Skip to main content
Original Research Article Open Access SINTA 2 Accredited

The Optimization of Budget Outcome to Create Trust in Public Expenditure Allocation on Local Budget

DOI
10.21787/jbp.08.2016.277-291
Published & Pages
30 November 2016 · pp. 277-291

949 Views 632 Downloads

Abstract

Planning and budgeting process is the most crucial process in the administration of local government. Results of previous studies in Solok, the increase in the total budget is not accompanied by spending management capabilities. Expenditure of public service has always fluctuated, but ideally should always increasing. This study aimed to analyze the outcome of the budget in the allocation of public spending in an effort to realize the presence of trust on the budget in Solok West Sumatra Province. This study uses qualitative research methods with the type of research that is selected using descriptive type. While the techniques of data collection are done through an interview, observation and documentation study. This study further highlights the emic perspective, is the voice of the informant, not the personal opinion of the researchers (etic). Then, the data analysis is done categorically and chronologically, viewed repeatedly, and will continue to be encoded. To test the verification of data, triangulation is done by comparing the results of interviews with documents obtained in the field and testing of concepts used by researchers with the information given by the informant. The results showed that the pathology was found that budget allocations reflect inefficiencies as a failure of the link between policy, planning, and budgeting as a fragmented system. But on the other hand, it must be admitted there has been “trust” among policymaking actors in allocating public expenditure budget in playing the role in the budget policy.

Read the Full Text

The full text of this article is available as PDF. Version of record published in Vol. 8 No. 2 (2016).

Open PDF

References

23 references
  1. Adisasmita, R. (2011). Pengelolaan Pendapatan & Anggaran Daerah. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
  2. Anggarini, Y. & Puranta, B. (2010). Anggaran Berbasis Kinerja: Penyusunan APBD Secara Komprehensif. Yogyakarta: UPP STIM YKPN.
  3. Bastian,. (2010). Sistem Perencanaan dan Penganggaran Pemerintah Daerah di Indonesia. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
  4. Creswell, J. (2002). Research Design: Qualitative & Quantitative Approach. Jakarta: KIK Press.
  5. Dirks, K. & Ferrin, D. (2001). The Role of Trust in Organizational Settings. Organization Science, 12(4), 450-467. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.4.450.10640
  6. Ellonen, R., Blomqvist, K., & Puumalainen, K. (2008). The Role of Trust in Organisational Innovativeness. European Journal Of Innovation Management, 11(2), 160-181. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14601060810869848
  7. Halim, A. (2007). Akuntansi Keuangan Daerah. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
  8. Indrayeni,. (2013). Teori, Konsep, dan Aplikasi Akuntansi Sektor Publik. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
  9. Koeswara, H. Laporan Akhir Penelitian (Tahun Kedua) Analisis Kebijakan Alokasi Belanja Pelayanan Publik pada Anggaran Pendapatan dan Belanja Daerah Kota Solok. Padang: Universitas Andalas.
  10. Koeswara, H. Laporan Akhir Penelitian (Tahun Ketiga) Analisis Kebijakan Alokasi Belanja Pelayanan Publik pada Anggaran Pendapatan dan Belanja Daerah Kota Solok. Padang: Universitas Andalas.
  11. Koeswara, H. Laporan Akhir Penelitian (Tahun Pertama) Analisis Kebijakan Alokasi Belanja Pelayanan Publik pada Anggaran Pendapatan dan Belanja Daerah Kota Solok. Padang: Universitas Andalas.
  12. Lee, R., Johnson, R., & Joyce, P. (2013). Public Budgeting Systems. Burlington, MA: Jones and Bartlett Learning.
  13. Mahmudi,. (2010). Manajemen Keuangan Daerah. Jakarta: Erlangga.
  14. Mardiasmo,. (2009). Akuntansi Sektor Publik. Yogyakarta: Andi.
  15. Marshall, C. & Rossman, G. (1999). Designing Qualitative Research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  16. Mayer, R., Davis, J., & Schoorman, F. (1995). An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust. The Academy Of Management Review, 20(3), 709. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/258792
  17. McEvily, B., Perrone, V., & Zaheer, A. (2003). Trust as an Organizing Principle. Organization Science, 14(1), 91-103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.14.1.91.12814
  18. McKnight, D., Cummings, L., & Chervany, N. (1998). Initial Trust Formation in New Organizational Relationships. The Academy Of Management Review, 23(3), 473. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/259290
  19. Patton, M. (1990). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
  20. Prawoto, A. (2011). Pengantar Keuangan Publik. Yogyakarta: BPFE.
  21. Schick, A. (1998). Contemporary Approach to Public Expenditure Management. Washington DC: World Bank Institute.
  22. Taylor, S. & Bogdan, R. (1984). Introduction to Qualitative Research for Meanings. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  23. Usman, H. & Akbar, P. (2003). Metodologi Penelitian Sosial. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.