Skip to main content
Original Research Article Open Access SINTA 2 Accredited

Designing the Concept of Regional Innovation Sustainability

The Triple Bottom Line Concept Approach and Sustainable Evaluation

Authors

  • Muhammad Ammar 1* Corresponding author
  • Gema Bangsawan 2
  • Asriani 3
  • 1 Regional Development Planning Agency, Research and Innovation, Sidenreng Rappang Regency, Indonesia
  • 2 Regional Research and Development Agency of Gowa Regency, Indonesia
  • 3 Development Planning, Research and Development Agency of Wajo Regency, Indonesia
  • *Corresponding author
DOI
10.21787/jbp.16.2024.523-539
Published & Pages
31 December 2024 · pp. 523-539
Manuscript History
Received13 Nov 2024 Published31 Dec 2024
License
CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0
Read PDF 719 KB Cite

1,163 Views 962 Downloads

Abstract

Sustainability of performance target achievement. While quantitative target achievement has reached an ideal state, it is often accompanied by a lack of sustainability as a continuous cycle. This cycle should be established from the inception of regional innovations, preventing them from becoming a burden on the government due to the utilization of various resources, including budget, time, and innovation actors. This research employs a qualitative approach with literature review data analysis to explore research perspectives and establish a framework aligned with the research subject. This approach facilitates developing or deepening theories and insights into the research subject. Previous research has focused on applying sustainability concepts within companies or corporations to enhance economic growth (revenue), social responsibility (community), and environmental sustainability. This research formulates a conceptual design for a sustainability assessment standard using empirically tested indicators for local governments. The concept utilizes the triple bottom line (TBL) approach, encompassing three dimensions: prosperity, people, and planet. These three dimensions serve as the focal points of intervention within the sustainability framework of this concept. The concept evaluates the potential for developing and continuing existing practices or, alternatively, identifies opportunities for cessation and replacement with more effective and efficient implementation methods through economic, social, and environmental dimensions. This research successfully develops an evaluation matrix for assessing regional innovation and establishes indicators that can be used as measurement tools within local government organizational units at smaller scales. However, the research is limited in its ability to generalize sustainability from a single framework or concept to diverse concepts tailored to the specific conditions of individual local governments. Time and methodological constraints also limit the scope of the research, leaving room for further refinement and expansion in future studies.

Keywords:

Read the Full Text

The full text of this article is available as PDF. Version of record published in Vol. 16 No. 3 (2024).

Open PDF

References

81 references
  1. Afum, E., Sun, Z., Agyabeng-Mensah, Y., & Baah, C. (2023). Lean Production Systems, Social Sustainability Performance and Green Competitiveness: The Mediating Roles of Green Technology Adoption and Green Product Innovation. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 21(1), 206–227. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-02-2021-0099
  2. Ahmad, M., & Satrovic, E. (2023). How Do Fiscal Policy, Technological Innovation, and Economic Openness Expedite Environmental Sustainability? Gondwana Research, 124, 143–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2023.07.006
  3. Ahmad, M., & Wu, Y. (2022). Combined Role of Green Productivity Growth, Economic Globalization, and Eco-Innovation in Achieving Ecological Sustainability for OECD Economies. Journal of Environmental Management, 302, 113980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113980
  4. Albert, M. (2019). Sustainable Frugal Innovation – The Connection Between Frugal Innovation and Sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 237, 117747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117747
  5. Albert, M. (2022). Assessing the Sustainability Impacts of Frugal Innovation – A Literature Review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 365, 132754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132754
  6. Allal-Chérif, O., Costa Climent, J., & Ulrich Berenguer, K. J. (2023). Born to Be Sustainable: How to Combine Strategic Disruption, Open Innovation, and Process Digitization to Create a Sustainable Business. Journal of Business Research, 154, 113379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113379
  7. Artha, A. D., Nurasa, H., & Candradewini. (2023). Kolaborasi Implementasi Kebijakan Pengelolaan Sampah Nagari di Kabupaten Pasaman Barat: Melihat Peluang dan Inovasi Kebijakan. Matra Pembaruan: Jurnal Inovasi Kebijakan, 7(1), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.21787/mp.7.1.2023.25-36
  8. Asadi, S., OmSalameh Pourhashemi, S., Nilashi, M., Abdullah, R., Samad, S., Yadegaridehkordi, E., Aljojo, N., & Razali, N. S. (2020). Investigating Influence of Green Innovation on Sustainability Performance: A Case on Malaysian Hotel Industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 258, 120860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120860
  9. Awosusi, A. A., Adebayo, T. S., Kirikkaleli, D., & Altunta?, M. (2022). Role of Technological Innovation and Globalization in BRICS Economies: Policy Towards Environmental Sustainability. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 29(7), 593–610. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2022.2059032
  10. Aziz, M. A., Raharjo, S. T., & Kusumawardhani, A. (2018). Analisis Orientasi Strategi untuk Meningkatkan Inovasi dan Kinerja Bisnis (Studi pada UKM Kasongan Kabupaten Bantul Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta). Jurnal Bisnis Strategi, 27(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.14710/jbs.27.1.1-20
  11. Bakri, B., Rustiadi, E., Fauzi, A., & Adiwibowo, S. (2017). Sensitivity Indicators Analysis and Regional Sustainable Development Status in Indonesia. Jurnal Bina Praja, 9(2), 265–280. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.09.2017.265-280
  12. Bangsawan, G. (2024). Transforming Poverty Alleviation Policies: Adapting the Regional Innovation Architecture Approach. Jurnal Bina Praja, 16(1), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.16.2024.21-36
  13. Barsei, A. N., Nugroho, S. A., Ghassani, G. A., & Trianita, L. N. (2023). Inovasi Digital pada Pemerintah Kabupaten Sumedang dalam Mendorong Open Government. Matra Pembaruan, 7(2), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.21787/mp.7.2.2023.99-110
  14. Bhatnagar, R., Keskin, D., Kirkels, A., Romme, A. G. L., & Huijben, J. C. C. M. (2022). Design Principles for Sustainability Assessments in the Business Model Innovation Process. Journal of Cleaner Production, 377, 134313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134313
  15. Buhl, A., Schmidt-Keilich, M., Muster, V., Blazejewski, S., Schrader, U., Harrach, C., Schäfer, M., & Süßbauer, E. (2019). Design Thinking for Sustainability: Why and How Design Thinking Can Foster Sustainability-Oriented Innovation Development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 231, 1248–1257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.259
  16. Cano, J. A., Londoño-Pineda, A., Castro, M. F., Paz, H. B., Rodas, C., & Arias, T. (2022). A Bibliometric Analysis and Systematic Review on E-Marketplaces, Open Innovation, and Sustainability. Sustainability, 14(9), 5456. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095456
  17. Cash, P., Isaksson, O., Maier, A., & Summers, J. (2022). Sampling in design research: Eight key considerations. Design Studies, 78, 101077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2021.101077
  18. Chege, S. M., & Wang, D. (2020). The Influence of Technology Innovation on SME Performance Through Environmental Sustainability Practices in Kenya. Technology in Society, 60, 101210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.101210
  19. Chen, J. Y., Dimitrov, S., & Pun, H. (2019). The Impact of Government Subsidy on Supply Chains’ Sustainability Innovation. Omega, 86, 42–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2018.06.012
  20. Cheng, C. C. J. (2020). Sustainability Orientation, Green Supplier Involvement, and Green Innovation Performance: Evidence from Diversifying Green Entrants. Journal of Business Ethics, 161(2), 393–414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3946-7
  21. Ciulli, F., & Kolk, A. (2019). Incumbents and Business Model Innovation for the Sharing Economy: Implications for Sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 214, 995–1010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.295
  22. Creswell, J. W. (2010). Research Design: Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed. Pustaka Pelajar.
  23. De, D., Chowdhury, S., Dey, P. K., & Ghosh, S. K. (2020). Impact of Lean and Sustainability Oriented Innovation on Sustainability Performance of Small and Medium Sized Enterprises: A Data Envelopment Analysis-based framework. International Journal of Production Economics, 219, 416–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.07.003
  24. Dey, P. K., Malesios, C., De, D., Chowdhury, S., & Abdelaziz, F. Ben. (2020). The Impact of Lean Management Practices and Sustainably-Oriented Innovation on Sustainability Performance of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: Empirical Evidence from the UK. British Journal of Management, 31(1), 141–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12388
  25. Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals With Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. Capstone.
  26. Fadli, M. R. (2021). Memahami Desain Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Humanika: Kajian Ilmiah Mata Kuliah Umum, 21(1), 33–54. https://doi.org/10.21831/hum.v21i1.38075
  27. Fadli, W., & Fadhillah, M. R. (2021). Analisis Inovasi dalam Upaya Mempermudah Capaian Kinerja dan Data Potensi Kinerja Daerah Perkotaan. Jurnal Studi Inovasi, 1(1), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.52000/jsi.v1i1.9
  28. Failaq, M. R. F., & Madjid, M. A. S. (2023). Inovasi dan Rekonstruksi Undang-Undang Sektoral Daerah untuk Desentralisasi Asimetris. Matra Pembaruan, 7(2), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.21787/mp.7.2.2023.75-86
  29. Fasolin, L. H., Pereira, R. N., Pinheiro, A. C., Martins, J. T., Andrade, C. C. P., Ramos, O. L., & Vicente, A. A. (2019). Emergent Food Proteins – Towards Sustainability, Health and Innovation. Food Research International, 125, 108586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108586
  30. Fatoni, A. (2022). A to Z Inovasi Daerah: Selalu Ada Ruang untuk Berinovasi. Bina Praja Press.
  31. Febrian, R. A. (2018). Inovasi Daerah dari Perspektif Regulasi, Konseptual, dan Empiris (Tinjauan Terhadap Pasal Pasal 386 Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah). Jurnal Kajian Pemerintah: Journal of Government, Social, and Politics, 4(1), 48–61. https://doi.org/10.25299/jkp.2018.vol4(1).2168
  32. Ferlito, R., & Faraci, R. (2022). Business Model Innovation for Sustainability: A New Framework. Innovation and Management Review, 19(3), 222–236. https://doi.org/10.1108/INMR-07-2021-0125
  33. Garay, L., Font, X., & Corrons, A. (2018). Sustainability-Oriented Innovation in Tourism: An Analysis Based on the Decomposed Theory of Planned Behavior. Journal of Travel Research, 58(4), 622–636. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287518771215
  34. George, G., Merrill, R. K., & Schillebeeckx, S. J. D. (2021). Digital Sustainability and Entrepreneurship: How Digital Innovations Are Helping Tackle Climate Change and Sustainable Development. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 45(5), 999–1027. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258719899425
  35. Hadi, A., Asrori, & Rusman. (2021). Penelitian Kualitatif: Studi Fenomenologi, Case Study, Grounded Theory, Etnografi, Biografi. CV. Pena Persada.
  36. Hanaysha, J. R., Al-Shaikh, M. E., Joghee, S., & Alzoubi, H. M. (2021). Impact of Innovation Capabilities on Business Sustainability in Small and Medium Enterprises. FIIB Business Review, 11(1), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/23197145211042232
  37. Haris, T. R., Junaid, A., Pelu, M. F. A. R., & Pramukti, A. (2021). Pengaruh Penerapan Akuntansi Manajemen Lingkungan dan Strategi Organisasi Terhadap Kinerja Lingkungan dan Inovasi Sebagai Variabel Moderating (Studi Kasus pada Rumah Sakit Umum Daerah Kabupaten Polewali Mandar). Center of Economic Students Journal (CSEJ), 4(4), 358–382. https://doi.org/10.56750/csej.v4i4.462
  38. Harsanto, B., Mulyana, A., Faisal, Y. A., & Shandy, V. M. (2022). Open Innovation for Sustainability in the Social Enterprises: An Empirical Evidence. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(3), 160. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8030160
  39. Herlina, M., Sipahutar, H., Wardani, D., Sulistyono, D., & Pribadi, M. (2021). Regional Government Service Innovation Model in Disaster Mitigation. Jurnal Bina Praja, 13(3), 383–394. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.13.2021.383-394
  40. Hermundsdottir, F., & Aspelund, A. (2021). Sustainability Innovations and Firm Competitiveness: A Review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 280, 124715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124715
  41. Humalanggi, M., Lantapon, N. N., Butolo, I., & Saksono, H. (2023). Strategic-Competitiveness for Socio-Economic Development: Unlocking the Potential of Gorontalo Province in the Context of the Nusantara Capital Integrated Development (IKN). Jurnal Bina Praja, 15(3), 639–649. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.15.2023.639-649
  42. Ibrahim, M. D. (2023). Efficiency and Productivity Analysis of Innovation, Human Capital, Environmental, and Economic Sustainability Nexus: Case of MENA Countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(12), 34394–34405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-24494-4
  43. Ikhsan, Hajad, V., Saputra, I. M., Maulida, I., & Setiawan, D. (2024). Innovating Corporate Social Responsibility: The ‘Makin Mesra’ Initiative for Poverty Alleviation in West Aceh District. Jurnal Bina Praja, 16(2), 403–425. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.16.2024.403-425
  44. Jiang, Z., Lyu, P., Ye, L., & Zhou, Y. wenqian. (2020). Green Innovation Transformation, Economic Sustainability and Energy Consumption During China’s New Normal Stage. Journal of Cleaner Production, 273, 123044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123044
  45. Kartika, R. S., & Simorangkir, G. (2019). Efektivitas Bimtek Fasilitator dalam Pelaksanaan Inovasi Daerah. Matra Pembaruan, 3(2), 119–131. https://doi.org/10.21787/mp.3.2.2019.119-131
  46. Kern, F., Rogge, K. S., & Howlett, M. (2019). Policy Mixes for Sustainability Transitions: New Approaches and Insights Through Bridging Innovation and Policy Studies. Research Policy, 48(10), 103832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.103832
  47. Koval, V., Arsawan, I. W. E., Suryantini, N. P. S., Kovbasenko, S., Fisunenko, N., & Aloshyna, T. (2023). Circular Economy and Sustainability-Oriented Innovation: Conceptual Framework and Energy Future Avenue. Energies, 16(1), 243. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16010243
  48. Kusi-Sarpong, S., Gupta, H., & Sarkis, J. (2019). A Supply Chain Sustainability Innovation Framework and Evaluation Methodology. International Journal of Production Research, 57(7), 1990–2008. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1518607
  49. Laksana, S., & Gustav, T. I. (2022). Menggagas Indikator Kinerja Agro?Ekologi Sebagai Inovasi Kebijakan Alokasi Dana Insentif Daerah di Indonesia (Bappenas Working Papers, Vol. 5, Issue 1). Kementerian Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional (Bappenas). https://doi.org/10.47266/bwp.v5i1.107
  50. LaMarre, A., & Chamberlain, K. (2022). Innovating Qualitative Research Methods: Proposals and Possibilities. Methods in Psychology, 6, 100083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metip.2021.100083
  51. Laraswati, L. (2020). Pengaruh Luasnya Kreativitas Bersama Terhadap Kinerja Inovasi Melalui Inovasi Produk dan Berbagi Pengetahuan Sebagai Variabel Mediasi “Studi Kasus pada UKM Kerajinan Perak di Daerah Kotagede Yogyakarta” [Universitas Islam Indonesia]. https://dspace.uii.ac.id/handle/123456789/44056
  52. Leesatapornwongsa, F., Thawesaengskulthai, N., & Vaiyavuth, R. (2023). Developing a Sustainability Measurement for Innovation Performance for the Food Industry. Sustainability, 15(24), 16714. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152416714
  53. Liu, X., Yuan, S., Yu, H., & Liu, Z. (2023). How Ecological Policy Stringency Moderates the Influence of Industrial Innovation on Environmental Sustainability: The Role of Renewable Energy Transition in BRICST Countries. Renewable Energy, 207, 194–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2023.01.045
  54. Marsanty, D. A., & Fitriati, R. (2023). Inovasi Kolaboratif pada Kepemimpinan Bapa Raja dalam Masa Krisis COVID-19 di Bumi Raja-Raja. Matra Pembaruan, 7(2), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.21787/mp.7.2.2023.137-150
  55. Maulana, I., Prihadyanti, D., & Asmara, A. Y. (Eds.). (2021). Praktik Inovasi di Indonesia: Isu, Kebijakan, dan Tantangannya. LIPI Press.
  56. Nadaa, D., & Priyanti, E. (2023). Inovasi Digital dalam Pelaksanaan Penggunaan Aplikasi SISKEUDES. Matra Pembaruan, 7(1), 61–73. https://doi.org/10.21787/mp.7.1.2023.61-73
  57. Naibaho, M. (2021). Regional Innovation Policy in Encouraging Regional Competitiveness in South Tangerang City. Jurnal Bina Praja, 13(2), 269–279. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.13.2021.269-279
  58. Ogbeibu, S., Emelifeonwu, J., Senadjki, A., Gaskin, J., & Kaivo-oja, J. (2020). Technological Turbulence and Greening of Team Creativity, Product Innovation, and Human Resource Management: Implications for Sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 244, 118703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118703
  59. Pane, I., Hadju, V. A., Maghfuroh, L., Akbar, H., Simamora, R. S., Lestari, Z. W., Galih, A. P., Wijayanto, P. W., Waluyo, Uslan, & Aulia, U. (2021). Desain Penelitian Mixed Method (N. Saputra, Ed.). Yayasan Penerbit Muhammad Zaini.
  60. Perdana, G. N. R., Irawan, B., & Hidayat, M. N. (2023). Inovasi Aplikasi Bebaya untuk Pemulihan Perekonomian UMKM di Kota Samarinda. Matra Pembaruan, 7(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.21787/mp.7.1.2023.1-12
  61. Pradono, J., Hapsari, D., Supardi, S., & Budiarto, W. (2018). Panduan Manajemen Penelitian Kualitatif. Lembaga Penerbit Balitbangkes.
  62. Putranti, A. D., & Mulyanto, M. (2020). Manuver Inovasi Pemimpin dalam Memberdayakan Perilaku Kinerja dengan Disiplin dan Komunikasi Pegawai (Riset pada Badan Keuangan Daerah Kabupaten Sukoharjo). Excellent, 7(1), 92–104. https://doi.org/10.36587/exc.v7i1.630
  63. Rauter, R., Globocnik, D., Perl-Vorbach, E., & Baumgartner, R. J. (2019). Open Innovation and Its Effects on Economic and Sustainability Innovation Performance. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 4(4), 226–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2018.03.004
  64. Rofi, A. E. N., Putra, F., & Sentanu, I. G. E. P. S. (2021). Creating Innovation of Public Value Through Management Information Systems. Jurnal Bina Praja, 13(3), 513–528. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.13.2021.513-528
  65. Rubio-Andrés, M., del Mar Ramos-González, M., & Sastre-Castillo, M. Á. (2022). Driving Innovation Management to Create Shared Value and Sustainable Growth. Review of Managerial Science, 16, 2181–2211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-022-00520-0
  66. Saksono, H. (2019). Manajemen Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah Berbasis Penelitian & Pengembangan dan Desain & Inovasi. Jurnal Kebijakan Pembangunan, 14(2), 213–226. https://jkpjournal.com/index.php/menu/article/view/36
  67. Sitompul, R. F., & Sumule, O. (2016). The Modelling of Strengthening Indicators Development in Regional Innovation System and Its Effect on the Gross Domestic Product. Jurnal Bina Praja, 8(2), 317–329. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.08.2016.317-329
  68. Stadtländer, C. T. K.-H. (2009). Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed-Methods Research. Microbe Magazine, 4(11), 485–485. https://doi.org/10.1128/microbe.4.485.1
  69. Sudrajat, A., & Andhika, L. (2021). Empirical Evidence Governance Innovation in Public Service. Jurnal Bina Praja, 13(3), 407–417. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.13.2021.407-417
  70. Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
  71. Suhendra, A. (2018). Inovasi Daerah dalam Reformasi Pemerintahan Kota Tangerang Selatan dan Kota Magelang. Matra Pembaruan, 2(1), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.21787/mp.2.1.2018.39-48
  72. Sukmadi. (2021). Implementasi Sistem Inovasi Terhadap Kinerja Perangkat Daerah Kabupaten Pelalawan [Master Thesis]. Universitas Islam Riau.
  73. Sutikno, M. S., & Hadisaputra, P. (2020). Penelitian Kualitatif. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
  74. Urbinati, A., Shams Esfandabadi, Z., & Messeni Petruzzelli, A. (2023). Assessing the Interplay Between Open Innovation and Sustainability-Oriented Innovation: A Systematic Literature Review and a Research Agenda. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 32(3), 1078–1095. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12540
  75. Vidiastuti, D. P., Darwin, M., & Ikhwan, H. (2023). Difusi dan Adopsi Inovasi SiBakul Markethub Free Ongkir DIY di Era Pandemi COVID-19. Matra Pembaruan, 7(1), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.21787/mp.7.1.2023.49-60
  76. Vinodh, S., & Jeya Girubha, R. (2012). PROMETHEE Based Sustainable Concept Selection. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 36(11), 5301–5308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2011.12.030
  77. Wang, C. H., & Juo, W. J. (2021). An Environmental Policy of Green Intellectual Capital: Green Innovation Strategy for Performance Sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(7), 3241–3254. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2800
  78. Wardani, D. K., & Apriani, T. (2023). Strategi Keberlanjutan Inovasi Daerah di Kota Bandung. Matra Pembaruan, 7(2), 125–135. https://doi.org/10.21787/mp.7.2.2023.125-135
  79. Weimin, Z., Chishti, M. Z., Rehman, A., & Ahmad, M. (2022). A Pathway Toward Future Sustainability: Assessing the Influence of Innovation Shocks on CO2 Emissions in Developing Economies. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24(4), 4786–4809. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01634-3
  80. Xie, X., Zhu, Q., & Wang, R. (2019). Turning Green Subsidies Into Sustainability: How Green Process Innovation Improves Firms’ Green Image. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(7), 1416–1433. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2323
  81. Zhang, L., Leung, M. Y., Boriskina, S., & Tao, X. (2022). Advancing Life Cycle Sustainability of Textiles Through Technological Innovations. Nature Sustainability, 6(3), 243–253. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-022-01004-5

Copyright & Open Access License

Copyright (c) 2024 Author(s). This article is licensed under CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0.

Most read articles by the same author(s)