Skip to main content
Original Research Article Open Access SINTA 2 Accredited

Digital Governance in Fraud Prevention in the Free Nutritious Meal Program

The Role of Internal Control and Government Internal Auditing

Authors

  • Yohanes Sugiyanta * Corresponding author
  • Rakhmat
DOI
10.21787/jbp.18.2026.2912
Published & Pages
31 May 2026 · pp. 113-119
Manuscript History
Received26 Jan 2026 Accepted21 Apr 2026 Published31 May 2026
License
CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0
Read PDF 1.2 MB Cite

606 Views 383 Downloads

Abstract

The Free Nutritious Meal (Makan Bergizi Gratis) program is a strategic national policy for strengthening human capital in Indonesia; however, its implementation is subject to significant fiscal and governance risks arising from the complexity of decentralized supply chains. This study aims to develop an integrated fraud prevention model, termed Smart-Nutri Governance, by combining digital governance architecture with continuous auditing mechanisms. This study employs a design-based policy research approach, using regulatory gap analysis and comparative policy analysis against India's Mid-Day Meal Scheme (Pradhan Mantri Poshan Shakti Nirman) and Brazil's National School Feeding Program (Programa Nacional de Alimentação Escolar). The analysis identifies three critical governance gaps: data validity (ghost recipients), price volatility, and audit detection lag. A simulation using West Java Province data estimates potential fiscal losses of up to 1.15 trillion Indonesian rupiah per year due to inefficiencies in beneficiary validation. To address these gaps, this study proposes a three-layer digital control architecture: (1) real-time biometric or QR-based validation at the point of service, (2) mandatory e-marketplace procurement to ensure price transparency and audit trails, and (3) artificial intelligence–based continuous auditing for real-time anomaly detection. The findings indicate that this model is projected to enhance control effectiveness and offer greater supervisory value compared to conventional post-audit approaches. This study contributes theoretically by integrating Fraud Diamond Theory with digital governance and continuous auditing in the public sector context. Practically, it provides an applicable and adaptive policy framework for strengthening financial accountability in large-scale social assistance programs.

Keywords:

Read the Full Text

The full text of this article is available as PDF. Version of record published in Vol. 18 No. 1 (2026).

Open PDF

References

15 references
  1. Bajpai, R., & Myers, C. B. (2020). Enhancing Government Effectiveness and Transparency: The Fight Against Corruption. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/235541600116631094
  2. Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and Assessing Accountability: A Conceptual Framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x
  3. Drèze, J., & Khera, R. (2017). Recent Social Security Initiatives in India. World Development, 98, 555–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.05.035
  4. Erlyn, P., Hidayat, B., Fatoni, A., & Saksono, H. (2021). Nutritional Interventions by Local Governments as an Effort to Accelerate Stunting Reduction. Jurnal Bina Praja, 13(3), 543–553. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.13.2021.543-553
  5. Heeks, R. (2006). Implementing and Managing eGovernment: An International Text. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446220191
  6. Janssen, M., & Estevez, E. (2013). Lean Government and Platform-Based Governance—Doing More With Less. Government Information Quarterly, 30, S1–S8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.11.003
  7. Kahyaoglu, S. B., Sarikaya, R., & Topal, B. (2020). Continuous Auditing as a Strategic Tool in Public Sector Internal Audit: The Turkish Case. Selcuk Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Meslek Yuksekokulu Dergisi, 23(1), 208–225. https://doi.org/10.29249/selcuksbmyd.670261
  8. Klitgaard, R. (1988). Controlling Corruption. University of California Press.
  9. Mardiasmo. (2018). Akuntansi Sektor Publik. Andi Offset.
  10. OECD. (2021). Government at a Glance 2021. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/1c258f55-en
  11. OECD. (2024). OECD Fiscal Decentralisation Database. OECD. https://www.oecd.org/en/data/datasets/oecd-fiscal-decentralisation-database.html
  12. Pavliuk, S. (2023). The Role of Creative Industries in Local Economic Development. Ukrainian Black Sea Region Agrarian Science, 27(1), 74–84. https://doi.org/10.56407/bs.agrarian/1.2023.74
  13. Power, M. (1997). The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification. Oxford University Press.
  14. Rose-Ackerman, S., & Palifka, B. J. (2016). Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences, and Reform. Cambridge University Press.
  15. Sidaner, E., Balaban, D., & Burlandy, L. (2013). The Brazilian School Feeding Programme: An Example of an Integrated Programme in Support of Food and Nutrition Security. Public Health Nutrition, 16(6), 989–994. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980012005101

Copyright & Open Access License

Copyright (c) 2026 Author(s). This article is licensed under CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0.