Digital Governance in Fraud Prevention in the Free Nutritious Meal Program

The Role of Internal Control and Government Internal Auditing

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.18.2026.2912

Keywords:

Free Nutritious Meal Program, Digital Governance, Fraud Diamond Theory, Continuous Auditing, Public Sector Accountability

Abstract

The Free Nutritious Meal (Makan Bergizi Gratis) program is a strategic national policy for strengthening human capital in Indonesia; however, its implementation is subject to significant fiscal and governance risks arising from the complexity of decentralized supply chains. This study aims to develop an integrated fraud prevention model, termed Smart-Nutri Governance, by combining digital governance architecture with continuous auditing mechanisms. This study employs a design-based policy research approach, using regulatory gap analysis and comparative policy analysis against India's Mid-Day Meal Scheme (Pradhan Mantri Poshan Shakti Nirman) and Brazil's National School Feeding Program (Programa Nacional de Alimentação Escolar). The analysis identifies three critical governance gaps: data validity (ghost recipients), price volatility, and audit detection lag. A simulation using West Java Province data estimates potential fiscal losses of up to 1.15 trillion Indonesian rupiah per year due to inefficiencies in beneficiary validation. To address these gaps, this study proposes a three-layer digital control architecture: (1) real-time biometric or QR-based validation at the point of service, (2) mandatory e-marketplace procurement to ensure price transparency and audit trails, and (3) artificial intelligence–based continuous auditing for real-time anomaly detection. The findings indicate that this model is projected to enhance control effectiveness and offer greater supervisory value compared to conventional post-audit approaches. This study contributes theoretically by integrating Fraud Diamond Theory with digital governance and continuous auditing in the public sector context. Practically, it provides an applicable and adaptive policy framework for strengthening financial accountability in large-scale social assistance programs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bajpai, R., & Myers, C. B. (2020). Enhancing Government Effectiveness and Transparency: The Fight Against Corruption. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/235541600116631094

Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and Assessing Accountability: A Conceptual Framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x

Drèze, J., & Khera, R. (2017). Recent Social Security Initiatives in India. World Development, 98, 555–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.05.035

Erlyn, P., Hidayat, B., Fatoni, A., & Saksono, H. (2021). Nutritional Interventions by Local Governments as an Effort to Accelerate Stunting Reduction. Jurnal Bina Praja, 13(3), 543–553. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.13.2021.543-553

Heeks, R. (2006). Implementing and Managing eGovernment: An International Text. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446220191

Janssen, M., & Estevez, E. (2013). Lean Government and Platform-Based Governance—Doing More With Less. Government Information Quarterly, 30, S1–S8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.11.003

Kahyaoglu, S. B., Sarikaya, R., & Topal, B. (2020). Continuous Auditing as a Strategic Tool in Public Sector Internal Audit: The Turkish Case. Selcuk Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Meslek Yuksekokulu Dergisi, 23(1), 208–225. https://doi.org/10.29249/selcuksbmyd.670261

Klitgaard, R. (1988). Controlling Corruption. University of California Press.

Mardiasmo. (2018). Akuntansi Sektor Publik. Andi Offset.

OECD. (2021). Government at a Glance 2021. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/1c258f55-en

OECD. (2024). OECD Fiscal Decentralisation Database. OECD. https://www.oecd.org/en/data/datasets/oecd-fiscal-decentralisation-database.html

Pavliuk, S. (2023). The Role of Creative Industries in Local Economic Development. Ukrainian Black Sea Region Agrarian Science, 27(1), 74–84. https://doi.org/10.56407/bs.agrarian/1.2023.74

Power, M. (1997). The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification. Oxford University Press.

Rose-Ackerman, S., & Palifka, B. J. (2016). Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences, and Reform. Cambridge University Press.

Sidaner, E., Balaban, D., & Burlandy, L. (2013). The Brazilian School Feeding Programme: An Example of an Integrated Programme in Support of Food and Nutrition Security. Public Health Nutrition, 16(6), 989–994. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980012005101

Downloads

Published

2026-05-31

How to Cite

Sugiyanta, Y., & Rakhmat. (2026). Digital Governance in Fraud Prevention in the Free Nutritious Meal Program: The Role of Internal Control and Government Internal Auditing. Jurnal Bina Praja, 18(1), 113–119. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.18.2026.2912