Beralih ke bagian utama
Artikel Riset Asli Akses Terbuka Terakreditasi SINTA 2

An Overview of Research Trend on Merit System in Indonesia and International Practices

A Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization

Penulis

  • Mutia Rahmah * Penulis korespondensi
  • Muchlis Hamdi
  • Department of Public Policy Studies, Faculty of Government Politic, Governance Institute of Home Affairs
  • *Penulis korespondensi
DOI
10.21787/jbp.14.2022.55-69
Tanggal Terbit & Halaman
29 April 2022 · Hlm. 55-69
Riwayat Naskah
Diterima28 Jan 2022 Disetujui1 Mar 2022 Terbit29 Apr 2022
Lisensi
CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0
Baca PDF 2,0 MB Kutip

2.094 Dilihat 1.650 Diunduh

Abstrak

An Overview of Research Trend on Merit System in Indonesia and International Practices: A Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization

This study intends to examine how the development of research related to the merit system in Indonesia and international practices. Bibliometric analysis is used to determine the dynamics of the research topics discussed related to the merit system through keywords that appear in the Scopus database until January 7, 2022. Visualization from bibliometric based on co-authorship, co-occurrence, and citation using VOSviewer 1.6.16. This study showed 485 articles had been filtered through the criteria of Open Access, Article, English, and Journal. Six of the 485 articles discussed various aspects of the merit system in Indonesia. In Co-authorship, there are eight of 23 clusters written by more than two people collaborating; the United Kingdom is the highest number of articles published, while Indonesia also appears in the visualization but does not collaborate with affiliated authors from other countries. In co-occurrence, 22 clusters of 1,503 keywords emerge, and 234 meet the threshold. The meritocracy item has the highest link and total link strength, but this item was published on average around the year 2018. In terms of citation, eight of the ten most-cited documents were published more than the last ten years, while the other two documents were published in the last eight years. The document of Pratto f. 1994 was the highest citation document and became an important article related to the merit system discussing social dominance orientation which looks at inequality in social groups.

Kata Kunci:

Baca Naskah Lengkap

Isi lengkap artikel ini tersedia dalam format PDF. Versi resmi yang diterbitkan pada Vol 14 No 1 (2022).

Buka PDF

Daftar Pustaka

69 rujukan
  1. Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Di Costa, F. (2011). National research assessment exercises: a comparison of peer review and bibliometrics rankings. Scientometrics, 89(3), 929–941. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0459-x
  2. AlRyalat, S. A. S., Malkawi, L. W., & Momani, S. M. (2019). Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases. Journal of Visualized Experiments, 2019(152). https://doi.org/10.3791/58494
  3. Anand, A., Brøns Kringelum, L., Øland Madsen, C., & Selivanovskikh, L. (2021). Interorganizational learning: a bibliometric review and research agenda. The Learning Organization, 28(2), 111–136. https://doi.org/10.1108/TLO-02-2020-0023
  4. Appio, F. P., Cesaroni, F., & Di Minin, A. (2014). Visualizing the structure and bridges of the intellectual property management and strategy literature: a document co-citation analysis. Scientometrics, 101(1), 623–661. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1329-0
  5. Baas, J., Schotten, M., Plume, A., Côté, G., & Karimi, R. (2020). Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00019
  6. Bach, T., & Wegrich, K. (2019). The Blind Spots of Public Bureaucracy and the Politics of Non‐Coordination (T. Bach & K. Wegrich (Eds.)). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76672-0
  7. Belussi, F., Orsi, L., & Savarese, M. (2019). Mapping Business Model Research: A Document Bibliometric Analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 35(3), 101048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2019.101048
  8. Berman, E. M., & Rabin, J. (Eds.). (2008). Encyclopedia of Public Administration and Public Policy. Taylor & Francis.
  9. Brewer, G. A., & Selden, S. C. (2000). Why Elephants Gallop: Assessing and Predicting Organizational Performance in Federal Agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(4), 685–712. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024287
  10. Cameron, B. D. (2005). Trends in the Usage of ISI Bibliometric Data: Uses, Abuses, and Implications. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 5(1), 105–125. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2005.0003
  11. Carnes, M., Devine, P. G., Baier Manwell, L., Byars-Winston, A., Fine, E., Ford, C. E., Forscher, P., Isaac, C., Kaatz, A., Magua, W., Palta, M., & Sheridan, J. (2015). The Effect of an Intervention to Break the Gender Bias Habit for Faculty at One Institution. Academic Medicine, 90(2), 221–230. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000552
  12. Carr, P., Goodman, S., & Jowett, A. (2019). ‘I don’t think there is any moral basis for taking money away from people’: using discursive psychology to explore the complexity of talk about tax. Critical Discourse Studies, 16(1), 84–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2018.1511440
  13. Castilla, E. J., & Benard, S. (2010). The Paradox of Meritocracy in Organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(4), 543–676. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2010.55.4.543
  14. Chairiah, A., S, A., Nugroho, A., & Suhariyanto, A. (2020). Implementasi Sistem Merit pada Aparatur Sipil Negara di Indonesia. Jurnal Borneo Administrator, 16(3), 383–400. https://doi.org/10.24258/jba.v16i3.704
  15. Charron, N., Dahlström, C., Fazekas, M., & Lapuente, V. (2017). Careers, Connections, and Corruption Risks: Investigating the Impact of Bureaucratic Meritocracy on Public Procurement Processes. The Journal of Politics, 79(1), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1086/687209
  16. Costa-Lopes, R., Dovidio, J. F., Pereira, C. R., & Jost, J. T. (2013). Social psychological perspectives on the legitimation of social inequality: Past, present and future. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43(4), 229–237. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1966
  17. Dwiputrianti, S. (2018). Challenges With Implementation Of The Merit System In The Open Recruitment Of Government High Positions: The Case In Indonesia. Proceedings of the 2018 Annual Conference of Asian Association for Public Administration: “Reinventing Public Administration in a Globalized World: A Non-Western Perspective” (AAPA 2018), 191, 70–80. https://doi.org/10.2991/aapa-18.2018.8
  18. Faiz, A., Astuti, R. S., & Afrizal, T. (2020). Sistem Merit pada Sektor Pemerintahan : Proses Pengisian dan Penempatan Jabatan Pelaksana di Badan Kepegawaian Daerah Jawa Tengah. Perspektif, 9(2), 406–417. https://doi.org/10.31289/perspektif.v9i2.3878
  19. Farazmand, A. (2002). Administrative Reform in Developing Nations. Greenwood Publishing Group.
  20. Farisa, F. C. (2020, November 1). Kemendagri Tegur 67 Kepala Daerah yang Belum Jalankan Rekomendasi Sanksi Netralitas ASN (K. Erdianto (Ed.)). Kompas.Com. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2020/11/01/08144221/kemendagri-tegur-67-kepala-daerah-yang-belum-jalankan-rekomendasi-sanksi?page=all
  21. Fathurrohman. (2021, June 14). Penyakit Kronis Jual-Beli Jabatan. DetikNews. https://news.detik.com/kolom/d-5605040/penyakit-kronis-jual-beli-jabatan
  22. Febriansyah, H., & Athory Ramdlany, D. M. (2016). The Future of Government Model after Mentality and Bureaucracy Reform in Indonesia. The Social Sciences, 11(7), 1297–1304. https://doi.org/10.36478/sscience.2016.1297.1304
  23. Flynn, J. R. (1999). Searching for justice: The discovery of IQ gains over time. American Psychologist, 54(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.1.5
  24. Folke, O., Persson, T., & Rickne, J. (2016). The Primary Effect: Preference Votes and Political Promotions. American Political Science Review, 110(3), 559–578. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000241
  25. Fujs, D., Vrhovec, S., & Vavpotič, D. (2020). Bibliometric Mapping of Research on User Training for Secure Use of Information Systems. JUCS - Journal of Universal Computer Science, 26(7), 764–782. https://doi.org/10.3897/jucs.2020.042
  26. Gill, R. (2014). Unspeakable Inequalities: Post Feminism, Entrepreneurial Subjectivity, and the Repudiation of Sexism among Cultural Workers. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 21(4), 509–528. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxu016
  27. Ginting, Y., & Daeli, S. (2012). Pengembangan Kapasitas Aparatur Pemerintah Daerah di Era Otonomi (Studi kasus: Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Samosir). Jurnal Bina Praja, 04(02), 105–116. https://doi.org/10.21787/JBP.04.2012.105-116
  28. Grindle, M. S. (2010). Constructing, Deconstructing, and Reconstructing Career Civil Service Systems in Latin America. In HKS Faculty Research Working Paper Series (RWP10-025). John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University. https://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/4448871
  29. Harvey, S. S. (2008). Mapping spectral tropicality in The Maid and Return to Pontianak. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 29(1), 24–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9493.2008.00317.x
  30. Homocianu, D., Plopeanu, A.-P., Florea, N., & Andrieș, A. M. (2020). Exploring the Patterns of Job Satisfaction for Individuals Aged 50 and over from Three Historical Regions of Romania. An Inductive Approach with Respect to Triangulation, Cross-Validation and Support for Replication of Results. Applied Sciences, 10(7), 2573. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10072573
  31. Hyde, A. C., & Shafritz, J. M. (Eds.). (2017). Classics of Public Administration (8th ed.). Cengage learning.
  32. Johnson, A. C. (2007). Unintended consequences: How science professors discourage women of color. Science Education, 91(5), 805–821. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20208
  33. Kartika, M. (2021, June 30). RUU ASN Hapus Lembaga KASN, Ini Kata Ketua KASN (R. Puspita (Ed.)). Republika.Co.Id. https://www.republika.co.id/berita/qvikfq428/ruu-asn-hapus-lembaga-kasn-ini-kata-ketua-kasn
  34. Killian, J. (2008). An International Perspective on Administrative Reform. In J. Killian & N. Eklund (Eds.), Handbook of Administrative Reform: An International Perspective. Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780849380662
  35. Komisi Aparatur Sipil Negara. (2020a). Laporan Tahunan Komisi Aparatur Sipil Negara 2020.
  36. Komisi Aparatur Sipil Negara. (2020b). Rencana Strategis Komisi Aparatur Sipil Negara 2020-2024.
  37. lenterasultra.com. (2019, September 1). Gubernur Sultra Diduga Menabrak Aturan, Nonjob Pejabatnya Tanpa Rekomendasi KASN. Komisi Aparatur Sipil Negara. https://kasn.go.id/id/publikasi/gubernur-sultra-diduga-menabrak-aturan-nonjob-pejabatnya-tanpa-rekomendasi-kasn
  38. MacDonald, K. I., & Dressler, V. (2018). Using Citation Analysis to Identify Research Fronts: A Case Study with the Internet of Things. Science & Technology Libraries, 37(2), 171–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/0194262X.2017.1415183
  39. Maclean, M., Harvey, C., & Kling, G. (2014). Pathways to Power: Class, Hyper-Agency and the French Corporate Elite. Organization Studies, 35(6), 825–855. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840613509919
  40. Moral-Muñoz, J. A., Herrera-Viedma, E., Santisteban-Espejo, A., & Cobo, M. J. (2020). Software tools for conducting bibliometric analysis in science: An up-to-date review. El Profesional de La Información, 29(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.ene.03
  41. Ngusmanto, N. (2016). Pilkada 2015 and Patronage Practice among Bureaucrat in West Kalimantan, Indonesia. Asian Social Science, 12(9), 236. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v12n9p236
  42. Noors, A. I. A. (2019). Analysis of the Implementation of Open Selection for Filling Senior Officer in Indonesia. Konferensi Nasional Ilmu Administrasi, 1–6.
  43. Nurmaya, L., & Febrina, R. (2021). Implementasi Sistem Merit dalam Rekrutmen ASN di Kabupaten Kampar. Journal of Governance Innovation, 3(1), 73–88. https://doi.org/10.36636/jogiv.v3i1.628
  44. Parrado, S., & Salvador, M. (2011). The institutionalization of meritocracy in Latin American regulatory agencies. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 77(4), 687–712. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852311419386
  45. Pesta, B., Fuerst, J., & Kirkegaard, E. (2018). Bibliometric Keyword Analysis across Seventeen Years (2000–2016) of Intelligence Articles. Journal of Intelligence, 6(4), 46. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence6040046
  46. Peters, B. G. (2018). The Politics of Bureaucracy. In The Politics of Bureaucracy (5th ed., pp. 163–192). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315813653-5
  47. Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(4), 741–763. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741
  48. Putra, Y. P., Purnomo, E. P., Suswanta, S., & Kasiwi, A. N. (2020). Policy of a Merit System to Make a Good and Clean Government in the Middle of Bureaucratic Politicization. Journal of Government and Civil Society, 4(2), 159–179. https://doi.org/10.31000/jgcs.v4i2.2393
  49. Quah, J. S. T. (2019). Combating police corruption in five Asian countries: a comparative analysis. Asian Education and Development Studies, 9(2), 197–216. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-06-2019-0100
  50. Rakhmawanto, A., Rusli, B., & Sintaningrum, S. (2019). Merit System on the Selection Process of the State Civil Apparatus First Senior Executive Service Officials in the Central Java Provincial Government. Jurnal Bina Praja, 11(1), 31–41. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.11.2019.31-41
  51. Rankin-Wright, A., Hylton, K., & Norman, L. (2019). Negotiating the coaching landscape: Experiences of Black men and women coaches in the United Kingdom. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 54(5), 603–621. https://doi.org/10.1177/1012690217724879
  52. Rauch, J. E., & Evans, P. B. (2000). Bureaucratic structure and bureaucratic performance in less developed countries. Journal of Public Economics, 75(1), 49–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(99)00044-4
  53. Redaksi Lombok Post (Ed.). (2020, May 13). KASN Temukan Pelanggaran Mutasi Pejabat Pemprov NTB. Lombok Post. https://lombokpost.jawapos.com/ntb/13/05/2020/kasn-temukan-pelanggaran-mutasi-pejabat-pemprov-ntb/
  54. Sakhiyya, Z., & Locke, K. (2019). Empowerment vs. meritocracy discourses in Indonesian public universities: The case of female leaders. Asian Journal of Women’s Studies, 25(2), 198–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/12259276.2019.1610210
  55. Scopus Search Guide. (n.d.).
  56. Setyowati, E. (2016). Merit System in Recruitment and Selection Process of Civil Servant Candidate in Malang Indonesia (Implementation of Recruitment and Selection of Civil Servant Candidate in 2010). Journal of Administrative Sciences and Policy Studies, 4(1), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.15640/jasps.v4n1a5
  57. Shafritz, Jr., J. M. (2018). Defining Public Administration: Selections from the International Encyclopedia of Public Policy and Administration. Taylor & Francis.
  58. Simons, A. M. W., Groffen, D. A. I., & Bosma, H. (2013). Income-related health inequalities: does perceived discrimination matter? International Journal of Public Health, 58(4), 513–520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-012-0429-y
  59. Stančetić, V. (2020). Spoils System Is Not Dead. Hrvatska i Komparativna Javna Uprava, 20(3), 415–438. https://doi.org/10.31297/hkju.20.3.1
  60. The World Bank. (2020). Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI). The World Bank. https://databank.worldbank.org/source/worldwide-governance-indicators
  61. Turner, M., & Hulme, D. (1997). Governance, Administration and Development. Macmillan Education UK. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25675-4
  62. Van De Werfhorst, H. G., & Van Tubergen, F. (2007). Ethnicity, schooling, and merit in the Netherlands. Ethnicities, 7(3), 416–444. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468796807080236
  63. van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2018). VOSviewer Manual - version 1.6.8.
  64. Wahyudi, I. (2021, April 21). Wali Kota Padang tanggapi rekomendasi KASN terkait mutasi pejabat (B. Budiman (Ed.)). ANTARA News. https://www.antaranews.com/berita/2113330/wali-kota-padang-tanggapi-rekomendasi-kasn-terkait-mutasi-pejabat
  65. Wang, G., Wu, X., & Li, Q. (2022). A bibliometric study of news discourse analysis (1988‒2020). Discourse & Communication, 16(1), 110–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/17504813211043725
  66. Wijaya Mulya, T., & Sakhiyya, Z. (2021). ‘Leadership is a sacred matter’: women leaders contesting and contextualising neoliberal meritocracy in the Indonesian academia. Gender and Education, 33(7), 930–945. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2020.1802407
  67. Wijoto, R. (2019, November 1). KASN Temukan Dugaan Pelanggaran dalam Mutasi Pegawai Pemkab Jember. Beritajatim.Com. https://beritajatim.com/pendidikan-kesehatan/kasn-temukan-dugaan-pelanggaran-dalam-mutasi-pegawai-pemkab-jember/
  68. Winarno, H. H. (2012, July 16). Mutasi sekda jadi staf kelurahan, bupati langgar aturan. Merdeka.Com. https://www.merdeka.com/peristiwa/mutasi-sekda-jadi-staf-kelurahan-bupati-langgar-aturan.html
  69. Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629

Hak Cipta & Lisensi Akses Terbuka

Hak Cipta (c) 2022 Author(s). Artikel ini dilisensikan di bawah CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0.

Artikel paling banyak dibaca berdasarkan penulis yang sama