Kerja Sama Pemerintah Daerah dengan Badan Usaha Konservasi Energi untuk Efisiensi Energi di Sektor Penerangan Jalan Umum (PJU)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21787/mp.2.3.2018.173-183Keywords:
Cooperation, Local Government, PPP, Energy Conservation, Public Road LightingAbstract
The implementation of energy conservation for energy efficiency and Public Street Lighting (PJU) has not run optimally. Several previous studies have presented technological options and economic policies for the implementation of energy conservation for energy efficiency in the Public Road Lighting sector. While to strengthen energy efficiency policies, the Government has a regional government cooperation policy with business entities. This study aims to analyze the implementation and problems of PPP policy (Government Cooperation with Business Entities) Energy Conservation for Energy Efficiency in the PJU sector. The method used in this study is a qualitative method with a descriptive approach. This study produces conclusions as follows. In its implementation, the energy conservation PPP policy for energy efficiency and PJU has been carried out by the local government and proven to be able to reduce the burden on local governments in financing the management of PJU, especially the cost / budget efficiency of the PJU in the APBD. The implementation of energy conservation PPP policy is included in the category of complex cooperation because the mechanism for payment of energy efficiency services is based on payment from saving, the Government does not cover the initial costs (zero investment) and does not bear the risk of state losses ( zero risk). Business entities that will bear the risk of financial losses due to technical implementation if they cannot prove the existence of savings. The PPP policy issues that emerged included the absence of technical guidelines related to the implementation of PPP on the initiative of energy conservation business entities for energy efficiency and PJU, in which the unsolicited project PPP scheme has not found a potential complaint/ indication of state financial losses because so far still fulfills the principle of prudence.
References
Al Irsyad, M., Wintolo, M., & Hartono. (2010). Penghematan Energi Penerangan Jalan Umum DKI Jakarta: Survei, Potensi, dan Keekonomian. Ketenagalistrikan dan Energi terbarukan, 9(2), 89-98. Retrieved from http://ketjurnal.p3tkebt.esdm.go.id/ketjurnal/index.php/ket/article/view/104
Berlian, A., Al Irsyad, M., Emo, S., Widyanto, P., Augusta, T., & Muhammad, A. (2014). Analisis Potensi Penghematan Energi Penerangan Jalan Umum Kota Surakarta dan Kota Bandung. Ketenagalistrikan dan Energi Terbarukan, 13, 1-14. Retrieved from http://ketjurnal.p3tkebt.esdm.go.id/ketjurnal/index.php/ket/article/view/65/28
Bulkeley, H., Schoeder, H., Janda, K., Zhao, J., Armstrong, A., Chu, S. Y., & Ghosh, S. (2009). Cities and Climate Change: The role of Insitutions, Governance, and Urban Planning. Marseille. 28-30 Juni 2009: Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research.
Cresswell, J. W. (1994). Research Design. Sage Publications.
Dinata, C. (2013). Model Kemitraan Pemerintah dan Swasta dalam Penanganan Penerangan Jalan Umum PJU di Kabupaten Magetan. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Effendi, A., & Razonta, N. (2015). Penataan dan Meterisasi Lampu Penerangan Jalan Umum Desa Apar Kecamatan Pariaman Utara. Jurnal Teknik Elektro-ITP, 4(1). Retrieved from https://ejournal.itp.ac.id/index.php/telektro/article/view/222/217
Fathurrokhman, M. (2015, Oktober 18). PJU Pintar Indonesia . Retrieved from sindoindonesiablog: https://sindoindonesiablog.wordpress.com/tag/permasalahan-pju/
Gregory, P. R., & Stuart, R. C. (2003). Comparing Economic Systems in The Twenty First Century. Boston : Houghton Miffin.
Hamdi, M. (2015). Kebijakan Publik: Proses, Analisis, dan Partisipasi. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.
hns. (2016, September 7). detik.com. Retrieved from finance.detik.com: https://finance.detik.com/berita-ekonomi-bisnis/d-3292877/infrastruktur-tak-hanya-pakai-apbn-puprbukan-berarti-negara-tak-ada-uang
Kyba, Hanel, & Holker. (2014). Redefining Efficiency for Outdoor Lighting. Energy and Environmental Science, 1-9. doi:10.1039/C4EE00566J
Mardikaningsih, I. S., Sutopo, W., & Astuti, R. W. (2016). Studi Kasus Analisis Teknis dan Ekonomis Penerapan Penerangan Jalan Umum Bertenaga Sel Surya. Industrial Engineering Conference. Retrieved from http://idec.industri.ft.uns.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Prosiding2016_ID048.pdf
Nancy, N. M. (2016). Analisis Peran Pajak Penerangan Jalan Umum terhadap Pendapatan Asli Daerah kota Tomohon. Jurnal Emba: Jurnal Riset Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis, dan Akuntansi, 4(3), 32-43. Retrieved from https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/emba/article/view/13388
Painter, K., & Farrington, D. P. (1999). Street Lighting and Crime: Diffusion of Benefits in The Stoke-On-Trent Project. Crime Prevention Studies, 10, 77-122.doi:10.1.1.362.602
Wibowo, A. (2016). Perkembangan Terkini dalam Pembiayaan Infrastruktur yang Melibatkan Partisipasi Badan Usaha. Konferensi Nasional Teknik Sipil Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta (pp. 1-9). Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. 26-27 Oktober 2016: Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Creative Commons-Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike License 4.0 International applies to all works published by Matra Pembaruan: Jurnal Inovasi Kebijakan. Authors will retain copyright of the work.