Pengembangan Kawasan Andalan Provinsi Kalimantan Selatan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21787/mp.2.1.2018.27-38Keywords:
Economic Potential, Economic Gap, Economic Sector, Mainstay AreaAbstract
Economic disparity between regions is a common aspect in the economic activities of a region. This inequality is basically caused by differences in natural resource content and differences in demographic conditions in each region. The inequality is then the reason for the birth of Regional Regulation of South Kalimantan No. 9 of 2000 on South Kalimantan Spatial Planning. Therefore, this study is an economic study to see and compare the economic potentials of the mainstay of South Kalimantan Province as well as whether or not the Regulation No. 9 of 2000 is correct. Research Methods are quantitative descriptive. Data collection techniques used literature study and analytical techniques using LQ, Regional Typology, Williamson Index and Theil Entropy. The result of the analysis shows that the inappropriate area becomes the mainstay area with regional typology analysis only Hulu Sungai Utara (HSU), Hulu Sungai Selatan (HSS), Banjar Regency, and Balangan Regency. Because these areas are included in Quadrant III. Economic disparities in the areas of Kandangan and Mainstay area can not be determined as a reliable area. Therefore, the division of the Mainstay Area as in the Regulation of Kalimantan Seelatan No 9 of 2000 on South Kalimantan Spatial Plan needs to be reviewed.
References
Adisasmita, R. (2005). Pembangunan Ekonomi Perkotaan. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Aswandi, H. M., & Kuncoro, M. (2015). Evaluasi Penetapan Kawasan Andalan: Studi Empiris di Kalimantan Selatan 1993-1999. Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.22146/jieb.6703
Erawati, N. K., & Yasa, I. N. M. (2012). Analisis Pola Pertumbuhan Ekonomi dan Sektor Potensial Kabupaten Klungkung. E-Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Universitas Udayana, 1(1). Retrieved from https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/EEB/article/view/3207
Hartono, B. (2008). Analisis Ketimpangan Pembangunan Ekonomi di Provinsi Jawa Tengah. Universitas Dipenogoro. Retrieved from http://eprints.undip.ac.id/16862/1/BUDIANTORO__HARTONO.pdf
Kuncoro, M. (2004). Otonomi dan Pembangunan Daerah. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Restiatun. (2009). Identifikasi Sektor Unggulan dan Ketimpangan Antar Kabupaten/Kota di Provinsi Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Jurnal Ekonomi & Studi Pembangunan, 10(1), 77–98. Retrieved from http://journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/esp/article/view/1279/1333
Siska, D., Hadi, S., Firdaus, M., & Said, S. (2015). Strategi Pengembangan Ekonomi Wilayah Berbasis Agroindustri di Kawasan Andalan Kandangan Kalimantan Selatan. Jurnal Bina Praja, 7(2), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.21787/JBP.07.2015.99-110
Sjafrizal. (2008). Ekonomi Wilayah dan Perkotaan. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Sutikno, & Maryunani. (2007). Analisis Daya Saing dan Potensi Daerah. Journal of Indonesian Applied Economics, 1(1), 1–17. Retrieved from http://jiae.ub.ac.id/index.php/jiae/article/download/160/129.
Sutrisno, A. (2012). Analisis Ketimpangan Pendapatan dan Pengembamgangan Sektor unggulan Di Kabupaten Dalam Kawasan Barlingmascakep Tahun 207-2010. Economics Development Analysis Journal, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.15294/EDAJ.V1I1.465
Syahza, A., & Suarman, D. (2013). Strategi Pengembangan Daerah Tertinggal Dalam Upaya Percepatan Pembangunan Ekonomi Pedesaan. Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan, 14(1), 126–139. Retrieved from http://journals.ums.ac.id/index.php/JEP/article/viewFile/166/153
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Creative Commons-Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike License 4.0 International applies to all works published by Matra Pembaruan: Jurnal Inovasi Kebijakan. Authors will retain copyright of the work.
