Beralih ke bagian utama
Artikel Riset Asli Akses Terbuka Terakreditasi SINTA 2

Licensing Innovations in Improving Regional Investment in Boyolali Regency

DOI
10.21787/jbp.10.2018.47-55
Tanggal Terbit & Halaman
12 Mei 2018 · Hlm. 47-55
Riwayat Naskah
Diterima16 Mar 2018 Disetujui11 Mei 2018 Terbit12 Mei 2018

807 Dilihat 642 Diunduh

Abstrak

Pelayanan Perizinan, Investasi, Pemerintah Daerah

Baca Naskah Lengkap

Isi lengkap artikel ini tersedia dalam format PDF. Versi resmi yang diterbitkan pada Vol 10 No 1 (2018).

Buka PDF

Daftar Pustaka

19 rujukan
  1. Boyolali District. (2015). Boyoloali Pro Investasi. Laporan Perkembangan Investasi di Kabupaten Boyolali Tahun 2010-2014. Boyolali: DPMPTSP of Boyolali District.
  2. Bryan, J. L. (2013). The Impact of Government Policy on Economic Growth. Management Faculty Publications. Retrieved from http://vc.bridgew.edu/management_fac/23
  3. De Vries, H., Bekkers, V., & Tummers, L. (2016). Innovation in the Public Sector: A Systematic Review and Future Research Agenda. Public Administration, 94(1), 146–166. http://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12209
  4. Denzin, N. K. (2012). Triangulation 2.0. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(2), 80–88. http://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812437186
  5. Giddens, A. (1971). Capitalism and Modern Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803109
  6. Karim, M. R. (2015). E-Government in Service Delivery and Citizen’s Satisfaction: A Case Study on Public Sectors in Bangladesh. International Journal of Managing Public Sector Information and Communication Technologies (IJMPICT), 6(2), 49–60. Retrieved from http://airccse.org/journal/mpict/papers/6215ijmpict05.pdf
  7. Kartikasari, D. (2017). The Effect of Export, Import and Investment to Economic Growth of Riau Islands Indonesia. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 7(4), 663–667. Retrieved from http://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijefi/article/view/5217
  8. Muallidin, I. (2011). Kebijakan Reorganisasi Perizinan Untuk Meningkatkan Kualitas Pelayanan Publik Di Kota Yogyakarta. Jurnal Studi Pemerintahan, 2(2), 398–423. http://doi.org/10.18196/jgp.2011.0020
  9. Osman, M. M., Bachok, S., Bakri, N. I. M., & Harun, N. Z. (2014). Government Delivery System: Effectiveness of Local Authorities in Perak, Malaysia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 153, 452–462. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.079
  10. Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (2014). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah. Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara.
  11. Pratama, M. R. (2013). Inovasi Pelayanan Publik (Studi Deskriptif tentang Nilai Tambah (Value Added) Inovasi Pelayanan Perizinan bagi Masyarakat di Kota Kediri). Kebijakan Dan Manajemen Publik, 1(2), 218–225. Retrieved from http://journal.unair.ac.id/KMP@inovasi-pelayanan-publik-(studi-deskriptif-tentang-nilai-tambah-(value-added)-inovasi-pelayanan-perizinan-bagi-masyarakat-di-kota-kediri)-article-5553-media-138-category-8.html
  12. Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations (4th ed.). Free Press.
  13. Somantri, G. R. (2005). Memahami Metode Kualitatif. Makara Seri Sosial Humaniora, 9(2), 57–65. http://doi.org/10.7454/mssh.v9i2.122
  14. Tarigan, A. (2015, January 8). Dilema Birokrasi Satu Pintu. Retrieved from https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2015/01/08/19033681/Dilema.Birokrasi.Satu.Pintu
  15. Teofilovic, N. (2002). The Reality of Innovation in Government. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 7(3), 1–19. Retrieved from https://www.innovation.cc/scholarly-style/7_3_4_teofilovic_reality-government.pdf
  16. Useem, J. (1956). Technology and the Changing Family. W. F. Ogburn, M. F. Nimkoff. The American Journal of Sociology, 62(1), 131–132. http://doi.org/10.1086/221948
  17. Utami, R. (2014). Taman Cerdas sebagai Simbolisasi Kota Layak Anak di Surakarta (Studi Kasus di Kelurahan Kadipiro Kecamatan Banjarsari Kota Surakarta). Sosialitas (Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Sosiologi Antropologi), 4(1). Retrieved from http://jurnal.fkip.uns.ac.id/index.php/sosant/article/view/4032
  18. World Bank. (2017). Doing Business 2017: Equal Opportunity for All. Washington, D.C.: World Bank. http://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0948-4
  19. World Economic Forum. (2016). The Global Competitiveness Report 2016–2017. (K. Schwab, Ed.). Geneva: World Economic Forum.