Skip to main content
Original Research Article Open Access SINTA 2 Accredited

Regional Innovation as a Catalyst for Economic Growth

A Perception Study in Banyuwangi

Authors

  • Gunawan Adi Saputra Silalahi * Corresponding author
  • Khoirunurrofik
  • Master Program in Economic Planning and Development Policy, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Indonesia
  • *Corresponding author
DOI
10.21787/jbp.16.2024.509-522
Published & Pages
31 December 2024 · pp. 509-522
Manuscript History
Received10 Sep 2024 Published31 Dec 2024
License
CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0
Read PDF 393 KB Cite

738 Views 759 Downloads

Abstract

This study analyzed public perceptions of regional innovation in Banyuwangi Regency. This study was conducted at the Banyuwangi Regional Government, the most innovative region in the last 5 years. This study adopts the theory of Regional Innovation and indicators in the Global Innovation Index (GII) and the Regional Innovation Index (IID). Data collection was carried out online with 311 respondents (N-311). The analysis method used a descriptive method with the SPSS 2017 application. The results of the analysis show that there is a relationship between public perceptions of regional innovation, generally having a very good category, but the product sophistication variable has an index value of 4.17 with the smallest good category compared to the index values of other variables, this is in line with the achievement of the Banyuwangi Regency regional innovation index in 2023 with an index value of 84.19 which experienced a decrease previously the index value in 2022, namely 96.3 where product sophistication was the lowest with a value of 44.5%. At the end of the research section, the author tries to recommend that the Banyuwangi Regency government improve the credit and investment system to improve the market sophistication variable in the regional innovation index.

Keywords:

Read the Full Text

The full text of this article is available as PDF. Version of record published in Vol. 16 No. 3 (2024).

Open PDF

References

33 references
  1. Abdullah, H. (2014). Realokasi Kebijakan Fiskal: Implikasi Peningkatan Human Capital dan Pembangunan Infrastruktur terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi dan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat. Jurnal Bina Praja, 6(2), 117–128. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.06.2014.117-128
  2. Andari, T., Masbiran, V. U. K., Momon, M., Savira, E. M., Yolarita, E., Manoby, W. M., & Asriani, A. (2022). Improving the Quality of Passenger Service Using Standards for Assessment of Rural Transport Services. Jurnal Bina Praja, 14(1), 189–200. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.14.2022.189-200
  3. Anggiawati, F. (2024, March 19). 91,50 Persen Masyarakat Puas dengan Pelayanan Publik Banyuwangi. VIVA Banyuwangi. https://banyuwangi.viva.co.id/peristiwa/3280-9150-persen-masyarakat-puas-dengan-pelayanan-publik-banyuwangi
  4. Anggraini, Y., & Rahayuningsih, Y. (2021). The Quality of Public Services on One Roof System (SAMSAT) of Banten Province. Jurnal Bina Praja, 13(3), 485–500. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.13.2021.485-500
  5. As’adi, Moh. (2024). Transformasi Digital dalam Pelayanan Administrasi Kependudukan di Kabupaten Banyuwangi. Konstitusi: Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik, dan Ilmu Komunikasi, 1(4), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.62383/konstitusi.v1i4.158
  6. Durnev, A., Enikolopov, R., Petrova, M., & Santarosa, V. (2014). Politics, Instability, and Composition of International Investment Flows. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1342169
  7. Etzkowitz, H. (2002). Incubation of Incubators: Innovation as a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Networks. Science and Public Policy, 29(2), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154302781781056
  8. Huang, W. (2022). Public Service Provision With a Limited Budget: Service Design, Privatization and Subsidies. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 172, 108374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2022.108374
  9. Husdinariyanto, N. (2022, December 23). Kemendagri Kembali Tetapkan Banyuwangi Kabupaten Terinovatif se-Tanah Air. ANTARA News Jawa Timur. https://jatim.antaranews.com/berita/666771/kemendagri-kembali-tetapkan-banyuwangi-kabupaten-terinovatif-se-tanah-air
  10. Hutagalung, S. S., & Hermawan, D. (2018). Evaluation of Local Government Innovation Program in Lampung Province. Jurnal Bina Praja, 10(2), 241–250. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.10.2018.241-250
  11. Kapiso, P., & Ansar. (2022). Analysis of Regent’s Leadership Banyuwangi District 2010–2020 Period (Abdullah Azwar Anas). Public Policy Journal, 3(3), 145–154. https://doi.org/10.37905/ppj.v3i3.1793
  12. Karya, M. A., Haryono, B. S., & Sujarwoto. (2024). Digitalization and Innovation of the Service Process: The Efforts to Improve the Quality of Higher Education Services in Kalimantan Island. Jurnal Bina Praja, 16(1), 69–81. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.16.2024.69-81
  13. Marlina, L., & Ahman, E. (2015). Pengaruh on the Job Training Terhadap Kualitas Human Capital Serta Implikasinya pada Pendapatan Karyawan. Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen dan Bisnis, 6(2), 18–23. https://doi.org/10.17509/jimb.v6i1.13100
  14. Masbiran, V. U. K., Yolarita, E., Wiguna, S., Andari, T., Afriyanni, A., & Momon, M. (2022). Opportunity of Implementing Buy the Service (BTS) Subsidies for Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) to Improve the Quality of Public Transport Services in Padang Panjang City. Jurnal Bina Praja, 14(3), 479–492. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.14.2022.479-492
  15. Muhlisin, Leksono, S. M., & Bahrudin, D. T. (2015). Daya Dukung Lingkungan dalam Pengembangan Pusat Inovasi Usaha Mikro, Kecil, dan Menengah (PI-UMKM) Peternakan Domba-Kambing di Kabupaten Pandeglang Provinsi Banten. Jurnal Bina Praja, 7(1), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.07.2015.37-50
  16. Mulgan, G. (2019). Social Innovation: How Societies Find the Power to Change. Bristol University Press. https://doi.org/10.46692/9781447353805
  17. Mulyani, I. T., & Mudiantono. (2015). Upaya Meningkatkan Kinerja Pemasaran Melalui Orientasi Pasar dan Orientasi Kewirausahaan dengan Inovasi Sebagai Variabel Intervening (Studi Empiris pada Usaha Mikro Kecil dan Menengah Kota Semarang). Diponegoro Journal of Management, 4(3). https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/djom/article/view/13215
  18. Muzaki, M., Martini, N. N. P., Susbiyani, A., & Qomariah, N. (2023). Pengaruh Kualitas dan Inovasi Pelayanan Terhadap Kepercayaan Masyarakat Melalui Kepuasan Masyarakat Sebagai Variabel Intervening pada Dinas Kependudukan dan Pencatatan Sipil Kabupaten Banyuwangi. Relasi: Jurnal Ekonomi, 19(2), 247–267. https://doi.org/10.31967/relasi.v19i2.856
  19. Natário, M. M., & Couto, J. (2022). Drivers, Enablers, and Conditions for Public Sector Innovation in European Countries. Innovar: Revista de Ciencias Administrativas y Sociales, 32(83), 5–16. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27093747
  20. Nender, T. A. E., Lapian, M. T., & Lambey, T. (2023). Persepsi Masyarakat Terhadap Kinerja Aparatur Desa dalam Meningkatkan Pelayanan Publik di Desa Tumpaan Kecamatan Tumpaan Kabupaten Minahasa Selatan. Eksekutif, 3(2), 1–8. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/jurnaleksekutif/article/view/48213
  21. Okuputra, M. A., & Nasikh. (2022). Pengaruh Inovasi Daerah Terhadap Kemiskinan. Inovasi: Jurnal Ekonomi, Keuangan dan Manajemen, 18(1), 159–166. https://doi.org/10.30872/jinv.v18i1.10379
  22. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. Free Press.
  23. Priyono, & Ismail, Z. (2012). Teori Ekonomi. Zifatama.
  24. Rimawati, E. (2023, December 13). Banyuwangi Kembali Jadi Kabupaten Terinovatif Se-Indonesia dari Mendagri. detikJatim. https://www.detik.com/jatim/berita/d-7087680/banyuwangi-kembali-jadi-kabupaten-terinovatif-se-indonesia-dari-mendagri
  25. Klingler-Vidra, R., & Ye, L. (2020). Inclusive Innovation Policy As Social Capital Accumulation Strategy. International Affairs, 96(4), 1033–1050. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiaa091
  26. Rofi, A. E. N., Putra, F., & Sentanu, I. G. E. P. S. (2021). Creating Innovation of Public Value Through Management Information Systems. Jurnal Bina Praja, 13(3), 513–528. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.13.2021.513-528
  27. Salsabila, L., Ariany, R., & Koeswara, H. (2024). Fostering Community-Led Waste Management Through Dynamic Governance: A Case Study of Batam City. Jurnal Bina Praja, 16(1), 187–200. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.16.2024.187-200
  28. Sastra Wijaya, K. A. (2024). Innovative Governance in Public Services Management Through the Jakarta Kini Application in DKI Jakarta Province. Jurnal Bina Praja, 16(1), 157–169. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.16.2024.157-169
  29. Simamora, B. (2005). Analisis Multivariat Pemasaran. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
  30. Tempo.co. (2023, May 19). Kabupaten Banyuwangi Raih Penghargaan Kinerja Terbaik. Tempo.co. https://www.tempo.co/info-tempo/kabupaten-banyuwangi-raih-penghargaan-kinerja-terbaik-185839
  31. Todaro, M. P., & Smith, S. C. (2006). Economic Development. Pearson Education Limited.
  32. Widuri, A., Ginting, A. M. P., Harsono, Moh., Qomariah, N., & Nursaid. (2024). Pengaruh Kualitas Pelayanan Terhadap Kepuasan Masyarakat pada Kantor Kelurahan Sobo Kecamatan Banyuwangi Kabupaten Banyuwangi. Budgeting: Journal of Business, Management and Accounting, 5(2), 870–883. https://doi.org/10.31539/budgeting.v5i2.7832
  33. Zainab, S. (2020). Persepsi Masyarakat Terhadap Kualitas Pelayanan Publik SAMSAT Keliling di Kota Banjarmasin [Diploma Thesis, Universitas Islam Kalimantan]. https://eprints.uniska-bjm.ac.id/id/eprint/3103

Copyright & Open Access License

Copyright (c) 2024 Author(s). This article is licensed under CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0.

Most read articles by the same author(s)