidhowah, A. (2022). Explaining Decentralization Performance in Indonesia: Member of Parliament Decision, Political Networks, and Constitution Amendment. Jurnal Bina Praja, 14(1), 97–109. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.14.2022.97-109
  7. Beath, A., Christia, F., & Enikolopov, R. (2015). The National Solidarity Programme: Assessing the Effects of Community-Driven Development in Afghanistan. International Peacekeeping, 22(4), 302–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/13533312.2015.1059287
  8. Berelson, B. R. (1952). Content Analysis in Communication Research. The Free Press.
  9. Boonperm, J., Haughton, J., & Khandker, S. R. (2013). Does the Village Fund matter in Thailand? Evaluating the impact on incomes and spending. Journal of Asian Economics, 25, 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2013.01.001
  10. Chase, R. S., & Sherburne-Benz, L. (2001). Household Effects of African Community Initiatives: Evaluating the Impact of the Zambia Social Fund. https://developmentevidence.3ieimpact.org/search-result-details/impact-evaluation-repository/household-effects-of-african-community-initiatives-evaluating-the-impact-of-the-zambia-social-fund/5570
  11. de Mello, L. R. (2000). Fiscal Decentralization and Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations: A Cross-Country Analysis. World Development, 28(2), 365–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(99)00123-0
  12. Deininger, K., & Liu, Y. (2009). Longer-Term Economic Impacts of Self-Help Groups in India. World Bank Policy Research, WPS 4886, 1–31.
  13. Direktorat Jenderal Perimbangan Keuangan. (2019). Buku Pintar Dana Desa: Dana Desa untuk Kesejahteraan Rakyat. Direktorat Jenderal Perimbangan Keuangan.
  14. Dwitayanti, Y., Maria, Nurhasanah, & Armaini, R. (2020). The Impact of Village Fund Program Implementation Toward Society Welfare in Indonesia. Proceedings of the 3rd Forum in Research, Science, and Technology (FIRST 2019). 3rd Forum in Research, Science, and Technology (FIRST 2019), Palembang, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200407.020
  15. Fatoni, A. (2020). Fiscal Decentralization Dilemma in Indonesia: Between Corruption Accountability and Probability at Local Levels. Jurnal Bina Praja, 12(1), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.12.2020.101-110
  16. Handoyo, F., Hidayatina, A., & Purwanto, P. (2021). The Effect of Rural Development on Poverty Gap, Poverty Severity and Local Economic Growth in Indonesia. Jurnal Bina Praja, 13(3), 369–381. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.13.2021.369-381
  17. Haryanto, J. T. (2018). Fiscal Condition of Sumatra in Decentralization Era. Jurnal Bina Praja, 10(1), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.10.2018.57-67
  18. Hindriks, J., & Myles, G. D. (2006). Intermediate Public Economics. MIT Press.
  19. Indra, J., & Khoirunurrofik, K. (2022). Understanding the Role of Village Fund and Administrative Capacity in Stunting Reduction: Empirical Evidence From Indonesia. PLOS ONE, 17(1), e0262743. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262743
  20. Kadafi, M., Sudarlan, & Sudrahman, H. (2020). The Implications of Village Funds Received by Underdeveloped Village per District/City Against Poverty in Indonesia and Literacy Rate: Emperical Evidence in Indonesia. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 9(1), 3924–3928.
  21. Kusuma, H. (2016). Desentralisasi Fiskal dan Pertumbuhan Ekonomi di Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi Kuantitatif Terapan, 9(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.24843/JEKT.2016.v09.i01.p01
  22. Labonne, J. (2013). The KALAHI-CIDSS Impact Evaluation: A Revised Synthesis Report (City Development Strategy (CDS) No. 69094). The World Bank Group. https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/654321468294947152/philippines-the-kalahi-cidss-impact-evaluation-a-synthesis-report
  23. Menkhoff, L., & Rungruxsirivorn, O. (2011). Do Village Funds Improve Access to Finance? Evidence from Thailand. World Development, 39(1), 110–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2010.09.002
  24. Murliasari, R. (2021). Implementation of Village Fund Management Policy Affirmation in Village Development. Jurnal Bina Praja, 13(3), 555–567. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.13.2021.555-567
  25. Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches (7th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.
  26. Newman, J., Pradhan, M., Rawlings, L. B., Ridder, G., Coa, R., & Evia, J. L. (2002). An Impact Evaluation of Education, Health, and Water Supply Investments by the Bolivian Social Investment Fund. The World Bank Economic Review, 16(2), 241–274. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/16.2.241
  27. Nordin, M., & Manevska-Tasevska, G. (2013). Farm-Level Employment and Direct Payment Support for Grassland Use: A Case of Sweden. AgriFood Economics Centre.
  28. Parajuli, D., Acharya, G., Chaudhury, N., & Thapa, B. B. (2012). Impact of Social Fund on the Welfare of Rural Households: Evidence from the Nepal Poverty Alleviation Fund. The World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-6042
  29. Permatasari, P., Ilman, A. S., Tilt, C. A., Lestari, D., Islam, S., Tenrini, R. H., Rahman, A. B., Samosir, A. P., & Wardhana, I. W. (2021). The Village Fund Program in Indonesia: Measuring the Effectiveness and Alignment to Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainability, 13(21), 12294. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132112294
  30. Rachma, D. D., Somaji, R. P., & Kustono, A. S. (2019). Government Expenditure, Poverty and Income Inequality in Indonesia: New Evidence From Village Funds. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 8(8), 38–42. https://repository.unej.ac.id/xmlui/handle/123456789/103481
  31. Rosen, H. S., & Gayer, T. (2010). Public Finance (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
  32. Sandjaja, F. R., Nafisa, F., & Manurung, I. N. (2020). The Impact of Fiscal Decentralization on Welfare in Selected Provinces in Indonesia. Jurnal Bina Praja, 12(1), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.12.2020.21-31
  33. Saragi, N. B. (2021). Indonesia’s Village Fund Program: Does It Contribute to Poverty Reduction? Jurnal Bina Praja, 13(1), 65–80. https://doi.org/10.21787/jpb.13.2021.65-80
  34. Shaaban, S. (2019). Reviewing Egyptian Community Social Fund (Village Savings and Loans Association, VSLA) as an Approach for Community Social Fund. Horticulture International Journal, 3(1), 13–18. https://doi.org/10.15406/hij.2019.03.00105
  35. Sigit, T. A., & Kosasih, A. (2020). Pengaruh Dana Desa terhadap Kemiskinan: Studi Tingkat Kabupaten/Kota di Indonesia. Indonesian Treasury Review: Jurnal Perbendaharaan, Keuangan Negara dan Kebijakan Publik, 5(2), 105–119. https://doi.org/10.33105/itrev.v5i2.170
  36. Stone, P. J., Dunphy, D. C., Smith, M. S., & Ogilvie, D. M. (1966). General Inquirer: A Computer Approach to Content Analysis. MIT Press.
  37. Yazid, Y., Abdullah, A., Mustafa, Edison, & Rafdeadi. (2019). Desa Funds and Achievement of SDG’S Purpose: Normative Study of Sustainable Development in Indonesia. 10th International Symposium on Islam, Civilization and Science (ISICAS 2019), 139–152.

Hak Cipta & Lisensi Akses Terbuka

Hak Cipta (c) 2022 Penulis. Artikel ini dilisensikan di bawah CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0.

Artikel paling banyak dibaca berdasarkan penulis yang sama