Challenges in Implementing Digital Democracy
A Case Study of Sinjai Regency
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.17.2025-2873Keywords:
Digital Democracy, Digital Literacy, Information Access, Digital ParticipationAbstract
This study explores the dynamics of digital democracy in Sinjai Regency by examining the factors that shape public participation, particularly access to information, digital literacy, and technological infrastructure. This study used a qualitative method with a phenomenological approach; data were collected through in-depth interviews, observations, focus group discussions, and documentation involving citizens, youth, government officials, and local digital media practitioners. The findings reveal five dominant factors influencing digital democracy: (1) limited and unequal internet access across regions, particularly in rural areas; (2) low digital literacy which reduces the ability of citizens to filter accurate political information; (3) the strong role of young people as digital actors in political engagement; (4) government digital initiatives-though available-remain underutilized due to limited public capability and uneven dissemination; and (5) local digital media serving as an important intermediary in delivering political information. These factors collectively contribute to the low level of digital participation in Sinjai. The study proposes several solutions, including expanding internet infrastructure through cross-sector collaboration, strengthening community-based digital literacy training, enhancing government digital services, and establishing an independent body to oversee digital democracy implementation. The results highlight the need for inclusive policies that consider geographical and socio-economic disparities. This research contributes novelty by focusing on digital democracy gaps at the local scale and emphasizing community capacity as a key determinant in achieving inclusive digital participation.
Downloads
References
Best, K. (2010). Living in the Control Society. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 13(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877909348536
Congge, U., Guillamón, M.-D., Nurmandi, A., Salahudin, & Sihidi, I. T. (2023). Digital Democracy: A Systematic Literature Review. Frontiers in Political Science, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2023.972802
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2017). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Sage Publications.
Elliott, K., Price, R., Shaw, P., Spiliotopoulos, T., Ng, M., Coopamootoo, K., & van Moorsel, A. (2021). Towards an Equitable Digital Society: Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Corporate Digital Responsibility (CDR). Society, 58(3), 179–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-021-00594-8
Hilbert, M. (2020). Digital Technology and Social Change: The Digital Transformation of Society From a Historical Perspective. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 22(2), 189–194. https://doi.org/10.31887/DCNS.2020.22.2/mhilbert
Komisi Pemilihan Umum. (2024). Keputusan Komisi Pemilihan Umum Nomor 1105 Tahun 2024 tentang Sistem Informasi Data Pemilih dalam Penyelenggaraan Pemilihan Gubernur dan Wakil Gubernur, Bupati dan Wakil Bupati, serta Walikota dan Wakil Walikota [Decision of the General Elections Commission Number 1105 of 2024 regarding the Voters Data Information System in the Election of Governors and Vice Governors, Regents and Vice Regents, and Mayors and Vice Mayors]. KPU RI.
Korupp, S. E., & Szydlik, M. (2005). Causes and Trends of the Digital Divide. European Sociological Review, 21(4), 409–422. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jci030
Legner, C., Eymann, T., Hess, T., Matt, C., Böhmann, T., Drews, P., Mädche, A., Urbach, N., & Ahlemann, F. (2017). Digitalization: Opportunity and Challenge for the Business and Information Systems Engineering Community. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 59(4), 301–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-017-0484-2
Levin, I., & Mamlok, D. (2021). Culture and Society in the Digital Age. Information, 12(2), 68. https://doi.org/10.3390/info12020068
Milner, H. V. (2006). The Digital Divide: The Role of Political Institutions in Technology Diffusion. Comparative Political Studies, 39(2), 176–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414005282983
Min, S.-J. (2010). From the Digital Divide to the Democratic Divide: Internet Skills, Political Interest, and the Second-Level Digital Divide in Political Internet Use. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 7(1), 22–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331680903109402
Murdock, G. (2002). Review Article: Debating Digital Divides. European Journal of Communication, 17(3), 385–390. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323102017003695
Nam, T. (2011). Whose E-democracy? The Democratic Divide in American Electoral Campaigns. Information Polity, 16(2), 131–150. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-2011-0220
Nurhakim, F., & Lestari, S. (2025). Economics and Digital Business Review Bureaucratic Transformation in the Digital Era: Analysis of the Impact of E-Government on the Quality of Public Services. Economics and Digital Business Review, 567–576. https://ojs.stieamkop.ac.id/index.php/ecotal/article/view/2134
Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Sinjai. (2023). Peraturan Bupati Sinjai Nomor 48 Tahun 2023 tentang Penyelenggaraan Sistem Pemerintahan Berbasis Elektronik [Regulation of the Regent of Sinjai Number 48 of 2023 on the Implementation of Electronic-Based Government System]. Berita Daerah Kabupaten Sinjai Tahun 2023 Nomor 48. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/292492/perbup-kab-sinjai-no-48-tahun-2023
Riggins, F., & Dewan, S. (2005). The Digital Divide: Current and Future Research Directions. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 6(12), 298–337. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00074
Rusdi, & Febriansyah, R. (2023). Kewenangan KPU dalam Menetapkan Regulasi Pemilu Studi Pemutakhiran Data dan Penyusunan Daftar Pemilih Pemilu Serentak 2024. Prosiding Seminar Hukum Aktual Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia, 207–217. https://journal.uii.ac.id/psha/article/view/32509
Salemink, K., Strijker, D., & Bosworth, G. (2017). Rural Development in the Digital Age: A Systematic Literature Review on Unequal ICT Availability, Adoption, and Use in Rural Areas. Journal of Rural Studies, 54, 360–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.09.001
Selwyn, N. (2004). Reconsidering Political and Popular Understandings of the Digital Divide. New Media & Society, 6(3), 341–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444804042519
Shirazi, F., Ngwenyama, O., & Morawczynski, O. (2010). ICT Expansion and the Digital Divide in Democratic Freedoms: An Analysis of the Impact of ICT Expansion, Education and ICT Filtering on Democracy. Telematics and Informatics, 27(1), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2009.05.001
Thomas, Y., Toumpis, S., & Smyrnioudis, N. (2024). Digital Twin Approach to Estimating and Utilizing the Capacity Region of Wireless Ad Hoc Networks. Computer Networks, 241, 110213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2024.110213
van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2002). A Framework for Digital Divide Research. The Electronic Journal of Communication, 12(1 & 2). https://cios.org/EJCPUBLIC/012/1/01211.html
van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2006). Digital Divide Research, Achievements and Shortcomings. Poetics, 34(4–5), 221–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2006.05.004
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
