Skip to main content
Original Research Article Open Access SINTA 2 Accredited

Exploring the Drivers of Continuance Intention to Use Mobile Government

A Case Study in Indonesia

DOI
10.21787/jbp.17.2025-2766
Published & Pages
31 December 2025
Manuscript History
Received24 Oct 2025 Accepted18 Dec 2025 Published31 Dec 2025

772 Views 562 Downloads

Abstract

The sustained use of technology is pivotal for ensuring the enduring impact of innovations and improving the quality of services within organizations. The long-term success of Information System (IS)/Information Technology (IT) initiatives hinges not merely on their initial adoption but on their continued use. Therefore, understanding the factors that motivate users to consistently engage with new technologies is essential for evaluating the success and sustainability of such projects. Despite this importance, most research in this domain has primarily focused on user acceptance rather than continued usage. This study aims to bridge this gap by exploring how citizens’ perceptions of usefulness and satisfaction influence their intention to continue using mobile government services. A survey was conducted with 254 Indonesian citizens who had interacted with mobile government platforms. The analysis was performed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM), with three primary constructs measured: perceived usefulness, satisfaction, and continuance intention to use m-government services. The R² value of the structural model indicates that 83.6% of the variation in continuance intention to use m-government services is explained by perceived usefulness and satisfaction. The findings reveal that perceived usefulness exerts a more substantial influence on continuance intention than satisfaction. The theoretical contribution of this study enhances the understanding of the factors influencing continued use within the context of m-government, while the practical contribution provides insights for policymakers to design more effective and engaging m-government services.

Read the Full Text

The full text of this article is available as PDF. Version of record published in Vol. 17 No. 3 (2025).

Open PDF

References

46 references
  1. Abdul Rahim, N. F., Abbasi, G. A., Iranmanesh, M., Christopher, N., & Amran, A. (2023). Determinants of Continuous Intention to Use E-Government Services: An Extension of Technology Continuance Theory. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 25(3), 245–267. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSIT-09-2020-0166
  2. Abu Tair, H. Y. A., & Abu-Shanab, E. A. (2014). Mobile Government Services: Challenges and Opportunities. International Journal of Technology Diffusion, 5(1), 17–25. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijtd.2014010102
  3. Afrizal, D., & Wallang, M. (2021). Attitude on Intention to Use E-Government in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 22(1), 435–441. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijeecs.v22.i1.pp435-441
  4. Ahmad, S. Z., & Khalid, K. (2017). The Adoption of M-Government Services From the User’s Perspectives: Empirical Evidence From the United Arab Emirates. International Journal of Information Management, 37(5), 367–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.03.008
  5. Alalwan, J. A. (2013). A Taxonomy for Decision Support Capabilities of Enterprise Content Management Systems. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 24(1), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hitech.2013.02.001
  6. AlBar, A. M., & Hddas, M. A. (2018). Exploring Saudi Citizens’ Acceptance of Mobile Government Service. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 9(11). https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2018.091156
  7. Almahamid, S. M., & McAdams, A. C. (2011). Determinants of User Continuance Intention to Use E-Government. International Journal of Electronic Governance, 3(4), 343–372. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEG.2010.038606
  8. Almarashdeh, I. (2020). The Effect of Recovery Satisfaction on Citizens Loyalty Perception: A Case Study of Mobile Government Services. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE), 10(4), 4279–4295. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v10i4.pp4279-4295
  9. Althunibat, O. Y., Al-Mustafa, A. H., Tarawneh, K., Khleifat, K. M., Ridzwan, B. H., & Qaralleh, H. N. (2010). Protective Role of Punica granatum L. Peel Extract Against Oxidative Damage in Experimental Diabetic Rats. Process Biochemistry, 45(4), 581–585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2009.12.004
  10. AL-Zahrani, M. (2020). Integrating IS Success Model With Cybersecurity Factors for E-Government Implementation in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE), 10(5), 4937–4955. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v10i5.pp4937-4955
  11. Ameen, A., Al-Ali, D., Isaac, O., & Mohammed, F. (2020). Examining Relationship Between Service Quality, User Satisfaction, and Performance Impact in the Context of Smart Government in UAE. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE), 10(6), 6026–6033. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v10i6.pp6026-6033
  12. Belanche, D., Casaló, L. V., Flavián, C., & Schepers, J. (2014). Trust Transfer in the Continued Usage of Public E-Services. Information & Management, 51(6), 627–640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2014.05.016
  13. Berlilana, Hariguna, T., & Lai, M. T. (2018). Effects of Relationship Quality on Citizen Intention Use of E-Government Services: An Empirical Study of E-Government System. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE), 8(6), 5127–5133. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v8i6.pp5127-5133
  14. Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model1. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 351–370. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250921
  15. Bretschneider, S. I., & Mergel, I. (2015). Technology and Public Management Information Systems: Where We Have Been and Where We Are Going. In D. C. Menzel & H. E. White (Eds.), The State of Public Administration: Issues, Challenges and Opportunities (pp. 187–203). Taylor & Francis.
  16. Chou, S.-W., & Chen, P.-Y. (2009). The Influence of Individual Differences on Continuance Intentions of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP). International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 67(6), 484–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.01.001
  17. Cohen, L. (1994). When Can Government Subsidize Research Joint Ventures? Politics, Economics, and Limits to Technology Policy. The American Economic Review, 84(2), 159–163. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2117821
  18. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 13(3), 319–339. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  19. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
  20. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., & Babin, B. J. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective. Pearson Education.
  21. Hernandez-Ortega, B., Serrano-Cinca, C., & Gomez-Meneses, F. (2014). The Firm’s Continuance Intentions to Use Inter-organizational ICTs: The Influence of Contingency Factors and Perceptions. Information & Management, 51(6), 747–761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2014.06.003
  22. Hossain, M. A., & Quaddus, M. (2012). Expectation–Confirmation Theory in Information System Research: A Review and Analysis. In Y. K. Dwivedi, M. R. Wade, & S. L. Schneberger (Eds.), Information Systems Theory: Explaining and Predicting Our Digital Society (Vol. 1, pp. 441–469). Springer New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6108-2_21
  23. Hung, M.-C., Chang, I.-C., & Hwang, H.-G. (2011). Exploring Academic Teachers’ Continuance Toward the Web-Based Learning System: The Role of Causal Attributions. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1530–1543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.02.001
  24. Iqbal, M., & Virginia, C. Y. (2020). User Behavior of Online Public Complaint and Aspiration Service (LAPOR!) in Mataram City. Transformasi: Jurnal Manajemen Pemerintahan, 12(2), 125–140. https://doi.org/10.33701/jtp.v12i2.947
  25. Kurnianingsih, F., Mahadiansar, M., & Adhayanto, O. (2022). Travel Corridor Arrangement Application Process by Governments of Indonesia and Singapore. Jurnal Bina Praja, 14(2), 263–274. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.14.2022.263-274
  26. Lawelai, H., & Sadat, A. (2022). Trend Analysis of Positive Sentiment for Special Autonomy for Papua on Twitter. Jurnal Bina Praja, 14(2), 213–224. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.14.2022.213-224
  27. Mpaspor. (2022, April 3). Bukan April Mop, M-Paspor Mengalami Gangguan Kesisteman. M-PASPOR.COM. https://www.mpaspor.com/2022/04/03/bukan-april-mop-m-paspor-mengalami-gangguan-kesisteman/
  28. Napitupulu, D., Usino, W., Azmi, N. A., Kartika, R. S., Supratikta, H., Suhendra, A., Yohanitas, W. A., Saksono, H., Halik, A., & Suhandojo, S. (2024). Understanding the Key Driver of E-Government Services Continuance Usage Intention: An Integrated Model of Expectation Confirmation Model and Technology Acceptance Model. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8(12), 7957. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i12.7957
  29. Noprisson, H., Husin, N., Utami, M., Rahayu, P., Sucahyo, Y. G., & Sensuse, D. I. (2016). The Use of a Mixed Method Approach to Evaluate M-Government Implementation. 2016 International Conference on Information Technology Systems and Innovation (ICITSI), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICITSI.2016.7858195
  30. Nurkumalawati, I., & Rofii, M. S. (2023). Public Review of M-Paspor Application in Indonesia: Mobile Government, Digital Resilience, Cyber Security (pp. 404–412). https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-090-9_32
  31. Oliver, R. L. (1980). A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(4), 460. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150499
  32. Pinem, A. A., Immanuella, I. M., Hidayanto, A. N., Phusavat, K., & Meyliana, M. (2018). Trust and Its Impact Towards Continuance of Use in Government-to-Business Online Service. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 12(3/4), 265–285. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-02-2018-0008
  33. Puthur, J. K., George, A. P., & Mahadevan, L. (2020). Understanding Citizen’s Continuance Intention to Use E-Government Services: The Case of the Indian Railway E-Ticket Booking Site. International Journal of Business Information Systems, 34(2), 183–203. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIS.2020.108343
  34. Ramadhan, A., & Patnistik, E. (2019, March 29). Apa Kabar Aplikasi Qlue di Jakarta? Kompas.com. https://megapolitan.kompas.com/read/2019/03/29/06555001/apa-kabar-aplikasi-qlue-di-jakarta
  35. Rofi, A. E. N., Putra, F., & Sentanu, I. G. E. P. S. (2021). Creating Innovation of Public Value Through Management Information Systems. Jurnal Bina Praja, 13(3), 513–528. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.13.2021.513-528
  36. Rusfiana, Y., & Kurniasih, D. (2024). The Role of Civil Society Organizations in Promoting Social and Political Change in Indonesia. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 11(3), 187–206. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/2154
  37. Saleh, A. A., & Alyaseen, I. F. T. (2021). Successful Factors Determining the Significant Relationship Between E-Governance System and Government Operational Excellence. Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, 10(6), 3460–3470. https://doi.org/10.11591/eei.v10i6.2447
  38. Santhanamery, T., & Ramayah, T. (2014). Explaining the e-Government Usage Using Expectation Confirmation Model: The Case of Electronic Tax Filing in Malaysia. In L. G. Anthopoulos & C. G. Reddick (Eds.), Government e-Strategic Planning and Management: (Vol. 3, pp. 287–304). Springer New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8462-2_15
  39. Saxena, S. (2017). Enhancing ICT Infrastructure in Public Services. The Bottom Line, 30(4), 279–296. https://doi.org/10.1108/BL-08-2017-0017
  40. Selya, A. S., Rose, J. S., Dierker, L. C., Hedeker, D., & Mermelstein, R. J. (2012). A Practical Guide to Calculating Cohen’s f2, a Measure of Local Effect Size, from PROC MIXED. Frontiers in Psychology, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00111
  41. Shyu, S. H.-P., & Huang, J.-H. (2011). Elucidating Usage of E-Government Learning: A Perspective of the Extended Technology Acceptance Model. Government Information Quarterly, 28(4), 491–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2011.04.002
  42. Subhan, & Suciningsih, I. G. A. (2024). Development of Geographic Information System for Government With Extreme Programming and User-Centered Design Methods. Jurnal Bina Praja, 16(1), 111–126. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.16.2024.111-126
  43. Sudrajat, A., & Andhika, L. (2021). Empirical Evidence Governance Innovation in Public Service. Jurnal Bina Praja, 13(3), 407–417. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.13.2021.407-417
  44. Sun, P.-L., Ku, C.-Y., & Shih, D.-H. (2015). An Implementation Framework for E-Government 2.0. Telematics and Informatics, 32(3), 504–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2014.12.003
  45. Talukder, S., Chiong, R., Dhakal, S., Sorwar, G., & Bao, Y. (2019). A Two-Stage Structural Equation Modeling-Neural Network Approach for Understanding and Predicting the Determinants of M-Government Service Adoption. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 21(4), 419–438. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSIT-10-2017-0096
  46. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540

Copyright & Open Access License

Copyright (c) 2025 Author(s). This article is licensed under CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0.