Skip to main content
Original Research Article Open Access SINTA 2 Accredited

Legal Liability of Free Nutritious Meal Program Organizers toward Third-Party Beneficiaries in Mass Poisoning Incidents

DOI
10.21787/jbp.18.2026.2951
Published & Pages
5 June 2026 · pp. 139–153
Manuscript History
Received8 Feb 2026 Accepted15 Apr 2026 Published5 Jun 2026

1,462 Views 795 Downloads

Abstract

This study analyzes the legal responsibility of organizers of the Free Nutritious Meal (MBG) program in Indonesia following nationwide mass poisoning incidents subsequent to its 2025 rollout. It examines weaknesses in food safety oversight, operational compliance, and access to remedies for affected students who lack direct contractual relations with implementing entities. The study aims to determine whether students qualify as intended third-party beneficiaries and to identify the civil liability applicable to the National Nutrition Agency (BGN) and its implementing units. This study employs a normative legal research method using deductive reasoning and combines statutory analysis with literature review. Sources include legislation, academic literature, incident reports, laboratory findings, and program documents collected through systematic library research. The analysis connects legal provisions with empirical evidence to assess coherence between law in books and law in action and to identify normative gaps. The findings indicate that students affected by MBG-related food poisoning incidents may be recognized as intended third-party beneficiaries under Article 1317 of the Civil Code and related constitutional and food safety norms. However, Presidential Regulation No. 115 of 2025 is primarily administrative and lacks explicit provisions on liability attribution compensation mechanisms insurance obligations and mandatory recall procedures. The study concludes that the recognition of beneficiary status must be accompanied by regulatory reform and institutional redesign. It recommends revising Presidential Regulation No. 115 of 2025 to define civil liability rules require compulsory liability insurance create a temporary compensation fund and establish a centralized response and compensation unit to expedite access to remedies.

Read the Full Text

The full text of this article is available as PDF. Version of record published in Vol. 18 No. 1 (2026).

Open PDF

References

52 references
  1. Adonara, F. F. (2021). Pilar-Pilar Hukum Perikatan. PT RajaGrafindo Persada.
  2. Apriliyanti, I. R., Santy, D. D., Linda, A., Lutfiyah, R., Athiya, F., Rusdi, R., Yohan, Y., Kristian, N. N., Istu, P. B., & Aprifah, A. A. N. A. (2025). Penilaian Status Gizi. Sada Kurnia Pustaka.
  3. Aulia, M. R. (2025). Penyimpanan Tak Sesuai Standar Jadi Salah Satu Pemicu Keracunan Makanan MBG. Metro TV News. https://www.metrotvnews.com/read/NLMCJzLj-penyimpanan-tak-sesuai-standar-jadi-salah-satu-pemicu-keracunan-makanan-mbg
  4. Ausath, A. (2026). Tinjau Aturan: Perpres No. 115 Tahun 2025 Resmi Tetapkan Perluasan Penerima Makan Bergizi Gratis Mencakup Guru dan Ibu Hamil, Pelaksanaan Wajib Disertai Edukasi Keamanan Pangan dan Gizi. Justisio. https://justisio.com/blog/tinjau-perpres-no-115-2025
  5. Baako, I., Alhassan, H., & Gidisu, P. (2022). Understanding and Spotting Research Gaps Through a Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 6(3), 549-554. https://www.rsisinternational.org
  6. Badri, S., Handayani, P., & Rizki, T. A. (2024). Ganti Rugi Terhadap Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Dan Wanprestasi Dalam Sistem Hukum Perdata Compensation for Acts Against the Law and Default in the Civil Law System. Jurnal USM Law Review, 7(2), 438. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v7i2.9440
  7. Balliu, A., Attila, D., Milan, H., Milan, H., Attila, M., Piotr, S., Lukasz, S., Tomasz, T., & Emod, V. (2022). Contract Law in East Central Europe Legal Studies on Central Europe. Central European Academic Publishing.
  8. Chess, G. (2022). Third-Party Beneficiaries of Government Contracts: Imagining an Equitable Approach and Applying It to Broken Promises in Detroit. Michigan Law Review, 121(2), 308. https://doi.org/10.36644/mlr.121.2.third-party
  9. Corebima, Y. A. K. (2025). Awal Mula Lahirnya Ide Revolusi Putih yang Berubah Menjadi Program Makan Bergizi Gratis. Olenka.Id. https://olenka.id/awal-mula-lahirnya-ide-revolusi-putih-yang-berubah-menjadi-program-makan-bergizi-gratis
  10. Darmawan, A. R. P., Farraastsaabitah, N., Ardian, S. F., Ardalia, T. H., Leni, P., Rio, F., Azkia, A., & Anastasya, S. E. (2025). Program MBG: Antara Hak Anak atas Gizi dan Kewajiban Negara Terhadap Warga. Sigaruda Journal: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Sosial, Ekonomi, Budaya, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan, 1(2), 223-230. https://ejournal.sociovisionary.com/index.php/garudajournal/article/view/110
  11. Eisenberg, M. A. (2018). Foundational Principles of Contract Law. Oxford University Press.
  12. Ekaputra, R. A., & Zubaedah, R. (2024). Pentingnya Hukum Perjanjian dalam Mempertahankan Keseimbangan dan Keadilan Sosial. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 10(23), 945-953. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14587286
  13. Fadhlan, D. Y. (2025). Respons Keracunan Makanan MBG, BGN Minta Maaf dan Tutup 40 Dapur. Metro TV News. https://www.metrotvnews.com/play/KvJCLrLY-respons-keracunan-makanan-mbg-bgn-minta-maaf-dan-tutup-40-dapur
  14. Felix, K., Emmanulle, V., Saputra, R. A., Pratama, A. S., Wicaksono, Y., Wicaksana, D. P., & Kamal, U. (2025). Keracunan Program Makan Siang Bergizi Gratis dalam Tinjauan Hukum Kemasyarakatan dan Aspek Negara Berkembang. Jurnal Penelitian Ilmiah Multidisipliner, 1(4), 1329-1342. https://ojs.ruangpublikasi.com/index.php/jpim/article/view/534
  15. Harla, M. C. F., Famauri, A. T., & Sapiddin, A. S. A. (2023). Penggunaan Asas Audi Et Alteram Partem dalam Proses Persidangan Gugatan Sederhana di Pengadilan Negeri. Collegium Studiosum Journal, 6(1), 146-155. https://doi.org/10.56301/csj.v6i1.828
  16. Hermawan, R. O., Adolf, H., & Santoso, E. (2024). Kajian Hukum Penerapan Pasal 1320 KUHPerdata dalam Kontrak Elektronik. Iustitia Omnibus: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 5(2), 141-164. http://jurnal-pasca.unla.ac.id/iustitiaomnibus/article/view/100
  17. Ikromi, Y. (2024). Analisis Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Pihak yang Dirugikan Akibat Perbuatan Melawan Hukum dalam Perjanjian. Al-Dalil: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik, Dan Hukum, 2(2), 78-85. https://doi.org/10.58707/aldalil.v2i2.771
  18. Info, D. (2025). Mencegah Keracunan Massal: Disiplin SOP Dapur MBG adalah Penjaga Nyawa. Damar Info. https://damarinfo.com/mencegah-keracunan-massal-disiplin-sop-dapur-mbg-adalah-penjaga-nyawa/
  19. Jeremia Alexander, W., & Otlief Jannes R., W. (2023). Buku Ajar Non Litigasi. Widina Media Utama.
  20. Kamalawati, N., Febrina, N. R., Wijayanti, N., & Hanoselina, Y. (2025). Ekspansi Program Makan Bergizi Gratis (MBG) dalam Penanggulangan Stunting dan Peningkatan Kualitas Sumber Daya Manusia. Jurnal Intelek Insan Cendikia, 2(12), 19033-19045. https://jicnusantara.com/index.php/jiic/article/view/5881
  21. Khokhar, F. (2024). Privity of Contract and Rights of Third Party: An Appraisal of Pakistani and English Courts Judgments on the Doctrine. Policy Perspectives, 21(1), 127-150. https://doi.org/10.13169/polipers.21.1.ra7
  22. Made, N., & Dewi, T. (2021). Penyelesaian Sengketa Non Litigasi dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata. Jurnal Analisis Hukum, 5(1), 81-89. https://doi.org/10.38043/jah.v5i1.3223
  23. Marzuki, P. M. (2016). Penelitian Hukum (Edisi Revisi). Prenadamedia Grup.
  24. Milah, N. (2025). BGN: 80 Persen Kasus Keracunan MBG Akibat SOP Diabaikan. Jakarta NU Online. https://jakarta.nu.or.id/nasional/bgn-80-persen-kasus-keracunan-mbg-akibat-sop-diabaikan-ZHC5z
  25. Muhaimin. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum (Vol. 1).
  26. Mulia, P. (2026). JPPI: Ada 1.242 Korban Keracunan MBG per Januari 2026. Tempo. https://www.tempo.co/politik/jppi-ada-1-242-korban-keracunan-mbg-per-januari-2026-2106850
  27. Nango, M., Purwoko, B., & Hazim, M. (2025). Makan Bergizi Gratis: Strategi Kebijakan Publik Menuju Generasi Emas Indonesia 2045. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Katolik (JPAK), 25(2), 354-368. https://doi.org/10.34150/jpak.v22i1.991
  28. Nasional, B. G. (2025). BGN akan Memulai Program MBG Secara Bertahap. Badan Gizi Nasional. https://www.bgn.go.id/news/artikel/bgn-akan-memulai-program-mbg-secara-bertahap
  29. Nurfadillah, M. (2025). Hukum Kontrak di Era Digital: Adaptasi Teknik Pembuatan Kontrak dalam Transaksi Online. Jurnal Ilmiah Nusantara, 2(1), 185-193. https://doi.org/10.61722/jinu.v2i1.3185
  30. Oktawila, D., & Bagijo, H. E. (2025). Kedudukan Lembaga Negara dalam Makan Bergizi Gratis. Jurnal Media Informatika JUMIN, 6(3), 1595-1602. https://doi.org/10.55338/jumin.v6i3.5915
  31. Putra, A. P. (2025). Surat Perjanjian Kerjasama. Scribd. https://id.scribd.com/document/827472853/SURAT-PERJANJIAN-KERJASAMA
  32. Qomarullah, R., Suratni, Wulandari, L., & Sawir, M. (2025). Dampak Jangka Panjang Program Makan Bergizi Gratis Terhadap Kesehatan dan Keberlanjutan Pendidikan. Indonesian Journal of Intellectual Publication, 5(2), 130-137. https://doi.org/10.51577/ijipublication.v5i2.660
  33. Raamdhani, F. A., Cornelis, V. I., Astutik, S., & Handayati, N. (2025). Dampak Hukum Program Makanan Bergizi Gratis Akibat Keracunan Massal di Daerah Jawa Timur Ditinjau dari Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia. Eduvest: Journal of Universal Studies, 5(12), 10537-10555. https://doi.org/10.59188/eduvest.v5i12.52454
  34. Riyanto, O. S., & Sinaga, M. R. E. (2021). Penegakan Hak Anak atas Makanan Aman dan Sehat: Studi Kasus Keracunan dalam Program Makan Bergizi Gratis Ditinjau dari Tanggung Jawab Negara. Juris Humanity: Jurnal Riset Dan Kajian Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia, 32(3), 167-186. https://doi.org/10.37631/jrkhm.v4i1.84
  35. Salsabila, J., & Wahyudi, S. T. (2025). Politik Hukum Kebijakan Makan Bergizi Gratis dalam Rangka Pemenuhan Gizi Kepada Ibu Hamil Guna Mencegah Stunting: Perspektif Ketahanan Pangan. Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Hukum, 3(6), 8934-8954. https://doi.org/10.61104/alz.v3i5.2609
  36. Santoso, A., Melianawati, B. D., & Ayuningtyas, E. A. (2025). Governance Analysis of the Implementation of the Free Nutritious Meal Program. JMBO (Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis Dan Organisasi), 4(1), 242-243. https://doi.org/10.58290/jmbo.v4i1.423
  37. Saptati, R. (2025). Pemerintah Salurkan Makan Bergizi Gratis (MBG), Ini Sasaran Utama Penerimanya. Media Keuangan. https://mediakeuangan.kemenkeu.go.id/article/show/pemerintah-salurkan-makan-bergizi-gratis-mbg-ini-sasaran-utama-penerimanya
  38. Setyabudi, A. H. (2023). Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Pihak Ketiga dalam Actio Pauliana. Argumentum: Jurnal Magister Hukum, 9(1), 119-127. https://doi.org/10.24123/argu.v9i1.5771
  39. Shabrina, D. (2025). Pakar Ungkap Hasil Lab Kasus Keracunan MBG: Ada Salmonella dan Bacillus cereus. Tempo. https://www.tempo.co/politik/pakar-ungkap-hasil-lab-kasus-keracunan-mbg-ada-salmonella-dan-bacillus-cereus-2073977
  40. Sufiarina, Digdo, I. J., Loso, J., Yeti, K., Nurlia, M. A. A., Apriyanto, Enindah, S. P., Liani, S., Zegovia, P., Takdir, I., & Bushido, G. Z. (2024). Hukum Perdata (Asas-Asas dan Perkembangannya). PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.
  41. Sunggono, B. (2023). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. PT Rajagrafindo Persada.
  42. Suryoadji, K. A., Ali, N., Adrianto Setyawan, D., Faruqi, M., Keane, A., Christian, C., Kusuma Wardani, A., Fauzi Suskhan, R., Marcio Edbert Rompies, A., Annabel Garnette, K., Qurrota, I. A., Nur Warsa Putra, E., & Tadeus Simanjuntak, K. (2024). Hubungan antara Pemberian Makanan Bergizi dan Keamanan Pangan: Tinjauan Literatur. Journal of Health and Therapy, 5(1), 37-57. https://doi.org/10.53088/jht.v5i1.2388
  43. Suryoutomo, M., Mariyam, S., & Satria, A. P. (2022). Koherensi Putusan Hakim dalam Pembuktian Ganti Rugi Imateriel Perbuatan Melawan Hukum. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 4(1), 139. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v4i1.139-144
  44. Susanto, A., & Suyatna, I. N. (2025). Implikasi Hukum Kesehatan terhadap Kasus Keracunan Makanan dalam Program Makan Bergizi Gratis di Indonesia. Rewang Rencang: Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 5(12), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v6i12.2127
  45. Syahril, I. (2024). Pedoman Makan Bergizi Gratis (MBG) di Satuan Pendidikan. Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, Pendidikan Dasar, dan Pendidikan Menengah.
  46. Thalib, A., & Aisyah, N. (2024). Hukum Perjanjian. PT RajaGrafindo Persada.
  47. Wahyuni, S., Masri, E., Rahayu, P., & Siswanto, H. (2024). Hukum Perikatan. PT RajaGrafindo Persada.
  48. Wicaksono, E. N. (2025). State Accountability for Food Poisoning in the Implementation of Free Nutritious Food Programs: A Legal Perspective. Internasional Seminar Universitas Tulungagung, 7(1), 132-137.
  49. Widodo, H. (2025). Ini Pelanggaran SOP yang Sering Dilakukan SPPG hingga Sebabkan Keracunan MBG. Newswire. https://news.espos.id/ini-pelanggaran-sop-yang-sering-dilakukan-sppg-hingga-sebabkan-keracunan-mbg-2149635
  50. Winriadirahman, P. (2026). Perlindungan Hukum Kesehatan Anak dalam Pusaran Kelalaian Program Makan Bergizi Gratis. Jurnal Serambi Hukum, 19(1), 413-423. https://doi.org/10.59582/sh.v19i01.1470
  51. Yusuf, F. N., Miftah, A. Z., Utami, S. B., & Fauziah, N. (2026). Kapasitas Organisasi Badan Gizi Nasional: Pilar Baru Tata Kelola Gizi di Indonesia. JANE (Jurnal Administrasi Negara), 17(2), 310-319. https://doi.org/10.24198/jane.v17i2.67718
  52. Zakia, E. (2025). Lebih dari 5 Ribu Anak Alami Keracunan Program Makan Gratis, Begini Data Terbarunya. GoodStats. https://goodstats.id/article/sebanyak-5360-anak-alami-kasus-keracunan-program-makan-gratis-begini-data-terbarunya-r6j3z

Copyright & Open Access License

Copyright (c) 2026 Author(s). This article is licensed under CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0.