Public Service Innovation

An Explanation from Cilegon City, Indonesia

Authors

  • Mahpudin Government Science Study Program, Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21787/mp.6.2.2022.107-117

Keywords:

innovation, public service, government, Cilegon City

Abstract

Public sector innovation is important to improve service quality, impacting high satisfaction and public trust in government institutions. However, the available innovations are often not always effective in bringing about better changes in governance. This article analyzes the obstacles that cause a public sector innovation to not work optimally by taking a specific case in Cilegon City, Indonesia. The qualitative-descriptive method was chosen as the research approach. Meanwhile, data were obtained through primary and secondary data. The results showed two main findings. First, public service innovation in Cilegon City needs to be well-established, so it tends to be a formality to meet the institution’s demands. Second, innovation relies more on a top-down approach without massive community involvement, so the innovations created are not based on an analysis of public needs. The obstacles found include low commitment and political will of regional leaders, unclear financial support schemes, and lack of rewards for innovators.

References

Adyawarman. (2021). The Challenges of Public Innovation : Insights From Risk Governance in Batang Regency. Jurnal Kebijakan Dan Administrasi Publik, 25(1), 1–24. https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/jkap/article/view/62314/31602

Agger, A., & Sørensen, E. (2018). Managing collaborative innovation in public bureaucracies. Planning Theory, 17(1), 53–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095216672500

Alwan. (2021). Pengangguran Kota Cilegon Melonjak Jumlahnya Mencapai 25976. Bantensuara.com. https://banten.suara.com/read/2021/03/16/170032/pengangguran-kota-cilegon-melonjakjumlahnya-mencapai-25976?page=all

Chen, J., Walker, R. M., & Sawhney, M. (2020). Public service innovation: a typology. Public Management Review, 22(11), 1674–1695. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1645874

Creswell. (2014). Penelitian Kualitatif & Desain Riset (3rd ed.). Pustaka Pelajar. https://pustakapelajar.co.id/buku/penelitian-kualitatif/

De Vries, H., Bekkers, V., & Tummers, L. (2016). Innovation in the public sector: A systematic review and future research agenda. Public Administration, 94(1), 146–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12209

De Vries, H., Tummers, L., & Bekkers, V. (2018). A stakeholder perspective on public sector innovation: why position matters. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 84(2), 269–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852317715513

Deby, L., Putri, M., & Mutiarin, D. (2018). Efektifitas inovasi kebijakan publik; Pengaruhnya pada kualitas pelayanan publik di Indonesia. Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Ke- 8 Asosiasi Program Pascasarjana Perguruan Tinggi Muhammadiyah (APPPTMA, 1–16. http://repository.umy.ac.id/ handle/123456789/29132.

Godenhjelm, S., & Johanson, J. E. (2018). The effect of stakeholder inclusion on public sector project innovation. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 84(1), 42–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852315620291

Hapzah, S. N., Rianto, B., & Tamrin, M. H. (2020). Tata kelola inovasi pelayanan publik: dimensi kelembagaan, aktor kebijakan dan masyarakat. Publisia (Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Publik), 5(2), 153–164. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/tata-kelola-inovasi-pelayanan-publik-dimensi/docview/2458752508/se-2?accountid=17242

Hutagalung, S. S., & Hermawan, D. (2018). Evaluation of Local Government Innovation Program in Lampung Province. Jurnal Bina Praja, 10(2), 241–250. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.10.2018.241-250

Iqbal. (2021). Pengangguran Di Cilegon Naik Terus Wawalkot Ijazah Warga Rata Rata SMP. Detik.com. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-5522215/pengangguran-di-cilegon-naik-terus-wawalkot-ijazahwarga-rata-rata-smp

Lopes, A. V., & Farias, J. S. (2020). How can governance support collaborative innovation in the public sector? A systematic review of the literature. International Review of Administrative Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852319893444

Lukman, I. B. (2021). Rethinking Public Sector Innovation in Indonesia. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Administration Science 2020 (ICAS 2020), 564(Icas 2020), 59–67. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210629.012

Melo, S., De Waele, L., & Polzer, T. (2020). The role of Post-New Public Management in shaping innovation: the case of a public hospital. International Review of Administrative Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852320977626

Pratama, A. B. (2019). The landscape of public service innovation in Indonesia. Innovation & Management Review, 17(1), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.1108/inmr-11-2018-0080

Queyroi, Y., Carassus, D., Maurel, C., Favoreu, C., & Marin, P. (2020). Local public innovation: an analysis of its perceived impacts on public performance. International Review of Administrative Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852320963214

Trivellato, B., Martini, M., & Cavenago, D. (2021). How Do Organizational Capabilities Sustain Continuous Innovation in a Public Setting? American Review of Public Administration, 51(1), 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074020939263

van Acker, W., & Bouckaert, G. (2018). What makes public sector innovations survive? An exploratory study of the influence of feedback, accountability and learning. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 84(2), 249–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852317700481

Yanuar, R. M. (2019). Inovasi Pelayanan Publik (Studi Kasus: Public Safety Center (PSC) 119 Kabupaten Bantul Sebagai Layanan Kesehatan dan Kegawatdaruratan). Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 04(0274), 20. https://ojs.umrah.ac.id/index.php/kemudi/article/view/1335

Yin, R. (2006). Studi Kasus: Desain dan Metode. Grafindo Persada. https://www.rajagrafindo.co.id/produk/studi-kasus-desain-dan-metode/

Published

2022-11-30

How to Cite

Mahpudin. (2022). Public Service Innovation: An Explanation from Cilegon City, Indonesia. Matra Pembaruan: Jurnal Inovasi Kebijakan, 6(2), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.21787/mp.6.2.2022.107-117

Issue

Section

Articles