Skip to main content
Original Research Article Open Access SINTA 2 Accredited

Value-added in Public Service Innovation: The Practice at Integrated Service Units in Pontianak Municipality and Tanah Bumbu District

DOI
10.21787/jbp.08.2016.49-58
Published & Pages
3 June 2016 · pp. 49-58
Manuscript History
Received3 Jun 2016 Accepted3 Jun 2016 Published3 Jun 2016

1,551 Views 930 Downloads

Abstract

The rise of innovations in the public sector creates something new in delivering public services. This study aims to analyze value-added in the practices of service innovation in the public sector. Drawing on desk research method, this study uses secondary data from literature sources. Innovation becomes a way to create value-added in public service sphere. This study concludes that some innovations created in the integrated service units in Pontiana Municipality and Tanah Bumbu District are included in innovation process which delivers efficiency and easiness values for the users of SITU, SIUP and TDP services. The innovation in the two service agencies has succeeded to reduce service delivery duration and minimized the occurrence of opportunity lost among citizens so that the innovation creates public value.Furthermore, those innovation practices demonstrate that there is an adjustment of network community governance in the process of public service administration.

Read the Full Text

The full text of this article is available as PDF. Version of record published in Vol. 8 No. 1 (2016).

Open PDF

References

37 references
  1. Beach, H. (2013). Why China Needs More Children.Time, (23).
  2. Benington, J. (2011). From Private Choice to Public Value?. In J. Benington & M. Moore, Public Value:Theory and Practice (1st ed.). Hampshire-UK:Palgrave Macmillan.
  3. Bozeman, B. (2007). Public Values and Public Interest:Counterbalancing Economic Individualism.Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
  4. Cole, M. & Parston, G. (2006). Unlocking Public Value.Hoboken, N.J.: John Wiley.
  5. Downes, D. & Vindurampulle, O. (2007). Valueadded Measures for School Improvement. East
  6. Melbourne, Vic.: Dept. of Education and Early Childhood Development.
  7. Dwiyanto, A. (2013). Discussion of Public Service Innovation Study, organized by the Division of Apparatus Study of PKP2A III LAN. Presentation, Samarinda.
  8. Hartley, J. (2005). Innovation in Governance and Public Services: Past and Present. Public Money & Management, 25(1), 27-34.
  9. Hartley, J. (2011). Public Value Through Innovation and Improvement. In J. Benington & M. Moore,Public Value: Theory and Practice (1st ed.).Hampshire-UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
  10. Kernaghan, K. (2003). Integrating Values into Public Service: The Values Statement as Centerpiece.Public Administration Review, 63(6), 711-719.
  11. Mayangsari, P., Soeaidy, M., & Prasetyo, W. (2013).Inovasi PT. POS Indonesia dalam Menjaga
  12. Eksistensi dan Daya Saing Pelayanan Publik.Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 1(2), 248-256.
  13. McGuire, L. (2001). Service Charters - Global Convergence or National Divergence? A Comparison of Initiatives in Australia, the United Kingdom and the United States. Public
  14. Management Review, 3(4), 493-524. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14616670110071856
  15. Ministry of Administrative and Bureaucratic Reform,. (2014). Top 99 Innovations of Indonesia Public Service in 2014. Jakarta: Ministry of Administrative and Bureaucratic Reform.
  16. Mirnasari, R. & Suaedi, F. (2013). Inovasi Pelayanan Publik UPTD Terminal Purabaya-Bungurasih. Kebijakan Dan Manajemen Publik, 1(1).
  17. Mitchell, J. (2011). Creating and Adding Value:How Responsiveness by TAFE NSW Benefits Its Customers. New South Wales: TAFE NSW.
  18. Moore, M. (1995). Creating Public Value. Cambridge,Mass.: Harvard University Press.
  19. Moore, M. (2005). Break-Through Innovations and Continuous Improvement: Two Different
  20. Models of Innovative Processes in the Public Sector. Public Money & Management, 25(1), 43-
  21. Parlina, I. & Atmanta, D. (2013). Bureaucratic Reform is All Talk and No Action. The Jakarta
  22. Post. Retrieved 6 February 2016, from http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2013/04/18/bureaucratic-reform-all-talk-and-no-action.html
  23. PKP2A III LAN,. (2013). Inovasi Pelayanan Publik di Wilayah Kalimantan. Samarinda: PKP2A III LAN.
  24. Pollitt, C. (2003). The Essential Public Manager. Midenhead: Open University Press.
  25. Pratama, M. & Irianto, J. (2013). Inovasi Pelayanan Publik (Studi Deskriptif tentang Nilai Tambah (Value Added) Inovasi Pelayanan Perizinan bagi Masyarakat di Kota Kediri). Kebijakan Dan Manajemen Publik, 1(2).
  26. Ratomo, U. (2015). LAN anugerahkan penghargaan Inovasi Administrasi Negara. Antaranews.com. Retrieved 5 February 2016, from http://www.antaranews.com/berita/526143/lan-anugerahkan-penghargaan-inovasiadministrasi-negara
  27. Sengupta, A. & Dev, C. (2010). Service Innovation: Applying the 7-I Model to Improve
  28. Brand Positioning at the Taj Holiday Village Goa, India. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 52(1), 11-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1938965510371443
  29. Stewart, J. (2009). Public Policy Values. New York:Palgrave Macmillan.
  30. Thiel, S. (2014). Research Methods in Public Administration and Public Management: An
  31. Introduction. New York: Routledge.
  32. Top 33 of Public Service Innovations in Indonesia.(2014). Menpan.go.id. Retrieved 5 February 2016,from http://www.menpan.go.id/beritaterkini/2357-top-33-inovasi-pelayananpublik-di-indonesia
  33. Town, J. (2011). Value, Impact, and the Transcendent Library: Progress and Pressures in Performance Measurement and Evaluation. The Library Quarterly, 81(1), 111-125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/657445
  34. Walker, R. (2006). Innovation Type and Diffusion: An Empirical Analysis of Local Government. Public Administration, 84(2), 311-335. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2006.00004.x
  35. World Economic Forum,. (2016). The Global Competitiveness Report 2015-2016. Geneva:
  36. World Economic Forum.

Author Biographies

  • Andi Wahyudi · Institute of Public Administration Samarinda

    Center for Public Administration Research and Government Official Training III