Skip to main content
Original Research Article Open Access SINTA 2 Accredited

Alternatives for Equal Education of Ministry of Education

Study on the Repatriation of Children of Migrant Workers in Blitar City

DOI
10.21787/jbp.17.2025.2617
Published & Pages
29 August 2025
Manuscript History
Received15 Jun 2025 Published29 Aug 2025

690 Views 728 Downloads

Abstract

Equal access to education is part of fulfilling the rights of citizens, both within the country and abroad. The government, through the Ministry of Education, repatriates the children of migrant workers to obtain the right to study in Indonesia through partner schools of the Ministry of Education and Culture. This study analyzes repatriation as an educational alternative for the children of Indonesian migrant workers. Lack of documentation is a problem for them regarding administrative requirements, especially in education. Data was collected through observation and interviews with repatriates. Data collection was considered easy because the researcher was directly involved in the daily activities of the repatriates. Field findings indicate that their current course of study helps with their education and living expenses. Despite language difficulties, they feel comfortable because a representative educational environment supports them. Their adaptation is also fast because there are several similarities between Blitar and their origins while abroad. The purpose of repatriation in the field of education is none other than educational equality. Collaborative support from the government (Ministry of Education) and the person responsible for repatriation in Blitar makes repatriates feel at ease pursuing education in Indonesia. The learning environment influences the latent pattern of nationalist character formation for repatriates. Many factors shape the social resilience of repatriates.

Read the Full Text

The full text of this article is available as PDF. Version of record published in Vol. 17 No. 2 (2025).

Open PDF

References

38 references
  1. Alfiani, V., & Purnomo, N. H. (2016). Persepsi Masyarakat Terkait Kenyamanan Tinggal di Pemukiman Kumuh (Studi Kasus: Pemukiman Kumuh Kelurahan Keputih Kecamatan Sukolilo Kota Surabaya). Swara Bhumi: Jurnal Geografi dan Pendidikan Geografi, 4(2), 8–13. https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/swara-bhumi/article/view/17722
  2. Anggraini, L. M., Irawan, & Purwasih, J. H. G. (2021). Internalisasi Pendidikan Seks terhadap Anak Pekerja Migran di Kabupaten Blitar. Jurnal Antropologi: Isu-Isu Sosial Budaya, 23(1), 58–65. https://doi.org/10.25077/jantro.v23.n1.p58-65.2021
  3. Arkum, D., & Amar, H. (2022). The Influence of Economic Growth, Human Development, Poverty and Unemployment on Income Distribution Inequality: Study in the Province of the Bangka Belitung Islands in 2005-2019. Jurnal Bina Praja, 14(3), 413–422. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.14.2022.413-422
  4. Arub, S. S., Setiyono, B., & Utomo, S. (2016). Peran Lembaga Swadaya Masyarakat dalam Penanganan dan Perlindungan Anak TKI (Studi Kasus Rumah Peduli Anak Tenaga Kerja Indonesia). Journal of Politic and Government Studies, 5(2), 241–250. https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/jpgs/article/view/11232
  5. As’ad, Moh. (2012). Psikologi Industri: Seri Ilmu Sumber Daya Manusia. Liberty.
  6. Aziz, A. (2021). Promising Business Opportunities in the Industrial Age 4.0 and the Society Era 5.0 in the New-Normal Period of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Scholarly Journal of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, 4(4), 577–584. https://doi.org/10.32474/SJPBS.2021.05.000216
  7. Berg, B. L., & Lune, H. (2009). Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences. Pearson.
  8. Chandra, A. R., & Budiyuwono, H. (2021). Adaptasi Sosial dan Pola Permukiman di Kampung Toleransi Bandung. Jurnal RISA, 5(2), 190–206. https://doi.org/10.26593/.v5i02.4733.190-206
  9. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications.
  10. Damayanti, C., Dewi, U. N. M., & Permatasari, D. G. (2023). Diplomasi Pendidikan Sabah Bridge dalam Memenuhi Hak Pendidikan bagi Anak Pekerja Migran Indonesia di Sabah, Malaysia. Indonesian Journal of International Relations, 7(2), 195–212. https://doi.org/10.32787/ijir.v7i2.440
  11. de Saussure, F. (1988). Pengantar Linguistik Umum. Gadjah Mada University Press.
  12. Dewi, S. (2017). Teamwork (Cara Menyenangkan Membangun Tim Impian). Penerbit Progressio.
  13. Emzir. (2010). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan: Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif. Rajagrafindo Persada.
  14. Fadhallah, R. A. (2021). Wawancara. UNJ Press.
  15. Farhaeni, M., & Martini, S. (2023). Pentingnya Pendidikan Nilai-Nilai Budaya dalam Mempertahankan Warisan Budaya Lokal di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, 3(2), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.30742/juispol.v3i2.3483
  16. Flick, U. (2024). The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research Quality. Sage.
  17. Haryanti, Y. D., Yonanda, D. A., Rosidah, A., Mahpudin, & Maula, M. (2025). Development of Project-Based Digital Teaching Modules in Social Studies Learning on the Critical Thinking Skills of Elementary School Students. Sekolah Dasar: Kajian Teori dan Praktik Pendidikan, 34(1), 36–49. https://doi.org/10.17977/um009v34i12025p36-49
  18. Hasanah, L., Rahmadhani, D., Amalia, W. A., Najah, E. S., & Putri, K. A. (2024). Kurikulum Operasional Satuan Pendidikan: Impelementasi, Struktur dan Prinsip. Incrementapedia: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 6(1), 53–59. https://doi.org/10.36456/incrementapedia.vol6.no1.a8904
  19. Hidayah, N. N. (2021). Perubahan Sosial: Tradisi Ganjaran Perspektif Teori AGIL Talcott Parsons di Dusun Tempel Desa Pangean Kecamatan Maduran Kabupaten Lamongan [UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya]. http://digilib.uinsa.ac.id/id/eprint/47111
  20. Holmwood, J. (2014). Founding Sociology? Talcott Parsons and the Idea of General Theory. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315841991
  21. Hutabarat, D., & Pangaribuan, C. S. (2025). Paradoks Teori Pendidikan Sebagai Alat Mobilitas Sosial dalam Ketimpangan Pendidikan dan Tantangan Kerja Generasi Z di Indonesia. Triwikrama: Jurnal Multidisiplin Ilmu Sosial, 7(12), 71–80. https://doi.org/10.6578/triwikrama.v7i12.12466
  22. Ilham, D. (2020). Persoalan-Persoalan Pendidikan dalam Kajian Filsafat Pendidikan Islam. Didaktika: Jurnal Kependidikan, 9(2), 179–188. https://doi.org/10.58230/27454312.22
  23. Krupka, E. L., & Weber, R. A. (2013). Identifying Social Norms Using Coordination Games: Why Does Dictator Game Sharing Vary? Journal of the European Economic Association, 11(3), 495–524. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeea.12006
  24. Leech, G. N. (2014). The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford University Press.
  25. Manzilati, A. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif: Paradigma, Metode, dan Aplikasi. Universitas Brawijaya Press.
  26. Mohajan, H. K. (2018). Qualitative Research Methodology in Social Sciences and Related Subjects. Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, 7(1), 23–48. https://doi.org/10.26458/jedep.v7i1.571
  27. Ningsih, D. F., & Andalas, E. F. (2021). Perbandingan Kehidupan Sosial Perempuan Indonesia dan Malaysia pada Kumcer Perempuan, Cinta dan Kehidupan. Tonil: Jurnal Kajian Sastra, Teater dan Sinema, 18(2), 92–107. https://doi.org/10.24821/tnl.v18i2.5730
  28. Novia, H. (2023). Dinamika Diplomasi Indonesia Terkait Pemenuhan Akses Pendidikan Anak Pekerja Migran Indonesia di Sarawak Malaysia. Jurnal Studi Diplomasi dan Keamanan, 15(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.31315/jsdk.v15i2.8393
  29. Putra, R. A. (2019). Sistem Informasi Geografis Pemetaan Penduduk Miskin di Kabupaten Kuantan Singingi. Jurnal Perencanaan, Sains, Teknologi, dan Komputer (JuPerSaTeK), 2(2), 262–268. https://ejournal.uniks.ac.id/index.php/JUPERSATEK/article/view/728
  30. Rimayanti. (2019). Dampak Repatriasi bagi Para Ekspatriat Negara. Journal of Islamic and Law Studies, 3(1), 63–84. https://doi.org/10.18592/jils.v1i1.2717
  31. Ritzer, G. (2012). Teori Sosiologi: Dari Sosiologi Klasik Sampai Perkembangan Terakhir Postmodern. Pustaka Pelajar.
  32. Ritzer, G., & Stepnisky, J. (2017). Sociological Theory. Sage.
  33. Santrock, J. W. (2020). Adolescence. McGraw-Hill.
  34. Setyawan, K. G., Suprijono, A., Imron, A., & Sarmini. (2020). Dasar-Dasar Sosiologi untuk Pendidikan IPS. Unesa University Press.
  35. Soh, A., Engelica, E., & Samosir, D. L. (2021). Makanan Tradisional Nasi Lemak Melayu sebagai Daya Tarik Wisata Kuliner di Kepulauan Riau. Altasia: Jurnal Pariwisata Indonesia, 3(2), 50–56. https://doi.org/10.37253/altasia.v3i2.5333
  36. Widagdo, S., Indrayanti, K. W., & Saraswati, A. A. A. N. (2021). Repatriation as a Human Rights Approach to State Options in Dealing with Returning ISIS Foreign Terrorist Fighters. Sage Open, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211032679
  37. Widayanti, R. S., & Jumintono. (2021). Manajemen Program Afirmasi Pendidikan Menengah (ADEM) Papua-Papua Barat dan Repatriasi pada Sekolah Mitra di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Media Manajemen Pendidikan, 4(2), 290–310. https://doi.org/10.30738/mmp.v4i2.10039
  38. Zulkarnaen, H. O., & Sutopo. (2013). Analisis Strategi Pemasaran pada Usaha Kecil Menengah (UKM) Makanan Ringan (Studi Penelitian UKM Snack Barokah di Solo). Diponegoro Journal of Management, 2(3), 108–120. https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/djom/article/view/3212

Copyright & Open Access License

Copyright (c) 2025 Author(s). This article is licensed under CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0.