Skip to main content
Original Research Article Open Access SINTA 2 Accredited

Nagari Minangkabau

The Study of Indigenous Institutions in West Sumatra, Indonesia

DOI
10.21787/jbp.10.2018.231-239
Published & Pages
13 November 2018 · pp. 231-239
Manuscript History
Received5 Sep 2018 Accepted3 Oct 2018 Published13 Nov 2018

5,457 Views 3,162 Downloads

Abstract

Nagari as government and customary institutions in West Sumatra is torn between the interests of the government system and the importance of maintaining the fundamental values in the community. Various government regulations regarding the village or Nagari generate new questions, the loss of the community’s identity and local wisdom of Nagari as an autonomous and independent society. This study aims to explore and describe the Nagari system of government, as a social system of indigenous peoples of Minangkabau that combine the state government system with the adat system of local customary institutions. The study was conducted with qualitative methods, using in-depth interviews with the community leaders as well as some observations related to the dynamics of its social community in addition to literature study. This study found that Nagari as Minangkabau community social unity has a sacred local wisdom from the community’s comprehensive thinking, and natural conditions. With its history, Nagari grows as an autonomous region where the community manages the social and natural resources potential independently. The Institutional system of Nagari is a combination between the state, custom, and religion, which is combined in the framework of tungku tigo sajarangan, tali tigo sapilin, the government, niniek mamak, and religious scholars. The social system that emerged from the wisdom of “reading” nature, as the strength of the Minangkabau community, made Nagari be one of the regions in Indonesia which are called by the Netherlands as “the Small Republic”.

Read the Full Text

The full text of this article is available as PDF. Version of record published in Vol. 10 No. 2 (2018).

Open PDF

References

18 references
  1. Amalia, A. D., & Syawie, M. (2015). Pembangunan Kemandirian Desa melalui Konsep Pemberdayaan: Suatu Kajian dalam Perspektif Sosiologi. Sosio Informa, 175–188. Retrieved from http://ejournal.kemsos.go.id/index.php/Sosioinforma/article/view/146
  2. Astuti, N. B. (2009). Transformasi dari Desa Kembali ke Nagari (Studi Kasus di Kenagarian IV Koto Palembayan, Sumatera Barat). Bogor Agricultural University. Retrieved from https://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/5046
  3. Astuti, N. B., & Kolopaking, L. M. (2009). Dilema dalam Transformasi Desa Ke Nagari: Studi Kasus di Kenagarian IV Koto Palembayan, Provinsi Sumatera Barat. Sodality: Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan, 3(2), 153–172. http://doi.org/10.22500/sodality.v3i2.5868
  4. Azwar, W. (2018). The Resistance of Local Wisdom Towards Radicalism: The Study of the Tarekat Community of West Sumatra, Indonesia. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities (JSSH), 26(1), 75–102. Retrieved from http://www.pertanika.upm.edu.my/Pertanika PAPERS/JSSH Vol. 26 (1) Mar. 2018/05 JSSH-1622-2016-3rdProof.pdf
  5. Hanani, S., & Aziz, R. A. (2009). Rekonstruksi dan usaha penyelamatan tradisi lokal era pasca sentralisme di Indonesia. Geografia - Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 5(2), 68–81. Retrieved from http://ejournal.ukm.my/gmjss/article/view/17905
  6. Hardiman, F. B. (2015). Seni Memahami: Hermeneutik dari Schleiermacher sampai Derrida. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
  7. Herry, A. (2015). Kesiapan Desa Menghadapi Implementasi Undang-Undang Desa (Tinjauan Desentralisasi Fiskal dan Peningkatan Potensi Desa). Civis, 5(1), 737–751. Retrieved from http://journal.upgris.ac.id/index.php/civis/article/view/634
  8. Holstein, J. A., & Gubrium, J. F. (2009). Fenomenologi, Etnometodologi, dan Praktik Interpretif. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
  9. ICRAF, LATIN, & P3AE-UI. (2001). Kajian Kebijakan Hak-Hak Masyarakat Adat di Indonesia; Suatu Refleksi Pengaturan Kebijakan dalam Era Otonomi Daerah. Seri Kebijakan I. ICRAF, LATIN, P3AE-UI.
  10. Muhi, A. H. (2011). Fenomena pembangunan desa. Institute Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri, 1–20.
  11. Nasrul, W. (2013). Peran Kelembagaan Lokal Adat dalam Pembangunan Desa. Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan: Kajian Masalah Ekonomi Dan Pembangunan, 14(1), 102. http://doi.org/10.23917/jep.v14i1.164
  12. Nazir, M. (1988). Metode Penelitian. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
  13. Pranadji, T. (2006). Penguatan Modal Sosial untuk Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Pedesaan dalam Pengelolaan Agroekosistem Lahan Kering (Studi Kasus di Desa-desa (Hulu DAS) Ex Proyek Bangun Desa, Kabupaten Gunungkidul dan Ex Proyek Pertanian Lahan Kering, Kabupaten Boyolali). Jurnal Agro Ekonomi, 24(2), 178–206. http://doi.org/10.21082/jae.v24n2.2006.178-206
  14. Vel, J. A. C., & Bedner, A. W. (2015). Decentralisation and village governance in Indonesia: the return to the nagari and the 2014 Village Law. The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 47(3), 493–507. http://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2015.1109379
  15. Wekke, I. S. (2013). Islam dan Adat: Tinjauan Akulturasi Budaya dan Agama dalam Masyarakat Bugis. Analisis, XIII(1), 27–56. Retrieved from http://ejournal.radenintan.ac.id/index.php/analisis/article/view/641
  16. Widyanti, T. (2015). Penerapan Nilai-Nilai Kearifan Lokal dalam Budaya. Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu Sosial, 24(2).
  17. Yunus, Y. (2008, October 29). Pemahaman tentang Nagari | Wawasan Islam. Retrieved from https://wawasanislam.wordpress.com/2009/03/06/pemahaman-tentang-nagari/
  18. Yunus, Y. (Ed.). (2011). Adat Basandi Syarak - Syarak Basandi Kitabullah dalam Masyarakat Minangkabau. Padang, Indonesia: Museum Nagari.