Skip to main content
Original Research Article Open Access SINTA 2 Accredited

Capital Investment Behavior of Local Government in Regional Development Bank (BPD) in Indonesia

Authors

  • M. Yusuf 1* Corresponding author
  • Sri Hartoyo 2
  • Adler H. Manurung 3
  • Yuswandi A. Temenggung 4
  • 1 School of Business IPB
  • 2 Sekolah Bisnis, Institut Pertanian Bogor
  • 3 Binus University image/svg+xml ROR Binus University
  • 4 Ministry of Home Affairs, Republic of Indonesia
  • *Corresponding author
DOI
10.21787/jbp.09.2017.281-293
Published & Pages
28 November 2017 · pp. 281-293
Manuscript History
Received21 Oct 2017 Published28 Nov 2017
Read PDF 914 KB Cite

940 Views 649 Downloads

Abstract

Capital investment of local government or long-term regional investment is a form of government program and one of the tools of regulating the regional fiscal. Local government investment in the form of direct investment is the capital investment in business entities which aims to increase regional economic growth, increase regional income, and improve the welfare of the community. Regional capital investment is a decision-making behavior to invest or not to invest in business entities to obtain dividends. The behavior of decision making requires Information on bank performance, knowledge of banking governance, and shareholder agreements with bank directors. This study aims to analyze performance behavior and investment of provincial government that affects the profit of regional development banks in Indonesia. The method of analysis is done using descriptive statistic and multiple linear regression. Multiple Linear Regression with dependent variable of regional development bank profit and independent variable consist of Bank size (SIZE), business risk of BPD bank (RISK_Bt), Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR), Operational Cost to Operating Income (BOPO), Return of Equity (ROE), Interest Rate of Bank (INTEREST), Provincial Capital Investment to Bank BPD (PMD), Regional Minimum Wage (UMR), Initial Public Offering Dummy (DIPO), and Bank Business Target Dummy (DSARBISB). The result of descriptive statistical analysis concluded that the capital investment of 26 provincial governments in 26 regional development banks describes the varying bank performance caused by different bank sizes. The results of multiple regression analysis can conclude that all independent variables are able to both explain the dependent variable at a significant level of level below 1%, as well as individually ten independent variables that are statistically significantly different with zero at levels below 1%, below 5%, and below 10%.

Keywords:

Read the Full Text

The full text of this article is available as PDF. Version of record published in Vol. 9 No. 2 (2017).

Open PDF

References

19 references
  1. Ahmad, K., & Wajid, S. (2013). What Matters for Economic Growth in Pakistan: Fiscal Policy or Its Composition? Asian Economic and Financial Review, 3(2), 196–215. Retrieved from http://www.aessweb.com/journals/February2013/5002/1771
  2. Al-Subhiri, F. N. (2013). Analysis the Relationship Between Liquidity, Credit Risk and Market Value in Commercial Jordanian Banking. International Journal of Academic Research, 5(5), 109–113.
  3. Bodie, Z., Kane, A., & Marcus, A. J. (2010). Investments (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
  4. Claessens, S., Fan, J. P. H., Djankov, S., & Lang, L. H. P. (1999). Expropriation of Minority Shareholders: Evidence from East Asia (Policy Research Working Paper No. WPS2088). Retrieved from http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/283121468771272365/Expropriation-of-minority-shareholders-evidence-from-East-Asia
  5. Coronado, J. L., Engen, E. M., & Knight, B. (2003). Public Funds and Private Capital Markets: The Investment Practices and Performance of State and Local Pension Funds. National Tax Journal, 56(3), 579–594. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/41790124
  6. Deo, M., & Sundar, V. (2015). Gender Difference: Investment Behavior and Risk Taking. SCMS Journal of Indian Management, 74–81. Retrieved from https://www.scms.edu.in/journal/article?journal_id=17
  7. Jaiyeoba, H. B., & Haron, R. (2016). A Qualitative Inquiry into the Investment Decision Behaviour of the Malaysian Stock Market Investors. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 8(3), 246–267. http://doi.org/10.1108/QRFM-07-2015-0027
  8. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. http://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
  9. Kun, Q., & Duo, M. (2014). Credit Risk Management of Commercial Bank. Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research, 6(5), 1784–1788. Retrieved from http://www.jocpr.com/archive/jocpr-volume-6-issue-5-year-2014.html
  10. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (2000). Investor Protection and Corporate Governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1–2), 3–27. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(00)00065-9
  11. Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 23 of 2014 on Regional Government, Pub. L. No. 23 (2014). Indonesia.
  12. Li, M.-Y. L., & Miu, P. (2010). A Hybrid Bankruptcy Prediction Model with Dynamic Loadings on Accounting-ratio-based and Market-based Information: A Binary Quantile Regression Approach. Journal of Empirical Finance, 17(4), 818–833. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2010.04.004
  13. Lo, A. W. Y., Wong, R. M. K., & Firth, M. (2010). Tax, Financial Reporting, and Tunneling Incentives for Income Shifting: An Empirical Analysis of the Transfer Pricing Behavior of Chinese-Listed Companies. The Journal of the American Taxation Association, 32(2), 1–26. http://doi.org/10.2308/jata.2010.32.2.1
  14. Mzee, S. S., & Mohamed, M. R. (2014). Cost and Profit Efficiency and Management Behaviour of Commercial Banks (Evidence from Tanzania). Asian Economic and Financial Review, 4(10), 1447–1460. Retrieved from http://www.aessweb.com/journals/October2014/5002/2812
  15. Pappalardo, A. (1987). Government Equity Participation under the EEC Rules on State Aids: Recent Developments. Fordham International Law Journal, 11(2).
  16. Polimpung, E. S. F. W. (2014). Pengaturan Pelayanan Publik dalam Rangka Otonomi Daerah. Lex et Societatis, 2(9), 18–26. Retrieved from https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexetsocietatis/article/view/6383
  17. Romer, D. (2006). Advanced Macroeconomics (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
  18. Ross, S. A. (1973). The Economic Theory of Agency: The Principal’s Problem. The American Economic Review, 63(2), 134–139. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1817064
  19. Triyonggo, Y., Maarif, M. S., Sukmawati, A., & Baga, L. M. (2015). Analisis Situasional Kompetensi Praktisi Sumber Daya Manusia Indonesia Menghadapi MEA 2015. Jurnal Manajemen Teknologi, 14(1), 100–112. http://doi.org/10.12695/jmt.2015.14.1.7