Collaborative Governance in the Optimization of Tax Revenue
Case Study in Yogyakarta
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.14.2022.17-29Keywords:
Collaborative Governance, DGT, DGCE, Bonded Zone, YogyakartaAbstract
Yogyakarta Regional Tax Office always has difficulty satisfying tax revenue targets year by year. For example, Yogyakarta’s DGT could not meet the revenue target in the last three years, while DGCE always exceeded the target. Reflecting on this condition, Yogyakarta Regional Tax Office needs help from other agencies in the form of collaborative governance that might help them achieve the set targets. Meanwhile, there is a lot of research on Collaborative Governance, but robust generalizations to link theory and practice are still being sought. In order to complement between theory and practice of collaboration, this study discusses the implementation of Collaborative Governance for optimizing state revenues by conducting case studies at the Directorate General of Taxes (DGT) and the Directorate General of Customs and Excise (DGCE) in Yogyakarta. The qualitative method was used with data acquisition through interviews and literature studies. Based on the results, it was found that Collaborative Governance in Yogyakarta is following the Emerson, Nabatchi, and Balogh framework (2012) since it has several system contexts and strong drivers. Resource Conditions and Socio-Economic Conditions are the system context behind the collaboration between the two agencies. Meanwhile, Leadership, Dependence, and Uncertainty are the drivers that trigger Collaborative Governance. Furthermore, by using data matching, the researcher identified the potency of tax revenue from the bonded zone that could be elaborated in Yogyakarta. Finally, we identified several obstacles and challenges to implementing Collaborative Governance in Yogyakarta and formulated practical and theoretical recommendations for them.
Downloads
References
Amin, R. M., Febrina, R., & Wicaksono, B. (2021). Handling COVID-19 from a Collaborative Governance Perspective in Pekanbaru City. Jurnal Bina Praja, 13(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.13.2021.1-13
Andhika, L. (2017). Negative Effects of Open Government: A Meta-Theory Analysis (Good Governance in Relation to Open Government Initiatives). Jurnal Bina Praja, 9(2), 219–229. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.09.2017.219-229
Ansell, Chris, & Gash, A. (2007). Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032
Ansell, Christopher, Doberstein, C., Henderson, H., Siddiki, S., & ‘t Hart, P. (2020). Understanding inclusion in collaborative governance: a mixed methods approach. Policy and Society, 39(4), 570–591. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2020.1785726
Bank Indonesia. (2021, June 2). Laporan Perekonomian di Yogyakarta Mei 2021. Bank Indonesia. https://www.bi.go.id/id/publikasi/laporan/lpp/Pages/Laporan-Perekonomian-DI-Yogyakarta-Mei-2021.aspx
Berardo, R., Fischer, M., & Hamilton, M. (2020). Collaborative Governance and the Challenges of Network-Based Research. The American Review of Public Administration, 50(8), 898–913. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074020927792
BI. (2021). LAPORAN PEREKONOMIAN DI YOGYAKARTA MEI 2021. Bi.Go.Id.
Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2015). Designing and Implementing Cross-Sector Collaborations: Needed and Challenging. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 647–663. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12432
Cope, S., & Goodship, J. (1999). Regulating Collaborative Government: Towards Joined-Up Government? Public Policy and Administration, 14(2), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/095207679901400202
Douglas, S., Berthod, O., Groenleer, M., & Nederhand, J. (2020). Pathways to collaborative performance: examining the different combinations of conditions under which collaborations are successful. Policy and Society, 39(4), 638–658. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2020.1769275
DuPraw, M. E., Brennan, B. V., & Placht, M. T. (2013). Research Articles: Case Study: Collaborative Governance as a Tool for Natural Resource Management in China and the United States. Environmental Practice, 15(3), 228–239. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1466046613000240
Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur011
Entwistle, T. (2014). Collaboration and Public Services Improvement: Evidence Review Prepared for the Commission on Public Service Governance and Delivery.
Essa, W. Y., Nurfindarti, E., & Ruhyana, N. F. (2021). Strategies for Handling Stunting in Bandung City. Jurnal Bina Praja, 13(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.13.2021.15-28
Furqoni, I., Rosyadi, S., & Isna, A. (2019). Collaborative Governance in Corporate Social Responsibility Forum in Banyumas Regency. Jurnal Bina Praja, 11(2), 209–217. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.11.2019.209-217
Gray, A., Jenkins, B., Leeuw, F., & Mayne, J. (Eds.). (2017). Collaboration in Public Services. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351323680
Kanwil DJP DIY. (2021). Laporan Kinerja Kanwil Ditjen Perbendaharaan Provinsi D.I. Yogyakarta Tahun 2020. http://djpb.kemenkeu.go.id/kanwil/diy/id/inforormasi-publik-kanwil/informasi-publik/lappublik/3091-laporan-kinerja-kanwil-djpb-provinsi-d-i-yogyakarta-tahun-2020.html
KPPBC TMP B Yogyakarta. (2021). Laporan Kinerja 2020 Kantor Pengawasan dan Pelayanan Bea dan Cukai Tipe Madya Pabean B Yogyakarta.
Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Indonesia. (2020). Rencana Strategis Kementerian Keuangan 2020-2024.
Muti’ah, A., & Anwar, M. (2021). Analisis Perbedaan Abnormal Return Sebelum dan Sesudah Pengumuman Covid-19 Sebagai Pandemi Global oleh WHO (Studi pada Pasar Modal Negara-negara ASEAN). Fair Value: Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 4(1), 236–245. https://journal.ikopin.ac.id/index.php/fairvalue/article/view/614
Nurfindarti, E. (2019). Strategy and Roadmap for Achieving Sustainable Development Goals in Serang City. Jurnal Bina Praja, 11(2), 219–235. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.11.2019.219-235
Riadi, S., & Erdiyansyah. (2021). Collaborative governance in handling natural and non-natural disasters based on the perspective of public administration: Evidence from Indonesia. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 19(2), 468–479. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.19(2).2021.37
Samputra, P. L., & Munandar, A. I. (2019). Korupsi, Indikator Makro Ekonomi, dan IPM terhadap Tingkat Kemiskinan di Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi Kuantitatif Terapan, 12(1), 35–46. https://doi.org/10.24843/JEKT.2019.v12.i01.p04
Santia, T. (2020, November 24). 88 Persen Perusahaan Terdampak Pandemi Covid-19, Sebagian Besar Merugi. Liputan 6. https://www.liputan6.com/bisnis/read/4416613/88-persen-perusahaan-terdampak-pandemi-covid-19-sebagian-besar-merugi
Soesanto, H. (2017). Development of Innovation Project as the Result of Leadership Training Through the Innovation Actor Collaboration Model in the Region. Jurnal Bina Praja, 9(2), 335–343. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.09.2017.335-343
Subhan, A. (2016). Multidirectional Networks of Government Transparency: A Preliminary Model. Jurnal Bina Praja, 8(2), 209–219. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.08.2016.209-219
Yasyi, D. N. (2020, December 29). Tentang Indeks Pembangunan Manusia di Indonesia, Jakarta Tertinggi dan Siapa Terendah? Good News From Indonesia. https://www.goodnewsfromindonesia.id/2020/12/29/tentang-indeks-pembangunan-manusia-di-indonesia-jakarta-tertinggi-dan-siapa-terendah
Yogyakarta Regional Tax Office. (2021). Laporan Kinerja Kanwil DJP DIY Tahun 2020.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
