PNPM Mandiri Vs Kemiskinan di Indonesia

Authors

  • Moh. Ilham A. Hamudy Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kementerian Dalam Negeri

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.05.2013.159-162

Keywords:

PNPM Mandiri, Program Pengentasan Rakyat Miskin, dan Penghidupan Berkelanjutan

Abstract

Abstrak

Artikel ini adalah tentang Program Nasional Pemberdayaan Masyarakat (PNPM Mandiri). Artikel ini berusaha mendedahkan PNPM secara makro, seraya menjabarkan beberapa kekurangannya yang kerap menjadi sasaran kritik para pemerhati pemberdayaan masyarakat. PNPM Mandiri, oleh pemerintah dianggap sebagai program jitu guna mengentaskan masyarakat dari kubangan kemiskinan. Tetapi, sayangnya, meski sudah banyak sekali uang digelontorkan untuk mensukseskan program itu, angka kemiskinan di Indonesia tidak mengalami penurunan secara signifikan. Oleh karenanya, PNPM Mandiri perlu ditinjau ulang keberadaannya, baik secara konsep maupun secara implementatif. Artikel ini menawarkan konsep dan pendekatan pemberdayaan dan pengentasan rakyat miskin dengan mengedepankan konsep penghidupan berkelanjutan yang lebih komprehensif.

 

Abstract

This article is about the National Program for Community Empowerment (PNPM Mandiri). This article try to exert PNPM macro, as outlines some drawbacks that are often the target of criticism of the observer community empowerment. PNPM Mandiri, the government considered the surefire program to alleviate poverty from the pool. But, unfortunately, though it was a lot of money disbursed to the success of the program, the poverty rate in Indonesia has not experienced significant declines. Therefore, PNPM Mandiri existence should be reviewed, both in concept and in implementation. This article offers the concept and approach to empowerment and poverty of the poor by promoting the concept of sustainable livelihoods is more comprehensive.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Djoeroemana, et.al. 2006. An overview of environmental, sociocultural, economic and political aspects of rural development in East Nusa Tenggara. Proceedings of a workshop to identify sustainable rural livelihoods, held in Kupang, Indonesia, 5–7 April. ACIAR Proceedings No. 126.

Jamal, Erizal. 2008. Kajian Kritis terhadap Pelaksanaan Pembangunan Perdesaan di Indonesia. In Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi. Volume 26 No 2. December, page 92-102.

Kabir, M.S, et.al. 2012. Impact of Small Entrepreneurship on Sustainable Livelihood Assets of Rural Poor Women in Bangladesh. International Journal of Economics and Finance. Volume. 4, No. 3; March. Canadian Center of Science and Education: Canada.

Neely, Constance et.al. 2004. Do Sustainable Livelihoods Approaches Have a Positive Impact on the Rural Poor? Livelihood Support Programme 16 Working Paper. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

Sutoro, Eko. 2005. Manifesto Pembaharuan Desa. APMD Press: Yogyakarta.

Tifa and Infid. 2012. PNPM Mandiri: Antara Retorika dan Realita. Proceeding of national seminar, held in Jakarta, Indonesia, 4 July.

Yaro, Joseph Awetori. 2006. Is deagrarianisation real? A study of livelihood activities in rural northern Ghana. Journal of Modern African Studies, 44, 1, pp. 125–156. Cambridge University Press: UK.

Downloads

Published

2015-12-21

How to Cite

Hamudy, M. I. A. (2015). PNPM Mandiri Vs Kemiskinan di Indonesia. Jurnal Bina Praja, 5(3), 159–162. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.05.2013.159-162

Issue

Section

Articles