Skip to main content
Original Research Article Open Access SINTA 2 Accredited

Participation and Neutrality of State Civil Apparatus in Direct Regional Election

Surabaya City Case

Authors

  • Catur Wibowo Budi Santoso
  • Research and Development Agency Ministry of Home Affairs
DOI
10.21787/jbp.08.2016.69-81
Published & Pages
3 June 2016 · pp. 69-81
Manuscript History
Received3 Jun 2016 Accepted3 Jun 2016 Published3 Jun 2016
Read PDF 956 KB Cite

787 Views 714 Downloads

Abstract

In relation to the existence of State Civil Apparatus, at least there are two issues that must be observed in the implementation of Regional elections, namely the issues of participation and neutrality of State Civil Apparatus. The phenomenon that occurs during this time is the involvement of the State Civil Apparatus in attendance is still minimum (low). Moreover, it is believed that there are many Civil Apparatus State who is not neutral in the organization of Regional Elections. In this regard, this study aims to analyze the participation and neutrality of State Civil Apparatus. The method utilized in this study is qualitative. The result of the study shows that in general the participation of State Civil Apparatus in Surabaya is adequately good, but the neutrality of State Civil Apparatus has not implemented well enough. There are
at least three (3) main factors influencing the participation of Civil State Apparatus, namely the factors of leadership exemplary, commitment to employees, and employee development. As for the neutrality of the State Civil Apparatus, among others, is influenced by the factors of the ambition of employee, primordialism, and working environment of employees.

Keywords:

Read the Full Text

The full text of this article is available as PDF. Version of record published in Vol. 8 No. 1 (2016).

Open PDF

References

27 references
  1. Arfani, F. (2015). 26 pasangan daftar pilkada serentak di Jatim. Antaranews.com. Retrieved28 July 2015, from http://www.antaranews.com/berita/509100/26-pasangan-daftarpilkada-serentak-di-jatim
  2. Fischer, F. & Sirianni, C. (2007). Critical Studies in Organization and Bureaucracy. Philadelphia:Temple University Press.
  3. Government of Republic of Indonesia,. (2010).Government Regulation No. 53 of 2010 about
  4. Civil Servants’ Discipline. Jakarta: Ministry of Law and Human Rights.
  5. Government of Republic of Indonesia,. (2014).Law No. 5 of 2014 about State Civil Apparatus.
  6. Jakarta: Ministry of Law and Human Rights.
  7. Henry, N. (2004). Administrasi Negara dan Masalahmasalah Publik. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia.
  8. Jer, A. (2015). Tingkat Partisipasi PNS dalam Pemilu Sangat Rendah - Tribun Pekanbaru.
  9. Tribun Pekanbaru. Retrieved 21 September 2015, from http://pekanbaru.tribunnews.com/2015/09/21/tingkat-partisipasi-pnsdalam-pemilu-sangat-rendah
  10. Kadir, J. (2010). Netralitas Birokrasi dalam Pemilihan Walikota dan Wakil Walikota Surabaya: Studi Kasus di KPUD Kota Surabaya (Master Thesis). Universitas Gadjah Mada.
  11. Kuncoro, B. (2007). Netralitas Birokrasi dalam Pemilukada. Swara Politika, 10(1).
  12. Pradhanawati, A. (2005). Pilkada Langsung, Tradisi Baru Demokrasi Lokal. Surakarta: KOMPIP.
  13. Prasojo, E. (2005). Demokrasi di Negeri Mimpi:Catatan Kritis Terhadap Pemilu 2004 dan
  14. Good Governance. Jakarta: Departemen Ilmu Administrasi FISIP UI.
  15. Purba, L. (2010). Netralitas PNS dalam Pilkada Secara Langsung: Studi Kasus Kabupaten Malang, Kabupaten Gowa, dan Kabupaten Kukar (Master Thesis). Universitas Indonesia.
  16. Riggs, F. (2008). The Modernization of a Bureaucratic Polity. Honolulu: East-West Center Press.
  17. Ritan, S. (2005). Netralitas Birokrasi Dalam Pemilihan Kepala Daerah dan Wakil Kepala Daerah: Studi Kasus Pemerintah Kabupaten Flores Timur (Master Thesis). Universitas Gadjah Mada.
  18. Rourke, F. (2009). Bureaucracy, Politics, and Public Policy. USA: Little Brown.
  19. Santoso, E. (2015). Kelebihan & Kekurangan Pilkada Serentak. Warta17agustus.com. Retrieved 17 March 2015, from http://warta17agustus.com/berita-kelebihan--kekurangan-pilkadaserentak-.html
  20. Saputro, S. (2013). Partisipasi PNS dalam Pemilukada Pemalang. Jawa Timur: KPUD Pemalang.
  21. Silaban, F. (2016). Dilema Netralitas PNS Masih Jadi Perdebatan | Badan Pengawas Pemilihan Umum Republik Indonesia. Bawaslu.go.id. Retrieved 20 May 2015, from http://www.bawaslu.go.id/en/berita/dilema-netralitas-pns-masih-jadiperdebatan
  22. Sriwahyuni, G. (2006). Netralitas PNS dalam Pilkada Secara Langsung: Studi Kasus di Kabupaten Tabanan (Master Thesis). Universitas Gadjah Mada.
  23. Stoner, J. (2010). Manajemen. Jakarta: Erlangga.
  24. Sutarto,. (2012). Dasar-dasar Organisasi. Yogyakarta:UGM Press.
  25. Thoha, M. (2003). Birokrasi dan Politik di Indonesia.Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo.
  26. Whitney, F. (2000). A Four Year Continuation Study of a Teachers College Class. New York: The Macmillan Co.
  27. Yamin, M. (2012). Netralitas PNS dalam Pemilukada di Kabupaten Takalar (Undergraduate Thesis).Universitas Hasanuddin.

Most read articles by the same author(s)