Skip to main content
Original Research Article Open Access SINTA 2 Accredited

Why Regions with Archipelagic Characteristics in Indonesia Also Need Asymmetric Decentralization?

Authors

DOI
10.21787/jbp.10.2018.251-261
Published & Pages
13 November 2018 · pp. 251-261
Manuscript History
Received13 Sep 2018 Accepted7 Nov 2018 Published13 Nov 2018
Read PDF 577 KB Cite

5,913 Views 1,238 Downloads

Abstract

Indonesia has been practicing both symmetric and asymmetric decentralization for decades. This study believes that asymmetric decentralization should not only for those five provinces (Jakarta, Yogyakarta, Aceh, Papua and West Papua). If political considerations and the effectiveness and efficiency of government, asymmetric decentralization becomes a necessary choice for many other regions in Indonesia. This includes autonomous regions characterized by islands (archipelagic regions). Hence, this paper will discuss a number of reasons why archipelagic regions also need asymmetrical arrangements. How to make such arrangements functional? What potential challenges might be encountered? This study employs qualitative approach with theory-driven type. Operationally, this study is sustained by a series of Focus Group Discussion (FGD) and documentary method. Aiming at strengthening the capacity of the government for more effective governance and development process, the uniqueness and various specific problems faced by archipelagic regions become the main reasons for applying asymmetric decentralization. Proposing a separate policy provides an effective strategy for certainty and functional de jure and de facto asymmetry arrangements. Handling various existing problems which could weaken the capacity to carry out asymmetric decentralization policy would be the most appropriate strategy to make the policy facilitates its potential benefits.

Keywords:

Read the Full Text

The full text of this article is available as PDF. Version of record published in Vol. 10 No. 2 (2018).

Open PDF

References

31 references
  1. Ahmad, E., & Mansoor, A. (2002). Indonesia: Managing Decentralization. In E. Ahmad & V. Tanzi (Eds.), Managing Fiscal Decentralization (pp. 306–320). London and New York: Routledge.
  2. Antaranews.com. (2012). Indonesian government enforces asymmetric decentralization - ANTARA News. Retrieved from https://en.antaranews.com/news/84004/indonesian-government-enforces-asymmetric-decentralization
  3. Aulawi, A. (2014, September). Jalan Panjang Menuju Akselerasi Pembangunan Daerah Kepulauan.
  4. Bertrand, J. (2004). Nationalism and Ethnic Conflict in Indonesia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  5. Bloor, M., & Wood, F. (2006). Keywords in Qualitative Methods: A Vocabulary of Research Concepts. London: Sage Publications.
  6. BPS. (2017). No Title.
  7. BPS. (2018). No Title.
  8. Central Batam.co.id. (2018, September). Dukung UU Daerah Kepulauan. Ini yang Dibahas BKS Provinsi Kepulauan | Batam.
  9. Conversi, D. (2007). Asymmetry in Quasi-federal and Unitary States. Ethnopolitics, 6(1), 121–124. http://doi.org/10.1080/17449050701233064
  10. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publications Inc.
  11. Cribb, R., & Ford, M. (2009). Indonesia beyond the Water’s Edge: Managing and Archipelagic State. (R. Cribb & M. Ford, Eds.). Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
  12. Firman, T. (2009). Decentralization Reform and Local-Government Proliferation in Indonesia: Towards a Fragmentation of Regional Development. Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies, 21(2–3), 143–157. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-940X.2010.00165.x
  13. Guess, G. M. (2005). Comparative Decentralization Lessons from Pakistan, Indonesia, and the Philippines. Public Administration Review, 65(2), 217–230. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00446.x
  14. Hadiz, V. R. (2004). Decentralization and Democracy in Indonesia: A Critique of Neo-Institutionalist Perspectives. Development and Change, 35(4), 697–718. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.0012-155X.2004.00376.x
  15. Halmin, M. Y. (2006). The Implementation of Special Autonomy in West Papua, Indonesia: Problems and Recommendations. Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California, US.
  16. Hofman, B., & Weist, D. (2003). Sequencing Decentralization. In Developing and Strengthening the System of Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations and Fiscal Decentralization. Seoul, South Korea.
  17. Keating, M. (1999). Asymmetrical Government: Multinational States in an Integrating Europe. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 29(1), 71–86. http://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubjof.a030014
  18. Kontan.co.id. (2016). Aliran DAU ke delapan provinsi 2017 naik pesat.
  19. Lewis, B. D., & Oosterman, A. (2009). The impact of decentralization on subnational government fiscal slack in Indonesia. Public Budgeting and Finance, 29(2), 27–47. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5850.2009.00927.x
  20. Litvack, J., Ahmad, J., & Bird, R. (1998). Rethinking Decentralization in Developing Countries. The World Bank Sector Studies Series. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank. Retrieved from http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/938101468764361146/Rethinking-decentralization-in-developing-countries
  21. Martinez-Vasquez, J. (2007). Asymmetric Federalism in Rusia: Cure or Poison? In R. M. Bird & R. D. Ebel (Eds.), Fiscal Fragmentation in Decentralized Countries: Subsidiarity, Solidarity and Asymmetry (pp. 227–266). Chaltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  22. Mcgarry, J. (2007). Asymmetry in Federations, Federacies and Unitary States. Ethnopolitics, 6(1), 105–116. http://doi.org/10.1080/17449050701232983
  23. Miller, M. A. (2004). The Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam law: a serious response to Acehnese separatism? Asian Ethnicity, 5(3), 333–351. http://doi.org/10.1080/1463136042000259789
  24. Pikiran Rakyat. (, June). Potensi Laut Indonesia belum Dimanfaatkan Secara Optima. 2016.
  25. Prud’homme, R. (1995). The dangers of decentralization. World Bank Research Observer, 10(2), 201–220.
  26. Rahmatunnisa, M. (2011). Desentralisasi dan Demokrasi. Governance (Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan), 1(2), 1–21. Retrieved from http://jurnal.unismabekasi.ac.id/index.php/governance/article/view/708
  27. Rahmatunnisa, M. (2013). The Rise and the Fall of Indonesia’s Decentralization Policies: from Independence to the Post-Suharto Era. Bandung: AIPI.
  28. Silverman, D. (2000). Doing Qualitative Research. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
  29. Watts, R. L. (2000). Asymmetrical Decentralization: Functional or Dysfunctional. Forum of Federations. Retrieved from http://www.forumfed.org/library/asymmetrical-decentralization-functional-or-dysfunctional/
  30. Watts, R. L. (2005). A Comparative Perspective on Asymmetry in Federations. Asymmetric Federalism Series.
  31. Wehner, J. H. G. (2000). Asymmetrical devolution. Development Southern Africa, 17(2), 249–262. http://doi.org/10.1080/713661401

Author Biographies

  • Mudiyati Rahmatunnisa · Padjadjaran University

    Department of Political Science

  • Reginawanti Hindersah · Padjadjaran University

    Department of Soil Science

  • Tri Hanggono Achmad · Padjadjaran University

    Faculty of Medicine

Most read articles by the same author(s)