Skip to main content
Original Research Article Open Access SINTA 2 Accredited

Opportunity of Implementing Buy the Service (BTS) Subsidies for Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) To Improve the Quality of Public Transport Services in Padang Panjang City

DOI
10.21787/jbp.14.2022.479-492
Published & Pages
26 December 2022 · pp. 479-492
Manuscript History
Received30 Jun 2022 Accepted9 Nov 2022 Published26 Dec 2022

1,731 Views 1,048 Downloads

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the cost of subsidies and the opportunity to implement Buy the Service (BTS) for Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) in Padang Panjang City. This study uses a quantitative method with a descriptive approach. Primary data collection includes observation and distribution questionnaires with respondents using public and non-public transport users. The information obtained from the distribution of questionnaires is the origin of the destination, characteristics of public transportation behavior, and the willingness to pay of the community towards public transportation modes that follow public transportation service standards. The operational costs of public vehicles are obtained from the survey results of the basic costs of public transportation, which consist of direct and indirect costs. The results of this study formulate 3 (three) main route trajectories scenarios and cost analysis of BTS implementation that meets Minimum Service Standards (SPM). The estimated subsidy cost for implementing BTS in the three main corridors is 10.09 billion, with the highest subsidy cost being in corridor 1. which is 4.41 billion but has a smaller headway than the other two corridors. The results of this study also recommend the need for continuous socialization to the community regarding the ease and convenience of using BRT as well as equalizing perceptions between local governments and operators regarding the mechanism for providing BRT subsidies.

Read the Full Text

The full text of this article is available as PDF. Version of record published in Vol. 14 No. 3 (2022).

Open PDF

References

34 references
  1. Abrantes, P. A. L. (2015). The Economic Value of Bus Subsidy. Transportation Research Procedia, 8, 247–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2015.06.059
  2. Agustien, M., Buchari, E., Foralisa, M., Rosidawani, R., Permata, D. Y., Alia, F., Indriyati, C., Rhaptialyani, R., & Hadinata, F. (2022). Sosialisasi Pelayanan Teman Bus Sebagai Upaya Meningkatkan Minat Masyarakat Menggunakan Layanan Angkutan Umum di Kota Palembang. Jurnal Pengabdian Community, 4(1), 29–38. http://ejournal.ft.unsri.ac.id/index.php/community/article/view/1021
  3. Andrew, L., Kitali, A. E., Sando, T., & Musagasa, J. (2022). Operational Evaluation of the Bus Rapid Transit System: Case Study of Dar es Salaam City. Journal of Public Transportation, 24, 100020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubtr.2022.100020
  4. Arikunto, S. (2016). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Rineka Cipta.
  5. Arranz, J. M., Burguillo, M., & Rubio, J. (2022). Are Public Transport Policies Influencing the Transport Behaviour of Older People and Economic Equity? A Case Study of the Madrid Region. Research in Transportation Economics, 95, 101218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2022.101218
  6. Cadena, P. C. B., Vassallo, J. M., Herraiz, I., & Loro, M. (2016). Social and Distributional Effects of Public Transport Fares and Subsidy Policies: Case of Madrid, Spain. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2544(1), 47–54. https://doi.org/10.3141/2544-06
  7. Cowie, J. (2021). Public Transport Subsidy and Regulation. In International Encyclopedia of Transportation (pp. 349–355). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102671-7.10771-7
  8. Dewi, C. P., & Setianingsih, E. L. (2018). Inovasi Pelayanan Transportasi Publik BRT (Bus Rapid Transit) Trans Semarang oleh Dinas Perhubungan Kota Semarang. Journal of Public Policy and Management Review, 7(2), 336–352. https://doi.org/10.14710/jppmr.v7i2.20006
  9. Emileo, G., Taufik, H., & Djuniati, S. (2017). Evaluasi Kelayakan Finansial Bus Trans Metro Pekanbaru Koridor VI Trayek Terminal Bandar Raya Payung Sekaki (BRPS)—Pandau. JOM FT Universitas Riau, 4(2), 1–10. https://jom.unri.ac.id/index.php/JOMFTEKNIK/article/view/15535
  10. Ferza, R., Hamudy, M. I. A., & Rifki, M. S. (2019). Tirtonadi Bus Terminal Services: An Innovation Derailed? Jurnal Bina Praja, 11(2), 171–183. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.11.2019.171-183
  11. Guzman, L. A., & Hessel, P. (2022). The Effects of Public Transport Subsidies for Lower-Income Users on Public Transport Use: A Quasi-experimental Study. Transport Policy, 126, 215–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.07.016
  12. Gwilliam, K. (2008). A Review of Issues in Transit Economics. Research in Transportation Economics, 23(1), 4–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2008.10.002
  13. Hidayat, B., Fatoni, A., Saksono, H., Asriani, A., & Andari, T. (2022). Integrated River Transport Development to Support Smart City. Jurnal Bina Praja, 14(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.14.2022.1-15
  14. Hörcher, D., & Tirachini, A. (2021). A Review of Public Transport Economics. Economics of Transportation, 25, 100196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecotra.2021.100196
  15. Istianto, B., Wijianto, Sutanto, S., Djajasinga, N., Subarto, & Halim, P. (2021). Implementation of the Policy to Operate Bus Assistance of Patriot Trans in Realizing Sustainable Public Transport in Bekasi City West Java Indonesia. PalArch’s Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology, 18(3), 512–524. https://archives.palarch.nl/index.php/jae/article/view/5617
  16. Kusuma, C. A., Multifiah, M., & Syafitri, W. (2018). The Influence of Urbanization and Socio-Economic Conditions to Vehicle Ownership in Developing City. Jurnal Bina Praja, 10(2), 287–302. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.10.2018.287-302
  17. Lubis, Y. A., Sirojuzilam, & Lubis, S. (2018). Youth Perception on Features and Accessibility of Bus Rapid Transit Mebidang in Bridging Interconnected Areas in North Sumatera. International Journal of Research and Review, 5(9), 192–200. https://www.ijrrjournal.com/IJRR_Vol.5_Issue.9_Sep2018/Abstract_IJRR0027.html
  18. Lumangkun, L., Massie, J. D. D., & Mandagie, Y. (2021). Desain Model Bisnis Transjakarta Menggunakan Business Model Canvas. Jurnal EMBA: Jurnal Riset Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis dan Akuntansi, 9(3), 1559–1568. https://doi.org/10.35794/emba.v9i3.35824
  19. Momon. (2013). Penanganan Dampak Lalu Lintas terhadap Pembangunan Pasar Tradisional dan Pasar Modern (Mall) Simpang Haru. Jurnal Bina Praja, 05(02), 123–132. https://doi.org/10.21787/JBP.05.2013.123-132
  20. Nadeem, M., Azam, M., Asim, M., Al-Rashid, M. A., Puan, O. C., & Campisi, T. (2021). Does Bus Rapid Transit System (BRTS) Meet the Citizens’ Mobility Needs? Evaluating Performance for the Case of Multan, Pakistan. Sustainability, 13(13), 7314. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137314
  21. Prayudyanto, M. N. (2021). Perbandingan Kinerja Buy the Services Angkutan Umum Massal Kota Metropolitan dengan Metode Biaya Operasional Kendaraan dan Indeks Sustainabilitas. Jurnal Penelitian Transportasi Darat, 23(1), 55–71. https://doi.org/10.25104/jptd.v23i1.1734
  22. Priyandono, T. R., Herijanto, W., & Kartika, A. A. G. (2021). Analisis Kelayakan dari Segi Ekonomi dan Finansial Teman Bus dengan Program Buy the Service Rute Terminal Purabaya-Kenjeran. Jurnal Teknik ITS, 10(2), E273–E280. https://doi.org/10.12962/j23373539.v10i2.70489
  23. Priyanto, D. F. (2018). Analisis Respon Masyarakat terhadap Kebijakan Aglomerasi Transportasi Massal Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) di Kabupaten Semarang. Efficient: Indonesian Journal of Development Economics, 1(3), 252–259. https://doi.org/10.15294/efficient.v1i3.27870
  24. Ropika, R. (2018). Analisis Tarif Angkutan Umum Berdasarkan Biaya Operasional Kendaraan dan Willingness to Pay (Studi Kasus: Angkutan Umum Trayek Teluk Kuantan – Pekanbaru). Jurnal Perencanaan, Sains, Teknologi, dan Komputer (JuPerSaTeK), 1(1), 144–166. https://ejournal.uniks.ac.id/index.php/JUPERSATEK/article/view/134
  25. Saputra, A. B., Sunarto, S., & Samin, S. (2021). Analisis Tarif Angkutan Umum Berdasarkan Biaya Operasional Kendaraan, Ability to Pay dan Willingness to Pay. Jurnal Teknik Sipil: Rancang Bangun, 7(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.33506/rb.v7i1.1204
  26. Silva, H. (2019). The Mohring Effect. Documento de Trabajo, 529, 1–8.
  27. Statistics of Padang Panjang Municipality. (2021). Kota Padang Panjang dalam Angka 2021. Statistics of Padang Panjang Municipality. https://padangpanjangkota.bps.go.id/publication/2021/02/26/a251fcebbb1d334f2a5a57c7/kota-padang-panjang-dalam-angka-2021.html
  28. Sudrajat, A., & Andhika, L. (2021). Empirical Evidence Governance Innovation in Public Service. Jurnal Bina Praja, 13(3), 407–417. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.13.2021.407-417
  29. Vigren, A. (2021). Incentives in Public Transport Contracts. In R. Vickerman (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Transportation (pp. 332–336). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102671-7.10063-6
  30. Wahyudi, A. (2016). Value-added in Public Service Innovation: The Practice at Integrated Service Units in Pontianak Municipality and Tanah Bumbu District. Jurnal Bina Praja, 8(1), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.08.2016.49-58
  31. Wahyudianto, H. (2015). Pengukuran Tingkat Kepuasan Masyarakat terhadap Pelaksanaan Kebijakan Pelayanan Pemerintah. Jurnal Bina Praja, 07(04), 331–345. https://doi.org/10.21787/JBP.07.2015.331-345
  32. Wicaksono, K. (2012). Barang Publik dan Eksternalitas pada Era Otonomi Daerah. Jurnal Bina Praja, 04(04), 281–286. https://doi.org/10.21787/JBP.04.2012.281-286
  33. Widayanti, A., Soeparno, & Karunia, B. (2014). Permasalahan dan Pengembangan Angkutan Umum di Kota Surabaya. Jurnal Transportasi, 14(1), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.26593/jtrans.v14i1.1374.%p
  34. Yaldi, G., Momon, & Irawan, B. B. (2019). Estimasi Mode Shift Angkutan Umum ke Trans Padang di Kota Padang. Jurnal Ilmiah Rekayasa Sipil, 16(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.30630/jirs.16.1.187

Copyright & Open Access License

Copyright (c) 2022 Author(s). This article is licensed under CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0.