Understanding Policy Innovation Instrumentation
Study of a Policy Hackathon at the Cimahi Innovathon Days Program in Cimahi City
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21787/mp.8.2.2024.159-171Keywords:
Policy Hackathon, Program Innovation Instrumentation, CimahiAbstract
This research explores the role of policy hackathons as an innovation instrument in public policy development through a case study of the Cimahi Innovathon Days program in Cimahi City. The background of this research is based on the need to understand how policy hackathons can produce relevant and sustainable policy solutions at the local level. The main objective of this research is to understand the context related to policy hackathons, which are still rarely discussed in practical terms in public policy case studies in Indonesia, as one of the methods in participatory public policy formulation. The methodology used is discourse analysis, which involves direct observation and interviews with the stakeholders involved. The research results indicate?that?the?implementation?of?policy?hackathons?can?be?one?alternative?for participatory policy formulation involving the general public. Additionally, focusing on the needs of citizens, responsible leadership, and measurable real-world impact are important factors in this process. The conclusion of this research underscores the great potential of policy hackathons in creating innovative solutions that can be effectively implemented at the local level. The practical implications of these findings include the importance of strengthening inter-sectoral collaboration in policy formulation and the need for ongoing evaluation of the long-term impacts of the resulting policies. This research also opens up opportunities for the development of new policy instruments that can be adopted in various other regions.
References
Alam, M. K. (2021). A systematic qualitative case study: questions, data collection, NVivo analysis and saturation. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 16(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1108/QROM-09-2019-1825
Andari Ratna Widyastuti, T., Iqbal Ramadhani Mukhlis, M., Henrietta Imelda Tondong, Mk., Mohammad Djamil Nur, M. M., Rahmawati Ning Utami, Mpf., Sri Yani Kusumastuti Shelvy Kurniawan, Ms., Loso Judijanto, M., Aryawira Pratama, Ms., Saktisyahputra, Mp., Ir Arwizet, Mik. K., Ture Simamora, M., Yoseb Boari, Ms., Lailatur Rohmah, Ms., Musran Munizu, M., Nita Purnamasari, M., Resnita Dewi, M., & Adolfina Krisifu, Mh. (n.d.). METODOLOGI PENELITIAN (Panduan Lengkap Penulisan Karya Tulis Ilmiah). Retrieved October 21, 2024, from www.buku.sonpedia.com
Barsei, A. N., Nugroho, S. A., Ghassani, G. A., & Trianita, L. N. (2023). Inovasi Digital pada Pemerintah Kabupaten Sumedang dalam Mendorong Open Government. Matra Pembaruan, 7(2), 99–110. https:// doi.org/10.21787/mp.7.2.2023.99-110
Bason,?C.?(2016).?Design?for?policy.?Routledge.?https://www.routledge.com/Design-for-Policy/Bason/p/ book/9780367670047?srsltid=AfmBOooY9YIzO0JffVvp7VMj4KOlL1Jne5ZrGjIE_mxDxeDboZt2109p
Cameron, B. T. (2018). (PDF) Understanding policy workers’ policy innovation capacity: An exploratory and qualitative mixed methods evaluation study of a policy hackathon program in Prince Edward Island, Canada | Bobby Thomas Cameron - Academia.edu. Centre for Policy Innovation and Public Engagement, October, 1–74. https://www.academia.edu/37768986/Understanding_policy_workers_policy_ innovation_capacity_An_exploratory_and_qualitative_mixed_methods_evaluation_study_of_a_policy_ hackathon_program_in_Prince_Edward_Island_Canada
Chaminade, C., Lundvall, B. åke, Vang, J., & Joseph, K. J. (2009). Designing innovation policies for development: Towards a systemic experimentation-based approach. Handbook of Innovation Systems and Developing Countries: Building Domestic Capabilities in a Global Setting, January, 360–379. https:// doi.org/10.4337/9781849803427.00022
Concilio, G., Molinari, F., & Morelli, N. (2017). Empowering citizens with open data by urban Hackathons.
Proceedings of the 7th International Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government, CeDEM 2017, May, 125–134. https://doi.org/10.1109/CeDEM.2017.28
Cutchins, D., Raw, L., & Welsh, J. M. (2010). Redefining Adaption Studies. Lanham, Maryland: Scarecrow Press. https://rowman.com/ISBN/9780810872998/Redefining-Adaptation-Studies
Damanpour, F. (1992). Organizational Size and Innovation. Organization Studies, 13(3), 375–402. https:// doi.org/10.1177/017084069201300304
Darusman, F. (2017). KAPABILITAS DINAMIS SEKTOR PUBLIK : SEBUAH TINJAUAN LITERATUR. JIANA: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Negara 18(2), 1–12. https://jiana.ejournal.unri.ac.id/index.php/JIANA/article/view/7925
Day, K., Humphrey, G., & Cockcroft, S. (2017). How do the design features of health hackathons contribute to participatory medicine? Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 21, 1383. https://doi.org/10.3127/ AJIS.V21I0.1383
Destiana, R. (2023). Kepemimpinan dan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia Sektor Publik. Dialogue : Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Publik, 5(1), 437–460. https://doi.org/10.14710/dialogue.v5i1.15762
Hadna, A. H. (2006). Pusat Studi Kependudukan dan Kebijakan Universitas Gadjah Mada. From CPPS: http:// cpps.ugm.ac.id/
Hardiana, R. (2024, July 18). Pemkot Cimahi Raih Penghargaan Inovasi Smart City. From Cimahikota.go.id: https://cimahikota.go.id/berita/detail/82619-pemkot-cimahi-raih-penghargaan-inovasi-smart-city
Hasthoro, H. A., & Sunardi, S. (2016). Tata Kelola Publik Dan Kinerja Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah Di Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 18(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.24914/jeb.v19i1.480
Hendrawan, M. R. (2019). Manajemen Pengetahuan: Konsep dan Praktik Berpengetahuan pada Organisasi Pembelajar. Malang: UB Press. https://digilib.ub.ac.id/opac/detail-opac?id=80540
Irvin, R. A., & Stansbury, J. (2004). Citizen Participation in Decision Making: Is It Worth the effort? Public Administration Review, 64(1), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00346.x
Iskandar, D. J. (2017). Pentingnya Partisipasi Dan Peranan Kelembagaan Politik Dalam Proses Pembuatan Kebijakan Publik. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi: Media Pengembangan Ilmu Dan Praktek Administrasi, 14(1), 17–35. https://doi.org/10.31113/jia.v14i1.2
Jember, U., Dampak, E., Collaborative, M., Pada, G., Sumber, P., Berkelanjutan, D., & Nurza, R. (2024). Evaluasi Dampak Model Collaborative Governance Pada Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Berkelanjutan. Konferensi Nasional Mitra FISIP, 2(1), 454–467. https://journal.unej.ac.id/KONAMI/article/view/1097
Johnson, P., & Robinson, P. (2014). Civic Hackathons: Innovation, procurement, or civic engagement? Review of Policy Research, 31(4), 349–357. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12074
José, R., & Rodrigues, H. (2024). A Review on Key Innovation Challenges for Smart City Initiatives. Smart Cities, 7(1), 141–162. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities7010006
Kabeer, N. (2021). Gender equality, inclusive growth, and labour markets. Women’s Economic Empowerment: Insights from Africa and South Asia, 13–48. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003141938-3/GENDER- EQUALITY-INCLUSIVE-GROWTH-LABOUR-MARKETS-NAILA-KABEER
Khademian, A. M., Mergel, I., & Desouza, K. C. (2013). Administrative Profile. Public Administration Review, 73(6), 882–890. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12141.Open
Meinzen-Dick, R., Quisumbing, A., Doss, C., & Theis, S. (2019). Women’s land rights as a pathway to poverty reduction: Framework and review of available evidence. Agricultural Systems, 172, 72–82. https://doi. org/10.1016/J.AGSY.2017.10.009
Garud, Raghu and Gehman, Joel and Kumaraswamy, Arun and Tuertscher, Philipp, From the Process of Innovation to Innovation as Process (January 20, 2016). The Sage Handbook of Process Organization Studies, Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2786644
George Towar Ikbal Tawakkal, Ahmad Zaki Fadlur Rohman - Metode Penelitian Kualitatif: Penerapan pada Kajian Politik Pemerintahan. Retrieved October 21, 2024, from https://books.google.co.id/books?hl=e n&lr=&id=AH2REAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=metode+penelitian+kualitatif+pemerintahan&ots=
v9W1S1_N_W&sig=oXJkqNLzRD6ia-lSNAklilb0Z3Q&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=metode penelitian kualitatif pemerintahan&f=false
Mishra, M., & Mishra, S. K. (2012). Participation of rural women in household food security management. Annals of Agricultural Research, 33(1&2), 58–61. https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/AAR/article/view/42646
Misdayanti S. (2021). S, M. (2021). Gambaran Sanitasi Lingkungan pada Masyarakat Pesisir Desa Bajo Indah, Afiasi : Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat, 6(1), pp. 19–29. https://doi.org/10.31943/afiasi.v1i4.134
Molinari, F. (2011). Living Labs as multi-stakeholder platforms for the eGovernance of innovation. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 131–140. https://doi.org/10.1145/2072069.2072092
Mostafa, A., Rahman, I., & Dorina, M. (2014). HOW RURAL AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS CAN USE THEIR BENEFITS FOR IMPROVING THE ECONOMICS STATES OF FARMERS. Cadastre Series.
Nam, T. (2019). Determinants of local public employee attitudes toward government innovation: Government 3.0 in Korea. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 32(4), 418–434. https:// doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-06-2018-0134
Nugraha, A. R., Sjoraida, D. F., & Novianti, E. (2022). Analisis strategi humas pemerintahan era milenial dalam menghadapi tata kelola informasi publik. PRofesi Humas Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hubungan Masyarakat, 6(2), 286. https://doi.org/10.24198/prh.v6i2.37095
Orr, G. (2003). Review Diffusion of Innovations, by Everett Rogers (1995). Stanford University, 1(3), 1–7. http://web.stanford.edu/class/symbsys205/Diffusion of Innovations.htm
Osborne, S. P., & Brown, L. (2011). Innovation in public services: engaging with risk. Public Money & Management, 31(1), 4-6.
Salerno, M. S., Gomes, L. A. D. V., Da Silva, D. O., Bagno, R. B., & Freitas, S. L. T. U. (2015). Innovation processes: Which process for which project? Technovation, 35, 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. technovation.2014.07.012
Schot, J., Steinmueller, W. E., Schot, J., & Steinmueller, W. E. (2016). FRAMING INNOVATION POLICY FOR TRANSFORMATIVE CHANGE : INNOVATION POLICY 3 . 0. October, 0–26. https://www.semanticscholar. org/paper/FRAMING-INNOVATION-POLICY-FOR-TRANSFORMATIVE-POLICY-Schot-Steinmueller/19d 6f186b55199d043fe587fd9525923ab8de78d
Skarzynski, P., & Gibson, R. (2008). Innovation to the core - a blueprint for transforming the way your company innovates. Harvard Business Press, 3–295. https://archive.org/details/innovationtocore0000skar
Smith, L., & Haddad, L. (2014). Reducing Child Undernutrition: Past Drivers and Priorities for the Post-MDG Era. In IDS Working Papers (Vol. 2014, Issue 441). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2040-0209.2014.00441.x
Studi, P., Masyarakat, K., Teknologi, I., Avicenna, K., & Kendari, I. (2021). Gambaran Sanitasi Lingkungan pada Masyarakat Pesisir Desa Bajo Indah. Afiasi : Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat, 6(1), 19–29. https:// doi.org/10.31943/AFIASI.V1I4.134
Susanty, Y., & Yuningsih, Y. (2021). E-Gov Implementation Analysis Through SILPa KAMI Application in?DISKOMINFOARPUS,?Cimahi?City.?Jurnal?Wacana?Kinerja:?Kajian?Praktis-Akademis?Kinerja?Dan Administrasi Pelayanan Publik, 24(2), 1. https://doi.org/10.31845/jwk.v24i2.696
Tobirin. (2020). Kontestasi Teoritik Epistemologi dan Relevansinya Terhadap Studi Administrasi Publik KontemporerdalamMenghadapiKenormalanBaru.InAdministrasiPublikNewNormal (IssueNovember). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/345177834_KONTESTASI_TEORITIK_EPISTEMOLOGI_ DAN_RELEVANSINYA_TERHADAP_STUDI_ADMINISTRASI_PUBLIK_KONTEMPORER_DALAM_ MENGHADAPI_KENORMALAN_BARU
Uly,Y.A.(2023,May24).SriMulyaniKeluhkan24.000AplikasiPemerintahBikinBorosAnggaran,Menkominfo: Akan Ditutup. From Kompas.com: https://money.kompas.com/read/2022/07/12/140407226/sri- mulyani-keluhkan-24000-aplikasi-pemerintah-bikin-boros-anggaran-menkominfo
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2010). Handbook of Service Science. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1- 4419-1628-0
Vujkovi?, P., Ravšelj, D., Umek, L., & Aristovnik, A. (2022). Bibliometric Analysis of Smart Public Governance Research: Smart City and Smart Government in Comparative Perspective. Social Sciences, 11(7). https:// doi.org/10.3390/socsci11070293
Yogi Suwarno. (2008). Inovasi Di Sektor Publik. STIA-LAN Press, October, 2013–2015.
Yuan, Q., & Gasco-Hernandez, M. (2021). Open innovation in the public sector: creating public value through civic hackathons. Public Management Review, 23(4), 523–544. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.20 19.1695884
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Creative Commons-Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike License 4.0 International applies to all works published by Matra Pembaruan: Jurnal Inovasi Kebijakan. Authors will retain copyright of the work.
