Beralih ke bagian utama
Artikel Riset Asli Akses Terbuka Terakreditasi SINTA 2

Pengelolaan Daerah Aliran Sungai Berbasis Good Environmental Governance

Penulis

  • Irvan Renaldi 1
  • Aldri Frinaldi 2* Penulis korespondensi
  • 1 Departemen Ilmu Administrasi Publik, Universitas Negeri Padang
  • 2 Pusat Penelitian Kebijakan, Hukum, dan Politik LPPM Universitas Negeri Padang
  • *Penulis korespondensi
DOI
10.21787/jbp.14.2022.225-237
Tanggal Terbit & Halaman
23 Agustus 2022 · Hlm. 225-237
Riwayat Naskah
Diterima14 Mei 2022 Disetujui5 Jul 2022 Terbit23 Agu 2022
Lisensi
CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0
Baca PDF 789 KB Kutip

2.410 Dilihat 1.260 Diunduh

Abstrak

This study aims to analyze the Management of the Batang Arau River Basin in Padang City with a Good Environmental Governance approach, as well as the Government's efforts to overcome obstacles in managing the Batang Arau watershed. This research is a qualitative type with data analysis techniques Manual Data Analysis Procedure (MDAP). The results showed that Batang Arau Watershed Management has not been implemented following the Good Environmental Governance Principles, according to the coding results, namely #1 Low public awareness, #2 Environmental protection laws are not optimal, #3 Unopened access to information on industrial waste, #4 The government's responsiveness is quite good, #5 Environmental consensus has not been reached, #6 occurs ego-sectoral, #7 Long bureaucratic path, #8 No implementation of environmental responsibility. #9 Obstacles, unified vision of management between stakeholders, insufficient budget and fleet, low supervision, there is no integrated IPAL facility, Illegal logging still occurs in upstream watersheds, and coordination between sectors is still problematic. #10 Efforts made by the government are; Providing socialization and education to the community, cleaning and dredging the Batang Arau watershed, normalizing the Batang Arau watershed, and rehabilitating critical watershed areas. The management of the Batang Arau watershed must be carried out thoroughly so that there is no gap between upstream and downstream. To create a balanced ecosystem, the Government needs to reform the watershed management with a Good Environmental Governance approach in every action in the formulation, planning, and implementation of the Batang Arau watershed program to create sustainable management.

Baca Naskah Lengkap

Isi lengkap artikel ini tersedia dalam format PDF. Versi resmi yang diterbitkan pada Vol 14 No 2 (2022).

Buka PDF

Daftar Pustaka

35 rujukan
  1. Abreu, M., Soares, I., & Silva, S. (2022). Governance Quality and Environmental Policy on Emergent, Resource-Rich Economies: The Case of Brazil. Energy Reports, 8, 70–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.01.041
  2. Armitage, D., de Loë, R., & Plummer, R. (2012). Environmental Governance and Its Implications for Conservation Practice: Environmental Governance. Conservation Letters, 5(4), 245–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-263X.2012.00238.x
  3. Belbase, N. P. (2010). Environmental Good Governance in the Future Constitution of Nepal.
  4. Bungin, B. (2021). Post-Qualitative Social Research Methods. PrenadaMedia.
  5. Cristani, M., Pasetto, L., & Tomazzoli, C. (2020). Protecting the Environment: A Multi-Agent Approach to Environmental Monitoring. Procedia Computer Science, 176, 3636–3644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.09.336
  6. Feris, L. (2010). The Role of Good Environmental Governance in the Sustainable Development of South Africa. Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.4314/pelj.v13i1.55354
  7. Floress, K., Akamani, K., Halvorsen, K. E., Kozich, A. T., & Davenport, M. (2015). The Role of Social Science in Successfully Implementing Watershed Management Strategies. Journal of Contemporary Water Research & Education, 154(1), 85–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1936-704X.2015.03189.x
  8. Goodspeed, R., Van Eyl, A., & Vaccaro, L. (2018). Analyzing Stakeholder’s Perceptions of Uncertainty to Advance Collaborative Sustainability Science: Case Study of the Watershed Assessment of Nutrient Loads to the Detroit River Project. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 72, 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2018.06.001
  9. Halim, F. (2014). Pengaruh Hubungan Tata Guna Lahan dengan Debit Banjir pada Daerah Aliran Sungai Malalayang. Jurnal Ilmiah Media Engineering, 4(1), 45–54. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/jime/article/view/4461
  10. Hanlon, J. W. (2017). Complementary Safeguards for Robust Regional Watershed Governance in a Federation: New York City and Its Municipal Water Supply. Environmental Science & Policy, 75, 47–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.04.014
  11. Heberlein, T. A. (2012). Navigating Environmental Attitudes. Conservation Biology, 26(4), 583–585. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01892.x
  12. Jeffery, M. (2005). Environmental Governance: A Comparative Analysis of Public Participation and Access to Justice. Journal of South Pacific Law, 9(2). https://ssrn.com/abstract=1126440
  13. Kagaya, S., & Wada, T. (2021). The Application of Environmental Governance for Sustainable Watershed-Based Management. Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, 5(2), 643–671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41685-020-00185-1
  14. Kanie, N., & Haas, P. M. (Eds.). (2004). Emerging Forces in Environmental Governance. United Nations University Press.
  15. Kerr, J. (2007). Watershed Management: Lessons from Common Property Theory. International Journal of the Commons, 1(1), 89. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.8
  16. Lemos, M. C., & Agrawal, A. (2006). Environmental Governance. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 31(1), 297–325. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.31.042605.135621
  17. Lopez Porras, G., Stringer, L. C., & Quinn, C. H. (2019). Corruption and Conflicts as Barriers to Adaptive Governance: Water Governance in Dryland Systems in the Rio del Carmen Watershed. Science of The Total Environment, 660, 519–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.030
  18. Ludwig, D. (2001). The Era of Management Is Over. Ecosystems, 4(8), 758–764. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-001-0044-x
  19. Maksudi, B. I. (2017). Dasar-Dasar Administrasi Publik: Dari Klasik ke Kontemporer. RajaGrafindo Persada.
  20. Mitchell, B., Setiawan, B., & Rahmi, D. H. (2010). Pengelolaan Sumberdaya dan Lingkungan. Gadjah Mada University Press.
  21. Ogunkan, D. V. (2022). Achieving Sustainable Environmental Governance in Nigeria: A Review for Policy Consideration. Urban Governance, S2664328622000213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ugj.2022.04.004
  22. Padek. (2022, June 8). Koalisi Masyarakat Minta Bersihkan Batang Arau, Tindak Pembuang Sampah. Padek. https://padek.jawapos.com/sumbar/08/06/2022/koalisi-masyarakat-minta-bersihkan-batang-arau-tindak-pembuang-sampah/
  23. Patel, M., Nevill, J. T., Hartmann, D. M., Tew, D., Thrall, S., Votaw, G., & Crenshaw, H. C. (2008). Development of a Microfluidic Instrument for Performing Enzyme Kinetic Assays. 1910–1912.
  24. Purniawati, P., Kasana, N., & Rodiyah, R. (2020). Good Environmental Governance in Indonesia (Perspective of Environmental Protection and Management). The Indonesian Journal of International Clinical Legal Education, 2(1), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijicle.v2i1.37328
  25. Putri, W. A. E. (2007). Kapasitas Asimilasi Bahan Pencemar di Muara Sungai Batang Arau (Muara Padang), Sumatera Barat. Akuatik: Jurnal Sumberdaya Perairan, 1(1), 27–34. https://journal.ubb.ac.id/index.php/akuatik/article/view/364
  26. Sarker, M. N. I., Wen, J., Yang, B., Yusufzada, S., Huda, N., & Mahbub, F. (2021). Assessment of Environmental Governance in Disaster Vulnerability Context of Rural Bangladesh. Growth and Change, 52(2), 1155–1171. https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.12482
  27. Satria, F. W., Saputro, S., & Marwoto, J. (2017). Analisa Pola Sebaran Sedimen Dasar Muara Sungai Batang Arau Padang. Journal of Oceanography, 6(1), 47–53. https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/joce/article/view/16128
  28. Sith, R., Watanabe, A., Nakamura, T., Yamamoto, T., & Nadaoka, K. (2019). Assessment of Water Quality and Evaluation of Best Management Practices in a Small Agricultural Watershed Adjacent to Coral Reef Area in Japan. Agricultural Water Management, 213, 659–673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2018.11.014
  29. Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. CV Alfabeta.
  30. Tamayo‐Álvarez, R. (2020). David Aven v Costa Rica: A step forward towards investor accountability for environmental harm? Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law, 29(2), 301–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/reel.12300
  31. Tang, X., & Adesina, J. A. (2022). Integrated Watershed Management Framework and Groundwater Resources in Africa—A Review of West Africa Sub-Region. Water, 14(3), 288. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14030288
  32. Thapa, P. S., Chaudhary, S., & Dasgupta, P. (2022). Contribution of Integrated Watershed Management (Iwm) to Disaster Risk Reduction and Community Development: Lessons From Nepal. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 76, 103029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103029
  33. Ulum, M. C., & Ngindana, R. (2017). Environmental Governance: Isu, Kebijakan, dan Tata Kelola Lingkungan Hidup. UB Press.
  34. UN Institute for Training and Research. (2017). Introduction to Environmental Governance. UN Institute for Training and Research.
  35. Wurzel, R., Zito, A., & Jordan, A. (2013). Environmental Governance in Europe. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849804721

Hak Cipta & Lisensi Akses Terbuka

Hak Cipta (c) 2022 Penulis. Artikel ini dilisensikan di bawah CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0.