Skip to main content
Original Research Article Open Access SINTA 2 Accredited

Transformative Policies and Infrastructure Strengthening Towards the Police Era 4.0

DOI
10.21787/jbp.13.2021.231-243
Published & Pages
31 August 2021 · pp. 231-243
Manuscript History
Received10 May 2021 Accepted14 Jul 2021 Published31 Aug 2021

1,855 Views 1,362 Downloads

Abstract

Police transformation policy to carry out community security functions is very adaptive in addressing the changing times. The research aims to map the transformation and strengthening of police infrastructure in response to the era of digitalization. The research uses a qualitative type of research with a literature study approach and policy analysis programmed by the Police. The results showed that the transformation policy consisting of organizational transformation, operation transformation, public service transformation, and supervise transformation is needed by the Police, especially in the current digital transition. Moreover, it can be carried out correctly if the Police have internally and externally owned by POLRI. The research concludes that transformative efforts and strengthening of police infrastructure strongly support the duties and functions of the National Police in securing the community.

Read the Full Text

The full text of this article is available as PDF. Version of record published in Vol. 13 No. 2 (2021).

Open PDF

References

22 references
  1. Amin, R. M., Febrina, R., & Wicaksono, B. (2021). Handling COVID-19 from a Collaborative Governance Perspective in Pekanbaru City. Jurnal Bina Praja, 13(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.13.2021.1-13
  2. Bryman, A. (2017). Quantitative and qualitative research: further reflections on their integration. In J. Brannen (Ed.), Mixing Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Research (pp. 57–78). Taylor & Francis Group.
  3. Djumantiara, R. E., & Susilawati, N. (2018). Policy Analysis on the Maximum Limit of Occupational Expenses in the Article 21 Income Tax Calculation. 2nd International Conference on Administrative Science, Policy, and Governance Studies 2018 (ICAS-PGS 2018), 257–267.
  4. Furqoni, I., Rosyadi, S., & Isna, A. (2019). Collaborative Governance in Corporate Social Responsibility Forum in Banyumas Regency. Jurnal Bina Praja, 11(2), 209–217. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.11.2019.209-217
  5. Gash, T., & Hobbs, R. (2018). Policing 4.0: Deciding the Future of Policing in the UK.
  6. Gobillot, E. (2009). Leadershift: Reinventing Leadership for the Age of Mass Collaboration. Kogan Page.
  7. Heri, E. I. (2019). Tantangan Pengembangan SDM Polri di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Jurnal Ilmu Kepolisian, 13(2), 90–105. http://www.jurnalptik.id/index.php/JIK/article/view/159
  8. Kerlinger, F. N. (1996). Methods in Social Research. McGraw Hill.
  9. Kranz, M. (2016). Building the Internet of Things: Implement New Business Models, Disrupt Competitors, Transform Your Industry. Wiley.
  10. Lopez-Varela, A. (Ed.). (2012). Theoretical and Methodological Approaches to Social Sciences and Knowledge Management. InTech. https://doi.org/10.5772/2273
  11. Machruf, I. N., Hermawan, D., & Meutia, I. F. (2020). Penanggulangan Pra Bencana Alam Tsunami di Kabupaten Lampung Selatan dalam Perspektif Collaborative Governance. Administrativa: Jurnal Birokrasi, Kebijakan Dan Pelayanan Publik, 2(1), 129–146. https://doi.org/10.23960/administrativa.v2i1.25
  12. Manning, P. K. (1981). The Technology of Policing: Crime Mapping, Information Technology, and the Rationality of Crime Control. NYU Press.
  13. Mukhtas, H. (2018). Formulasi Kebijakan Restrukturisasi Organisasi Markas Besar Polri Pasca Reformasi 1998. Jurnal Politik Pemerintahan Dharma Praja, 11(2), 107–119. https://doi.org/10.33701/jppdp.v11i2.399
  14. Mulyana, S., Tumpu, M., Rachman, R., Pasoepati, I. G. P. A. G., Saeni, A., Alpius, Rangan, P., Salle, L., Sahar, N., Darsim, S., Asdar, M., Tanje, H., Atmika, I. M. B., & Gusty, S. (2019). Pengembangan Inovasi dan Teknologi di Era Industri 4.0: Konsep & Penerapan (I. Marjuki, M. Chaerul, & N. Desi (Eds.)). Tohar Media.
  15. Neuman, W. L., & Wiegand, B. (2000). Criminal Justice Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Allyn and Bacon.
  16. Schwab, K. (2017). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Penguin Books Limited.
  17. Supriyanto, E. E. (2016). Kebijakan Inovasi Teknologi Informasi (IT) Melalui Program Elektronik Goverment dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Pelayanan Publik di Indonesia. JIP (Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan): Kajian Ilmu Pemerintahan Dan Politik Daerah, 1(1), 141–161. https://doi.org/10.24905/jip.1.1.2016.141-161
  18. Supriyanto, E. E. (2021). Strategi Penerapan Kebijakan Sovereign Wealth Funds (SWFs) di Indonesia: Studi Literatur dan Studi Komparatif Oman. Jurnal Inovasi Ilmu Sosial Dan Politik (JISoP), 3(1), 10–21. https://doi.org/10.33474/JISOP.V3I1.6959
  19. Supriyanto, E. E., Bakti, I. S., & Furqon, M. (2021). The Role of Big Data in the Implementation of Distance Learning. Paedagoria: Jurnal Kajian, Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Kependidikan, 12(1), 61–68. https://doi.org/10.31764/PAEDAGORIA.V12I1.3902
  20. Tim Peneliti ITK. (2015). Laporan Eksekutif Indeks Tata Kelola Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia.
  21. Trochim, W. M. K. (2019). Research Methods.
  22. Wardhana, B. S. (2020). Kompleksitas Tugas Kepolisian pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Ilmu Kepolisian, 14(2), 80–88. https://jurnalptik.id/index.php/JIK/article/view/252

Copyright & Open Access License

Copyright (c) 2021 Author(s). This article is licensed under CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0.