Desain Kebijakan Sistem Aplikasi Profil Desa dan Kelurahan
Studi Kasus Tata Kelola Data Digital pada Kementerian Dalam Negeri
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21787/mp.10.1.2026.1-13Kata Kunci:
Desain Kebijakan, Prodeskel, Pendayagunaan Data, Desa dan KelurahanAbstrak
Studi ini mengeksplorasi efektivitas desain kebijakan Prodeskel sebagai instrumen tata kelola data desa yang selama ini belum mencapai pemanfaatan maksimal, padahal validitas data merupakan pilar utama dalam akurasi perencanaan pembangunan di tingkat akar rumput. Menggunakan metodologi kualitatif deskriptif, penelitian ini membedah proses implementasi dan kendala operasional di lingkungan Direktorat Jenderal Bina Pemerintahan Desa melalui pendekatan fenomenologis untuk memahami realitas birokrasi yang ada. Data primer diperoleh melalui wawancara mendalam dengan pemangku kepentingan guna memastikan kedalaman analisis sesuai kaidah administrasi publik yang komprehensif. Hasil penelitian mengonfirmasi bahwa rendahnya sinkronisasi instrumen kebijakan, dualisme peran antarlembaga, dan keterbatasan kompetensi teknis aparat lapangan menjadi hambatan utama dalam mewujudkan ekosistem data yang terpadu. Faktor eksternal berupa defisit infrastruktur digital di daerah terpencil turut memperlemah akurasi data serta memperlebar celah digital antarwilayah. Sebagai implikasi kebijakan, penelitian ini merekomendasikan desain kebijakan yang baru dengan berbasis kerangka instrumen kebijakan Michael Howlett. Rekomendasi tersebut menekankan pada kalibrasi ulang instrumen kebijakan (policy instrument calibration) yang menyelaraskan dimensi teknologi, regulasi, dan kapasitas organisasi secara koheren agar tercipta sinergi fungsional yang berkelanjutan. Selain itu, diperlukan penguatan mekanisme pengawasan dan insentif bagi pengelola data di tingkat desa guna meningkatkan motivasi kerja serta kualitas input data secara real-time. Hal ini diharapkan dapat menjadi referensi strategis bagi Kementerian Dalam Negeri dalam menyempurnakan tata kelola data desa melalui desain kebijakan yang lebih integratif, aplikatif, dan responsif terhadap dinamika tata kelola pemerintahan digital di Indonesia.
Referensi
Capano, G., & Howlett, M. (2024). Calibration and Specification in Policy Practice: Micro-dimensions of Policy Design. Policy Design and Practice, 7(2), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2024.2 353929
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage.
Danar, O. R. (2024). Digital Transformation of Indonesian Administration and Bureaucratic System. International Journal of Electronic Governance, 16(2), 152–171. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEG.2024.140789
De la Cruz, M., Tan, E., Muñoz, P., & Casas, C. (2025). Unlocking the Value of Data Governance in Developing Countries: A Framework for Public Administration. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 91(6). https://doi.org/10.1002/isd2.70043
Gusman, S. W. (2024). Development of the Indonesian Government’s Digital Transformation. Dinasti International Journal of Education Management and Social Science, 5(5), 1128–1141. https://doi. org/10.38035/dijemss.v5i5.2868
Haug, N., Dan, S., & Mergel, I. (2024). Digitally-Induced Change in the Public Sector: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda. Public Management Review, 26(7), 1963–1987. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719 037.2023.2234917
Hodapp, D., & Hanelt, A. (2022). Interoperability in the Era of Digital Innovation: An Information Systems Research Agenda. Journal of Information Technology, 37(4), 407–427. https://doi.org/10.1177/02683962211064304
Hood, C. C. (1983). The Tools of Government. Macmillan Education UK. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17169-9
Howlett, M. (2023). Designing Public Policies: Principles and Instruments (3 ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003343431
Howlett, M., Giest, S., Mukherjee, I., & Taeihagh, A. (2025). New Policy Tools and Traditional Policy Models: Better Understanding Behavioural, Digital and Collaborative Instruments. Policy Design and Practice, 8(1), 121–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2025.2495373
Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (2023). Designing for Adaptation: Static and Dynamic Robustness in Policy-Making. Public Administration, 101(1), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12849
Howlett, M., Ramesh, M., & Perl, A. (2009). Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles & Policy Subsystems. Oxford University Press.
Ibrahim, A. H. H., Baharuddin, T., & Wance, M. (2023). Bibliometric Analysis of E-Government and Trust: A Lesson for Indonesia. Jurnal Borneo Administrator, 19(3), 269–284. https://doi.org/10.24258/jba.v19i3.1303
Inakefe, G. I., Bassey, V. U., & Amadi, J. O. (2024). Evaluation of the Policy and Institutional Implications of Digital Tools in E-Governance Reforms Implementation for Service Delivery in Cross River State Civil Service, Nigeria. Sage Open, 14(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241297047
Janssen, M., & van der Voort, H. (2020). Agile and Adaptive Governance in Crisis Response: Lessons From the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Information Management, 55, 102180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102180
Kempeneer, S., & Heylen, F. (2023). Virtual State, Where Are You? A Literature Review, Framework and Agenda for Failed Digital Transformation. Big Data & Society, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517231160528
Kurhayadi, K. (2023). Public Policy Implementation: A Theoretical Review. Ministrate: Jurnal Birokrasi dan Pemerintahan Daerah, 5(1), 10–18. https://doi.org/10.15575/jbpd.v5i1.23742
Maheshwari, N., Mohan, G., & Mishra, D. (2025). Digital Transformation in Governance: Preconditions for Achieving Good Governance. Public Policy and Administration. https://doi.org/10.1177/09520767251355715
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. SAGE.
Mondragon Regalado, J. R., Huaman Monteza, A., Montenegro Juárez, J. C., Montenegro Juárez, J. A., Hurtado Villanueva, A., Aguirre Baique, N., & Yon Delgado, M. R. (2023). “Face to Face”. Citizen Security Model Based on Information Systems in the Cloud and Artificial Intelligence (hlm. 232–238). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36001-5_30
Muhtar, E. A., Abdillah, A., Widianingsih, I., & Adikancana, Q. M. (2023). Smart Villages, Rural Development and Community Vulnerability in Indonesia: A Bibliometric Analysis. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2219118
Mutiarin, D., Wahyuni, H., Ismail, N. S. A., & Kumorotomo, W. (2023). Social Media in Support of Indonesia’s One Data Interoperability Process for Implementing Data Governance Policies. E3S Web of Conferences, 440, 03022. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202344003022
Novitasari, E., Dewi, F. G., & Oktavia, R. (2022). Determinants of E-Government Implementation in Indonesia. Asian Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting, 25–33. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajeba/2022/v22i1930656
Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 12 Tahun 2007 tentang Pedoman Penyusunan dan Pendayagunaan Data Profil Desa dan Kelurahan.
Peraturan Presiden Nomor 39 Tahun 2019 tentang Satu Data Indonesia.
Putra, F., Wike, W., Nurani, F., Ulum, M. C., Salsabilla, S. A., & Ferdhianzah, H. J. (2024). The Determinants for Policy Implementation: A Study of Public Service Mall Program in Indonesia. Jurnal Borneo Administrator, 20(2), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.24258/jba.v20i2.1408
Qekaj-Thaçi, A., & Thaçi, L. (2022). The Quality of E-Government Management, Information Security and Quality. Emerging Science Journal, 7(1), 228–244. https://doi.org/10.28991/ESJ-2023-07-01-016
Sharma, S. K., Metri, B., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Rana, N. P. (2021). Challenges Common Service Centers (CSCs) Face in Delivering E-government Services in Rural India. Government Information Quarterly, 38(2), 101573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101573
Sisilianingsih, S., Purwandari, B., Eitiveni, I., & Purwaningsih, M. (2023). Analisis Faktor Transformasi Digital Pelayanan Publik Pemerintah di Era Pandemi. Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer, 10(4), 883–892. https://doi.org/10.25126/jtiik.2023107059
Taufiqurokhman, T., Satispi, E., Andriansyah, A., Murod, M., & Sulastri, E. (2024). The Impact of E-service Quality on Public Trust and Public Satisfaction in E-government Public Services. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 8(2), 765–772. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2024.1.002
Turner, M., Prasojo, E., & Sumarwono, R. (2022). The Challenge of Reforming Big Bureaucracy in Indonesia. Policy Studies, 43(2), 333–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2019.1708301
Vassilakopoulou, P., & Hustad, E. (2023). Bridging Digital Divides: A Literature Review and Research Agenda for Information Systems Research. Information Systems Frontiers, 25(3), 955–969. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-020-10096-3
Wahyudin, M., Devi, R. K., & Sensuse, D. I. (2024). Digital Transformation Readiness Model in Government. Ranah Research: Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 6(4), 689–709. https://doi.org/10.38035/rrj.v6i4.868
Weible, C. M. (Ed.). (2023). Theories of the Policy Process. Routledge.
Wellstead, A., & Howlett, M. (2024). Public Value and Procedural Policy Instrument Specifications in “Design for Service.” Policy Design and Practice, 7(2), 144–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2024.2337095
Yukhno, A. (2024). Digital Transformation: Exploring Big Data Governance in Public Administration. Public Organization Review, 24(1), 335–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-022-00694-x
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2026 Penulis
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-NonKomersial-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional berlaku untuk semua karya yang diterbitkan oleh Matra Pembaruan: Jurnal Inovasi Kebijakan. Penulis akan mempertahankan hak cipta dari karya tersebut.
