Analysis of Mitigation Performance Budget in Transportation Sector in Yogyakarta Province

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21787/10.21787/mp.1.3.2017.165-176

Keywords:

GHG Emission, Congestion, Transportation

Abstract

Yogyakarta province is one of the regions with growing concerns towards increasing carbon emission from growing private transportation usage. In response, the provincial government enacted Local Mitigation Plan by the Governor Regulation Number 51 Year 2012, in accordance with the Presidential Decree No. 61 Year 2011 on National Mitigation Plan for Reducing Glass House Gas (GHG) Emission. The plan places energy and transport sector as top priority programs that should be controlled and regulated by the local government. This paper examines the implementation of the plan by looking at the derivation of the local mitigation planning into government budgeting. It employs project sustainability analysis to elaborate the presence of factors affecting the application of the plan into government programs. The study reveals that in general, the government programs reported in the strategic and performance indicators on Government Performance Report (LAKIP) in transportation sector are in accordance with the local mitigation plan. Almost 80% from 25 core activities in the Local Mitigation Plan, can be described in each of the strategic objectives and performance indicators LAKIP. Only five core activities can not be translated into strategic objectives and performance indicators on LAKIP. Meanwhile, for supporting documents, approximately 52% has occurred compatibility between Local Mitigation Plan document with strategic goals and performance indicators in LAKIP. However, it is necessary for the government to make adjustments in a number of activities to improve the quality of planning as well as optimize the effectiveness of the budget.

Author Biography

Joko Tri Haryanto, Ministry of Finance

Fiscal Policy Agency

References

ADB. (2002). Increasing Air Quality on The Cities: Strategy and Local Action. Jakarta.

Ajani, J. I., Keith, H., Blakers, M., Mackey, B. G., & King, H. P. (2013). Comprehensive Carbon Stock and Flow Accounting: A National Framework to Support Climate Change Mitigation Policy. Ecological Economics, 89(May 2013), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOLECON.2013.01.010

Bappeda. (2013). DIY Province Healty Profile. Jakarta.

Brunn, S. D., Williams, J. F., & Zeigler, D. J. (2003). Cities of the world : world regional urban development (3rd ed.). Lanham Md.: Rowman & Littlefield.

Devas, N., & Rakodi, C. (1993). Managing Fast Growing Cities: New Approach to Urban Planning and Management in Developing World. New York: Longman Scientific & Technical.

Greaker, M., Stoknes, P. E., Alfsen, K. H., & Ericson, T. (2013). A Kantian Approach to Sustainable Development Indicators for Climate Change. Ecological Economics, 91(July 2013), 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOLECON.2013.03.011

Haryanto, J. T. (2010). Manajemen Pengelolaan Transportasi yang Berkelanjutan. Yogyakarta: Diandracreative.com.

Kustiwan, I., Pontoh, N. K., Ardjo, A. T., & Ananda, R. J. (2009). Pengantar Perencanaan Perkotaan. (Tuti Sarah, Ed.). Bandung: Penerbit ITB.

Muller, N. Z., & Mendelsohn, R. (2007). Measuring the Damages of Air Pollution in the United States. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 54(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JEEM.2006.12.002

Rickels, W., Rehdanz, K., & Oschlies, A. (2010). Method for Greenhouse Gas Offset Accounting; A Case Study of Ocean Iron Fertilization. Ecological Economics, 69(12), 2495–2509. Retrieved from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecolec/v69y2010i12p2495-2509.html

UNDP. (2015). Public Spending and Budget Tagging Review for Climate Change Mitigation in DIY Province. Jakarta.

Regulations

Law Number 23 Year 2014 on Local Government;

Law Number 24 Year 2007 on Disaster Management;

Law Number 26 Year 2007 on Spatial Planning;

Law Number 32 Year 2009 on Environment Protection and Conservation;

Presidential Regulation Number 61 Year 2011 on Developing National GHG Emission for Mitigation Action Plan;

Governor Regulation Number 51 Year 2012 on Developing Local GHG Emission for DIY Province Mitigation Action Plan;

Published

2017-11-30

How to Cite

Haryanto, J. T. (2017). Analysis of Mitigation Performance Budget in Transportation Sector in Yogyakarta Province. Matra Pembaruan: Jurnal Inovasi Kebijakan, 1(3), 165–176. https://doi.org/10.21787/10.21787/mp.1.3.2017.165-176

Issue

Section

Articles