Skip to main content
Original Research Article Open Access SINTA 2 Accredited

Performance Analysis of Innovative and Flexible Modern Leadership Towards a Golden Indonesia

Authors

  • Arman 1* Corresponding author
  • Rini Indryati Patasaka 2
  • Stephen Yong-Seung Park 3
  • 1 Government Science Study Program, Universitas Ichsan Gorontalo, Gorontalo, Indonesia
  • 2 Political Science Study Program, Universitas Pembangunan Indonesia, Manado, Indonesia
  • 3 School of Management, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, The Republic of Korea
  • *Corresponding author
DOI
10.21787/jbp.16.2024.127-140
Published & Pages
30 April 2024 · pp. 127-140
Manuscript History
Received12 Feb 2024 Published30 Apr 2024
License
CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0
Read PDF 437 KB Cite

1,155 Views 991 Downloads

Abstract

This research aims to understand the role and influence of innovative and flexible modern leadership in pushing Indonesia toward the vision of a golden Indonesia. With research variables, analyzing innovative and flexible modern leadership performance towards a Golden Indonesia involves several important aspects. Three analyses are made regarding this first. Creativity and innovation, second. Collaboration, flexibility, and third. Development of human potential. This involves analyzing leaders’ strategies, policies, and actions to stimulate economic growth, improve governance, and increase societal well-being through innovative and flexible modern leadership performance toward a golden Indonesia. A quantitative research method used a multistage random sampling survey method, which can open up opportunities to gain a deeper understanding of the leadership phenomenon, with 1200 respondents throughout Indonesia who are 17 years old or have been married for two years. The findings of the innovative and flexible modern leadership performance analysis towards a Golden Indonesia involve several important aspects, where the modern leadership performance analysis shows creativity and innovation (38%), collaboration and flexibility (29%), and the development of human potential (27%) And the need for modern leadership can be seen in transformational leadership (36%), situational leadership (30%), and servant leadership (28%), I don’t know 6%. By analyzing the data, performing statistical analysis with reliability testing, using software, and identifying patterns. These three things have advantages and disadvantages in certain work situations and will have an impact on the government in the future toward a bright and certain golden Indonesia.

Keywords:

Read the Full Text

The full text of this article is available as PDF. Version of record published in Vol. 16 No. 1 (2024).

Open PDF

References

43 references
  1. Adlin. (2021). Waste Management System in Pekanbaru City: City Government Capability, Issues, and Policy Alternatives. Jurnal Bina Praja, 13(3), 395–406. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.13.2021.395-406
  2. Anggara, S. (2012). Perbandingan Administrasi Negara. CV Pustaka Setia.
  3. Apriyani, T., & Swari, M. D. Y. (2021, May 18). 7 Negara dengan Larangan Paling Aneh Sedunia, Apa Saja? Yoursay.id. https://yoursay.suara.com/lifestyle/2021/05/18/103825/7-negara-dengan-larangan-paling-aneh-sedunia-apa-saja
  4. Arman, S. P. (2021). Analisis Pemerintah Daerah. CV. Cahaya Arsh Publisher & Printing.
  5. Arsandi, S. A. (2022). Collaborative Governance in the Optimization of Tax Revenue: Case Study in Yogyakarta. Jurnal Bina Praja, 14(1), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.14.2022.17-29
  6. Astutik, E. P., & Gunartin. (2019). Analisis Kota Jakarta sebagai Smart City dan Penggunaan Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi Menuju Masyarakat Madani. Inovasi: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Manajemen, 6(2), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.32493/Inovasi.v6i2.p41-58.3678
  7. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations. Free Press.
  8. Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. K. (2007). Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theories and Methods. Pearson A & B.
  9. Christensen, C. M. (1997). The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Harvard Business School Press.
  10. Cole, M., & Higgins, J. (2021). Leadership Unravelled. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003035015
  11. Elfia, E., & Duhriah, D. (2022). The Productivity of West Sumatra Muhammadiyah Cash Waqf as a Model for the Development of Sharia Investment in Empowering UMKM. Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Syir’ah, 20(2), 167–189. https://doi.org/10.30984/jis.v20i2.2053
  12. Fauzan, D. N., Triono, R. A., & Dalimunthe, Z. (2022). How Does Public Service Motivation Explain Knowledge Sharing Behavior among Indonesian Civil Servants? Jurnal Bina Praja, 14(1), 71–82. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.14.2022.71-82
  13. Fitri, S. E., Pranasari, M. A., Indarti, D. M., Savira, E. M., Andari, T., Aprilani, T. L., Utami, K. J., Putri, N., Manoby, W. M., Putra, I. R. A. S., & Saksono, H. (2023). Illuminating Tradition Through Innovation: Transforming Traditional Woven Tourism in Smart Tourism in Central Lombok Regency. Jurnal Bina Praja, 15(1), 207–220. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.15.2023.207-220
  14. GamatechnoBlog. (2015). Smart Government Tingkatkan Kualitas Pelayanan Publik. Blog Gamatechno Indonesia. https://blog.gamatechno.com/smart-government-tingkatkan-kualitas-pelayanan-publik/
  15. Graham, M. W. (2014). Government Communication in the Digital Age: Social Media’s Effect on Local Government Public Relations. Public Relations Inquiry, 3(3), 361–376. https://doi.org/10.1177/2046147X14545371
  16. Harefa, H. Y., & Sinambela, T. (2012). Pengaruh Pembinaan terhadap Motivasi Kerja dan Produktivitas Kerja Pegawai Negeri Sipil (Studi: Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Serdang Bedagai). Jurnal Bina Praja, 4(3), 207–216. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.21787/jbp.4.2012.207-216
  17. Hasmin, M. O., Paridy, A., & Lopes Amaral, M. A. (2022). The Role of Commitment, Motivation, and Performance for Career Paths for Employees of the General Bureau of the Regional Secretary of East Nusa Tenggara Province. Jurnal Bina Praja, 14(2), 339–348. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.14.2022.339-348
  18. Heifetz, R. A., & Linsky, M. (2002). Leadership on the Line: Staying Alive Through the Dangers of Leading. Harvard Business School Press.
  19. Hutagalung, S. S., & Hermawan, D. (2018). Evaluation of Local Government Innovation Program in Lampung Province. Jurnal Bina Praja, 10(2), 241–250. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.10.2018.241-250
  20. Kementerian PPN/Bappenas. (2019, June 21). Menteri Bambang: Indonesia Siap Hadapi Tantangan Era Digital dan Industri 4.0. Kementerian PPN/Bappenas. https://www.bappenas.go.id/index.php/berita/menteri-bambang-indonesia-siap-hadapi-tantangan-era-digital-dan-industri-40
  21. Khasanah, N., & Rubini, R. (2021). Kontribusi Pemuda Muslim dalam Dunia Pendidikan Menuju Indonesia Emas Tahun 2045. Al-Manar: Jurnal Komunikasi dan Pendidikan Islam, 10(2), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.36668/jal.v10i2.302
  22. Kurniawan, A. W. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. Pandiva Buku.
  23. Mahadiansar, M., Ikhsan, K., Sentanu, I. G. E. P. S., & Aspariyana, A. (2020). Paradigma Pengembangan Model Pembangunan Nasional di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi: Media Pengembangan Ilmu dan Praktek Administrasi, 17(1), 77–92. https://doi.org/10.31113/jia.v17i1.550
  24. McClanahan, K. J. (2020). Viva La Evolution: Using Dual-Strategies Theory to Explain Leadership in Modern Organizations. The Leadership Quarterly, 31(1), 101315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.101315
  25. Muslimin, & Daeli, S. P. (2012). Kepemimpinan Nasional, Budaya Politik, dan Partisipasi Publik. Jurnal Bina Praja, 4(3), 161–168. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.4.2012.161-168
  26. Paisa, L., Gosal, R., & Monintja, D. (2019). Etika Pemerinthan dalam Meningkatkan Kinerja Aparatur Sipil Negara. Eksekutif, 3(3), 1–10. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/jurnaleksekutif/article/view/23852
  27. Patapan, H. (2022). The Modern Manual of Authoritarian Leadership. Democratization, 29(5), 958–973. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2021.2023500
  28. Pertiwi, S. B. (2020). Changes and Continuities in the Global Health Governance of Coronaviruses. Andalas Journal of International Studies, 9(2), 185–202. https://doi.org/2355-9500
  29. Prabowo, H. (2019). Influence of Implementation of Development and Supervision Policy to the Effectiveness of Regional Autonomy in Indonesia. Jurnal Bina Praja, 11(1), 63–73. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.11.2019.63-73
  30. Puspa, C. I. S., Rahayu, D. N. O., & Parhan, M. (2023). Transformasi Pendidikan Abad 21 dalam Merealisasikan Sumber Daya Manusia Unggul Menuju Indonesia Emas 2045. Jurnal Basicedu, 7(5), 3309–3321. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v7i5.5030
  31. Rachmawati, M., Dewantoro, B., Dasmadi, D., Novandalina, A., & Budiyono, R. (2021). Transformational Leadership and Motivation on Community Performance: Case Study on Village-Owned Enterprise (BUMDes) Organization in Semarang District Central Java. Jurnal Bina Praja, 13(2), 331–341. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.13.2021.331-341
  32. Ramadhan, A., Syah, A. F., Plamonia, N., Andreani, S., & Yohanitas, W. A. (2023). Development of Sustainable Regional Innovation Towards Gemilang Tangerang Regency: Study in the Tangerang Regency. Jurnal Bina Praja, 15(1), 145–161. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.15.2023.145-161
  33. Rizki, T., & Kurniawan, S. (2023). Public Service Performance: An Influence of Female Leadership and Good Governance. Jurnal Bina Praja, 15(3), 443–452. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.15.2023.443-452
  34. Rizqi, S. K., & Raodah, R. (2017). Pengaruh Komunikasi Horizontal Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai pada Badan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Kampung di Kabupaten Jayawijaya. Otoritas: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 7(1), 37–45. https://doi.org/10.26618/ojip.v7i1.399
  35. Ruhlandt, R. W. S. (2018). The Governance of Smart Cities: A Systematic Literature Review. Cities, 81, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.02.014
  36. Sakir, M., & Muhammad, I. (2022). Administrasi Publik Teori dan Aplikasi (I. Muhammad, Ed.). Tanah Air Beta.
  37. Sanjaya, R. (2018). Pengaruh Motivasi Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai dalam Perspektif Ekonomi Islam (Studi di Dinas Sosial Tenaga Kerja dan Transmigrasi Kabupaten Pesisir Barat) [Skripsi, UIN Raden Intan Lampung]. http://repository.radenintan.ac.id/id/eprint/3563
  38. Srimulyani, V. A., Rustiyaningsih, S., & Hermanto, Y. B. (2023). The Relationship of Servant Leadership on Knowledge Sharing Behavior With Organizational Culture and Organizational Citizenship Behavior As Mediator. Jurnal Bina Praja, 15(3), 521–541. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.15.2023.521-541
  39. Stern, P. J. (2002). Generational Differences. The Journal of Hand Surgery, 27(2), 187–194. https://doi.org/10.1053/jhsu.2002.32329
  40. Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
  41. Wekke, I. S. (2019). Metode Penelitian Sosial. Gawe Buku.
  42. Yusuf, A. M. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif & Penelitian Gabungan. Prenada Media.
  43. Zhu, J., & Mukhin, N. (2021). The Modern Regency. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 54(1–2), 24–44. https://doi.org/10.1525/j.postcomstud.2021.54.1-2.24

Copyright & Open Access License

Copyright (c) 2024 Author(s). This article is licensed under CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0.